search
Back to results

Alfapump® System in the Treatment of Refractory or Recurrent Ascites (POSEIDON Study) (POSEIDON)

Primary Purpose

Ascites

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Alfapump
Sponsored by
Sequana Medical N.V.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Ascites

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

At the time of Initial Screening:

  1. Patients > 18 years of age
  2. Cirrhosis of the liver defined by histological and/or clinical, endoscopic, laboratory and radiological criteria.
  3. Refractory or recurrent ascites primarily managed with periodic therapeutic paracentesis . Patients must have a minimum of 2 therapeutic paracenteses in the 30 Days prior to enrollment
  4. Not a candidate for (e.g. refused, contraindicated) Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) or previously implanted TIPS is permanently obstructed or non-functioning.
  5. Screened for esophageal varices and on optimal management
  6. Absence of contraindications to prophylactic antibiotic use from time of pump implant
  7. Life expectancy of at least 6 months following pump implant (approximately 10 months from enrollment)
  8. Capable of giving written informed consent, willing to comply with study procedures including the 3-month pre-implant observation period and ability to operate and charge the device.
  9. Women of childbearing age should use adequate contraceptives.

    Reassessed at time of implant procedure (Pivotal Cohort Only):

  10. Has required a minimum of 5 therapeutic paracenteses in the 3-month observation period prior to pump implant

Exclusion Criteria:

At the time of Initial Screening:

  1. Renal failure defined as serum creatinine higher than 1.5 mg/dL
  2. More than one episode of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis over the previous 6 months
  3. More than one episode of bacterascites over the previous 6 months
  4. Recurrent urinary infections as per standard criteria, defined as 2 or more episodes over the last 6 months
  5. Evidence of loculated ascites, as per imaging
  6. Hepatocellular carcinoma, exceeding Milan criteria or for which RF ablation is anticipated
  7. Pregnant females or females anticipating pregnancy during study period
  8. Patients currently enrolled in another interventional clinical study that has not reached the primary endpoint assessment point, or (for pivotal cohort) patients who have previously had an alfapump implanted
  9. Immuno-modulatory treatment (including azathioprine, methotrexate, anti-TNF therapies) used within last 4 months (corticosteroids at stable dose over the last 4 months but < 15 mg/day, or in tapering doses are allowed)
  10. Known or suspected hepatic or extra hepatic malignancy (other than skin cancer and in-situ cancers), unless adequately treated or in complete remission for ≥ 3 years
  11. History of bladder cancer
  12. BMI>40 presenting a risk for technical difficulties for surgery or catheter implantation
  13. Contraindications to general anesthesia
  14. Comorbid condition or other reason (example hypertension) that may preclude stopping diuretics after enrollment
  15. MELD-Na Score > 20
  16. Budd Chiari syndrome (Pivotal cohort only)
  17. Clostridium difficile infection within the past year

    Assessed or re-assessed at time of pump implant:

  18. Acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage requiring transfusions over the previous 42 days
  19. Condition that prevents continued cessation of diuretic use
  20. Patient condition does not allow the implant procedure to be performed within the limits of acceptable risk (e.g. cardiovascular comorbidities, variceal bleeding within the previous 6 weeks, skin infections or skin ulcers of the anterior abdominal wall within 2 weeks of device placement)
  21. Hepatocellular carcinoma exceeding Milan criteria or for which RF ablation is anticipated
  22. ICU admission since enrollment in the 30 days preceding pump implant procedure
  23. INR >/= 2.0
  24. Platelet count of < 50,000 /μL at the time of implantation, unless the platelet count is ≥30,000 / μL and bleeding risk can be satisfactorily addressed with means such as platelet infusion during the implant procedure and/or thrombopoietin receptor agonists
  25. Bacterial peritonitis within 4 weeks of implant procedure (this includes peritonitis diagnosed at the time of intervention)
  26. Bacterascites within 4 weeks of implant procedure (this includes bacterascites diagnosed at the time of intervention). Note: at the time of final eligibility (just prior to implantation) the subject will not be allowed to move forward with the procedure if he/she has experienced an episode bacterascites within four weeks of the implant procedure date.
  27. Serum sodium <125 mmol/L
  28. Urinary infection within the last 2 weeks
  29. Obstructive uropathy, residual urinary volume exceeding 100 ml, or any bladder anomaly which might contraindicate implantation of the device
  30. Evidence of renal failure, defined as serum creatinine higher than or equal to 1.5 mg/dL, in the preceding 30 days
  31. Evidence of loculated ascites, as per imaging
  32. Pregnant females or females anticipating pregnancy during study period

Sites / Locations

  • Mayo Clinic (Arizona)
  • Cedars-Sinai Comprehensive Transplant Center
  • University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center
  • University of Minnesota
  • Mayo Clinic
  • Duke University
  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • Avera Medical Group
  • Methodist Dallas
  • Baylor University Medical Center (Dallas)
  • McGuire VA Medical Center
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (Froedtert)
  • Ottawa Hospital
  • Toronto General Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Alfapump

Arm Description

Implantation of Alfapump

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Per-patient ratio of post-implant to pre-implant with respect to average monthly number of therapeutic paracentesis
Defined as removal of ascites ≥1.5L through needle puncture of abdominal wall
Proportion of patients with at least 50% reduction in number of therapeutic paracenteses from the pre-observation period to post-observation period
Defined as removal of ascites ≥1.5L through needle puncture of abdominal wall
Combined rate of open surgical reintervention due to pump system related adverse event or to restore pump functionality, pump explant due to pump system related adverse event, or pump system related death
Safety of the alfapump implant procedure and alfapump therapy as determined by rates of explant, reintervention, and other serious device or procedure related adverse events

Secondary Outcome Measures

Requirement for large volume paracentesis (LVP): change in the average number of LVP events per month (that consist of removing ≥ 5L of ascitic fluid)
Effectiveness of the alfapump to control ascites as determined by the change in the need for repeated paracentesis compared to baseline
Change of cumulative volume of ascitic fluid removed by means of therapeutic paracentesis
Effectiveness of the alfapump to control ascites as determined by the change in the need for repeated paracentesis compared to baseline
Change in SF-36 Physical Component Score
The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Survey Instrument (SF-36) taps eight health concepts: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal/emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general health perceptions. It also includes one item that indicates a perceived change in health. Scoring the SF-36 is a two-step process. First, precoded numeric values are recoded per a scoring key. A high score defines a more favorable health state. Each item is scored on a 0-100 range. The lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively. Scores represent the percentage of total possible score achieved. In step 2, items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores. Items that are left blank (missing data) are not taken into account when calculating the scale scores. Scale scores represent the average for all items in the scale that the respondent answered.
Change in Ascites-Q Score
The Ascites-Q was developed by modifying the Polycystic Liver Disease Questionnaire. It includes 11 out of 16 original questions, covering symptoms of abdominal fullness, anorexia, early satiety, nausea, abdominal pain, back pain, dyspnea, reduced mobility, fatigue, insomnia, discomfort because of abdomen size, and problems with sexual intimacy. One other ascites-specific symptom (insomnia) was added. Each individual symptom is assessed with a frequency (6-point Likert scale "never" to "always") and discomfort (5-point Likert scale "not at all" to "a lot") question. Severity scores of individual symptoms are the sum of the frequency and discomfort score (range 2-11). A higher score represents a worse outcome.

Full Information

First Posted
May 31, 2019
Last Updated
November 29, 2022
Sponsor
Sequana Medical N.V.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03973866
Brief Title
Alfapump® System in the Treatment of Refractory or Recurrent Ascites (POSEIDON Study)
Acronym
POSEIDON
Official Title
Alfapump® System in the Treatment of Refractory or Recurrent Ascites: a Multicenter Single Arm Within Subject Crossover Design Pivotal Study (the POSEIDON Study)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
September 16, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 30, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Sequana Medical N.V.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Device Product Not Approved or Cleared by U.S. FDA
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The POSEIDON study is a multi-center, prospective, single arm, crossover pivotal study enrolling up to 70 pivotal cohort patients and up to 45 additional Roll-in patients with refractory or recurrent ascites at up to 20 sites. Pivotal cohort patients will undergo a 3-month pre-implant observation phase after enrollment, followed by implantation of the alfapump and 24 months of post-implant follow up. An analysis will be conducted to support an application for device approval when a minimum of 40 treated pivotal cohort patients are through 6 months.
Detailed Description
The POSEIDON Study is a multicenter, single arm within subject crossover design pivotal trial conducted in patients diagnosed with refractory or recurrent ascites due to liver cirrhosis who meet inclusion/exclusion criteria. The study will enroll up to 70 pivotal cohort patients with refractory or recurrent ascites at up to 20 sites. In addition, up to 45 additional Roll-in patients will be allowed. An analysis will be conducted to support an application for device approval when a minimum of 40 treated pivotal cohort patients are through 6 months. Patients will be followed for longer-term safety and effectiveness for a total of 2-years post-implant. Patients with a functioning pump at 24 months may consent to continued participation in a long-term follow-up evaluation and with assessments every 3 months from 24 months through the time the pump ceases to function, pump explant or patient death. This long-term follow-up period will continue until the product is approved or the sponsor determines they will no longer pursue product approval. Pivotal Cohort Patients Pivotal cohort patients will be evaluated in a 3-month pre-implant observation period during which they will receive standard of care therapy consisting of paracentesis as required for removal of ascitic fluid. Following the initial 3-month observation period during which the number and volume of paracentesis and Quality of life (assessed by general HRQL scores (SF-36)) as well as disease-specific validated questionnaires (Ascites-Q) will be documented, patients will be reevaluated for eligibility for pump implant. Roll-in Patients In the study centers without previous experience in pump placement, training in the pump implant procedure will be conducted and up to 3 initial pump implantations conducted as roll-in cases. Roll-in patients will be sequentially enrolled at the site until sufficient experience has been obtained and the site is approved by the sponsor to enroll in the pivotal phase. Roll-in patients will not undergo the 3-month pre-implant observation period and will not be included in the Primary Analysis set but will be summarized separately for purposes of safety evaluation with effectiveness data provided as supplemental. In the event a primary implanter at the site is a replaced or added, up to 3 additional Roll-in implants will be allowed. All patients (Pivotal and Roll-in) will undergo a final eligibility assessment prior to pump implant. If deemed eligible, patients will be implanted with the alfapump. In the 3 months post-implant, patients will be monitored with pump adjustments as needed to increase or decrease volume of fluid to be removed each day. After this period of stabilization, a 3-month primary endpoint observation period (month 4 through month 6) will begin. In each period, the protocol specifies when symptom driven (therapeutic) paracentesis can be performed per protocol as well as conditions under which the use of diuretics may be considered (all patients must discontinue diuretics post implant procedure). The study is designed to demonstrate in pivotal cohort patients 1) a 50% reduction (superiority margin) in the per-patient ratio of post-implant 3-month observation period (M4 to M6 post implantation) to pre-implant 3-month observation period with respect to average monthly requirement for therapeutic paracentesis and 2) at least 50% of patients will achieve a 50% reduction in the requirement for therapeutic paracentesis in the same period.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Ascites

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
110 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Alfapump
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Implantation of Alfapump
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Alfapump
Intervention Description
Implantation of alfapump
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Per-patient ratio of post-implant to pre-implant with respect to average monthly number of therapeutic paracentesis
Description
Defined as removal of ascites ≥1.5L through needle puncture of abdominal wall
Time Frame
Comparing data from the post-implant 3-month observation period to data from the pre-implant 3-month observation period:
Title
Proportion of patients with at least 50% reduction in number of therapeutic paracenteses from the pre-observation period to post-observation period
Description
Defined as removal of ascites ≥1.5L through needle puncture of abdominal wall
Time Frame
Comparing data from the post-implant 3-month observation period to data from the pre-implant 3-month observation period
Title
Combined rate of open surgical reintervention due to pump system related adverse event or to restore pump functionality, pump explant due to pump system related adverse event, or pump system related death
Description
Safety of the alfapump implant procedure and alfapump therapy as determined by rates of explant, reintervention, and other serious device or procedure related adverse events
Time Frame
from time of pump implant through 6 months post-implant
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Requirement for large volume paracentesis (LVP): change in the average number of LVP events per month (that consist of removing ≥ 5L of ascitic fluid)
Description
Effectiveness of the alfapump to control ascites as determined by the change in the need for repeated paracentesis compared to baseline
Time Frame
in the post-implant 3-month primary endpoint observation period compared to the pre-implant observation period
Title
Change of cumulative volume of ascitic fluid removed by means of therapeutic paracentesis
Description
Effectiveness of the alfapump to control ascites as determined by the change in the need for repeated paracentesis compared to baseline
Time Frame
in the post-implant 3-month primary endpoint observation period as compared to the pre-implant 3-month observation period
Title
Change in SF-36 Physical Component Score
Description
The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Survey Instrument (SF-36) taps eight health concepts: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal/emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general health perceptions. It also includes one item that indicates a perceived change in health. Scoring the SF-36 is a two-step process. First, precoded numeric values are recoded per a scoring key. A high score defines a more favorable health state. Each item is scored on a 0-100 range. The lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively. Scores represent the percentage of total possible score achieved. In step 2, items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores. Items that are left blank (missing data) are not taken into account when calculating the scale scores. Scale scores represent the average for all items in the scale that the respondent answered.
Time Frame
post-implant 3-month primary endpoint observation period as compared to the pre-implant 3-month observation period
Title
Change in Ascites-Q Score
Description
The Ascites-Q was developed by modifying the Polycystic Liver Disease Questionnaire. It includes 11 out of 16 original questions, covering symptoms of abdominal fullness, anorexia, early satiety, nausea, abdominal pain, back pain, dyspnea, reduced mobility, fatigue, insomnia, discomfort because of abdomen size, and problems with sexual intimacy. One other ascites-specific symptom (insomnia) was added. Each individual symptom is assessed with a frequency (6-point Likert scale "never" to "always") and discomfort (5-point Likert scale "not at all" to "a lot") question. Severity scores of individual symptoms are the sum of the frequency and discomfort score (range 2-11). A higher score represents a worse outcome.
Time Frame
in the post-implant 3-month primary endpoint observation period as compared to the pre-implant 3-month observation period

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: At the time of Initial Screening: Patients > 18 years of age Cirrhosis of the liver defined by histological and/or clinical, endoscopic, laboratory and radiological criteria. Refractory or recurrent ascites primarily managed with periodic therapeutic paracentesis . Patients must have a minimum of 2 therapeutic paracenteses in the 30 Days prior to enrollment Not a candidate for (e.g. refused, contraindicated) Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) or previously implanted TIPS is permanently obstructed or non-functioning. Screened for esophageal varices and on optimal management Absence of contraindications to prophylactic antibiotic use from time of pump implant Life expectancy of at least 6 months following pump implant (approximately 10 months from enrollment) Capable of giving written informed consent, willing to comply with study procedures including the 3-month pre-implant observation period and ability to operate and charge the device. Women of childbearing age should use adequate contraceptives. Reassessed at time of implant procedure (Pivotal Cohort Only): Has required a minimum of 5 therapeutic paracenteses in the 3-month observation period prior to pump implant Exclusion Criteria: At the time of Initial Screening: Renal failure defined as serum creatinine higher than 1.5 mg/dL More than one episode of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis over the previous 6 months More than one episode of bacterascites over the previous 6 months Recurrent urinary infections as per standard criteria, defined as 2 or more episodes over the last 6 months Evidence of loculated ascites, as per imaging Hepatocellular carcinoma, exceeding Milan criteria or for which RF ablation is anticipated Pregnant females or females anticipating pregnancy during study period Patients currently enrolled in another interventional clinical study that has not reached the primary endpoint assessment point, or (for pivotal cohort) patients who have previously had an alfapump implanted Immuno-modulatory treatment (including azathioprine, methotrexate, anti-TNF therapies) used within last 4 months (corticosteroids at stable dose over the last 4 months but < 15 mg/day, or in tapering doses are allowed) Known or suspected hepatic or extra hepatic malignancy (other than skin cancer and in-situ cancers), unless adequately treated or in complete remission for ≥ 3 years History of bladder cancer BMI>40 presenting a risk for technical difficulties for surgery or catheter implantation Contraindications to general anesthesia Comorbid condition or other reason (example hypertension) that may preclude stopping diuretics after enrollment MELD-Na Score > 20 Budd Chiari syndrome (Pivotal cohort only) Clostridium difficile infection within the past year Assessed or re-assessed at time of pump implant: Acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage requiring transfusions over the previous 42 days Condition that prevents continued cessation of diuretic use Patient condition does not allow the implant procedure to be performed within the limits of acceptable risk (e.g. cardiovascular comorbidities, variceal bleeding within the previous 6 weeks, skin infections or skin ulcers of the anterior abdominal wall within 2 weeks of device placement) Hepatocellular carcinoma exceeding Milan criteria or for which RF ablation is anticipated ICU admission since enrollment in the 30 days preceding pump implant procedure INR >/= 2.0 Platelet count of < 50,000 /μL at the time of implantation, unless the platelet count is ≥30,000 / μL and bleeding risk can be satisfactorily addressed with means such as platelet infusion during the implant procedure and/or thrombopoietin receptor agonists Bacterial peritonitis within 4 weeks of implant procedure (this includes peritonitis diagnosed at the time of intervention) Bacterascites within 4 weeks of implant procedure (this includes bacterascites diagnosed at the time of intervention). Note: at the time of final eligibility (just prior to implantation) the subject will not be allowed to move forward with the procedure if he/she has experienced an episode bacterascites within four weeks of the implant procedure date. Serum sodium <125 mmol/L Urinary infection within the last 2 weeks Obstructive uropathy, residual urinary volume exceeding 100 ml, or any bladder anomaly which might contraindicate implantation of the device Evidence of renal failure, defined as serum creatinine higher than or equal to 1.5 mg/dL, in the preceding 30 days Evidence of loculated ascites, as per imaging Pregnant females or females anticipating pregnancy during study period
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Florence Wong, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Toronto General Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic (Arizona)
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85054
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cedars-Sinai Comprehensive Transplant Center
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90048
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center
City
Worcester
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
01605
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Minnesota
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55455
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke University
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medical University of South Carolina
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29425
Country
United States
Facility Name
Avera Medical Group
City
Sioux Falls
State/Province
South Dakota
ZIP/Postal Code
57105
Country
United States
Facility Name
Methodist Dallas
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75203
Country
United States
Facility Name
Baylor University Medical Center (Dallas)
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75246
Country
United States
Facility Name
McGuire VA Medical Center
City
Richmond
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23249
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medical College of Wisconsin (Froedtert)
City
Milwaukee
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53226
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ottawa Hospital
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K1H 8L6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Toronto General Hospital
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Alfapump® System in the Treatment of Refractory or Recurrent Ascites (POSEIDON Study)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs