search
Back to results

Efficacy and Safety of GSK3196165 Versus Placebo and Tofacitinib in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate (contRAst 1)

Primary Purpose

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
GSK3196165 (Otilimab)
Tofacitinib 5 mg
Placebo
Placebo
Sponsored by
GlaxoSmithKline
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Arthritis, Rheumatoid focused on measuring Rheumatoid arthritis, GSK3196165, Otilimab, Tofacitinib, Methotrexate, Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Key inclusion criteria

  • >=18 years of age
  • Has had RA for >=6 months and was not diagnosed before 16 years of age
  • Has active disease, as defined by having both:*

    • >=6/68 tender/painful joint count (TJC), and
    • >=6/66 swollen joint count (SJC)
  • Has at least 1 bone erosion present on hand/wrist or foot radiographs
  • Has had an inadequate response to MTX, despite currently taking MTX 15-25 mg/week** oral or injected

    • If surgical treatment of a joint has been performed, that joint cannot be counted in the TJC or SJC.

      • A lower dose of 7.5 mg/week is acceptable if reduced for reasons of intolerance to MTX or per local requirement.

Key exclusion criteria

  • Has had any active and/or recurrent infections (excluding recurrent fungal infections of the nail bed) or has required management of acute or chronic infections.
  • Has received prior treatment with an antagonist of GM-CSF or its receptor or Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (either experimental or approved)
  • Has received prior treatment with a biologic Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) which has been discontinued due to an inadequate response.

Sites / Locations

  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm 6

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

GSK3196165 90mg + MTX

GSK3196165 150mg + MTX

Tofacitinib 5mg + MTX

Placebo + MTX and GSK3196165 90mg + MTX

Placebo + MTX and GSK3196165 150mg + MTX

Placebo + MTX and Tofacitinib 5mg + MTX

Arm Description

Participants received GSK3196165 90 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection once weekly for 52 weeks in combination with methotrexate (MTX).

Participants received GSK3196165 150 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection once weekly for 52 weeks in combination with MTX.

Participants received Tofacitinib 5mg capsule, orally, twice daily (BID) in combination with MTX plus placebo injection weekly to maintain the blind for 52 weeks.

Participants received Placebo weekly SC injection in combination with MTX for 12 weeks. At Week 12, participants were switched from placebo to GSK3196165 90 mg, SC injection, once weekly in combination with MTX until Week 52.

Participants received Placebo weekly SC injection in combination with MTX for 12 weeks. At Week 12, participants were switched from placebo to GSK3196165 150 mg, SC injection, once weekly in combination with MTX until Week 52.

Participants received Placebo capsule weekly in combination with MTX for 12 weeks. At Week 12, participants were switched from placebo capsule to Tofacitinib 5mg, capsule, orally, BID in combination with MTX plus placebo injection to maintain the blind for 52 weeks.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants Achieving 20 Percentage (%) Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR20) at Week 12 Superiority Comparison With Placebo
ACR20 is calculated as a 20% improvement from Baseline in Tender Joint Count 68 (TJC68) and Swollen Joint Count 66 (SJC66) and a 20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) [visual analogue scale (VAS) with values from 0=best to 100=worst], Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (VAS with values from 0=best to 100=worst), Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS with values from 0=no pain and 100=most severe pain), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (ranges from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty) and an acute-phase reactant [high sensitivity C-reactive Protein milligram per liter (mg/L) (hsCRP)]. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Total Score Less Than or Equal to (<=)10 [CDAI Low Disease Activity (LDA)] at Week 12
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) total score is a composite score consisting of the sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). PtGA and PhGA are transformed to a 0-10 scale before computing the CDAI total score. CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when CDAI total score <=10. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is a 20-question instrument that assesses degree of difficulty of a participant in accomplishing tasks in eight functional areas: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. Overall HAQ-DI score was computed as sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains answered. The total possible score ranges from 0 to 3 where 0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty. Higher overall score indicates greater disability. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Percentage of Participants Achieving 20% Improvement in ACR20 at Week 24 (Non-Inferiority Versus Tofacitinib)
ACR20 is calculated as a 20% improvement from Baseline in Tender Joint Count 68 (TJC68) and Swollen Joint Count 66 (SJC66) and a 20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) [visual analogue scale (VAS) with values from 0=best to 100=worst], Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (VAS with values from 0=best to 100=worst), Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS with values from 0=no pain and 100=most severe pain), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (ranges from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty) and an acute-phase reactant [high sensitivity C-reactive Protein milligram per liter (mg/L) (hsCRP)].
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50%/70% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR50/70) at Week 24 and ACR 20/50/70 at and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
ACR20/50/70 is calculated as a 20%/50%/70% improvement from Baseline in Tender Joint Count 68 (TJC68) and Swollen Joint Count 66 (SJC66) and a 20%/50%/70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale (VAS) with values from 0=best to 100=worst), Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) [VAS with values from 0=best to 100=worst], Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS with values from 0=no pain and 100=most severe pain), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ- DI) (ranges from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty) and an acute-phase reactant [high sensitivity C-reactive Protein mg/L (hsCRP)].
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20/50/70 at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
ACR20/50/70 is calculated as a 20%/50%/70% improvement from Baseline in Tender Joint Count 68 (TJC68) and Swollen Joint Count 66 (SJC66) and a 20%/50%/70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale (VAS) with values from 0=best to 100=worst), Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) [VAS with values from 0=best to 100=worst], Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS with values from 0=no pain and 100=most severe pain), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ- DI) (ranges from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty) and an acute-phase reactant [high sensitivity C-reactive Protein mg/L (hsCRP)].
Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Total Score <=10 (CDAI LDA) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) total score is a composite score consisting of the sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). PtGA and PhGA are transformed to a 0-10 scale before computing the CDAI total score. CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when CDAI total score <=10.
Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Total Score <=10 (CDAI LDA) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) total score is a composite score consisting of the sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). PtGA and PhGA are transformed to a 0-10 scale before computing the CDAI total score. CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when CDAI total score <=10.
Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Total Score <=2.8 (CDAI Remission) at Week 12
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) total score is a composite score consisting of the sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). PtGA and PhGA are transformed to a 0-10 scale before computing the CDAI total score. CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. CDAI remission is achieved when CDAI total score <=2.8. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Total Score <=2.8 (CDAI Remission) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) total score is a composite score consisting of the sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). PtGA and PhGA are transformed to a 0-10 scale before computing the CDAI total score. CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. CDAI remission is achieved when CDAI total score <=2.8.
Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Total Score <=2.8 (CDAI Remission) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) total score is a composite score consisting of the sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). PtGA and PhGA are transformed to a 0-10 scale before computing the CDAI total score. CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. CDAI remission is achieved when CDAI total score <=2.8.
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50%/70% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR50/70) at Week 12
ACR50/70 is calculated as a 50%/70% improvement from Baseline in Tender Joint Count 68 (TJC68) and Swollen Joint Count 66 (SJC66) and a 50%/70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale (VAS) with values from 0=best to 100=worst), Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) [VAS with values from 0=best to 100=worst), Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS with values from 0=no pain and 100=most severe pain), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (ranges from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty) and an acute-phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein mg/L (hsCRP)]. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score Using 28 Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) <=3.2 (DAS28-CRP LDA) at Week 12
The DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP) (in mg/L), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28- CRP scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when DAS28-CRP greater than or equal to (<=)3.2. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-CRP indicates an improvement. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) <=3.2 (DAS28-ESR LDA) at Week 12
The DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (in millimeter [mm]/hour[hr]), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-ESR scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when DAS28-ESR<=3.2. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-ESR indicates an improvement. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP <=3.2 (DAS28-CRP LDA) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
The DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP) (in mg/L), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-CRP scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when DAS28-CRP<=3.2. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-CRP indicates an improvement.
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-ESR <=3.2 (DAS28-ESR LDA) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
The DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (in millimeter [mm]/hour[hr]), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-ESR scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when DAS28-ESR<=3.2. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-ESR indicates an improvement.
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP <=3.2 (DAS28-CRP LDA) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
The DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP) (in mg/L), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-CRP scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when DAS28-CRP<=3.2. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-CRP indicates an improvement.
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-ESR <=3.2 (DAS28-ESR LDA) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
The DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (in millimeter [mm]/hour[hr]), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-ESR scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when DAS28-ESR<=3.2. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-ESR indicates an improvement.
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 (DAS28-CRP Remission) at Week 12
The DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP) (in mg/L), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-CRP scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Remission is achieved when DAS28-CRP less than (<)2.6. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-CRP indicates an improvement. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 ESR <2.6 (DAS28-ESR Remission) at Week 12
The DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (in mm/hr), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-ESR scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Remission is achieved when DAS28-ESR <2.6. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-ESR indicates an improvement. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 (DAS28-CRP Remission) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
The DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP) (in mg/L), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-CRP scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Remission is achieved when DAS28-CRP <2.6. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-CRP indicates an improvement.
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 ESR <2.6 (DAS28-ESR Remission) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
The DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (in mm/hr), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-ESR scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Remission is achieved when DAS28-ESR <2.6. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-ESR indicates an improvement.
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 (DAS28-CRP Remission) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
The DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP) (in mg/L), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-CRP scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Remission is achieved when DAS28-CRP <2.6. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-CRP indicates an improvement.
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 ESR <2.6 (DAS28-ESR Remission) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
The DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (in mm/hr), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-ESR scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Remission is achieved when DAS28-ESR <2.6. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-ESR indicates an improvement.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Good/Moderate (European League Against Rheumatism) EULAR Response at Week 12
DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR scores were categorized using EULAR response criteria. Response at given time point was defined based on the combination of current DAS28 score and improvement in the current DAS28 score relative to Baseline. The definition of no response, moderate response and good response was as; DAS28 <=3.2 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline (>1.2:good response), (>0.6 to <=1.2:moderate response) and (<=0.6:no response); DAS28 >3.2 to <=5.1 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline (>1.2:moderate response), (>0.6 to <=1.2:moderate response) and (<=0.6:no response) and DAS28 >5.1 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline (>1.2:moderate response), (>0.6 to <=1.2:no response) and (<=0.6:no response). If the post-Baseline DAS28-CRP score was missing, then the corresponding EULAR category was set to missing. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Good/Moderate EULAR Response at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR scores were categorized using EULAR response criteria. Response at a given time point was defined based on the combination of current DAS28 score and the improvement in the current DAS28 score relative to Baseline. The definition of no response, moderate response and good response was as; if current DAS28 <=3.2 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline (>1.2: good response), (>0.6 to <=1.2: moderate response) and (<=0.6: no response); if current DAS28 >3.2 to <=5.1 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline value (>1.2: moderate response), (>0.6 to <=1.2: moderate response) and (<=0.6: no response) and if current DAS28 >5.1 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline value (>1.2: moderate response), (>0.6 to <=1.2: no response) and (<=0.6: no response). If the post-Baseline DAS28-CRP score was missing, then the corresponding EULAR category was set to missing.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Good/Moderate EULAR Response at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR scores were categorized using EULAR response criteria. Response at a given time point was defined based on the combination of current DAS28 score and the improvement in the current DAS28 score relative to Baseline. The definition of no response, moderate response and good response was as; if current DAS28 <=3.2 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline (>1.2: good response), (>0.6 to <=1.2: moderate response) and (<=0.6: no response); if current DAS28 >3.2 to <=5.1 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline value (>1.2: moderate response), (>0.6 to <=1.2: moderate response) and (<=0.6: no response) and if current DAS28 >5.1 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline value (>1.2: moderate response), (>0.6 to <=1.2: no response) and (<=0.6: no response). If the post-Baseline DAS28-CRP score was missing, then the corresponding EULAR category was set to missing.
Number of Participants Achieving ACR/EULAR Remission at Week 12
Boolean-based ACR/EULAR remission is achieved if all of the following requirements are met at the same timepoint: Tender Joint Count 68 (TJC68) <= 1, Swollen Joint Count 66 (SJC66) <= 1, high sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) <= 1mg/dl and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) <= 10. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Number of Participants Achieving ACR/EULAR Remission at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Boolean-based ACR/EULAR remission is achieved if all of the following requirements are met at the same timepoint: Tender Joint Count 68 (TJC68) <= 1, Swollen Joint Count 66 (SJC66) <= 1, high sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) <= 1mg/dl and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) <= 10.
Number of Participants Achieving ACR/EULAR Remission at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Boolean-based ACR/EULAR remission is achieved if all of the following requirements are met at the same timepoint: Tender Joint Count 68 (TJC68) <= 1, Swollen Joint Count 66 (SJC66) <= 1, high sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) <= 1mg/dl and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) <= 10.
Percentage of Participants Achieving no Radiographic Progression (Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Scores (mTSS <= 0.5) at Week 12
Van der Heijde mTSS is utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. This method includes 16 areas of erosions, and 15 areas for joint space narrowing (JSN) in each hand, and 6 areas for erosions and 6 areas JSN in each foot. The total mTSS score is the sum of erosion (maximum of 280) and JSN (maximum of 168) scores. The score ranges from 0 to 448 for mTSS with higher values representing higher disease activity. No radiographic progression is defined as a change from Baseline in van der Heijde mTSS score of <=0.5. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Percentage of Participants Achieving no Radiographic Progression (mTSS <= 0.5) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Van der Heijde mTSS is utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. This method includes 16 areas of erosions, and 15 areas for joint space narrowing (JSN) in each hand, and 6 areas for erosions and 6 areas JSN in each foot. The total mTSS score is the sum of erosion (maximum of 280) and JSN (maximum of 168) scores. The score ranges from 0 to 448 for mTSS with higher values representing higher disease activity. No radiographic progression is defined as a change from Baseline in van der Heijde mTSS score of <=0.5.
Percentage of Participants Achieving no Radiographic Progression (mTSS <= 0.5) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Van der Heijde mTSS is utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. This method includes 16 areas of erosions, and 15 areas for joint space narrowing (JSN) in each hand, and 6 areas for erosions and 6 areas JSN in each foot. The total mTSS score is the sum of erosion (maximum of 280) and JSN (maximum of 168) scores. The score ranges from 0 to 448 for mTSS with higher values representing higher disease activity. No radiographic progression is defined as a change from Baseline in van der Heijde mTSS score of <=0.5.
Change From Baseline in CDAI Total Score at Week 12
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) total score is a composite score consisting of sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (PtGA and PhGA VAS with values from 0=best to 100=worst). PtGA and PhGA are transformed to a 0-10 scale before computing the CDAI total score. CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when CDAI total score <=10. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post dose visit value from Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Change From Baseline in CDAI Total Score at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
CDAI total score is a composite score consisting of the sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). PtGA and PhGA are transformed to a 0-10 scale before computing the CDAI total score. CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when CDAI total score <=10. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in CDAI Total Score at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
CDAI total score is a composite score consisting of the sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). PtGA and PhGA are transformed to a 0-10 scale before computing the CDAI total score. CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when CDAI total score <=10. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For efficacy assessments baseline is interpreted as Day 1.
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP/DAS28-ESR at Week 12
DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR are measure of RA disease activity calculated using Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), high sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP in mg/L)/Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) [ESR in millimeter/hour (mm/hr)] and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score range from 0-9.4, with higher scores indicating more disease activity. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP/DAS28-ESR at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR are measure of RA disease activity calculated using Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), high sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP in mg/L)/Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) [ESR in millimeter/hour (mm/hr)] and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-9.4, with higher scores indicating more disease activity. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP/DAS28-ESR at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR are measure of RA disease activity calculated using Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), high sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP in mg/L)/Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) [ESR in millimeter/hour (mm/hr)] and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-9.4, with higher scores indicating more disease activity. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For efficacy assessments baseline is interpreted as Day 1.
Change From Baseline in Van Der Heijde mTSS at Week 12
Van der Heijde mTSS is utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. This method includes 16 areas of erosions, and 15 areas for joint space narrowing (JSN) in each hand, and 6 areas for erosions and 6 areas JSN in each foot. The total mTSS score is the sum of erosion (maximum of 280) and JSN (maximum of 168) scores. The score range from 0 to 448 for mTSS with higher values representing higher disease activity. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Change From Baseline in Van Der Heijde mTSS at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Van der Heijde mTSS is utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. This method includes 16 areas of erosions, and 15 areas for joint space narrowing (JSN) in each hand, and 6 areas for erosions and 6 areas JSN in each foot. The total mTSS score is the sum of erosion (maximum of 280) and JSN (maximum of 168) scores. The score range from 0 to 448 for mTSS with higher values representing higher disease activity. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Van Der Heijde mTSS at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Van der Heijde mTSS is utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. This method includes 16 areas of erosions, and 15 areas for joint space narrowing (JSN) in each hand, and 6 areas for erosions and 6 areas JSN in each foot. The total mTSS score is the sum of erosion (maximum of 280) and JSN (maximum of 168) scores. The score range from 0 to 448 for mTSS with higher values representing higher disease activity. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For efficacy assessments baseline is interpreted as Day 1.
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument that assesses the degree of difficulty of a participant in accomplishing tasks in eight functional areas: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. Overall HAQ-DI score was computed as sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains answered. The total possible score ranges from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Higher overall score indicates greater disability. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument that assesses the degree of difficulty of a participant in accomplishing tasks in eight functional areas: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. Overall HAQ-DI score was computed as sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains answered. The total possible score ranges from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Higher overall score indicates greater disability. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For efficacy assessments baseline is interpreted as Day 1.
Change From Baseline in Arthritis Pain VAS at Week 12
For the Arthritis Pain VAS, participants assess the severity of their current arthritis pain using a continuous visual analogue scale (VAS) with anchors at "0" (no pain) and "100" (most severe pain). A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Change From Baseline in Arthritis Pain VAS at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
For the Arthritis Pain VAS, participants assess the severity of their current arthritis pain using a continuous visual analogue scale (VAS) with anchors at "0" (no pain) and "100" (most severe pain). A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Arthritis Pain VAS at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
For the Arthritis Pain VAS, participants assess the severity of their current arthritis pain using a continuous visual analogue scale (VAS) with anchors at "0" (no pain) and "100" (most severe pain). A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For efficacy assessments baseline is interpreted as Day 1.
Change From Baseline in Short Form (SF)-36 Physical Component Scores (PCS) at Week 12
SF-36 is health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains:physical functioning(PF),bodily pain(BP),role limitations due to physical/emotional problems,general health(GH),mental health,social functioning,vitality.Each of 8 domains is scored using average, 0-100; higher score represents better health.PCS was aggregated across the domains and scaled to T-score with mean of 50 and SD of 10; higher score represents better health.PCS is primarily derived from 4 domains(PF,role-physical,BP,GH) representing overall physical health.Positive change from baseline, reported using T-score change, indicates improvement in overall physical health.Quality Metric software was used for scoring.Baseline=latest pre-dose assessment with NMV, including those from unscheduled visits.CB=subtracting PD visit value from BV.For purpose of all analyses up to week12, placebo arms were pooled into single arm to primarily serve as reference for comparison of active treatment arms.
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Component Scores (MCS) at Week 12
SF-36 is health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains:physical functioning,bodily pain,role limitations due to physical/emotional problems,general health,mental health(MH),social functioning(SF),vitality.Each of 8 domains is scored using average, 0-100; higher score represents better health.MCS was aggregated across the domains and scaled to T-score with mean of 50 and SD of 10; higher score represents better health. MCS is primarily derived from 4 domains (SF,vitality,MH,role-emotional) representing overall mental health.Positive change from baseline, reported using T-score change, indicates improvement in overall mental health.Quality Metric software was used for scoring.Baseline=latest pre-dose assessment with NMV, including those from unscheduled visits.CB=subtracting PD visit value from BV.For purpose of all analyses up to week12, placebo arms were pooled into single arm to primarily serve as reference for comparison of active treatment arms.
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Domain Scores at Week 12
Short-Form 36 (SF-36) is a health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality. The MCS consists of 4 domains (SF, vitality, MH, role-emotional) and PCS consists of 4 domains (PF, role-physical, BP and GH).The individual question items are first summed for each item under the various sections. Then, those domain scores are weighted to a scale between 0 to 100, where higher score represents better health. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. Quality Metric software was used for scoring of SF-36.Baseline=latest pre-dose assessment with NMV, including those from unscheduled visits. CB=subtracting PD visit value from BV. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Change From Baseline in SF-36 PCS at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
SF-36 is health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains:physical functioning(PF),bodily pain(BP),role limitations due to physical/emotional problems,general health(GH),mental health,social functioning,vitality.Each of 8 domains is scored using average, 0-100; higher score represents better health.PCS was aggregated across the domains and scaled to T-score with mean of 50 and SD of 10; higher score represents better health.PCS is primarily derived from 4 domains(PF,role-physical,BP,GH) representing overall physical health.Positive change from baseline, reported using T-score change, indicates improvement in overall physical health.Quality Metric software was used for scoring. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with non-missing value, including from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post dose visit value from Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in SF-36 MCS at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
SF-36 is health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains:physical functioning,bodily pain,role limitations due to physical/emotional problems,general health,mental health(MH),social functioning(SF),vitality.Each of 8 domains is scored using average, 0-100; higher score represents better health.MCS was aggregated across the domains and scaled to T-score with mean of 50 and SD of 10; higher score represents better health. MCS is primarily derived from 4 domains (SF,vitality,MH,role-emotional) representing overall mental health.Positive change from baseline, reported using T-score change, indicates improvement in overall mental health.Quality Metric software was used for scoring. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with non-missing value, including from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post dose visit value from Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Domain Scores at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
The Short-Form 36 (SF-36) is a health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality. The MCS consists of 4 domains (social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional domains) and PCS consists of 4 domains (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain and general health). The individual question items are first summed for each item under the various sections. Then, those domain scores are weighted to a scale between 0 to 100, where higher score represents better health. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. Quality Metric software was used for scoring for SF-36. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with non-missing value, including from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post dose visit value from Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in SF-36 PCS at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
SF-36 is health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains:physical functioning(PF),bodily pain(BP),role limitations due to physical/emotional problems,general health(GH),mental health,social functioning,vitality. Each of 8 domains is scored using average, 0-100; higher score represents better health. PCS was aggregated across the domains and scaled to T-score with mean of 50 and SD of 10; higher score represents better health. PCS is primarily derived from 4 domains (PF,role-physical,BP,GH) representing overall physical health. Positive change from baseline, reported using T-score change, indicates improvement in overall physical health. Quality Metric software was used for scoring. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with non-missing value, including from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post dose visit value from Baseline value. For efficacy assessments baseline is interpreted as Day 1.
Change From Baseline in SF-36 MCS at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
SF-36 is health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains:physical functioning,bodily pain,role limitations due to physical/emotional problems,general health,mental health(MH),social functioning(SF),vitality. Each of 8 domains is scored using average, 0-100; higher score represents better health. MCS was aggregated across the domains and scaled to T-score with mean of 50 and SD of 10; higher score represents better health. MCS is primarily derived from 4 domains (SF,vitality,MH,role-emotional) representing overall mental health. Positive change from baseline, reported using T-score change, indicates improvement in overall mental health. Quality Metric software was used for scoring. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with non-missing value, including from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post dose visit value from Baseline value. For efficacy assessments baseline is interpreted as Day 1.
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Domain Scores at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Short-Form 36 (SF-36) is a health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains: physical functioning(PF), bodily pain(BP), role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, general health(GH), mental health(MH), social functioning(SF), vitality. The MCS consists of 4 domains (SF, vitality, MH, role-emotional) and PCS consists of 4 domains (PF, role-physical, BP, GH). The individual question items are first summed for each item under the various sections. Then, those domain scores are weighted to a scale between 0 to 100, where higher score represents better health. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. Quality Metric software was used for scoring for SF-36. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with non-missing value, including from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post dose visit value from Baseline value. For efficacy assessments baseline is interpreted as Day 1.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue at Week 12
The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-fatigue is a validated patient-reported measure of 13 statements regarding the feeling of fatigue. The total score ranges from 0 to 52 with higher values representing a lower fatigue and a better quality of life. A positive change from baseline in FACIT-fatigue indicates an improvement. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Change From Baseline in FACIT-Fatigue at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-fatigue is a validated patient-reported measure of 13 statements regarding the feeling of fatigue. The total score ranges from 0 to 52 with higher values representing a lower fatigue and a better quality of life. A positive change from baseline in FACIT-fatigue indicates an improvement. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in FACIT-Fatigue at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-fatigue is a validated patient-reported measure of 13 statements regarding the feeling of fatigue. The total score ranges from 0 to 52 with higher values representing a lower fatigue and a better quality of life. A positive change from baseline in FACIT-fatigue indicates an improvement. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For efficacy assessments baseline is interpreted as Day 1.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAEs are defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death, cause life threatening events which requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability or incapacity and birth defect or congenital anomaly. Protocol defined AESIs were included. Fifteen participants in Pooled placebo group who received active treatment of Tofacitinib from Week 4 instead of Week 12 as planned. They were pooled with the Tofacitinib arm in safety analysis.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) for Placebo Switched Arms
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAEs are defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death, cause life threatening events which requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability or incapacity and birth defect or congenital anomaly. Protocol defined AESIs were included.
Change From Baseline in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count at Week 12
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of hematology parameter white blood cell count. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Change From Baseline in WBC Count at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of hematology parameter white blood cell count. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in WBC Count at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of hematology parameter white blood cell count. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For safety assessments baseline is interpreted as Week 12.
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter of Platelet Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes at Week 12
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of hematology parameters including platelet count, neutrophils, lymphocytes. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter of Platelet Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of hematology parameters including platelet count, neutrophils, lymphocytes. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter of Platelet Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of hematology parameters including platelet count, neutrophils, lymphocytes. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For safety assessments baseline is interpreted as Week 12.
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter of Hemoglobin at Week 12
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of change from baseline in hematology parameters hemoglobin level. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter of Hemoglobin at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of change from baseline in hematology parameters hemoglobin level. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter of Hemoglobin at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of change from baseline in hematology parameters hemoglobin level. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For safety assessments baseline is interpreted as Week 12.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Alkaline Phosphatase (AP), Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase (GGT) at Week 12
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters including aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (AP) and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter of AST, ALT, AP, GGT at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters including AST, ALT, AP and GGT levels. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter of AST, ALT, AP, GGT at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters including AST, ALT, AP and GGT levels. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For safety assessments baseline is interpreted as Week 12.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter of Total Bilirubin at Week 12
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameter total bilirubin level. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter of Total Bilirubin at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameter total bilirubin level. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter of Total Bilirubin at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameter total bilirubin level. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For safety assessments baseline is interpreted as Week 12.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter of Albumin at Week 12
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameter albumin level. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter of Albumin at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameter albumin level. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter of Albumin at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameter albumin level. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For safety assessments baseline is interpreted as Week 12.
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of Total Cholesterol at Week 12
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of lipid profile of total cholesterol levels. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of Total Cholesterol at Week 24 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of lipid profile of total cholesterol levels. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of Total Cholesterol at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of lipid profile of total cholesterol levels. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For safety assessments baseline is interpreted as Week 12.
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of Total Cholesterol at Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of lipid profile of total cholesterol levels. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of Total Cholesterol at Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of lipid profile of total cholesterol levels. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For safety assessments baseline is interpreted as Week 12.
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 12
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of fasting lipid profile including LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol levels. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of LDL Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 24 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of fasting lipid profile including LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol levels. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of LDL Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of fasting lipid profile including LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol levels. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For safety assessments baseline is interpreted as Week 12.
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of LDL Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of fasting lipid profile including LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol levels. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of LDL Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of fasting lipid profile including LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol levels. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For safety assessments baseline is interpreted as Week 12.
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of Triglycerides at Week 12
Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of Triglycerides at Week 24 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of Triglycerides at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of fasting lipid profile including triglycerides. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For safety assessments baseline is interpreted as Week 12.
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of Triglycerides at Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of Triglycerides at Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of fasting lipid profile including triglycerides. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For safety assessments baseline is interpreted as Week 12.
Number of Participants With National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) >=Grade 3 Hematological/Clinical Chemistry Abnormalities
Number of participants with NCI-CTCAE >=Grade 3 hematological/clinical chemistry abnormalities were summarized. Hematological and Clinical chemistry parameters were summarized according to the NCI-CTCAE, version 5.0: Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening or disabling. Higher grade indicates more severity. Data is presented for only those parameters for which participants had worst case >=Grade 3 shifts from Baseline. Fifteen participants in Pooled placebo group who received active treatment of Tofacitinib from Week 4 instead of Week 12 as planned. They were pooled with the Tofacitinib arm in safety analysis.
Number of Participants With National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) >=Grade 3 Hematological/Clinical Chemistry Abnormalities for Placebo Switched Arms
Number of participants with NCI-CTCAE >=Grade 3 hematological/clinical chemistry abnormalities were summarized. Hematological and Clinical chemistry parameters were summarized according to the NCI-CTCAE, version 5.0: Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening or disabling. Higher grade indicates more severity. Data is presented for only those parameters for which participants had worst case >=Grade 3 shifts from Baseline.
Concentrations of Granulocyte-macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) Autoantibody
Concentrations of GM-CSF autoantibodies were determined.
Number of Participants With Anti-GSK3196165 Antibodies
Serum samples were collected for the determination of anti- GSK3196165 antibodies (ADA) using a validated electrochemiluminescence (ECL) immunoassay. The assay involved screening, confirmation and titration steps. If serum samples tested positive in the screening assay, they were considered 'potentially positive' and were further analyzed for the specificity using the confirmation assay. Samples that confirmed positive in the confirmation assay were reported as 'positive'. Confirmed positive ADA samples were further characterized in the titration assay to quasi-quantitate the amount of ADA in the sample. Additionally, confirmed positive ADA samples were also tested in a validated neutralizing antibody assay to determine the potential neutralizing activity of the ADA.

Full Information

First Posted
May 15, 2019
Last Updated
September 29, 2023
Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Collaborators
Iqvia Pty Ltd
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03980483
Brief Title
Efficacy and Safety of GSK3196165 Versus Placebo and Tofacitinib in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate
Acronym
contRAst 1
Official Title
A 52-week, Phase 3, Multicentre, Randomised, Double Blind, Efficacy and Safety Study Comparing GSK3196165 With Placebo and With Tofacitinib, in Combination With Methotrexate in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 16, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 15, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 16, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Collaborators
Iqvia Pty Ltd

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study [contRAst 1 (201790: NCT03980483)] is a phase 3, randomized, multicenter, double blind study to assess the safety and efficacy of GSK3196165, in combination with methotrexate (MTX), for the treatment of adult participants with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have had an inadequate response to MTX. The study will consist of a screening phase of up to 6 weeks followed by a 52-week treatment phase in which participants will be randomized in a ratio of 6:6:3:1:1:1 to receive GSK3196165 150 milligrams (mg) subcutaneous (SC) weekly, GSK3196165 90 mg SC weekly, tofacitinib capsules (cap) 5 mg twice a day or placebo (three arms, each placebo arm will have 12 weeks placebo followed by 40 weeks active treatment) respectively, all in combination with MTX. Participants who, in investigator's judgement will benefit from extended treatment with GSK3196165, may be included in the long-term extension study [contRAst X (209564: NCT04333147)]. For those participants who do not continue into the long term-extension study, there will be an 8 week safety follow-up visit following the treatment phase.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Keywords
Rheumatoid arthritis, GSK3196165, Otilimab, Tofacitinib, Methotrexate, Placebo

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Participants will be randomized to one of six intervention arms in ratio of 6:6:3:1:1:1.
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Masking Description
Double blinded
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1537 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
GSK3196165 90mg + MTX
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received GSK3196165 90 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection once weekly for 52 weeks in combination with methotrexate (MTX).
Arm Title
GSK3196165 150mg + MTX
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received GSK3196165 150 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection once weekly for 52 weeks in combination with MTX.
Arm Title
Tofacitinib 5mg + MTX
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants received Tofacitinib 5mg capsule, orally, twice daily (BID) in combination with MTX plus placebo injection weekly to maintain the blind for 52 weeks.
Arm Title
Placebo + MTX and GSK3196165 90mg + MTX
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Participants received Placebo weekly SC injection in combination with MTX for 12 weeks. At Week 12, participants were switched from placebo to GSK3196165 90 mg, SC injection, once weekly in combination with MTX until Week 52.
Arm Title
Placebo + MTX and GSK3196165 150mg + MTX
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Participants received Placebo weekly SC injection in combination with MTX for 12 weeks. At Week 12, participants were switched from placebo to GSK3196165 150 mg, SC injection, once weekly in combination with MTX until Week 52.
Arm Title
Placebo + MTX and Tofacitinib 5mg + MTX
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Participants received Placebo capsule weekly in combination with MTX for 12 weeks. At Week 12, participants were switched from placebo capsule to Tofacitinib 5mg, capsule, orally, BID in combination with MTX plus placebo injection to maintain the blind for 52 weeks.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
GSK3196165 (Otilimab)
Intervention Description
GSK3196165 solution in vial/pre-filled syringe (PFS) to be administered SC.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tofacitinib 5 mg
Intervention Description
Tofacitinib cap (over encapsulated 5mg tablet) to be administered orally.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo sterile 0.9 percentage (%) weight by volume (w/v) sodium chloride solution in vial/pre-filled syringe (PFS) to be administered SC.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo cap (containing lactose) to be administered orally.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving 20 Percentage (%) Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR20) at Week 12 Superiority Comparison With Placebo
Description
ACR20 is calculated as a 20% improvement from Baseline in Tender Joint Count 68 (TJC68) and Swollen Joint Count 66 (SJC66) and a 20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) [visual analogue scale (VAS) with values from 0=best to 100=worst], Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (VAS with values from 0=best to 100=worst), Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS with values from 0=no pain and 100=most severe pain), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (ranges from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty) and an acute-phase reactant [high sensitivity C-reactive Protein milligram per liter (mg/L) (hsCRP)]. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Week 12
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Total Score Less Than or Equal to (<=)10 [CDAI Low Disease Activity (LDA)] at Week 12
Description
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) total score is a composite score consisting of the sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). PtGA and PhGA are transformed to a 0-10 scale before computing the CDAI total score. CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when CDAI total score <=10. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12
Description
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is a 20-question instrument that assesses degree of difficulty of a participant in accomplishing tasks in eight functional areas: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. Overall HAQ-DI score was computed as sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains answered. The total possible score ranges from 0 to 3 where 0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty. Higher overall score indicates greater disability. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving 20% Improvement in ACR20 at Week 24 (Non-Inferiority Versus Tofacitinib)
Description
ACR20 is calculated as a 20% improvement from Baseline in Tender Joint Count 68 (TJC68) and Swollen Joint Count 66 (SJC66) and a 20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) [visual analogue scale (VAS) with values from 0=best to 100=worst], Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (VAS with values from 0=best to 100=worst), Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS with values from 0=no pain and 100=most severe pain), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (ranges from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty) and an acute-phase reactant [high sensitivity C-reactive Protein milligram per liter (mg/L) (hsCRP)].
Time Frame
Week 24
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50%/70% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR50/70) at Week 24 and ACR 20/50/70 at and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
ACR20/50/70 is calculated as a 20%/50%/70% improvement from Baseline in Tender Joint Count 68 (TJC68) and Swollen Joint Count 66 (SJC66) and a 20%/50%/70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale (VAS) with values from 0=best to 100=worst), Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) [VAS with values from 0=best to 100=worst], Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS with values from 0=no pain and 100=most severe pain), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ- DI) (ranges from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty) and an acute-phase reactant [high sensitivity C-reactive Protein mg/L (hsCRP)].
Time Frame
Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20/50/70 at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
ACR20/50/70 is calculated as a 20%/50%/70% improvement from Baseline in Tender Joint Count 68 (TJC68) and Swollen Joint Count 66 (SJC66) and a 20%/50%/70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale (VAS) with values from 0=best to 100=worst), Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) [VAS with values from 0=best to 100=worst], Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS with values from 0=no pain and 100=most severe pain), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ- DI) (ranges from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty) and an acute-phase reactant [high sensitivity C-reactive Protein mg/L (hsCRP)].
Time Frame
Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Total Score <=10 (CDAI LDA) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) total score is a composite score consisting of the sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). PtGA and PhGA are transformed to a 0-10 scale before computing the CDAI total score. CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when CDAI total score <=10.
Time Frame
Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Total Score <=10 (CDAI LDA) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) total score is a composite score consisting of the sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). PtGA and PhGA are transformed to a 0-10 scale before computing the CDAI total score. CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when CDAI total score <=10.
Time Frame
Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Total Score <=2.8 (CDAI Remission) at Week 12
Description
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) total score is a composite score consisting of the sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). PtGA and PhGA are transformed to a 0-10 scale before computing the CDAI total score. CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. CDAI remission is achieved when CDAI total score <=2.8. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Total Score <=2.8 (CDAI Remission) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) total score is a composite score consisting of the sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). PtGA and PhGA are transformed to a 0-10 scale before computing the CDAI total score. CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. CDAI remission is achieved when CDAI total score <=2.8.
Time Frame
Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Total Score <=2.8 (CDAI Remission) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) total score is a composite score consisting of the sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). PtGA and PhGA are transformed to a 0-10 scale before computing the CDAI total score. CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. CDAI remission is achieved when CDAI total score <=2.8.
Time Frame
Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50%/70% Improvement in American College of Rheumatology Criteria (ACR50/70) at Week 12
Description
ACR50/70 is calculated as a 50%/70% improvement from Baseline in Tender Joint Count 68 (TJC68) and Swollen Joint Count 66 (SJC66) and a 50%/70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale (VAS) with values from 0=best to 100=worst), Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) [VAS with values from 0=best to 100=worst), Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS with values from 0=no pain and 100=most severe pain), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (ranges from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty) and an acute-phase reactant (high sensitivity C-reactive Protein mg/L (hsCRP)]. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score Using 28 Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) <=3.2 (DAS28-CRP LDA) at Week 12
Description
The DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP) (in mg/L), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28- CRP scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when DAS28-CRP greater than or equal to (<=)3.2. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-CRP indicates an improvement. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) <=3.2 (DAS28-ESR LDA) at Week 12
Description
The DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (in millimeter [mm]/hour[hr]), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-ESR scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when DAS28-ESR<=3.2. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-ESR indicates an improvement. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP <=3.2 (DAS28-CRP LDA) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
The DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP) (in mg/L), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-CRP scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when DAS28-CRP<=3.2. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-CRP indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-ESR <=3.2 (DAS28-ESR LDA) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
The DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (in millimeter [mm]/hour[hr]), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-ESR scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when DAS28-ESR<=3.2. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-ESR indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP <=3.2 (DAS28-CRP LDA) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
The DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP) (in mg/L), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-CRP scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when DAS28-CRP<=3.2. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-CRP indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-ESR <=3.2 (DAS28-ESR LDA) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
The DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (in millimeter [mm]/hour[hr]), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-ESR scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when DAS28-ESR<=3.2. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-ESR indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 (DAS28-CRP Remission) at Week 12
Description
The DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP) (in mg/L), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-CRP scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Remission is achieved when DAS28-CRP less than (<)2.6. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-CRP indicates an improvement. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 ESR <2.6 (DAS28-ESR Remission) at Week 12
Description
The DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (in mm/hr), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-ESR scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Remission is achieved when DAS28-ESR <2.6. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-ESR indicates an improvement. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 (DAS28-CRP Remission) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
The DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP) (in mg/L), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-CRP scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Remission is achieved when DAS28-CRP <2.6. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-CRP indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 ESR <2.6 (DAS28-ESR Remission) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
The DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (in mm/hr), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-ESR scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Remission is achieved when DAS28-ESR <2.6. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-ESR indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 (DAS28-CRP Remission) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
The DAS28-CRP is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), C-reactive protein (CRP) (in mg/L), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-CRP scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Remission is achieved when DAS28-CRP <2.6. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-CRP indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 ESR <2.6 (DAS28-ESR Remission) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
The DAS28-ESR is a measure of RA disease activity calculated using Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (in mm/hr), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). DAS28-ESR scores range from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicate less disease activity. Remission is achieved when DAS28-ESR <2.6. A negative change from baseline in DAS28-ESR indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Good/Moderate (European League Against Rheumatism) EULAR Response at Week 12
Description
DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR scores were categorized using EULAR response criteria. Response at given time point was defined based on the combination of current DAS28 score and improvement in the current DAS28 score relative to Baseline. The definition of no response, moderate response and good response was as; DAS28 <=3.2 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline (>1.2:good response), (>0.6 to <=1.2:moderate response) and (<=0.6:no response); DAS28 >3.2 to <=5.1 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline (>1.2:moderate response), (>0.6 to <=1.2:moderate response) and (<=0.6:no response) and DAS28 >5.1 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline (>1.2:moderate response), (>0.6 to <=1.2:no response) and (<=0.6:no response). If the post-Baseline DAS28-CRP score was missing, then the corresponding EULAR category was set to missing. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Good/Moderate EULAR Response at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR scores were categorized using EULAR response criteria. Response at a given time point was defined based on the combination of current DAS28 score and the improvement in the current DAS28 score relative to Baseline. The definition of no response, moderate response and good response was as; if current DAS28 <=3.2 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline (>1.2: good response), (>0.6 to <=1.2: moderate response) and (<=0.6: no response); if current DAS28 >3.2 to <=5.1 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline value (>1.2: moderate response), (>0.6 to <=1.2: moderate response) and (<=0.6: no response) and if current DAS28 >5.1 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline value (>1.2: moderate response), (>0.6 to <=1.2: no response) and (<=0.6: no response). If the post-Baseline DAS28-CRP score was missing, then the corresponding EULAR category was set to missing.
Time Frame
Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Good/Moderate EULAR Response at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR scores were categorized using EULAR response criteria. Response at a given time point was defined based on the combination of current DAS28 score and the improvement in the current DAS28 score relative to Baseline. The definition of no response, moderate response and good response was as; if current DAS28 <=3.2 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline (>1.2: good response), (>0.6 to <=1.2: moderate response) and (<=0.6: no response); if current DAS28 >3.2 to <=5.1 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline value (>1.2: moderate response), (>0.6 to <=1.2: moderate response) and (<=0.6: no response) and if current DAS28 >5.1 and DAS28 decrease from Baseline value (>1.2: moderate response), (>0.6 to <=1.2: no response) and (<=0.6: no response). If the post-Baseline DAS28-CRP score was missing, then the corresponding EULAR category was set to missing.
Time Frame
Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Number of Participants Achieving ACR/EULAR Remission at Week 12
Description
Boolean-based ACR/EULAR remission is achieved if all of the following requirements are met at the same timepoint: Tender Joint Count 68 (TJC68) <= 1, Swollen Joint Count 66 (SJC66) <= 1, high sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) <= 1mg/dl and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) <= 10. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Number of Participants Achieving ACR/EULAR Remission at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
Boolean-based ACR/EULAR remission is achieved if all of the following requirements are met at the same timepoint: Tender Joint Count 68 (TJC68) <= 1, Swollen Joint Count 66 (SJC66) <= 1, high sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) <= 1mg/dl and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) <= 10.
Time Frame
Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Number of Participants Achieving ACR/EULAR Remission at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
Boolean-based ACR/EULAR remission is achieved if all of the following requirements are met at the same timepoint: Tender Joint Count 68 (TJC68) <= 1, Swollen Joint Count 66 (SJC66) <= 1, high sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) <= 1mg/dl and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) <= 10.
Time Frame
Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving no Radiographic Progression (Van Der Heijde Modified Total Sharp Scores (mTSS <= 0.5) at Week 12
Description
Van der Heijde mTSS is utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. This method includes 16 areas of erosions, and 15 areas for joint space narrowing (JSN) in each hand, and 6 areas for erosions and 6 areas JSN in each foot. The total mTSS score is the sum of erosion (maximum of 280) and JSN (maximum of 168) scores. The score ranges from 0 to 448 for mTSS with higher values representing higher disease activity. No radiographic progression is defined as a change from Baseline in van der Heijde mTSS score of <=0.5. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Week 12
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving no Radiographic Progression (mTSS <= 0.5) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
Van der Heijde mTSS is utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. This method includes 16 areas of erosions, and 15 areas for joint space narrowing (JSN) in each hand, and 6 areas for erosions and 6 areas JSN in each foot. The total mTSS score is the sum of erosion (maximum of 280) and JSN (maximum of 168) scores. The score ranges from 0 to 448 for mTSS with higher values representing higher disease activity. No radiographic progression is defined as a change from Baseline in van der Heijde mTSS score of <=0.5.
Time Frame
Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving no Radiographic Progression (mTSS <= 0.5) at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
Van der Heijde mTSS is utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. This method includes 16 areas of erosions, and 15 areas for joint space narrowing (JSN) in each hand, and 6 areas for erosions and 6 areas JSN in each foot. The total mTSS score is the sum of erosion (maximum of 280) and JSN (maximum of 168) scores. The score ranges from 0 to 448 for mTSS with higher values representing higher disease activity. No radiographic progression is defined as a change from Baseline in van der Heijde mTSS score of <=0.5.
Time Frame
Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in CDAI Total Score at Week 12
Description
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) total score is a composite score consisting of sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (PtGA and PhGA VAS with values from 0=best to 100=worst). PtGA and PhGA are transformed to a 0-10 scale before computing the CDAI total score. CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when CDAI total score <=10. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post dose visit value from Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in CDAI Total Score at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
CDAI total score is a composite score consisting of the sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). PtGA and PhGA are transformed to a 0-10 scale before computing the CDAI total score. CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when CDAI total score <=10. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in CDAI Total Score at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
CDAI total score is a composite score consisting of the sum of Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PtGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst) and Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis Disease Activity (PhGA) (visual analogue scale with values from 0=best to 100=worst). PtGA and PhGA are transformed to a 0-10 scale before computing the CDAI total score. CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76 with higher values representing higher disease activity. Low disease activity (LDA) is achieved when CDAI total score <=10. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For efficacy assessments baseline is interpreted as Day 1.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP/DAS28-ESR at Week 12
Description
DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR are measure of RA disease activity calculated using Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), high sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP in mg/L)/Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) [ESR in millimeter/hour (mm/hr)] and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score range from 0-9.4, with higher scores indicating more disease activity. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP/DAS28-ESR at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR are measure of RA disease activity calculated using Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), high sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP in mg/L)/Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) [ESR in millimeter/hour (mm/hr)] and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-9.4, with higher scores indicating more disease activity. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP/DAS28-ESR at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR are measure of RA disease activity calculated using Swollen Joint Count 28 (SJC28), Tender Joint Count 28 (TJC28), high sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP in mg/L)/Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) [ESR in millimeter/hour (mm/hr)] and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) transformed to a 0-10 scale. Total score approximate range 0-9.4, with higher scores indicating more disease activity. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For efficacy assessments baseline is interpreted as Day 1.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Van Der Heijde mTSS at Week 12
Description
Van der Heijde mTSS is utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. This method includes 16 areas of erosions, and 15 areas for joint space narrowing (JSN) in each hand, and 6 areas for erosions and 6 areas JSN in each foot. The total mTSS score is the sum of erosion (maximum of 280) and JSN (maximum of 168) scores. The score range from 0 to 448 for mTSS with higher values representing higher disease activity. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Van Der Heijde mTSS at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
Van der Heijde mTSS is utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. This method includes 16 areas of erosions, and 15 areas for joint space narrowing (JSN) in each hand, and 6 areas for erosions and 6 areas JSN in each foot. The total mTSS score is the sum of erosion (maximum of 280) and JSN (maximum of 168) scores. The score range from 0 to 448 for mTSS with higher values representing higher disease activity. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Van Der Heijde mTSS at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
Van der Heijde mTSS is utilized for scoring radiographs of hands and feet in rheumatoid arthritis. This method includes 16 areas of erosions, and 15 areas for joint space narrowing (JSN) in each hand, and 6 areas for erosions and 6 areas JSN in each foot. The total mTSS score is the sum of erosion (maximum of 280) and JSN (maximum of 168) scores. The score range from 0 to 448 for mTSS with higher values representing higher disease activity. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For efficacy assessments baseline is interpreted as Day 1.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument that assesses the degree of difficulty of a participant in accomplishing tasks in eight functional areas: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. Overall HAQ-DI score was computed as sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains answered. The total possible score ranges from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Higher overall score indicates greater disability. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument that assesses the degree of difficulty of a participant in accomplishing tasks in eight functional areas: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. Overall HAQ-DI score was computed as sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains answered. The total possible score ranges from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Higher overall score indicates greater disability. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For efficacy assessments baseline is interpreted as Day 1.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Arthritis Pain VAS at Week 12
Description
For the Arthritis Pain VAS, participants assess the severity of their current arthritis pain using a continuous visual analogue scale (VAS) with anchors at "0" (no pain) and "100" (most severe pain). A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Arthritis Pain VAS at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
For the Arthritis Pain VAS, participants assess the severity of their current arthritis pain using a continuous visual analogue scale (VAS) with anchors at "0" (no pain) and "100" (most severe pain). A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Arthritis Pain VAS at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
For the Arthritis Pain VAS, participants assess the severity of their current arthritis pain using a continuous visual analogue scale (VAS) with anchors at "0" (no pain) and "100" (most severe pain). A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For efficacy assessments baseline is interpreted as Day 1.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Short Form (SF)-36 Physical Component Scores (PCS) at Week 12
Description
SF-36 is health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains:physical functioning(PF),bodily pain(BP),role limitations due to physical/emotional problems,general health(GH),mental health,social functioning,vitality.Each of 8 domains is scored using average, 0-100; higher score represents better health.PCS was aggregated across the domains and scaled to T-score with mean of 50 and SD of 10; higher score represents better health.PCS is primarily derived from 4 domains(PF,role-physical,BP,GH) representing overall physical health.Positive change from baseline, reported using T-score change, indicates improvement in overall physical health.Quality Metric software was used for scoring.Baseline=latest pre-dose assessment with NMV, including those from unscheduled visits.CB=subtracting PD visit value from BV.For purpose of all analyses up to week12, placebo arms were pooled into single arm to primarily serve as reference for comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Component Scores (MCS) at Week 12
Description
SF-36 is health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains:physical functioning,bodily pain,role limitations due to physical/emotional problems,general health,mental health(MH),social functioning(SF),vitality.Each of 8 domains is scored using average, 0-100; higher score represents better health.MCS was aggregated across the domains and scaled to T-score with mean of 50 and SD of 10; higher score represents better health. MCS is primarily derived from 4 domains (SF,vitality,MH,role-emotional) representing overall mental health.Positive change from baseline, reported using T-score change, indicates improvement in overall mental health.Quality Metric software was used for scoring.Baseline=latest pre-dose assessment with NMV, including those from unscheduled visits.CB=subtracting PD visit value from BV.For purpose of all analyses up to week12, placebo arms were pooled into single arm to primarily serve as reference for comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Domain Scores at Week 12
Description
Short-Form 36 (SF-36) is a health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality. The MCS consists of 4 domains (SF, vitality, MH, role-emotional) and PCS consists of 4 domains (PF, role-physical, BP and GH).The individual question items are first summed for each item under the various sections. Then, those domain scores are weighted to a scale between 0 to 100, where higher score represents better health. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. Quality Metric software was used for scoring of SF-36.Baseline=latest pre-dose assessment with NMV, including those from unscheduled visits. CB=subtracting PD visit value from BV. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in SF-36 PCS at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
SF-36 is health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains:physical functioning(PF),bodily pain(BP),role limitations due to physical/emotional problems,general health(GH),mental health,social functioning,vitality.Each of 8 domains is scored using average, 0-100; higher score represents better health.PCS was aggregated across the domains and scaled to T-score with mean of 50 and SD of 10; higher score represents better health.PCS is primarily derived from 4 domains(PF,role-physical,BP,GH) representing overall physical health.Positive change from baseline, reported using T-score change, indicates improvement in overall physical health.Quality Metric software was used for scoring. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with non-missing value, including from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post dose visit value from Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in SF-36 MCS at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
SF-36 is health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains:physical functioning,bodily pain,role limitations due to physical/emotional problems,general health,mental health(MH),social functioning(SF),vitality.Each of 8 domains is scored using average, 0-100; higher score represents better health.MCS was aggregated across the domains and scaled to T-score with mean of 50 and SD of 10; higher score represents better health. MCS is primarily derived from 4 domains (SF,vitality,MH,role-emotional) representing overall mental health.Positive change from baseline, reported using T-score change, indicates improvement in overall mental health.Quality Metric software was used for scoring. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with non-missing value, including from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post dose visit value from Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Domain Scores at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
The Short-Form 36 (SF-36) is a health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality. The MCS consists of 4 domains (social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional domains) and PCS consists of 4 domains (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain and general health). The individual question items are first summed for each item under the various sections. Then, those domain scores are weighted to a scale between 0 to 100, where higher score represents better health. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. Quality Metric software was used for scoring for SF-36. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with non-missing value, including from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post dose visit value from Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in SF-36 PCS at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
SF-36 is health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains:physical functioning(PF),bodily pain(BP),role limitations due to physical/emotional problems,general health(GH),mental health,social functioning,vitality. Each of 8 domains is scored using average, 0-100; higher score represents better health. PCS was aggregated across the domains and scaled to T-score with mean of 50 and SD of 10; higher score represents better health. PCS is primarily derived from 4 domains (PF,role-physical,BP,GH) representing overall physical health. Positive change from baseline, reported using T-score change, indicates improvement in overall physical health. Quality Metric software was used for scoring. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with non-missing value, including from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post dose visit value from Baseline value. For efficacy assessments baseline is interpreted as Day 1.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in SF-36 MCS at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
SF-36 is health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains:physical functioning,bodily pain,role limitations due to physical/emotional problems,general health,mental health(MH),social functioning(SF),vitality. Each of 8 domains is scored using average, 0-100; higher score represents better health. MCS was aggregated across the domains and scaled to T-score with mean of 50 and SD of 10; higher score represents better health. MCS is primarily derived from 4 domains (SF,vitality,MH,role-emotional) representing overall mental health. Positive change from baseline, reported using T-score change, indicates improvement in overall mental health. Quality Metric software was used for scoring. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with non-missing value, including from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post dose visit value from Baseline value. For efficacy assessments baseline is interpreted as Day 1.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Domain Scores at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
Short-Form 36 (SF-36) is a health-related survey that assesses quality of life covering 8 domains: physical functioning(PF), bodily pain(BP), role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, general health(GH), mental health(MH), social functioning(SF), vitality. The MCS consists of 4 domains (SF, vitality, MH, role-emotional) and PCS consists of 4 domains (PF, role-physical, BP, GH). The individual question items are first summed for each item under the various sections. Then, those domain scores are weighted to a scale between 0 to 100, where higher score represents better health. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. Quality Metric software was used for scoring for SF-36. Baseline was defined as latest pre-dose assessment with non-missing value, including from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post dose visit value from Baseline value. For efficacy assessments baseline is interpreted as Day 1.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue at Week 12
Description
The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-fatigue is a validated patient-reported measure of 13 statements regarding the feeling of fatigue. The total score ranges from 0 to 52 with higher values representing a lower fatigue and a better quality of life. A positive change from baseline in FACIT-fatigue indicates an improvement. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in FACIT-Fatigue at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-fatigue is a validated patient-reported measure of 13 statements regarding the feeling of fatigue. The total score ranges from 0 to 52 with higher values representing a lower fatigue and a better quality of life. A positive change from baseline in FACIT-fatigue indicates an improvement. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in FACIT-Fatigue at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-fatigue is a validated patient-reported measure of 13 statements regarding the feeling of fatigue. The total score ranges from 0 to 52 with higher values representing a lower fatigue and a better quality of life. A positive change from baseline in FACIT-fatigue indicates an improvement. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For efficacy assessments baseline is interpreted as Day 1.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)
Description
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAEs are defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death, cause life threatening events which requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability or incapacity and birth defect or congenital anomaly. Protocol defined AESIs were included. Fifteen participants in Pooled placebo group who received active treatment of Tofacitinib from Week 4 instead of Week 12 as planned. They were pooled with the Tofacitinib arm in safety analysis.
Time Frame
Up to Week 59
Title
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAEs are defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death, cause life threatening events which requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability or incapacity and birth defect or congenital anomaly. Protocol defined AESIs were included.
Time Frame
Up to Week 59
Title
Change From Baseline in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count at Week 12
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of hematology parameter white blood cell count. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in WBC Count at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of hematology parameter white blood cell count. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in WBC Count at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of hematology parameter white blood cell count. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For safety assessments baseline is interpreted as Week 12.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 12), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter of Platelet Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes at Week 12
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of hematology parameters including platelet count, neutrophils, lymphocytes. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter of Platelet Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of hematology parameters including platelet count, neutrophils, lymphocytes. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter of Platelet Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of hematology parameters including platelet count, neutrophils, lymphocytes. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For safety assessments baseline is interpreted as Week 12.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 12), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter of Hemoglobin at Week 12
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of change from baseline in hematology parameters hemoglobin level. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter of Hemoglobin at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of change from baseline in hematology parameters hemoglobin level. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter of Hemoglobin at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of change from baseline in hematology parameters hemoglobin level. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For safety assessments baseline is interpreted as Week 12.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 12), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Alkaline Phosphatase (AP), Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase (GGT) at Week 12
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters including aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (AP) and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter of AST, ALT, AP, GGT at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters including AST, ALT, AP and GGT levels. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter of AST, ALT, AP, GGT at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameters including AST, ALT, AP and GGT levels. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For safety assessments baseline is interpreted as Week 12.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 12), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter of Total Bilirubin at Week 12
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameter total bilirubin level. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter of Total Bilirubin at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameter total bilirubin level. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter of Total Bilirubin at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameter total bilirubin level. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For safety assessments baseline is interpreted as Week 12.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 12), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter of Albumin at Week 12
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameter albumin level. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter of Albumin at Week 24 and Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameter albumin level. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter of Albumin at Week 24 and Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of clinical chemistry parameter albumin level. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For safety assessments baseline is interpreted as Week 12.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week 12), Week 24 and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of Total Cholesterol at Week 12
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of lipid profile of total cholesterol levels. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of Total Cholesterol at Week 24 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of lipid profile of total cholesterol levels. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of Total Cholesterol at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of lipid profile of total cholesterol levels. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For safety assessments baseline is interpreted as Week 12.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of Total Cholesterol at Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of lipid profile of total cholesterol levels. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of Total Cholesterol at Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of lipid profile of total cholesterol levels. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For safety assessments baseline is interpreted as Week 12.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 12
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of fasting lipid profile including LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol levels. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of LDL Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 24 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of fasting lipid profile including LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol levels. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of LDL Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of fasting lipid profile including LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol levels. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For safety assessments baseline is interpreted as Week 12.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of LDL Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of fasting lipid profile including LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol levels. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of LDL Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of fasting lipid profile including LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol levels. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For safety assessments baseline is interpreted as Week 12.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of Triglycerides at Week 12
Description
Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For the purpose of all analyses up to week 12, the placebo arms were pooled into a single placebo arm to primarily serve as a reference for the comparison of active treatment arms.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of Triglycerides at Week 24 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of Triglycerides at Week 24 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of fasting lipid profile including triglycerides. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For safety assessments baseline is interpreted as Week 12.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of Triglycerides at Week 52 for Treatment Arms Who Started Study Intervention From Day 1
Description
Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Lipid Profile Parameter of Triglycerides at Week 52 for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of fasting lipid profile including triglycerides. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post dose visit value from the Baseline value. For safety assessments baseline is interpreted as Week 12.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
Title
Number of Participants With National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) >=Grade 3 Hematological/Clinical Chemistry Abnormalities
Description
Number of participants with NCI-CTCAE >=Grade 3 hematological/clinical chemistry abnormalities were summarized. Hematological and Clinical chemistry parameters were summarized according to the NCI-CTCAE, version 5.0: Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening or disabling. Higher grade indicates more severity. Data is presented for only those parameters for which participants had worst case >=Grade 3 shifts from Baseline. Fifteen participants in Pooled placebo group who received active treatment of Tofacitinib from Week 4 instead of Week 12 as planned. They were pooled with the Tofacitinib arm in safety analysis.
Time Frame
Up to Week 59
Title
Number of Participants With National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) >=Grade 3 Hematological/Clinical Chemistry Abnormalities for Placebo Switched Arms
Description
Number of participants with NCI-CTCAE >=Grade 3 hematological/clinical chemistry abnormalities were summarized. Hematological and Clinical chemistry parameters were summarized according to the NCI-CTCAE, version 5.0: Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe; Grade 4: life-threatening or disabling. Higher grade indicates more severity. Data is presented for only those parameters for which participants had worst case >=Grade 3 shifts from Baseline.
Time Frame
Up to Week 59
Title
Concentrations of Granulocyte-macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) Autoantibody
Description
Concentrations of GM-CSF autoantibodies were determined.
Time Frame
At baseline
Title
Number of Participants With Anti-GSK3196165 Antibodies
Description
Serum samples were collected for the determination of anti- GSK3196165 antibodies (ADA) using a validated electrochemiluminescence (ECL) immunoassay. The assay involved screening, confirmation and titration steps. If serum samples tested positive in the screening assay, they were considered 'potentially positive' and were further analyzed for the specificity using the confirmation assay. Samples that confirmed positive in the confirmation assay were reported as 'positive'. Confirmed positive ADA samples were further characterized in the titration assay to quasi-quantitate the amount of ADA in the sample. Additionally, confirmed positive ADA samples were also tested in a validated neutralizing antibody assay to determine the potential neutralizing activity of the ADA.
Time Frame
Up to Week 59

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Key inclusion criteria >=18 years of age Has had RA for >=6 months and was not diagnosed before 16 years of age Has active disease, as defined by having both:* >=6/68 tender/painful joint count (TJC), and >=6/66 swollen joint count (SJC) Has at least 1 bone erosion present on hand/wrist or foot radiographs Has had an inadequate response to MTX, despite currently taking MTX 15-25 mg/week** oral or injected If surgical treatment of a joint has been performed, that joint cannot be counted in the TJC or SJC. A lower dose of 7.5 mg/week is acceptable if reduced for reasons of intolerance to MTX or per local requirement. Key exclusion criteria Has had any active and/or recurrent infections (excluding recurrent fungal infections of the nail bed) or has required management of acute or chronic infections. Has received prior treatment with an antagonist of GM-CSF or its receptor or Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (either experimental or approved) Has received prior treatment with a biologic Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) which has been discontinued due to an inadequate response.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
GSK Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
GlaxoSmithKline
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Anniston
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
36207
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85032
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sun City
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85351
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85704
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Covina
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91722
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92128
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Upland
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91786
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Whittier
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90602
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Brandon
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33511
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Daytona Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32117
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
DeBary
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32713
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Fort Lauderdale
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33309
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hialeah
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33016
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32207
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Miami Lakes
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33014
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33155
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33165
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33173
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33613
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33614
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Newnan
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30265
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60607
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60640
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Wheaton
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20902
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63141
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Lincoln
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68516
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Minot
State/Province
North Dakota
ZIP/Postal Code
58701
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45242
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Dayton
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45417
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73112
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Greenville
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29601
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Baytown
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77521
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
College Station
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77845
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Colleyville
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76034
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77089
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Lubbock
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79410
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
San Marcos
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78666
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
The Woodlands
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77382
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Waco
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76710
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
State/Province
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
C1417
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires
State/Province
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
C1430EGF
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires
State/Province
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
1426
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires
State/Province
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
C1046AAQ
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires
State/Province
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
C1431FWO
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
La Palta
State/Province
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
B1900AXI
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Mar del Plata
State/Province
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
B7600FYK
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
San Isidro
State/Province
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
1643
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
San Nicolas
State/Province
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
B2900DMH
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Córdoba
State/Province
Córdova
ZIP/Postal Code
X5000AVE
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Rosario
State/Province
Santa Fe
ZIP/Postal Code
S2000DSV
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
C1430CKE
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
C1426BOR
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Salta
ZIP/Postal Code
A4400ANW
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
San Juan
ZIP/Postal Code
J5402DIL
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Santiago Del Estero
ZIP/Postal Code
G4200DYB
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Brampton
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L6T 0G1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Trois-Rivieres
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
G8Z 1Y2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bengbu
State/Province
Anhui
ZIP/Postal Code
233004
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Pingxiang
State/Province
Jiangxi
ZIP/Postal Code
337055
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Changchun
State/Province
Jilin
ZIP/Postal Code
130021
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Chengdu
State/Province
Sichuan
ZIP/Postal Code
610041
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Shanghai
ZIP/Postal Code
200052
Country
China
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Brno
ZIP/Postal Code
638 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Brno
ZIP/Postal Code
65691
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ostrava
ZIP/Postal Code
70200
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Praha 10
ZIP/Postal Code
10000
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Praha 2
ZIP/Postal Code
128 50
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Praha 4 Nusle
ZIP/Postal Code
140 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Praha 4
ZIP/Postal Code
140 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Praha 4
ZIP/Postal Code
148 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Praha 5
ZIP/Postal Code
150 06
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Uherske Hradiste
ZIP/Postal Code
686 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Zlin
ZIP/Postal Code
760 01
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Baja
ZIP/Postal Code
6500
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Balatonfured
ZIP/Postal Code
8230
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1023
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1033
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1036
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kistarcsa
ZIP/Postal Code
2143
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Szekesfehervar
ZIP/Postal Code
8000
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Szentes
ZIP/Postal Code
6600
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Székesfehérvár
ZIP/Postal Code
8000
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Veszprem
ZIP/Postal Code
H-8200
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ahmedabad
ZIP/Postal Code
380005
Country
India
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ahmedabad
ZIP/Postal Code
380013
Country
India
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ahmedabad
ZIP/Postal Code
380016
Country
India
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ahmedabad
ZIP/Postal Code
380054
Country
India
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Banglore
ZIP/Postal Code
560070
Country
India
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Belagavi
ZIP/Postal Code
590010
Country
India
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hubli
ZIP/Postal Code
580021
Country
India
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hyderabad
ZIP/Postal Code
500018
Country
India
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Jaipur
ZIP/Postal Code
302001
Country
India
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Jaipur
ZIP/Postal Code
302006
Country
India
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kolkata
ZIP/Postal Code
700020
Country
India
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nagpur
ZIP/Postal Code
440009
Country
India
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nagpur
ZIP/Postal Code
440012
Country
India
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nashik
ZIP/Postal Code
422005
Country
India
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nashik
ZIP/Postal Code
422101
Country
India
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
New Delhi
ZIP/Postal Code
110060
Country
India
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Pimpri-Chinchwad
ZIP/Postal Code
411033
Country
India
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Pune
ZIP/Postal Code
411004
Country
India
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Pune
ZIP/Postal Code
411057
Country
India
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Rajkot
ZIP/Postal Code
360005
Country
India
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Surat
ZIP/Postal Code
395002
Country
India
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Vadodara
ZIP/Postal Code
390001
Country
India
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Verona
State/Province
Veneto
ZIP/Postal Code
37126
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Adazi
ZIP/Postal Code
LV2164
Country
Latvia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Liepaja
ZIP/Postal Code
LV-3401
Country
Latvia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Riga
ZIP/Postal Code
LV 1038
Country
Latvia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kaunas
ZIP/Postal Code
LT-45130
Country
Lithuania
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kaunas
ZIP/Postal Code
LT-50128
Country
Lithuania
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Klaipeda
ZIP/Postal Code
LT-92288
Country
Lithuania
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Siauliai
ZIP/Postal Code
76231
Country
Lithuania
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Vilnius
ZIP/Postal Code
LT-01117
Country
Lithuania
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Klang
ZIP/Postal Code
41200
Country
Malaysia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kuala Lumpur
ZIP/Postal Code
59100
Country
Malaysia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Seremban, Negeri Sembilan
ZIP/Postal Code
70300
Country
Malaysia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sibu
ZIP/Postal Code
96000
Country
Malaysia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Mexicali
State/Province
Baja California Sur
ZIP/Postal Code
21100
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Leon
State/Province
Guanajuato
ZIP/Postal Code
37000
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Guadalajara
State/Province
Jalisco
ZIP/Postal Code
44130
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Morelia
State/Province
Michoacán
ZIP/Postal Code
58000
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Durango
ZIP/Postal Code
34270
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Mexico
ZIP/Postal Code
6700
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bialystok
ZIP/Postal Code
15-351
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bydgoszcz
ZIP/Postal Code
85-168
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Czestochowa
ZIP/Postal Code
42202
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Gdansk
ZIP/Postal Code
80-382
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Gdynia
ZIP/Postal Code
81-338
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Gdynia
ZIP/Postal Code
81-537
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Katowice
ZIP/Postal Code
40-040
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Katowice
ZIP/Postal Code
40-282
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kraków
ZIP/Postal Code
30-363
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Lodz
ZIP/Postal Code
90-127
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Lublin
ZIP/Postal Code
20-362
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Lublin
ZIP/Postal Code
20-582
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nowa Sol
ZIP/Postal Code
67-100
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Olsztyn
ZIP/Postal Code
10-117
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Poznan
ZIP/Postal Code
60-529
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Poznan
ZIP/Postal Code
60-702
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Poznan
ZIP/Postal Code
60-773
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sochaczew
ZIP/Postal Code
96-500
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Staszow
ZIP/Postal Code
28-200
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Torun
ZIP/Postal Code
87-100
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Warsaw
ZIP/Postal Code
02-673
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
00-465
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
00-874
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
01-192
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-118
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Wrocław
ZIP/Postal Code
50-381
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Zamosc
ZIP/Postal Code
22-400
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ekaterinburg
ZIP/Postal Code
620043
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kemerovo
ZIP/Postal Code
650066
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Korolev
ZIP/Postal Code
141060
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Krasnoyarsk
ZIP/Postal Code
660062
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
111539
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
115404
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
115522
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Novosibirsk
ZIP/Postal Code
630091
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Omsk
ZIP/Postal Code
644024
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Saint Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
197022
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Saint-Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
190068
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Saratov
ZIP/Postal Code
410054
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Smolensk
ZIP/Postal Code
214025
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tomsk
ZIP/Postal Code
634050
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tver
ZIP/Postal Code
170036
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ulyanovsk
ZIP/Postal Code
432063
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Yaroslavl
ZIP/Postal Code
150003
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Yaroslavl
ZIP/Postal Code
150007
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Yaroslavl
ZIP/Postal Code
150062
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Belgrade
ZIP/Postal Code
11000
Country
Serbia
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Johannesburg
State/Province
Gauteng
ZIP/Postal Code
2113
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Pretoria
State/Province
Gauteng
ZIP/Postal Code
0122
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Pretoria
State/Province
Gauteng
ZIP/Postal Code
184
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Umhlanga
State/Province
KwaZulu- Natal
ZIP/Postal Code
4319
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bellville
ZIP/Postal Code
7530
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bloemfontein
ZIP/Postal Code
9301
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Cape Town
ZIP/Postal Code
7405
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Johannesburg
ZIP/Postal Code
2193
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kempton Park
ZIP/Postal Code
1619
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Panorama, Cape Town
ZIP/Postal Code
7500
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Pretoria
ZIP/Postal Code
0002
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Somerset West
ZIP/Postal Code
7130
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Stellenbosch
ZIP/Postal Code
7600
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
A Coruña
ZIP/Postal Code
15006
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Cordoba
ZIP/Postal Code
140044
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Santiago de Compostela
ZIP/Postal Code
15706
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Cherkasy
ZIP/Postal Code
18009
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ivano-Frankivsk
ZIP/Postal Code
76018
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kharkiv
ZIP/Postal Code
61039
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kharkiv
ZIP/Postal Code
61124
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kharkiv
ZIP/Postal Code
61176
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kyiv
ZIP/Postal Code
02091
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kyiv
ZIP/Postal Code
03037
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kyiv
ZIP/Postal Code
03680
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kyiv
ZIP/Postal Code
04054
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kyiv
ZIP/Postal Code
1023
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kyiv
ZIP/Postal Code
2002
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kyiv
ZIP/Postal Code
2125
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kyiv
ZIP/Postal Code
3049
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Lutsk
ZIP/Postal Code
43005
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Lutsk
ZIP/Postal Code
43024
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Lviv
ZIP/Postal Code
79049
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Odesa
ZIP/Postal Code
65026
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Odessa
ZIP/Postal Code
65025
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Poltava
ZIP/Postal Code
36011
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Vinnytsia
ZIP/Postal Code
21001
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Vinnytsia
ZIP/Postal Code
21018
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Vinnytsia
ZIP/Postal Code
21029
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Vinnytsia
ZIP/Postal Code
21050
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Vinnytsya
ZIP/Postal Code
21029
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Zaporizhzhia
ZIP/Postal Code
69014
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Zaporizhzia
ZIP/Postal Code
69065
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Zhytomyr
ZIP/Postal Code
10002
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Romford
State/Province
Essex
ZIP/Postal Code
RM1 3PJ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Northwood
State/Province
Middlesex
ZIP/Postal Code
HA6 2RN
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kenilworth
State/Province
Warwickshire
ZIP/Postal Code
CV8 1JD
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD will be made available within 6 months of publishing the results of the primary endpoints, key secondary endpoints and safety data of the study.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Access is provided after a research proposal is submitted and has received approval from the Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension can be granted, when justified, for up to another 12 months.
IPD Sharing URL
http://clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Links:
URL
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04333147?term=209564&draw=2&rank=1
Description
209564 contRAst X NCT04333147

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy and Safety of GSK3196165 Versus Placebo and Tofacitinib in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs