search
Back to results

Improving Self-care of Heart Failure Caregivers

Primary Purpose

Heart Failure

Status
Active
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
ViCCY
Sponsored by
University of Pennsylvania
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Heart Failure focused on measuring Self-care, Self-efficacy, Heart Failure, Stress, Support Systems

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Informal caregiver of adults with heart failure providing care at least 8 hours/week, reporting poor self-care on screening (Health Self-Care Neglect scale score >=2 based on our pilot data), able to complete the protocol, e.g., adequate vision and hearing, English speaking, and living within 50 miles of the research office in case home visits are required for enrollment or Internet set-up.

Exclusion Criteria: Cognitive impairment (Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status [TICS] <25), Participation in another clinical trial of a support intervention, Untreated major psychiatric illness (Use of anti-anxiety/antidepressant medicines is acceptable and will be adjusted in analysis if group inbalance is identified), and plans to move out of the area imminently.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Pennsylvania Hospital Heart and Vascular Clinic

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Intervention

Health Information

Arm Description

Caregivers randomized to the intervention ViCCY will receive 10 front-loaded sessions of virtual health coaching by trained registered nurses over 6 months with content based on the theoretical framework (based on the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping) and prior research. Sessions are provided using tablets. Initially, sessions are weekly but the frequency decreases over time as needed. We help caregivers gain the knowledge and skills needed to achieve self-identified health goals through self-care using motivational interviewing. We focus on identifying personal values, solving problems, and transforming goals into action. ViCCY is standardized in a treatment manual. Because stress does not affect all people equally, the intervention is tailored to individual appraisals and the factors most likely to influence demand and perceived burden.

The Health Information (HI) group will receive health resource information delivered through the internet.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in the Health Self-Care Neglect Scale
Self-care refers to those behaviors undertaken to maintain health. The scale is a 9- item dichotomous scale with demonstrated reliability (alpha 0.76) and content validity. Scores range from 0-9 with higher scores indicating more self-care neglect.
Change in the Self-Care Inventory
30 items scored 0-100. A higher score indicates better self-care. This theoretically-derived instrument has construct validity. The self-care confidence scale is embedded within this instrument.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in the Perceived Stress Scale
The Perceived Stress Scale, a 14-item instrument that provides a global rating of an individual's belief in the severity and frequency of stressful experiences during the last month. The Perceived Stress Scale includes 14 items designed to assess symptoms of stress and global measures of the degree of stress experienced in the past month. Each item is scored from 0 (never) to 4 (very often), with total sum scores ranging from 0 to 56; higher scores indicate higher perceived stress. Cronbachs alpha of the scale ranges from 0.84 to 0.86, and was 0.91 for older African American and European American females.
Change in the Ways of Coping questionnaire
This 42-item questionnaire measures the use of five different coping styles: avoidance, problem-focused, seeking social support, self-blame, and wishful thinking. The original scale has been used widely since developed by Lazarus in 1985. The short version (30 items) uses a 4-point Likert-scale response format (0 = not used to 3 = used a great deal). Scores range from 0-90 with higher scores indicating greater coping. It is reliable (alpha 0.95) and has construct validity. This instrument has been used numerous times in studies with older adult caregivers.
Change in Health Status (physical and mental health status)
Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36): measure of physical and mental health.The SF-36 has 36 items formatted in scales of varied format (3-, 5- and 6-pt scales and dichotomous [yes/no] scales). Each component score is standardized a 0-100 point scale. Reliability is varied samples is typically 0.80. Convergent and divergent validity have been demonstrated in various populations, including caregivers. A benefit of using the SF-36 is that it is one of the common data elements.
Change in the Medical Outcomes Study short form 6-dimension (SF-6D)
derived from the SF-36 and used in the cost-effectiveness analysis
Difference in hospital and provider events
measure of acute care resource use

Full Information

First Posted
May 22, 2019
Last Updated
June 20, 2023
Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03988621
Brief Title
Improving Self-care of Heart Failure Caregivers
Official Title
Improving Self-Care of Informal Caregivers of Adults With Heart Failure
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
August 23, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 19, 2023 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 31, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Informal caregiving is demanding and stressful. Caregivers of adults with heart failure (HF) report significant stress and poor self-care. Health coaching, a support intervention, may relieve stress and promote self-care in HF caregivers. Few studies have tested the cost-effectiveness of support interventions for caregivers. Even less is known about the effect of caregiver support interventions on HF outcomes. We have developed and pilot tested a virtual support intervention (ViCCY ("Vicky")-Virtual Caregiver Coach for you), that we propose to evaluate among HF caregivers. Using randomized controlled trial (RCT) design, we will enroll informal HF caregivers with poor self-care (Health Self-Care Neglect scale score>=2), randomizing them 1:1 to an intervention or control group. Both groups will receive standard care augmented with Health Information (HI) delivered through the Internet, but the ViCCY caregiver group will also receive 10 front-loaded coaching support sessions tailored to individual issues. The control group will have access to the same HI resources over the same interval, using the same Internet program, but without coaching support. At baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, we will collect self-reported data on self-care, stress, coping, and health status. At 6 months, we will compare ViCCY to HI alone to assess intervention efficacy using intent-to-treat analysis. Our pilot data suggest that addition of support provided by the health coach will make ViCCY more efficacious than HI alone. A sample of 250 caregivers (125/arm) will provide >90% power to detect significant differences between the groups on the primary outcome of self-care (Aim 1). We will collect quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and health care resource use in caregivers over 12 months to assess cost-effectiveness of ViCCY (Aim 2). To explore the effect of caregiver outcomes on HF patients' outcomes (hospitalization rates, hospital days, mortality rates, QALYs) over a 12-month period (Aim 3) and knowing that not all HF patients will participate, we will consent a subgroup of the HF patients cared for by these caregivers (at least 40 dyads). If shown to be efficacious and cost-effective, our virtual health coaching intervention can easily scaled to support millions of caregivers worldwide. This application addresses the NINR strategic plan and is directly responsive to PA-18-150.
Detailed Description
We will use a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design, randomizing informal heart failure (HF) caregivers meeting our inclusion and exclusion criteria 1:1 to an intervention or control group. After collecting baseline data, we will block randomize the caregivers to achieve equal distribution of key variables in each condition. We will block randomize on caregiver sex (male/female) and relationship to patient (e.g., spouse) - factors shown to influence perceived caregiving burden and receptivity to intervention. The randomization sequence will be generated a priori by a statistician independent of the study investigators using a randomly permuted blocks algorithm to ensure equal distribution of these variables in each study arm. The Project Manager will notify the study staff and participants of their group assignment (intervention or control) by telephone, email or message, as preferred by the individual. Although balance in sample size can be achieved with block randomization, the groups may not be fully comparable on other factors. Initial comparison of the groups will allow us to control for important covariates in the analyses. Investigators and all staff involved in collecting assessment data will be blinded to group assignment until after the data are locked. The nurse providing the intervention and the caregiver participants will not be blinded. All baseline data will be collected prior to randomizing. Timing of follow-up assessments will be based on day of randomization. The study intervention will be provided to individual caregivers. All caregivers (both groups) will be provided with access to an Internet site with excellent health information (HI). In addition, we have developed and pilot tested a virtual support intervention (ViCCY ["Vicky"] - Virtual Caregiver Coach for You), that we will provide on tablet devices to caregivers in the intervention group. We will provide tablets to all the caregivers, assuring that they have wireless network access so they can access the Internet site providing HI content. Caregivers in the control group will receive only HI but caregivers in the intervention group will receive 10 front-loaded sessions of ViCCY over 6 months.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Heart Failure
Keywords
Self-care, Self-efficacy, Heart Failure, Stress, Support Systems

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
The proposed study is based on the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping. Stressful experiences such as caregiving demand - circumstances that give rise to real or perceived stress - are construed as person-environment transactions. Primary appraisal of demand involves assessment of its significance, which results in perceived burden. Secondary appraisal involves assessment of the resources available to cope with it. These appraisals lead to the coping effort. Without successful coping, self-care is poor, which decreases health status in caregivers. The virtual support intervention [ViCCY ("Vicky") - Virtual Caregiver Coach for You] addresses both appraisal and coping.
Masking
Investigator
Masking Description
The investigator will be blinded to the assignment of participant to the two different arms in the study.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
342 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Caregivers randomized to the intervention ViCCY will receive 10 front-loaded sessions of virtual health coaching by trained registered nurses over 6 months with content based on the theoretical framework (based on the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping) and prior research. Sessions are provided using tablets. Initially, sessions are weekly but the frequency decreases over time as needed. We help caregivers gain the knowledge and skills needed to achieve self-identified health goals through self-care using motivational interviewing. We focus on identifying personal values, solving problems, and transforming goals into action. ViCCY is standardized in a treatment manual. Because stress does not affect all people equally, the intervention is tailored to individual appraisals and the factors most likely to influence demand and perceived burden.
Arm Title
Health Information
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
The Health Information (HI) group will receive health resource information delivered through the internet.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
ViCCY
Intervention Description
Virtual Health Coaching for You
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in the Health Self-Care Neglect Scale
Description
Self-care refers to those behaviors undertaken to maintain health. The scale is a 9- item dichotomous scale with demonstrated reliability (alpha 0.76) and content validity. Scores range from 0-9 with higher scores indicating more self-care neglect.
Time Frame
The primary outcome will be analyzed at 6 months (baseline compared to 6 months)
Title
Change in the Self-Care Inventory
Description
30 items scored 0-100. A higher score indicates better self-care. This theoretically-derived instrument has construct validity. The self-care confidence scale is embedded within this instrument.
Time Frame
The primary outcome will be analyzed at 6 months (baseline compared to 6 months)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in the Perceived Stress Scale
Description
The Perceived Stress Scale, a 14-item instrument that provides a global rating of an individual's belief in the severity and frequency of stressful experiences during the last month. The Perceived Stress Scale includes 14 items designed to assess symptoms of stress and global measures of the degree of stress experienced in the past month. Each item is scored from 0 (never) to 4 (very often), with total sum scores ranging from 0 to 56; higher scores indicate higher perceived stress. Cronbachs alpha of the scale ranges from 0.84 to 0.86, and was 0.91 for older African American and European American females.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Title
Change in the Ways of Coping questionnaire
Description
This 42-item questionnaire measures the use of five different coping styles: avoidance, problem-focused, seeking social support, self-blame, and wishful thinking. The original scale has been used widely since developed by Lazarus in 1985. The short version (30 items) uses a 4-point Likert-scale response format (0 = not used to 3 = used a great deal). Scores range from 0-90 with higher scores indicating greater coping. It is reliable (alpha 0.95) and has construct validity. This instrument has been used numerous times in studies with older adult caregivers.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Title
Change in Health Status (physical and mental health status)
Description
Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36): measure of physical and mental health.The SF-36 has 36 items formatted in scales of varied format (3-, 5- and 6-pt scales and dichotomous [yes/no] scales). Each component score is standardized a 0-100 point scale. Reliability is varied samples is typically 0.80. Convergent and divergent validity have been demonstrated in various populations, including caregivers. A benefit of using the SF-36 is that it is one of the common data elements.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Title
Change in the Medical Outcomes Study short form 6-dimension (SF-6D)
Description
derived from the SF-36 and used in the cost-effectiveness analysis
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
Title
Difference in hospital and provider events
Description
measure of acute care resource use
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Informal caregiver of adults with heart failure providing care at least 8 hours/week, reporting poor self-care on screening (Health Self-Care Neglect scale score >=2 based on our pilot data), able to complete the protocol, e.g., adequate vision and hearing, English speaking, and living within 50 miles of the research office in case home visits are required for enrollment or Internet set-up. Exclusion Criteria: Cognitive impairment (Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status [TICS] <25), Participation in another clinical trial of a support intervention, Untreated major psychiatric illness (Use of anti-anxiety/antidepressant medicines is acceptable and will be adjusted in analysis if group inbalance is identified), and plans to move out of the area imminently.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvania Hospital Heart and Vascular Clinic
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Plan to share the data internally with doctoral students and post-doctoral trainees instead of sharing the data widely with external sources. Internal sharing will allow our trainees to complete meaningful studies using secondary analysis techniques and to finish their programs in a timely fashion.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Starting 6 months after publication of our major trial data, we will share data with Penn trainees.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
The Principal Investigator will personally review requests from students for use of the data. She will approve requests based on the importance of the questions asked. She will personally oversee progress in analysis and the publication of abstracts and articles based on the data.

Learn more about this trial

Improving Self-care of Heart Failure Caregivers

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs