search
Back to results

Enhancing the Clinical Effectiveness of Depression Screening Using Patient-targeted Feedback in General Practices

Primary Purpose

Depression

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Patient-targeted feedback
GP-targeted feedback
Sponsored by
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional screening trial for Depression focused on measuring Depression, Screening, Primary Care, General Practice, Feedback

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Gender: male, female, diverse
  • Maximum Age: no maximum age
  • Attendance in primary care with medical consultation
  • Age ≥ 18 years;
  • Sufficient language skills;
  • Informed consent
  • Patient Health Questionnaire-9 > 9 points

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Life threatening health status;
  • Severe somatic or/and psychological disorder that needs urgent treatment;
  • Known diagnosis of a depressive disorder
  • Current depression treatment
  • Acute suicidal tendency;
  • Severe cognitive or/and visual difficulties;
  • Not being able to fill out questionnaires
  • No contact details

Sites / Locations

  • University Medical Center Heidelberg
  • University Medical Center Tuebingen
  • Technical University of Munich - Medical Faculty
  • University Medical Center Jena
  • University Medical Center Hamburg

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

No Intervention

Arm Label

PATIENT-GP-FEEDBACK

GP-FEEDBACK

NO-FEEDBACK

Arm Description

Using a randomized-controlled study design one third of the patients and their attending general practitioner will receive feedback after depression screening. The feedback for the patient contains the screening result, information about depression in general, guideline based treatment recommendations for patients and contact-information for treatment. The feedback for the general practitioner contains the screening result and guideline-based recommendations, i.e. to inform patients of their depression screening result. Nevertheless, in order to reflect routine clinical practice, the physicians will decide themselves whether or not to address depression during their consultation with the patient.

Using a randomized-controlled study design in one third of the cases only the attending general practitioner will receive feedback after depression screening. The feedback for the general practitioner contains the screening result and guideline-based recommendations, i.e. to inform patients of their depression screening result. Nevertheless, in order to reflect routine clinical practice, the physicians will decide themselves whether or not to address depression during their consultation with the patient.

Using a randomized-controlled study design one third of the patients and their attending general practitioner will not receive any feedback.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Depression severity (Questionnaire: Patient Health Questionnaire-9)
Level of depression severity six months after screening (Patient Health Questionnaire-9)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Depression severity (Questionnaire: Patient Health Questionnaire-9)
Level of depression severity one and twelve months after screening (Questionnaire: Patient Health Questionnaire-9)
Depression treatment
Proportion of patients treated according to German Guideline based recommendations
Health economic Evaluation (Questionnaire: Client Sociodemographic and Service Receipt Inventory)
Direct and indirect health costs (Client Sociodemographic and Service Receipt Inventory)
Quality-adjusted life years (Questionnaire: EuroQol-5D)
Quality-adjusted years of life and quality of life (EuroQol-5D)
Anxiety (Questionnaire: Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7)
Level of anxiety severity one, six and twelve months after screening
Somatic symptom severity (Questionnaire: Somatic Symptom Scale-8)
Level of somatic symptom severity one, six and twelve months after screening

Full Information

First Posted
June 4, 2019
Last Updated
July 1, 2023
Sponsor
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Collaborators
Federal Joint Committee
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03988985
Brief Title
Enhancing the Clinical Effectiveness of Depression Screening Using Patient-targeted Feedback in General Practices
Official Title
Enhancing the Clinical Effectiveness of Depression Screening Using Patient-targeted Feedback in General Practices: The GET.FEEDBACK.GP Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 17, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 1, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 1, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Collaborators
Federal Joint Committee

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The multi-center GET.FEEDBACK.GP randomized controlled trial is designed based on patients' needs and preferences. In order to evaluate the effect of feedback in the broader setting of primary care, a total of 1076 primary care patients with elevated levels of depression (PHQ-9 score ≥ 10) will be randomized into three groups who either receive a) patient-targeted and physician-targeted feedback of depression screening results, b) a physician-targeted feedback of depression screening results only, or c) no feedback of screening results. The primary study outcome is depression severity after 6 months, secondary outcomes include the patients' behavior and cognitions after the screening, depression care according to German guideline recommendations and the health economic evaluation.
Detailed Description
Major depression is one of the most significant clinical disorders. In primary care, every sixth patient suffers from increased depression level, which is associated with higher risk of suicide, increased risk of onset and progression of chronic physical conditions. Still, depression is under recognized and undertreated in primary care. Moreover, evidence regarding the efficacy of depression screening in primary care is insufficient to draw clear conclusions. Our previous mono-center depression screening trial in cardiac patients, provides first evidence that written patient-targeted feedback improves depression severity, encourages greater patient participation and engagement in mental health. To amplify these effects, the multi-center GET.FEEDBACK.GP randomized controlled trial is now designed based on patients' needs and preferences. In order to evaluate the effect of feedback in the broader setting of primary care, a total of 1076 primary care patients with elevated levels of depression (PHQ-9 score ≥ 10) will be randomized into three groups who either receive a) patient-targeted and physician-targeted feedback of depression screening results, b) a physician-targeted feedback of depression screening results only, or c) no feedback of screening results. The primary study outcome is depression severity after 6 months, secondary outcomes include the patients' behavior and cognitions after the screening, depression care according to German guideline recommendations and the health economic evaluation.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Depression
Keywords
Depression, Screening, Primary Care, General Practice, Feedback

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Screening
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Factorial Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1030 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
PATIENT-GP-FEEDBACK
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Using a randomized-controlled study design one third of the patients and their attending general practitioner will receive feedback after depression screening. The feedback for the patient contains the screening result, information about depression in general, guideline based treatment recommendations for patients and contact-information for treatment. The feedback for the general practitioner contains the screening result and guideline-based recommendations, i.e. to inform patients of their depression screening result. Nevertheless, in order to reflect routine clinical practice, the physicians will decide themselves whether or not to address depression during their consultation with the patient.
Arm Title
GP-FEEDBACK
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Using a randomized-controlled study design in one third of the cases only the attending general practitioner will receive feedback after depression screening. The feedback for the general practitioner contains the screening result and guideline-based recommendations, i.e. to inform patients of their depression screening result. Nevertheless, in order to reflect routine clinical practice, the physicians will decide themselves whether or not to address depression during their consultation with the patient.
Arm Title
NO-FEEDBACK
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Using a randomized-controlled study design one third of the patients and their attending general practitioner will not receive any feedback.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Patient-targeted feedback
Intervention Description
The feedback for the patient contains the screening result, information about depression in general, guideline based treatment recommendations for patients and contact-information for treatment.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
GP-targeted feedback
Intervention Description
The feedback for the general practitioner contains the screening result and guideline-based recommendations, i.e. to inform patients of their depression screening result. Nevertheless, in order to reflect routine clinical practice, the physicians will decide themselves whether or not to address depression during their consultation with the patient.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Depression severity (Questionnaire: Patient Health Questionnaire-9)
Description
Level of depression severity six months after screening (Patient Health Questionnaire-9)
Time Frame
Six months after screening
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Depression severity (Questionnaire: Patient Health Questionnaire-9)
Description
Level of depression severity one and twelve months after screening (Questionnaire: Patient Health Questionnaire-9)
Time Frame
One and twelve months after screening
Title
Depression treatment
Description
Proportion of patients treated according to German Guideline based recommendations
Time Frame
Six and twelve months after screening
Title
Health economic Evaluation (Questionnaire: Client Sociodemographic and Service Receipt Inventory)
Description
Direct and indirect health costs (Client Sociodemographic and Service Receipt Inventory)
Time Frame
Six and twelve months after screening
Title
Quality-adjusted life years (Questionnaire: EuroQol-5D)
Description
Quality-adjusted years of life and quality of life (EuroQol-5D)
Time Frame
Six and twelve months after screening
Title
Anxiety (Questionnaire: Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7)
Description
Level of anxiety severity one, six and twelve months after screening
Time Frame
One, six and twelve months after screening
Title
Somatic symptom severity (Questionnaire: Somatic Symptom Scale-8)
Description
Level of somatic symptom severity one, six and twelve months after screening
Time Frame
One, six and twelve months after screening

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Gender: male, female, diverse Maximum Age: no maximum age Attendance in primary care with medical consultation Age ≥ 18 years; Sufficient language skills; Informed consent Patient Health Questionnaire-9 > 9 points Exclusion Criteria: Life threatening health status; Severe somatic or/and psychological disorder that needs urgent treatment; Known diagnosis of a depressive disorder Current depression treatment Acute suicidal tendency; Severe cognitive or/and visual difficulties; Not being able to fill out questionnaires No contact details
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bernd Löwe, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Director of the Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Medical Center Heidelberg
City
Heidelberg
State/Province
Baden-Würtenberg
ZIP/Postal Code
69120
Country
Germany
Facility Name
University Medical Center Tuebingen
City
Tuebingen
State/Province
Baden-Würtenberg
ZIP/Postal Code
72076
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Technical University of Munich - Medical Faculty
City
Munich
State/Province
Bavaria
ZIP/Postal Code
80333
Country
Germany
Facility Name
University Medical Center Jena
City
Jena
State/Province
Thueringen
ZIP/Postal Code
07743
Country
Germany
Facility Name
University Medical Center Hamburg
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
20246
Country
Germany

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
In accordance with the ethics approval of the Ethics Committee of the Hamburg Medical Association on April 8, 2019, (approval number PV6031) and the German Research Foundation guidelines for the handling of research data, deidentified data will be made available on request.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data will become available six months after publication of the main findings. Data will be available for ten years after publication of the main findings.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Data can be requested by the principal investigators. Data use and request underly the publication policy of the multicentre GET.FEEBDACK.GP RCT.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32958483
Citation
Kohlmann S, Lehmann M, Eisele M, Braunschneider LE, Marx G, Zapf A, Wegscheider K, Harter M, Konig HH, Gallinat J, Joos S, Resmark G, Schneider A, Allwang C, Szecsenyi J, Nikendei C, Schulz S, Brenk-Franz K, Scherer M, Lowe B. Depression screening using patient-targeted feedback in general practices: study protocol of the German multicentre GET.FEEDBACK.GP randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 21;10(9):e035973. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035973.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Enhancing the Clinical Effectiveness of Depression Screening Using Patient-targeted Feedback in General Practices

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs