search
Back to results

Implementation of Telerehabilitation as Modality of Patient Follow-up on the Waiting List of a Clinic

Primary Purpose

Rehabilitation, Orthopedic Disorder

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Phone call follow-up
Telerehabilitation follow-up
Sponsored by
Université de Sherbrooke
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Rehabilitation focused on measuring Rehabilitation, Telerehabilitation, Waiting list, follow-up

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • To present a non-urgent condition (status determined during the initial evaluation at the clinic)
  • To be apt to understand simple statement
  • To have access to internet at and possess an electronic tablet or a computer at

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Do not understand French or English

Sites / Locations

  • Research Center on Aging
  • Research Centre on Aging

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Other

Experimental

Arm Label

Phone follow-up

Telerehabilitation follow-up

Arm Description

Phone follow-up initiated by the health care professional one month after the initial evaluation at the external rehabilitation clinic.

Telerehabilitation follow-up initiated by the health care professional one month after the initial evaluation at the external rehabilitation clinic.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in pain through time
0-10 pain scale (0= no pain, 10 = worst pain)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in quality of life through time
Evaluate quality of life related to physical and mental state (Questionnaire SF-6Dv2 (Health Utility Survey)). This questionnaire provide a multidimensional generic measure of health-related quality of life. In its current form, this questionnaire includes six questions on different aspects of physical and mental health. The score will be converted to QALY (quality-adjusted life year).The cost-utility analysis (CUA) is an increasingly used method to help health decision-maker. The CUA uses the Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) that combines the length of life with the health related quality of life (HRQoL) into a single score.
Direct and indirect costs related to intervention
Indirect and direct costs related to intervention. Direct costs are the costs that are essentials for clinical follow-up and refer to the physiotherapists salary and the acquisition of technological equipment (tablet or computer) used by the patient. Indirect costs are needed to optimize the performance of clinical follow-up and take into account the patient's expenses and / or any other necessary expenses related to his/her participation in the RT program. A home-made questionnaire will be administered to collect information about costs.
Satisfaction with service received
Questionnaire about satisfaction of health care received. The satisfaction construct is determined by three distinct factors which include satisfaction with: 1) the therapist relationship, 2) the services provided, and 3) the organization of services. This tool includes 26 questions, scored on a four-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated based on average satisfaction for the three factors, with higher scores indicating higher levels of satisfaction (on a 0-100 scale)

Full Information

First Posted
May 2, 2019
Last Updated
September 27, 2021
Sponsor
Université de Sherbrooke
Collaborators
Ministère de l'Économie, de la Science et de l'Innovation
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03991858
Brief Title
Implementation of Telerehabilitation as Modality of Patient Follow-up on the Waiting List of a Clinic
Official Title
Implementation of Telerehabilitation as an Innovative Modality of Patient Follow-up on the Waiting List of the External Rehabilitation Clinic of the CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 13, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 2, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 22, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Université de Sherbrooke
Collaborators
Ministère de l'Économie, de la Science et de l'Innovation

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study responds to the need to validate the feasibility and effectiveness of a telerehabilitation home monitoring program for users receiving a preliminary assessment while waiting for rehabilitation services at the outpatient physiotherapy clinic. The specific objectives are as followed: 1) Evaluate the implementation of telerehabilitation monitoring (TELE-FOLLOW-UP); 2) Evaluate the effectiveness of TELE-FOLLOW-UP compared to the usual phone call; 3) Evaluate user satisfaction for these two modes of service delivery; 4) Identify facilitators and barriers to the implementation of TELE-FOLLOW-UP. In order to meet the objectives of the study, mixed methods will be used. A randomized clinical trial will be used to achieve objectives 1, 2 and 3. The investigators plan to recruit 142 patients. Two groups will be formed: 1) TELE-FOLLOW-UP group: users who will receive follow-up by telerehabilitation; 2) PHONE-FOLLOW-UP group: those who will receive follow-up by a phone call.
Detailed Description
Rational : The rehabilitation service offered at the Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie - Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CIUSSS de l'Estrie - CHUS) for non-hospitalized patients is performed in outpatient clinics. However, the demand for this service far exceeds the supply, so the take-up time is very long. Recognizing the threatened short-term accessibility, this outpatient clinic has put in place an initial assessment for any service request. The goal is to conduct a preliminary assessment of the condition of the user to teach an exercise and education program. In addition, sporadic monitoring is recommended to promote the effectiveness of the intervention. To date, the follow-up of this preliminary assessment is done by a phone call from the professional to the patient one month later. However, it is noted that this type of monitoring is not optimal for various reasons, in particular because of the absence of visual contact with the user to allow appropriate feedback from the professional on the exercise execution. In this context, the possibility of having a follow-up by a physiotherapist using telerehabilitation, an application of information technologies allowing a synchronous auditory and visual link, would be an innovative way of increasing the effectiveness of the intervention. This study therefore responds to the need to validate the feasibility and effectiveness of a telerehabilitation home monitoring program for users receiving a preliminary assessment while waiting for physiotherapist at the outpatient physiotherapy clinic. The results of this study will be relevant to clinicians and managers and will undeniably influence the provision of rehabilitation services. Objectives: The specific objectives are as followed: 1) Evaluate the implementation of telerehabilitation monitoring (TELE-FOLLOW-UP); 2) Evaluate the effectiveness of TELE-FOLLOW-UP compared to the usual phone call; 3) Evaluate user satisfaction for these two modes of service delivery; 4) Identify facilitators and barriers to the implementation of TELE-FOLLOW-UP. Methodology : In order to meet the objectives of the study, mixed methods will be used. A randomized clinical trial will be used to achieve objectives 1, 2 and 3. The investigators plan to recruit 142 patients. Two groups will be formed: 1) TELE-FOLLOW-UP group: users who will receive follow-up by telerehabilitation; 2) PHONE-FOLLOW-UP group: those who will receive follow-up by a phone call. In order to complete Objective 4, a qualitative exploratory and descriptive study will be conducted using individual interviews (clinicians and health care managers) and focus groups (participants). The successful implementation of this project will bring a unique experience in Quebec of implementing telerehabilitation in a health care facility. The CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS could become a leader in sharing its experience for large-scale implementation in Quebec. The application in orthopedic outpatient clinics may be generalized to other clientele by increasing accessibility to rehabilitation services for clients where accessibility is an issue

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rehabilitation, Orthopedic Disorder
Keywords
Rehabilitation, Telerehabilitation, Waiting list, follow-up

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
142 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Phone follow-up
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Phone follow-up initiated by the health care professional one month after the initial evaluation at the external rehabilitation clinic.
Arm Title
Telerehabilitation follow-up
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Telerehabilitation follow-up initiated by the health care professional one month after the initial evaluation at the external rehabilitation clinic.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Phone call follow-up
Intervention Description
A physical therapist made a phone call to the patient one month after his/her initial evaluation at the external rehabilitation clinic
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Telerehabilitation follow-up
Intervention Description
A physical therapist made a direct follow-up through telerehabilitation to the patient one month after his/her initial evaluation at the external rehabilitation clinic
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in pain through time
Description
0-10 pain scale (0= no pain, 10 = worst pain)
Time Frame
Day 0, 1 month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in quality of life through time
Description
Evaluate quality of life related to physical and mental state (Questionnaire SF-6Dv2 (Health Utility Survey)). This questionnaire provide a multidimensional generic measure of health-related quality of life. In its current form, this questionnaire includes six questions on different aspects of physical and mental health. The score will be converted to QALY (quality-adjusted life year).The cost-utility analysis (CUA) is an increasingly used method to help health decision-maker. The CUA uses the Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) that combines the length of life with the health related quality of life (HRQoL) into a single score.
Time Frame
Day 0, 12 months
Title
Direct and indirect costs related to intervention
Description
Indirect and direct costs related to intervention. Direct costs are the costs that are essentials for clinical follow-up and refer to the physiotherapists salary and the acquisition of technological equipment (tablet or computer) used by the patient. Indirect costs are needed to optimize the performance of clinical follow-up and take into account the patient's expenses and / or any other necessary expenses related to his/her participation in the RT program. A home-made questionnaire will be administered to collect information about costs.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Satisfaction with service received
Description
Questionnaire about satisfaction of health care received. The satisfaction construct is determined by three distinct factors which include satisfaction with: 1) the therapist relationship, 2) the services provided, and 3) the organization of services. This tool includes 26 questions, scored on a four-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated based on average satisfaction for the three factors, with higher scores indicating higher levels of satisfaction (on a 0-100 scale)
Time Frame
1 month

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: To present a non-urgent condition (status determined during the initial evaluation at the clinic) To be apt to understand simple statement To have access to internet at and possess an electronic tablet or a computer at Exclusion Criteria: Do not understand French or English
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michel Tousignant
Organizational Affiliation
Université de Sherbrooke
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Research Center on Aging
City
Sherbrooke
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
J1H 4C4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Research Centre on Aging
City
Sherbrooke
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35142425
Citation
Renard M, Gaboury I, Michaud F, Tousignant M. The acceptability of two remote monitoring modalities for patients waiting for services in a physiotherapy outpatient clinic. Musculoskeletal Care. 2022 Sep;20(3):616-624. doi: 10.1002/msc.1622. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Implementation of Telerehabilitation as Modality of Patient Follow-up on the Waiting List of a Clinic

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs