Efficacy of Psychological Therapy in Chronic Pain and Fibromyalgia (DOLORTRATPSI)
Primary Purpose
Fibromyalgia, Chronic Pain
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
control group: usual medical care
MBPM- Mindfulness-Based Pain Management
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Fibromyalgia focused on measuring Fibromyalgia, Chronic Pain, Psychological Treatment, Effectiveness, MBPM
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Be able to complete the assessment protocol
- Suffer from chronic non-oncological pain, lasting longer than 6 months
- Not being receiving psychological treatment
- Sign the informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Present a cognitive impairment, such as a dementia
- Present a diagnosis of a psychotic disease, bipolar disease or additive disease
Sites / Locations
- University of Basque Country
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Other
Experimental
Arm Label
control group
MBPM- Minfulness- Based Pain Management
Arm Description
The patients received usual medical care.
Psychological intervention with 8 group sessions ( 8 -10 subjects) with a duration of 2 and a half hours per session and a weekly periodicity (total hours 1080). It is centered on training on the awareness of physical, cognitive and emotional sensations, and the attentional processes to become an observer of one's own thoughts and emotions. With the aim to provide greater flexibility to manage pain
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change in Lattinen Index- IL
It is a scale with five items to assess variables associated with pain: frequency, intensity, disability, drugs usage and sleep problems. These are assessed by a Likert scale of 0 to 4, in order to explain the discomfort that pain generates. (Gonzalez-Escada, 2012)
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change in the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire- FIQ
its a 10 item scale that assesses the impact of the disease. The first item evaluates the interference of the disease in skills such as home care and work. The second item assesses how they felt last week; the third item values the days of last week that the disease prevented him from performing his usual tasks. Finally, the fourth item assesses the interference caused by pain and other items of the disease.
It will only be completed by patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia. (Esteve et al., 2007)
Change in the Listado de Sintomas Breve- LSB-50
it is composed of 50 items, which are rated on a Likert scale from 0 to 4, depending on the level of discomfort caused by each item to the subject. it includes two scales of validity, three general indices, clinical scales (psychoreactivity, hypersensitivity, obsession, anxiety, hostility, somatization, depression, and sleep disturbances) and a psychological risk index. (de Rivera & Abuin, 2012)
Change in the Short Form 12 Health Survey- SF-12
It assesses a patient's health perception in 12 areas like physical function, physical role, body pain, general health, vitality, social function, emotional role, and mental health.
It is completed with Likert type response options from 3 to 5 points.(Schmidt et al., 2012)
Change in Cuestionario de afrontamiento del dolor- CAD-R
It consists of 31 items related to the strategies that the patient performs when suffer pain. The strategies are valued from 1 (never use) to 5 (always use). The items are grouped into the following factors: religion, catharsis, distraction, information search, self-control, and self-affirmation. (Soriano & Monsaslve, 2002)
Change in Connor-Davison Resilience Scale- CDRISC
The CD-RISC scale assesses resilience. Consist in 25 items and the subject has to indicate what extent each of the statements has been true, in his case, during the last month on a scale ranging from 0 (not true at all) to 4 (almost always true). Fernández-Lansac & Soberón, 2014)
Change in Inventaire of negative thoughts in response to pain- INTRP
This questionnaire assesses the presence of negative thinking in response to pain. It consists of 21 items distributed in 5 factors: general negative thoughts, negative social thoughts, thoughts of disability, thoughts of lack of control, and thoughts of self-blame (Cano & Rodriguez, 2002)
Change Pain Catastrophizing Scale- PCS
The scale evaluates through 13 items the thoughts and feelings related to the experiences of pain. It is divided into three subscales, scored from 0 (never) to 4 (always), rumination, desperation, and magnification (Lami et al., 2013)
Change in Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire- CPAQ
The scale evaluates strategies of the pain experience. It consists of 20 items, scored from 0 (never true) to 6 (always true), from which three scores are obtained: involvement in activities, openness to pain, and total punctuation.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03992612
First Posted
June 14, 2019
Last Updated
March 1, 2022
Sponsor
University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03992612
Brief Title
Efficacy of Psychological Therapy in Chronic Pain and Fibromyalgia
Acronym
DOLORTRATPSI
Official Title
Efficacy of Mindfulness-based Pain Management in Patients With Chronic Pain With and Without Fibromyalgia
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 30, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2021 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Today, one of the most important challenges of the health system is the attitude towards chronic disorders. That implies changing from a health structure established for the treatment of acute diseases to a continued care system.
In this sense, the approach of chronic pain, of non-oncological origin, supposes an important care challenge, to which this project wishes to respond.
Chronic pain affects one of every Europeans (19%), and has a prevalence of 11% in Spain, being one of the most important causes of medical consultation and is associated with high personal, social and economic costs. For example, in 2017 it was calculated that it has an economic impact of between 1.7 and 2.1% of Spain's GDP.
Referred to the psychological consequences of the disease, it has been found that 42% of people who have chronic pain suffer insomnia, a 40% anxiety, and 24% depressive symptoms. Hence the importance of implementing evidence-based psychological treatments along with their treatment as usual The main objective is comparing the efficacy of mindfulness-based pain management (MBPM), together with the usual medical treatment, in patients diagnosed with chronic pain, with and without comorbid fibromyalgia.
Specific objectives are:
To study the sociodemographic and clinical profile of patients with chronic pain, with and without fibromyalgia.
Define the characteristics of patients who are in the different stages of the disease: stage 1 (less than two years since diagnosis); stage 2 (between 2 and 4 years); stage 3 (between 5 and 8 years), and stage 4 (more than 8 years).
Check the effectiveness of psychological therapies MBPM depending on the presence of fibromyalgia.
Check the effectiveness of the psychological treatment in function of the stage of the disease.
Method:
A quasi-experimental design of two groups will be used. Patients will be assigned to experimental group: 50 subjects will receive MBPM and control group 40 subjects, 3-months wait list, after which time they will also receive MBPM.
All the participants will be assessed in the baseline; at the end of the treatment; and in the 1, 3, 6 and 12 months follow-ups. Group 2 (waiting list) will be assessed in the baseline, and re-assessed before starting the treatment; at the end of the psychological therapy; and in the 1, 3, 6 and 12 months follow-ups.
Detailed Description
The objetive of this research are the study of efficacy in chronic pain and fybromyalgia of mindfulness therapy.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Fibromyalgia, Chronic Pain
Keywords
Fibromyalgia, Chronic Pain, Psychological Treatment, Effectiveness, MBPM
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
112 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
control group
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
The patients received usual medical care.
Arm Title
MBPM- Minfulness- Based Pain Management
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Psychological intervention with 8 group sessions ( 8 -10 subjects) with a duration of 2 and a half hours per session and a weekly periodicity (total hours 1080).
It is centered on training on the awareness of physical, cognitive and emotional sensations, and the attentional processes to become an observer of one's own thoughts and emotions. With the aim to provide greater flexibility to manage pain
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
control group: usual medical care
Intervention Description
The patients received usual medical care.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
MBPM- Mindfulness-Based Pain Management
Intervention Description
8 group session of maindfulness-based treatment to management pain
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Lattinen Index- IL
Description
It is a scale with five items to assess variables associated with pain: frequency, intensity, disability, drugs usage and sleep problems. These are assessed by a Likert scale of 0 to 4, in order to explain the discomfort that pain generates. (Gonzalez-Escada, 2012)
Time Frame
base line (week 0), end of treatment (week 12); and during maintenance phase (weeks 17, 29 and 41)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire- FIQ
Description
its a 10 item scale that assesses the impact of the disease. The first item evaluates the interference of the disease in skills such as home care and work. The second item assesses how they felt last week; the third item values the days of last week that the disease prevented him from performing his usual tasks. Finally, the fourth item assesses the interference caused by pain and other items of the disease.
It will only be completed by patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia. (Esteve et al., 2007)
Time Frame
base line (week 0), end of treatment (week 12); and during maintenance phase (weeks 17, 29 and 41)
Title
Change in the Listado de Sintomas Breve- LSB-50
Description
it is composed of 50 items, which are rated on a Likert scale from 0 to 4, depending on the level of discomfort caused by each item to the subject. it includes two scales of validity, three general indices, clinical scales (psychoreactivity, hypersensitivity, obsession, anxiety, hostility, somatization, depression, and sleep disturbances) and a psychological risk index. (de Rivera & Abuin, 2012)
Time Frame
base line (week 0), end of treatment (week 12); and during maintenance phase (weeks 17, 29 and 41)
Title
Change in the Short Form 12 Health Survey- SF-12
Description
It assesses a patient's health perception in 12 areas like physical function, physical role, body pain, general health, vitality, social function, emotional role, and mental health.
It is completed with Likert type response options from 3 to 5 points.(Schmidt et al., 2012)
Time Frame
base line (week 0), end of treatment (week 12); and during maintenance phase (weeks 17, 29 and 41)
Title
Change in Cuestionario de afrontamiento del dolor- CAD-R
Description
It consists of 31 items related to the strategies that the patient performs when suffer pain. The strategies are valued from 1 (never use) to 5 (always use). The items are grouped into the following factors: religion, catharsis, distraction, information search, self-control, and self-affirmation. (Soriano & Monsaslve, 2002)
Time Frame
base line (week 0), end of treatment (week 12); and during maintenance phase (weeks 17, 29 and 41)
Title
Change in Connor-Davison Resilience Scale- CDRISC
Description
The CD-RISC scale assesses resilience. Consist in 25 items and the subject has to indicate what extent each of the statements has been true, in his case, during the last month on a scale ranging from 0 (not true at all) to 4 (almost always true). Fernández-Lansac & Soberón, 2014)
Time Frame
base line (week 0), end of treatment (week 12); and during maintenance phase (weeks 17, 29 and 41)
Title
Change in Inventaire of negative thoughts in response to pain- INTRP
Description
This questionnaire assesses the presence of negative thinking in response to pain. It consists of 21 items distributed in 5 factors: general negative thoughts, negative social thoughts, thoughts of disability, thoughts of lack of control, and thoughts of self-blame (Cano & Rodriguez, 2002)
Time Frame
base line (week 0), end of treatment (week 12); and during maintenance phase (weeks 17, 29 and 41)
Title
Change Pain Catastrophizing Scale- PCS
Description
The scale evaluates through 13 items the thoughts and feelings related to the experiences of pain. It is divided into three subscales, scored from 0 (never) to 4 (always), rumination, desperation, and magnification (Lami et al., 2013)
Time Frame
base line (week 0), end of treatment (week 12); and during maintenance phase (weeks 17, 29 and 41)
Title
Change in Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire- CPAQ
Description
The scale evaluates strategies of the pain experience. It consists of 20 items, scored from 0 (never true) to 6 (always true), from which three scores are obtained: involvement in activities, openness to pain, and total punctuation.
Time Frame
base line (week 0), end of treatment (week 12); and during maintenance phase (weeks 17, 29 and 41)
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire
Description
This scale assesses clients satisfaction with the treatment through 8 items, using a Likert scale from 0 to 4. (Larsen et al., 1978)
Time Frame
end of treatment (week 12); and during maintenance phase (weeks 17, 29 and 41)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Be able to complete the assessment protocol
Suffer from chronic non-oncological pain, lasting longer than 6 months
Not being receiving psychological treatment
Sign the informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Present a cognitive impairment, such as a dementia
Present a diagnosis of a psychotic disease, bipolar disease or additive disease
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Karmele Salaberria, PH.D
Organizational Affiliation
University of Basque Country
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Basque Country
City
San Sebastián
State/Province
Guipuzcoa
ZIP/Postal Code
20018
Country
Spain
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Efficacy of Psychological Therapy in Chronic Pain and Fibromyalgia
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs