search
Back to results

Respiratory Effect of the LISA Method With Sedation by Propofol Versus Absence of Sedation. (PROLISA)

Primary Purpose

Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Propofol-Lipuro
Placebos
Sponsored by
University Hospital, Grenoble
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant focused on measuring LISA, propofol, medialipide, ketamin, sedation, premature infant, surfactant

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Preterm Infants < 32 wGA (weeks of gestational age)
  • Presenting a RDS (respiratory distress syndrome)

    • in the first 48 hours of life
    • treated by CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) or BiPAP (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure)
    • requiring surfactant :

      • FIO2 : (fraction of inspired oxygen)

        • if 28 - 31 SA : FiO2 ≥30% for a duration ≥ 10mn
        • if <28 SA FIO2 ≥25% for a duration ≥10mn
      • SpO2 (arterial oxygen saturation) : to obtain a SpO2 between ≥88 and ≤ 95%
  • Available IntraVenous line (peripheral, umbilical or central catheter)
  • Recipient of the French Social Security
  • Informed consent form signed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Congenital and/or major malformations
  • FIO2 >60%
  • Silverman score >6
  • Contraindication to the use of Propofol :
  • Low Blood Pressure with 2 successive measurements (Mean < Gestational Age expressed in Weeks of Gestation) persisting after one volume expansion,
  • Use of inotropic medication to maintain a normal blood pressure.
  • Use of sedative or analgesic drugs (except paracetamol and ibuprofen) in the previous 24h
  • Coma, convulsions, areactivity at neurological examination

Sites / Locations

  • centre hospitalier deTroyesRecruiting
  • CHU Grenoble AlpesRecruiting
  • Chu AmiensRecruiting
  • Chu AngersRecruiting
  • Chu BrestRecruiting
  • Chu ChamberyRecruiting
  • Chi CreteilRecruiting
  • Chu LimogesRecruiting
  • Ap-H MarseilleRecruiting
  • Chu NantesRecruiting
  • Chu NimesRecruiting
  • Chi Poissy St GermainRecruiting
  • Ch RennesRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Propofol

medialipide

Arm Description

Propofol (Propofol LIPURO 1% 100mL), Pharmacologic form: 10mg/ml. Considering the birthweight of most preterm babies, Propofol will be diluted to a final concentration of 1mg/ml by the nurse. Treatment initiation: the 1st dose will be injected following usual management of LISA procedure included the installation of the newborn and the atropine and caffeine injections and sugar solution administration Dose per administration: 0.5mg/kg per dose of Propofol. Number of administrations: Several administrations of 0.5 mg/kg are possible, according the level of sedation achieved, as evaluated by the FANS score. If the FANS score is ≥6, a new dose will be injected up to a total of two (before 28 wGA) or 3 (between 28 - 31 wGA) administrations of the drug. (See paragraph 5.3)

Name of treatment for placebo: Medialipide® (B. BRAUN) Pharmacological form: 20g/100ml Medialipide 20% will be used as the placebo. This is an emulsion of medium and long triglycerides based on soya oil and having same appearance organoleptic characteristics as Propofol. Dose per administration: Same volume as for the Propofol administration Number of administrations: according the same protocol that for the Propofol administration. Modalities of preparation : The same dilution procedure as Propofol lipuro 1% SPC (Summary of Product Characteristics):1 part of Medialipide 20% with 9 parts of 5% w/v glucose solution or 0.9% w/v sodium chloride solution as shown in parenteral nutrition which is in accordance with medialipide 20% SPC

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

need for mechanical ventilation after the procedure
Rate of mechanical ventilation from the start of the LISA procedure up to 72 hours of life.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Rate of MV (mechanical ventilation ) in each class of GA (<28, 28-31wGA)
Rate of MV (mechanical ventilation ) from the start of the LISA procedure up to 72 hours of life in each class of GA (<28, 28-31wGA)
FANS during LISA and 1h after LISA
Faceless acute neonatal pain scale (FANS) assessed during LISA and 1 hour after the procedure by an independent operator.
number of ketamine administrations for rescue
Number of ketamine administrations for rescue in order to obtain a FANS score <6 and to be able to proceed to LISA.
Number of laryngoscopies
Number of laryngoscopies needed to perform LISA
Tolerance and efficacy (Per procedure events): Apnea
Apnea requiring bag mask ventilation
Tolerance and efficacy (Per procedure events): emergency intubation
Emergency intubation after the drug injection before the LISA procedure can be performed or within 1h following the drug injection
Tolerance and efficacy (Per procedure events): Viby Mogensen score
Clinician's satisfaction during laryngoscopy with the Viby Mogensen score : Item Score 1 Score 2 Score 3 Score 4 Laryngoscopy Easy Fair Difficult Impossible Vocal cords Open Moving Closing Closed Coughing None Slight Moderate Severe Jaw relaxation Complete Slight Stiff Rigid Limb movements None Slight Moderate Severe the total score is calculated adding each item scores. min score = 5. max score = 20. An easy intubation would obtain a low score and a difficult intubation would have a high score.
BPD (bronchopulmonary dysplasia) at 36 weeks of Gestational Age
Broncho Pulmonary Dysplasia at 36 weeks of Gestational Age
In-hospital morbidity and mortality: pneumothorax
Pneumothorax within 72hours
In-hospital morbidity and mortality: Necrotizing Enterocolitis
necrotizing enterocolitis during hospitalization
In-hospital morbidity and mortality : sepsis
proven sepsis during hospitalization
In-hospital morbidity and mortality: retinopathy
retinopathy of prematurity during hospitalization
In-hospital morbidity and mortality
periventricular leukomalacia or grade 3 or 4 intraventricular hemorrhage during hospitalization
In-hospital morbidity and mortality: patent ductus arteriosus
treatment of a patent ductus arteriosus during hospitalization
In-hospital morbidity and mortality: death 36weeks of Gestational Age
Death at 36 weeks of Gestational Age
In-hospital morbidity and mortality: death during hospitalization
in-hospital mortality
At two years of corrected age: ASQ (Ages and Stages Questionnaire)
ASQ (Ages and Stages Questionnaire) questionnaire is a general developmental screening tool (5 areas are evaluated: Communication, gross motor, fine motor, problem solving, and personal-social). Total score is the sum of each of the 5 area scores (wich are between 0-60. Total score is between 0 and 300. The higher the score is, the best developed the children is.
At two years of corrected age: motor function
Gross Motor Function Classification Scale (GMFCS) looks at movements such as sitting, walking and use of mobility devices. It is helpful because it provides families and clinicians with a clear description of a child's current motor function, and an idea of what equipment or mobility aids a child may need in the future, e.g. crutches, walking frames or wheelchairs. Participant will be assignated to one of the 5 levels by the clinicians : a patient who is in level 5 has more motor impairments than a patient in level 1.
At two years of corrected age: vision
Visual functions : a clinical examination will conclude if the participant has a visual deficit or not. And in the deficit case, what kind of vision pathology.
At two years of corrected age: audition
Hearing functions : a clinical examination will conclude if the participant has a hearing deficit or not. And in the deficit case, what kind of audition pathology.

Full Information

First Posted
June 7, 2019
Last Updated
August 25, 2021
Sponsor
University Hospital, Grenoble
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04016246
Brief Title
Respiratory Effect of the LISA Method With Sedation by Propofol Versus Absence of Sedation.
Acronym
PROLISA
Official Title
Respiratory Effect of the LISA (Less Invasive Surfactant Administration) Method With Sedation by Propofol Versus Absence of Sedation: Double-blind Comparative Randomized Clinical Trial.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
October 7, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 7, 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 7, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Grenoble

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The investigators propose to evaluate premedication with Propofol compared to a control strategy including a placebo with a possible rescue treatment with ketamine to ensure pain control before LISA Procedure . Investigators hypothesize that sedation with Propofol is safe and non-inferior to placebo for the risk of Mechanical Ventilation in the 72 hours following the procedure.
Detailed Description
Non-inferiority trial comparing Propofol versus placebo during the intra tracheal Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) in preterm babies < 32 weeks of gestation for the need for mechanical ventilation after the procedure. An open-label ketamine treatment as rescue is possible in each group. In each participating unit, information will be given to parents of preterm babies <32 wGA upon their admission to the delivery room or to the NICU (neonatal intensive care unit), and informed consent will be sought as soon as possible. Eligible babies presenting a RDS (respiratory distress syndrome) will be included and randomized to the control (placebo) group or Propofol group. While benefiting from Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) the newborn will be prepared as usual for tracheal intubation. Trialists will be blinded to treatment allocation. The drug administration in the two groups will be titrated according to weight (0.5mg/kg per dose of Propofol or a similar volume of placebo). After each dose, a pain score (FANS) will be quickly evaluated within 2 minutes of the injection, to assess the need for a supplementary dose (up to a predefined limit) or rescue treatment by Ketamine. After the steps of sedation, the LISA procedure will be performed, with detailed data collection of per procedure events up to 72 hours of life. Babies will be subsequently managed as usual in each NICU and data will be collected about respiratory, neurological and hemodynamic outcomes during the hospital stay, and especially at discharge, 28 days, and 36 weeks. At two years of corrected age, a final examination will be performed to evaluate neurodevelopmental outcomes.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant
Keywords
LISA, propofol, medialipide, ketamin, sedation, premature infant, surfactant

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
542 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Propofol
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Propofol (Propofol LIPURO 1% 100mL), Pharmacologic form: 10mg/ml. Considering the birthweight of most preterm babies, Propofol will be diluted to a final concentration of 1mg/ml by the nurse. Treatment initiation: the 1st dose will be injected following usual management of LISA procedure included the installation of the newborn and the atropine and caffeine injections and sugar solution administration Dose per administration: 0.5mg/kg per dose of Propofol. Number of administrations: Several administrations of 0.5 mg/kg are possible, according the level of sedation achieved, as evaluated by the FANS score. If the FANS score is ≥6, a new dose will be injected up to a total of two (before 28 wGA) or 3 (between 28 - 31 wGA) administrations of the drug. (See paragraph 5.3)
Arm Title
medialipide
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Name of treatment for placebo: Medialipide® (B. BRAUN) Pharmacological form: 20g/100ml Medialipide 20% will be used as the placebo. This is an emulsion of medium and long triglycerides based on soya oil and having same appearance organoleptic characteristics as Propofol. Dose per administration: Same volume as for the Propofol administration Number of administrations: according the same protocol that for the Propofol administration. Modalities of preparation : The same dilution procedure as Propofol lipuro 1% SPC (Summary of Product Characteristics):1 part of Medialipide 20% with 9 parts of 5% w/v glucose solution or 0.9% w/v sodium chloride solution as shown in parenteral nutrition which is in accordance with medialipide 20% SPC
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Propofol-Lipuro
Intervention Description
sedation of babies < 32wGA with propofol / placebo before a LISA Procedure
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebos
Other Intervention Name(s)
medialipide
Intervention Description
injected to babies < 32wGA with propofol / placebo before a LISA Procedure
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
need for mechanical ventilation after the procedure
Description
Rate of mechanical ventilation from the start of the LISA procedure up to 72 hours of life.
Time Frame
72hours
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rate of MV (mechanical ventilation ) in each class of GA (<28, 28-31wGA)
Description
Rate of MV (mechanical ventilation ) from the start of the LISA procedure up to 72 hours of life in each class of GA (<28, 28-31wGA)
Time Frame
72hours
Title
FANS during LISA and 1h after LISA
Description
Faceless acute neonatal pain scale (FANS) assessed during LISA and 1 hour after the procedure by an independent operator.
Time Frame
1hour
Title
number of ketamine administrations for rescue
Description
Number of ketamine administrations for rescue in order to obtain a FANS score <6 and to be able to proceed to LISA.
Time Frame
before LISA Procedure
Title
Number of laryngoscopies
Description
Number of laryngoscopies needed to perform LISA
Time Frame
during LISA Procedure (T0)
Title
Tolerance and efficacy (Per procedure events): Apnea
Description
Apnea requiring bag mask ventilation
Time Frame
during LISA Procedure (T0)
Title
Tolerance and efficacy (Per procedure events): emergency intubation
Description
Emergency intubation after the drug injection before the LISA procedure can be performed or within 1h following the drug injection
Time Frame
from drug injection to 1hour after
Title
Tolerance and efficacy (Per procedure events): Viby Mogensen score
Description
Clinician's satisfaction during laryngoscopy with the Viby Mogensen score : Item Score 1 Score 2 Score 3 Score 4 Laryngoscopy Easy Fair Difficult Impossible Vocal cords Open Moving Closing Closed Coughing None Slight Moderate Severe Jaw relaxation Complete Slight Stiff Rigid Limb movements None Slight Moderate Severe the total score is calculated adding each item scores. min score = 5. max score = 20. An easy intubation would obtain a low score and a difficult intubation would have a high score.
Time Frame
during LISA Procedure
Title
BPD (bronchopulmonary dysplasia) at 36 weeks of Gestational Age
Description
Broncho Pulmonary Dysplasia at 36 weeks of Gestational Age
Time Frame
equivalent to 36 weeks of Gestational Age
Title
In-hospital morbidity and mortality: pneumothorax
Description
Pneumothorax within 72hours
Time Frame
72hours post LISA Procedure
Title
In-hospital morbidity and mortality: Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Description
necrotizing enterocolitis during hospitalization
Time Frame
the day of discharge from hospital (the day depends to each participant : between 36-45 weeks of Gestational Age)
Title
In-hospital morbidity and mortality : sepsis
Description
proven sepsis during hospitalization
Time Frame
the day of discharge from hospital (the day depends to each participant : between 36-45 weeks of Gestational Age)
Title
In-hospital morbidity and mortality: retinopathy
Description
retinopathy of prematurity during hospitalization
Time Frame
the day of discharge from hospital (the day depends to each participant : between 36-45weeks of gestational ageGA)
Title
In-hospital morbidity and mortality
Description
periventricular leukomalacia or grade 3 or 4 intraventricular hemorrhage during hospitalization
Time Frame
the day of discharge from hospital (the day depends to each participant : between 36-45weeks of Gestational Age)
Title
In-hospital morbidity and mortality: patent ductus arteriosus
Description
treatment of a patent ductus arteriosus during hospitalization
Time Frame
the day of discharge from hospital (the day depends to each participant : between 36-45 weeks of Gestational Age)
Title
In-hospital morbidity and mortality: death 36weeks of Gestational Age
Description
Death at 36 weeks of Gestational Age
Time Frame
equivalent to 36 weeks of Gestational Age
Title
In-hospital morbidity and mortality: death during hospitalization
Description
in-hospital mortality
Time Frame
the day of discharge from hospital (the day depends to each participant : between 36-45weeks of Gestational Age)
Title
At two years of corrected age: ASQ (Ages and Stages Questionnaire)
Description
ASQ (Ages and Stages Questionnaire) questionnaire is a general developmental screening tool (5 areas are evaluated: Communication, gross motor, fine motor, problem solving, and personal-social). Total score is the sum of each of the 5 area scores (wich are between 0-60. Total score is between 0 and 300. The higher the score is, the best developed the children is.
Time Frame
2 years (corrected age)
Title
At two years of corrected age: motor function
Description
Gross Motor Function Classification Scale (GMFCS) looks at movements such as sitting, walking and use of mobility devices. It is helpful because it provides families and clinicians with a clear description of a child's current motor function, and an idea of what equipment or mobility aids a child may need in the future, e.g. crutches, walking frames or wheelchairs. Participant will be assignated to one of the 5 levels by the clinicians : a patient who is in level 5 has more motor impairments than a patient in level 1.
Time Frame
2 years (corrected age)
Title
At two years of corrected age: vision
Description
Visual functions : a clinical examination will conclude if the participant has a visual deficit or not. And in the deficit case, what kind of vision pathology.
Time Frame
2 years (corrected age)
Title
At two years of corrected age: audition
Description
Hearing functions : a clinical examination will conclude if the participant has a hearing deficit or not. And in the deficit case, what kind of audition pathology.
Time Frame
2 years (corrected age)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Preterm Infants < 32 wGA (weeks of gestational age) Presenting a RDS (respiratory distress syndrome) in the first 48 hours of life treated by CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) or BiPAP (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure) requiring surfactant : FIO2 : (fraction of inspired oxygen) if 28 - 31 SA : FiO2 ≥30% for a duration ≥ 10mn if <28 SA FIO2 ≥25% for a duration ≥10mn SpO2 (arterial oxygen saturation) : to obtain a SpO2 between ≥88 and ≤ 95% Available IntraVenous line (peripheral, umbilical or central catheter) Recipient of the French Social Security Informed consent form signed Exclusion Criteria: Congenital and/or major malformations FIO2 >60% Silverman score >6 Contraindication to the use of Propofol : Low Blood Pressure with 2 successive measurements (Mean < Gestational Age expressed in Weeks of Gestation) persisting after one volume expansion, Use of inotropic medication to maintain a normal blood pressure. Use of sedative or analgesic drugs (except paracetamol and ibuprofen) in the previous 24h Coma, convulsions, areactivity at neurological examination
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Marie CHEVALLIER, MD
Phone
+33476769248
Email
MChevallier3@chu-grenoble.fr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
cécile LACHAUD
Phone
+33476765577
Email
clachaud@chu-grenoble.fr
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thierry DEBILLON, MD PHD
Organizational Affiliation
CHU de Grenoble Alpes
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
centre hospitalier deTroyes
City
Troyes
State/Province
Aube
ZIP/Postal Code
10000
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bilal ALI, MD
Email
ali.bilal@ch-troyes.fr
Facility Name
CHU Grenoble Alpes
City
Grenoble
State/Province
Isère
ZIP/Postal Code
38043
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thierry DEBILLON
Phone
+33476765577
Email
tdebillon@chu-grenoble.fr
Facility Name
Chu Amiens
City
Amiens
ZIP/Postal Code
80000
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
tourneux
Email
Tourneux.Pierre@chu-amiens.fr
Facility Name
Chu Angers
City
Angers
ZIP/Postal Code
49000
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
gascoin
Email
GeGascoin@chu-angers.fr
Facility Name
Chu Brest
City
Brest
ZIP/Postal Code
29200
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
roue
Email
jean-michel.roue@chu-brest.fr
Facility Name
Chu Chambery
City
Chambéry
ZIP/Postal Code
73000
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
parra
Email
johanna.parra@ch-metropole-savoie.fr
Facility Name
Chi Creteil
City
Créteil
ZIP/Postal Code
94000
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
durrmeyer
Email
Xavier.Durrmeyer@chicreteil.fr
Facility Name
Chu Limoges
City
Limoges
ZIP/Postal Code
87000
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
ponthier
Email
laure.ponthier@chu-limoges.fr
Facility Name
Ap-H Marseille
City
Marseille
ZIP/Postal Code
13000
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
bourgouin
Email
laura.bourgouin@ap-hm.fr
Facility Name
Chu Nantes
City
Nantes
ZIP/Postal Code
44000
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
flamant
Email
cyril.flamant@chu-nantes.fr
Facility Name
Chu Nimes
City
Nîmes
ZIP/Postal Code
30000
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
desenfants
Email
aurelie.desenfants@chu-nimes.fr
Facility Name
Chi Poissy St Germain
City
Poissy
ZIP/Postal Code
78300
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Durandy
Email
adurandy@chi-poissy-st-germain.fr
Facility Name
Ch Rennes
City
Rennes
ZIP/Postal Code
35000
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
beuchee
Email
alain.beuchee@chu-rennes.fr

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26907795
Citation
Dekker J, Lopriore E, Rijken M, Rijntjes-Jacobs E, Smits-Wintjens V, Te Pas A. Sedation during Minimal Invasive Surfactant Therapy in Preterm Infants. Neonatology. 2016;109(4):308-13. doi: 10.1159/000443823. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25164872
Citation
Dargaville PA, Kamlin CO, De Paoli AG, Carlin JB, Orsini F, Soll RF, Davis PG. The OPTIMIST-A trial: evaluation of minimally-invasive surfactant therapy in preterm infants 25-28 weeks gestation. BMC Pediatr. 2014 Aug 27;14:213. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-213.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21963186
Citation
Gopel W, Kribs A, Ziegler A, Laux R, Hoehn T, Wieg C, Siegel J, Avenarius S, von der Wense A, Vochem M, Groneck P, Weller U, Moller J, Hartel C, Haller S, Roth B, Herting E; German Neonatal Network. Avoidance of mechanical ventilation by surfactant treatment of spontaneously breathing preterm infants (AMV): an open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2011 Nov 5;378(9803):1627-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60986-0. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
30068669
Citation
Dekker J, Lopriore E, van Zanten HA, Tan RNGB, Hooper SB, Te Pas AB. Sedation during minimal invasive surfactant therapy: a randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019 Jul;104(4):F378-F383. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315015. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22250028
Citation
Berde CB, Walco GA, Krane EJ, Anand KJ, Aranda JV, Craig KD, Dampier CD, Finkel JC, Grabois M, Johnston C, Lantos J, Lebel A, Maxwell LG, McGrath P, Oberlander TF, Schanberg LE, Stevens B, Taddio A, von Baeyer CL, Yaster M, Zempsky WT. Pediatric analgesic clinical trial designs, measures, and extrapolation: report of an FDA scientific workshop. Pediatrics. 2012 Feb;129(2):354-64. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3591. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
29532502
Citation
Bourgoin L, Caeymaex L, Decobert F, Jung C, Danan C, Durrmeyer X. Administering atropine and ketamine before less invasive surfactant administration resulted in low pain scores in a prospective study of premature neonates. Acta Paediatr. 2018 Jul;107(7):1184-1190. doi: 10.1111/apa.14317. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17485450
Citation
Ghanta S, Abdel-Latif ME, Lui K, Ravindranathan H, Awad J, Oei J. Propofol compared with the morphine, atropine, and suxamethonium regimen as induction agents for neonatal endotracheal intubation: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2007 Jun;119(6):e1248-55. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2708. Epub 2007 May 7.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
26922562
Citation
Owen LS, Manley BJ. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in preterm infants: Equipment, evidence, and synchronization. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Jun;21(3):146-53. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23439457
Citation
Durrmeyer X, Daoud P, Decobert F, Boileau P, Renolleau S, Zana-Taieb E, Saizou C, Lapillonne A, Granier M, Durand P, Lenclen R, Coursol A, Nicloux M, de Saint Blanquat L, Shankland R, Boelle PY, Carbajal R. Premedication for neonatal endotracheal intubation: results from the epidemiology of procedural pain in neonates study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013 May;14(4):e169-75. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182720616.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23359581
Citation
Kanmaz HG, Erdeve O, Canpolat FE, Mutlu B, Dilmen U. Surfactant administration via thin catheter during spontaneous breathing: randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2013 Feb;131(2):e502-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0603. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28483817
Citation
Descamps CS, Chevallier M, Ego A, Pin I, Epiard C, Debillon T. Propofol for sedation during less invasive surfactant administration in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017 Sep;102(5):F465. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-312791. Epub 2017 May 8. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
27942865
Citation
Klotz D, Porcaro U, Fleck T, Fuchs H. European perspective on less invasive surfactant administration-a survey. Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Feb;176(2):147-154. doi: 10.1007/s00431-016-2812-9. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
32384914
Citation
Chevallier M, Durrmeyer X, Ego A, Debillon T; PROLISA Study Group. Propofol versus placebo (with rescue with ketamine) before less invasive surfactant administration: study protocol for a multicenter, double-blind, placebo controlled trial (PROLISA). BMC Pediatr. 2020 May 8;20(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02112-x.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Respiratory Effect of the LISA Method With Sedation by Propofol Versus Absence of Sedation.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs