search
Back to results

The People Like Us Evaluation Study

Primary Purpose

HIV/AIDS, Sexually Transmitted Infection, Homosexuality

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Singapore
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
People Like Us Online Video Series Intervention
Sexual Health Pamphlet (Standard of Care)
Sponsored by
National University of Singapore
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for HIV/AIDS focused on measuring HIV Testing, STI Testing, Homophobia, eHealth, Singapore

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 29 Years (Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Self-reported HIV-negative status, or unsure of HIV status
  • Self-reported gay, bisexual or queer sexual orientation
  • Self-reported male gender, regardless of sex assigned at birth
  • Self-reported age of 18 to 29 years old at point of recruitment
  • Singapore citizen or permanent resident at the point of recruitment
  • Self-reported as never having watched an online video drama series by Gayhealth.sg or Action for AIDS in the last year

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who have watched the People Like Us Series prior to study
  • Participants who have self-reported being HIV-positive
  • Participants who are not English-literate
  • Participants aged below 18 or above 29 at baseline recruitment

Sites / Locations

  • National University of Singapore

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Intervention Group

Control Group

Arm Description

The online intervention comprises a series of six videos, each about 10-minutes in length, entitled the People Like Us series. The intervention was developed by gayhealth.sg and Action for AIDS Singapore in 2018. The series follow the love and sex lives of four ethnically-diverse GBQ men of varying socioeconomic backgrounds, as they negotiate issues of sexual health, mental health, and relationships throughout the six-part miniseries. The intervention group will also be provided with an e-pamphlet on sexual wellness catered to GBMSM. This e-pamphlet has been developed by the National Skin Centre and Department of Sexually Transmitted Infections Clinic specifically for information on sexual wellness among GBMSM. It comprises segments on HIV/STI symptoms, etiology, information on how to seek help for HIV/STI, behavioral and biomedical methods of HIV prevention.

The control group will be provided with an e-pamphlet on sexual wellness catered to GBMSM. This e-pamphlet has been developed by the National Skin Centre and Department of Sexually Transmitted Infections Clinic specifically for information on sexual wellness among GBMSM. It comprises segments on HIV/STI symptoms, etiology, information on how to seek help for HIV/STI, behavioral and biomedical methods of HIV prevention.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in intention to test for HIV at 3 months
Participants are asked: "How likely are you to get tested for HIV in the next three months?"; to which they may respond: Extremely unlikely to get tested Very unlikely to get tested Somewhat unlikely to get tested Somewhat likely to get tested Very likely to get tested Extremely likely to get tested
Change in intention to test for HIV at 6 months
Participants are asked: "How likely are you to get tested for HIV in the next three months?"; to which they may respond: Extremely unlikely to get tested Very unlikely to get tested Somewhat unlikely to get tested Somewhat likely to get tested Very likely to get tested Extremely likely to get tested
Change in intention to test for Syphilis at 3 months
Participants are asked: "How likely are you to get tested for Syphilis in the next three months?"; to which they may respond: Extremely unlikely to get tested Very unlikely to get tested Somewhat unlikely to get tested Somewhat likely to get tested Very likely to get tested Extremely likely to get tested
Change in intention to test for Syphilis at 6 months
Participants are asked: "How likely are you to get tested for Syphilis in the next three months?"; to which they may respond: Extremely unlikely to get tested Very unlikely to get tested Somewhat unlikely to get tested Somewhat likely to get tested Very likely to get tested Extremely likely to get tested
Change in intention to test for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea at 3 months
Participants are asked: "How likely are you to get tested for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in the next three months?"; to which they may respond: Extremely unlikely to get tested Very unlikely to get tested Somewhat unlikely to get tested Somewhat likely to get tested Very likely to get tested Extremely likely to get tested
Change in intention to test for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea at 6 months
Participants are asked: "How likely are you to get tested for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in the next three months?"; to which they may respond: Extremely unlikely to get tested Very unlikely to get tested Somewhat unlikely to get tested Somewhat likely to get tested Very likely to get tested Extremely likely to get tested
HIV testing at 3 months
Participants are asked: "When did you go for you last (most recent) voluntary HIV test?"; to which they may respond: Never In the last 3 months In the last 6 months 6 to 12 months ago More than 1 year ago
HIV testing at 6 months
Participants are asked: "When did you go for you last (most recent) voluntary HIV test?"; to which they may respond: Never In the last 3 months In the last 6 months 6 to 12 months ago More than 1 year ago
Syphilis testing at 3 months
Participants are asked: "When did you go for you last (most recent) voluntary Syphilis test?"; to which they may respond: Never In the last 3 months In the last 6 months 6 to 12 months ago More than 1 year ago
Syphilis testing at 6 months
Participants are asked: "When did you go for you last (most recent) voluntary Syphilis test?"; to which they may respond: Never In the last 3 months In the last 6 months 6 to 12 months ago More than 1 year ago
Chlamydia and Gonorrhea testing at 3 months
Participants are asked: "When did you go for you last (most recent) voluntary Chlamydia or Gonorrhea test?"; to which they may respond: Never In the last 3 months In the last 6 months 6 to 12 months ago More than 1 year ago
Chlamydia and Gonorrhea testing at 6 months
Participants are asked: "When did you go for you last (most recent) voluntary Chlamydia or Gonorrhea test?"; to which they may respond: Never In the last 3 months In the last 6 months 6 to 12 months ago More than 1 year ago
Self-reported regularity of HIV testing at 3 months
Participants are asked: "On average, how regularly do you test for HIV?"; to which they may respond: I do not test regularly Once every few years Once a year Once every 6 months Once every 3 months Once a month
Self-reported regularity of HIV testing at 6 months
Participants are asked: "On average, how regularly do you test for HIV?"; to which they may respond: I do not test regularly Once every few years Once a year Once every 6 months Once every 3 months Once a month
Self-reported regularity of Syphilis testing at 3 months
Participants are asked: "On average, how regularly do you test for Syphilis?"; to which they may respond: I do not test regularly Once every few years Once a year Once every 6 months Once every 3 months Once a month
Self-reported regularity of Syphilis testing at 6 months
Participants are asked: "On average, how regularly do you test for Syphilis?"; to which they may respond: I do not test regularly Once every few years Once a year Once every 6 months Once every 3 months Once a month
Self-reported regularity of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea testing at 3 months
Participants are asked: "On average, how regularly do you test for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea?"; to which they may respond: I do not test regularly Once every few years Once a year Once every 6 months Once every 3 months Once a month
Self-reported regularity of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea testing at 6 months
Participants are asked: "On average, how regularly do you test for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea?"; to which they may respond: I do not test regularly Once every few years Once a year Once every 6 months Once every 3 months Once a month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Risk perception for HIV
Risk perception is measures through a questions (slider scale) that asks participants: "How much risk do you think you are at of getting HIV?". Participants will rate this from 0 to 10 (0=no risk at all; 10=very high risk)
Risk perception for other sexually transmitted infections
Risk perception is measures through a questions (slider scale) that asks participants: "How much risk do you think you are at of getting other sexually transmitted infections?". Participants will rate this from 0 to 10 (0=no risk at all; 10=very high risk)
Knowledge of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis
Participants are tested on their knowledge of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis by providing a response (1=True; 2=False; 3=I do not know) to two questions: "HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis is an effective means of preventing HIV infection". The correct answer is "True". "HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis can also reduce the chances of acquiring other STIs". The correct answer is "False". Each correct answer provides a score of 1 point.
Knowledge of risks associated with acquiring other sexually transmitted infections
Participants are tested on their knowledge of other sexually transmitted infections by providing a response (1=True; 2=False; 3=I do not know) to three questions: "Gonorrhea can be transmitted through oral sex". The correct answer is "True". "Chemsex, or the use of substances during sex, often increases a person's risk of engaging in risky sexual behavior and acquiring HIV or other STIs" The correct answer is "True". "There is a/are clinics in Singapore where I can test anonymously for HIV and Syphilis". The correct answer is "True". Each correct answer provides a score of 1 point.
Knowledge of HIV
Participants are tested on their knowledge of HIV by providing a response (1=True; 2=False; 3=I do not know) to two questions: "An HIV-positive individual who has achieved viral suppression or an 'undetectable' viral load has almost zero chances of transmitting the virus to someone else through sexual intercourse". The correct answer is "True". "An HIV-positive individual on effective treatment can live a long, healthy, and productive life". The correct answer is "True". Each correct answer provides a score of 1 point.
Connectedness to LGBT Community
This is an 8-item scale adapted from Frost & Meyer (2012) that measures a participant's self-perceived connectedness to the LGBT community on a 4-point Likert Scale. The measure is a sum score of all 8 items.
Modified Self-Concealment Scale
This is a 7-item scale adapted from Scrimshaw (2013) that measures a participant's self-concealment of their sexual orientation on a 5-point Likert Scale. The measure is a sum score of all 7 items.
Consistent condom use for anal sex with casual partners or sex workers
This is assessed by the question, "In the last 3 months, how often did you use a condom when having anal sex with a casual partner?" or "In the last 3 months, how often did you use a condom when having anal sex with a sex worker/money boy?" (Options are always, more than half the time, about half the time, less than half the time, never used a condom). Participants who give the answer 'Always' are classified as having consistent condom usage for anal sex with causal partners or sex workers.
Incidence of sexually transmitted infections
This is defined as self-reporting a diagnosis of Syphilis, Chlamydia, Genital Herpes, Genital Warts, Hepatitis C, or Gonorrhea at the 3-month or 6-month follow-up.
Perceived Homophobia
This is a 6-item scale adapted from Smolenski, Ross, Risser, and Rosser (2009) that measures a participant's self-concealment of their sexual orientation. The measure is a sum score of all 6 items.
Internalized Homophobia
This is a 5-item scale adapted from Frost and Meyer (2013) that measures a participant's internalized homophobia on a 4-point Likert Scale. The measure is a sum score of all 5 items.
HIV testing self-efficacy
This is a 10-item scale adapted from Jamil and colleagues (2015) that measures a participant's self-efficacy in HIV testing on a 5-point Likert Scale. The measure is a sum score of all 10 items.
HIV testing social norms
This is a 9-item scale adapted from Pettifor and colleagues (2010) that measures a participant's perceptions on norms around HIV testing on a 4-point Likert Scale. The measure is a sum score of all 9 items.

Full Information

First Posted
July 12, 2019
Last Updated
August 30, 2021
Sponsor
National University of Singapore
Collaborators
National Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore, Action for AIDS Singapore
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04021953
Brief Title
The People Like Us Evaluation Study
Official Title
Evaluation of eHealth Videos for the Singaporean Gay, Bisexual and Queer Male Community
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 13, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 6, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 6, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
National University of Singapore
Collaborators
National Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore, Action for AIDS Singapore

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The study is a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial design to evaluate an online video series developed by a community-based organization in Singapore for gay, bisexual and queer men. A total of 300 HIV-negative, gay, bisexual and queer men in Singapore aged 18 to 29 years old will be recruited with the assistance of the partner community-based organization (CBO), Action for AIDS Singapore. Recruitment will utilize both online and offline channels, and with the help of other CBOs in Singapore. Participants should also not have watched the video prior to their participation in this study, which will be ascertained through a questionnaire. Participants will subsequently be randomized into the intervention arm (n=150) and the control arm (n=150). The treatment group (n=150) will be assigned the intervention along with sexual health information via a pamphlet, while the control group (n=150) will be assigned only the sexual health information via a pamphlet. This will be conducted through block randomization.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
HIV/AIDS, Sexually Transmitted Infection, Homosexuality, Health Behavior, Stigma, Social, Health Care Seeking Behavior
Keywords
HIV Testing, STI Testing, Homophobia, eHealth, Singapore

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
300 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intervention Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The online intervention comprises a series of six videos, each about 10-minutes in length, entitled the People Like Us series. The intervention was developed by gayhealth.sg and Action for AIDS Singapore in 2018. The series follow the love and sex lives of four ethnically-diverse GBQ men of varying socioeconomic backgrounds, as they negotiate issues of sexual health, mental health, and relationships throughout the six-part miniseries. The intervention group will also be provided with an e-pamphlet on sexual wellness catered to GBMSM. This e-pamphlet has been developed by the National Skin Centre and Department of Sexually Transmitted Infections Clinic specifically for information on sexual wellness among GBMSM. It comprises segments on HIV/STI symptoms, etiology, information on how to seek help for HIV/STI, behavioral and biomedical methods of HIV prevention.
Arm Title
Control Group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The control group will be provided with an e-pamphlet on sexual wellness catered to GBMSM. This e-pamphlet has been developed by the National Skin Centre and Department of Sexually Transmitted Infections Clinic specifically for information on sexual wellness among GBMSM. It comprises segments on HIV/STI symptoms, etiology, information on how to seek help for HIV/STI, behavioral and biomedical methods of HIV prevention.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
People Like Us Online Video Series Intervention
Intervention Description
People Like Us miniseries incorporates key sexual health messages to: Increase viewers' knowledge and perceptions of HIV and other STI risk; Address homophobia and sexual orientation disclosure; Increase safer-sex negotiation self-efficacy; Promote positive attitudes towards condom use and other safe sex behaviors; Build skills and self-efficacy for practicing safer sex; Provide information on HIV and other STI testing and its benefits; Provide information on resources for HIV/STI testing and other mental health services; Model appropriate behaviors around practicing safer sex. Each video in the six-part series ends with an educational video segment featuring the managers of Action for AIDS and Gayhealth.sg, who provide a brief synopsis of the episode and cover key points relevant to mental and sexual health for GBQ men.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Sexual Health Pamphlet (Standard of Care)
Intervention Description
The control group will be provided with an e-pamphlet on sexual wellness catered to GBMSM. This e-pamphlet has been developed by the National Skin Centre and Department of Sexually Transmitted Infections Clinic specifically for information on sexual wellness among GBMSM. It comprises segments on HIV/STI symptoms, etiology, information on how to seek help for HIV/STI, behavioral and biomedical methods of HIV prevention.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in intention to test for HIV at 3 months
Description
Participants are asked: "How likely are you to get tested for HIV in the next three months?"; to which they may respond: Extremely unlikely to get tested Very unlikely to get tested Somewhat unlikely to get tested Somewhat likely to get tested Very likely to get tested Extremely likely to get tested
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Change in intention to test for HIV at 6 months
Description
Participants are asked: "How likely are you to get tested for HIV in the next three months?"; to which they may respond: Extremely unlikely to get tested Very unlikely to get tested Somewhat unlikely to get tested Somewhat likely to get tested Very likely to get tested Extremely likely to get tested
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change in intention to test for Syphilis at 3 months
Description
Participants are asked: "How likely are you to get tested for Syphilis in the next three months?"; to which they may respond: Extremely unlikely to get tested Very unlikely to get tested Somewhat unlikely to get tested Somewhat likely to get tested Very likely to get tested Extremely likely to get tested
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Change in intention to test for Syphilis at 6 months
Description
Participants are asked: "How likely are you to get tested for Syphilis in the next three months?"; to which they may respond: Extremely unlikely to get tested Very unlikely to get tested Somewhat unlikely to get tested Somewhat likely to get tested Very likely to get tested Extremely likely to get tested
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change in intention to test for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea at 3 months
Description
Participants are asked: "How likely are you to get tested for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in the next three months?"; to which they may respond: Extremely unlikely to get tested Very unlikely to get tested Somewhat unlikely to get tested Somewhat likely to get tested Very likely to get tested Extremely likely to get tested
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Change in intention to test for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea at 6 months
Description
Participants are asked: "How likely are you to get tested for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in the next three months?"; to which they may respond: Extremely unlikely to get tested Very unlikely to get tested Somewhat unlikely to get tested Somewhat likely to get tested Very likely to get tested Extremely likely to get tested
Time Frame
6 months
Title
HIV testing at 3 months
Description
Participants are asked: "When did you go for you last (most recent) voluntary HIV test?"; to which they may respond: Never In the last 3 months In the last 6 months 6 to 12 months ago More than 1 year ago
Time Frame
3 months
Title
HIV testing at 6 months
Description
Participants are asked: "When did you go for you last (most recent) voluntary HIV test?"; to which they may respond: Never In the last 3 months In the last 6 months 6 to 12 months ago More than 1 year ago
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Syphilis testing at 3 months
Description
Participants are asked: "When did you go for you last (most recent) voluntary Syphilis test?"; to which they may respond: Never In the last 3 months In the last 6 months 6 to 12 months ago More than 1 year ago
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Syphilis testing at 6 months
Description
Participants are asked: "When did you go for you last (most recent) voluntary Syphilis test?"; to which they may respond: Never In the last 3 months In the last 6 months 6 to 12 months ago More than 1 year ago
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Chlamydia and Gonorrhea testing at 3 months
Description
Participants are asked: "When did you go for you last (most recent) voluntary Chlamydia or Gonorrhea test?"; to which they may respond: Never In the last 3 months In the last 6 months 6 to 12 months ago More than 1 year ago
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Chlamydia and Gonorrhea testing at 6 months
Description
Participants are asked: "When did you go for you last (most recent) voluntary Chlamydia or Gonorrhea test?"; to which they may respond: Never In the last 3 months In the last 6 months 6 to 12 months ago More than 1 year ago
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Self-reported regularity of HIV testing at 3 months
Description
Participants are asked: "On average, how regularly do you test for HIV?"; to which they may respond: I do not test regularly Once every few years Once a year Once every 6 months Once every 3 months Once a month
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Self-reported regularity of HIV testing at 6 months
Description
Participants are asked: "On average, how regularly do you test for HIV?"; to which they may respond: I do not test regularly Once every few years Once a year Once every 6 months Once every 3 months Once a month
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Self-reported regularity of Syphilis testing at 3 months
Description
Participants are asked: "On average, how regularly do you test for Syphilis?"; to which they may respond: I do not test regularly Once every few years Once a year Once every 6 months Once every 3 months Once a month
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Self-reported regularity of Syphilis testing at 6 months
Description
Participants are asked: "On average, how regularly do you test for Syphilis?"; to which they may respond: I do not test regularly Once every few years Once a year Once every 6 months Once every 3 months Once a month
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Self-reported regularity of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea testing at 3 months
Description
Participants are asked: "On average, how regularly do you test for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea?"; to which they may respond: I do not test regularly Once every few years Once a year Once every 6 months Once every 3 months Once a month
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Self-reported regularity of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea testing at 6 months
Description
Participants are asked: "On average, how regularly do you test for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea?"; to which they may respond: I do not test regularly Once every few years Once a year Once every 6 months Once every 3 months Once a month
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Risk perception for HIV
Description
Risk perception is measures through a questions (slider scale) that asks participants: "How much risk do you think you are at of getting HIV?". Participants will rate this from 0 to 10 (0=no risk at all; 10=very high risk)
Time Frame
3 months and 6 months
Title
Risk perception for other sexually transmitted infections
Description
Risk perception is measures through a questions (slider scale) that asks participants: "How much risk do you think you are at of getting other sexually transmitted infections?". Participants will rate this from 0 to 10 (0=no risk at all; 10=very high risk)
Time Frame
3 months and 6 months
Title
Knowledge of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis
Description
Participants are tested on their knowledge of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis by providing a response (1=True; 2=False; 3=I do not know) to two questions: "HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis is an effective means of preventing HIV infection". The correct answer is "True". "HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis can also reduce the chances of acquiring other STIs". The correct answer is "False". Each correct answer provides a score of 1 point.
Time Frame
3 months and 6 months
Title
Knowledge of risks associated with acquiring other sexually transmitted infections
Description
Participants are tested on their knowledge of other sexually transmitted infections by providing a response (1=True; 2=False; 3=I do not know) to three questions: "Gonorrhea can be transmitted through oral sex". The correct answer is "True". "Chemsex, or the use of substances during sex, often increases a person's risk of engaging in risky sexual behavior and acquiring HIV or other STIs" The correct answer is "True". "There is a/are clinics in Singapore where I can test anonymously for HIV and Syphilis". The correct answer is "True". Each correct answer provides a score of 1 point.
Time Frame
3 months and 6 months
Title
Knowledge of HIV
Description
Participants are tested on their knowledge of HIV by providing a response (1=True; 2=False; 3=I do not know) to two questions: "An HIV-positive individual who has achieved viral suppression or an 'undetectable' viral load has almost zero chances of transmitting the virus to someone else through sexual intercourse". The correct answer is "True". "An HIV-positive individual on effective treatment can live a long, healthy, and productive life". The correct answer is "True". Each correct answer provides a score of 1 point.
Time Frame
3 months and 6 months
Title
Connectedness to LGBT Community
Description
This is an 8-item scale adapted from Frost & Meyer (2012) that measures a participant's self-perceived connectedness to the LGBT community on a 4-point Likert Scale. The measure is a sum score of all 8 items.
Time Frame
3 months and 6 months
Title
Modified Self-Concealment Scale
Description
This is a 7-item scale adapted from Scrimshaw (2013) that measures a participant's self-concealment of their sexual orientation on a 5-point Likert Scale. The measure is a sum score of all 7 items.
Time Frame
3 months and 6 months
Title
Consistent condom use for anal sex with casual partners or sex workers
Description
This is assessed by the question, "In the last 3 months, how often did you use a condom when having anal sex with a casual partner?" or "In the last 3 months, how often did you use a condom when having anal sex with a sex worker/money boy?" (Options are always, more than half the time, about half the time, less than half the time, never used a condom). Participants who give the answer 'Always' are classified as having consistent condom usage for anal sex with causal partners or sex workers.
Time Frame
3 months and 6 months
Title
Incidence of sexually transmitted infections
Description
This is defined as self-reporting a diagnosis of Syphilis, Chlamydia, Genital Herpes, Genital Warts, Hepatitis C, or Gonorrhea at the 3-month or 6-month follow-up.
Time Frame
3 months and 6 months
Title
Perceived Homophobia
Description
This is a 6-item scale adapted from Smolenski, Ross, Risser, and Rosser (2009) that measures a participant's self-concealment of their sexual orientation. The measure is a sum score of all 6 items.
Time Frame
3 months and 6 months
Title
Internalized Homophobia
Description
This is a 5-item scale adapted from Frost and Meyer (2013) that measures a participant's internalized homophobia on a 4-point Likert Scale. The measure is a sum score of all 5 items.
Time Frame
3 months and 6 months
Title
HIV testing self-efficacy
Description
This is a 10-item scale adapted from Jamil and colleagues (2015) that measures a participant's self-efficacy in HIV testing on a 5-point Likert Scale. The measure is a sum score of all 10 items.
Time Frame
3 months and 6 months
Title
HIV testing social norms
Description
This is a 9-item scale adapted from Pettifor and colleagues (2010) that measures a participant's perceptions on norms around HIV testing on a 4-point Likert Scale. The measure is a sum score of all 9 items.
Time Frame
3 months and 6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Gender Based
Yes
Gender Eligibility Description
Self-identified Male gender (regardless of sex assigned at birth)
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
29 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Self-reported HIV-negative status, or unsure of HIV status Self-reported gay, bisexual or queer sexual orientation Self-reported male gender, regardless of sex assigned at birth Self-reported age of 18 to 29 years old at point of recruitment Singapore citizen or permanent resident at the point of recruitment Self-reported as never having watched an online video drama series by Gayhealth.sg or Action for AIDS in the last year Exclusion Criteria: Participants who have watched the People Like Us Series prior to study Participants who have self-reported being HIV-positive Participants who are not English-literate Participants aged below 18 or above 29 at baseline recruitment
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rayner Kay Jin Tan, B.Soc.Sci
Organizational Affiliation
National University of Singapore
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
National University of Singapore
City
Singapore
Country
Singapore

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35522470
Citation
Tan RKJ, Koh WL, Le D, Banerjee S, Chio MT, Chan RKW, Wong CM, Tai BC, Wong ML, Cook AR, Chen MI, Wong CS. Effect of a Popular Web Drama Video Series on HIV and Other Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men in Singapore: Community-Based, Pragmatic, Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 6;24(5):e31401. doi: 10.2196/31401.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32269026
Citation
Tan RKJ, Koh WL, Le D, Tan A, Tyler A, Tan C, Banerjee S, Wong CS, Wong ML, Chio MT, Chen MI. Effect of a web drama video series on HIV and other sexually transmitted infection testing among gay, bisexual and queer men: study protocol for a community-based, pragmatic randomised controlled trial in Singapore: the People Like Us (PLU) Evaluation Study. BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 7;10(4):e033855. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033855.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

The People Like Us Evaluation Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs