Behavioral and Neural Representations of Subjective Effort Cost
Primary Purpose
Fatigue
Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cognitive Fatigue
Physical Fatigue
Rewarding Stimuli
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional basic science trial for Fatigue
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Right-handed
- Age between 18 and 35 years old - Male or female
- Any ethnicity
Exclusion Criteria:
Individuals with a history of any of the following will be excluded from the study:
- Neurological problems such as stroke, head injury, epilepsy, seizures, brain tumors, brain surgery, Parkinson's Disease (self- report)
- Diagnosed history of severe psychiatric disease such as depression, schizophrenia (self-report)
- Metal in the head or eyes
- If they are pregnant or suspect that you may be pregnant
- If they experience discomfort from the MRI scan, such as severe claustrophobia or excessive heating of tattoos
Sites / Locations
- Kennedy Krieger InstituteRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
Cognitive Fatigue
Physical Fatigue
Rewarding Stimuli
Arm Description
We will use a behavioral intervention. Participants will perform a cognitively demanding task, repeatedly, to induce cognitive fatigue.
We will use a behavioral intervention. Participants will perform a physically demanding task (grip force exertion task), repeatedly, to induce cognitive fatigue.
We will use a behavioral intervention. Reward-associated stimuli will be used to study how reward-induced changes in motivational state influence effort choices.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Mean of cognitive subjective effort parameters (from behavioral choice data)
Choice data will be fit to a model of the form u(x) = x^rho. The parameter rho is indicative of individuals' subjective preferences for effort. We will test if participants cognitive subjective effort parameters will be significantly different than zero. Effort levels will be expressed as a percentage of each individual's maximum exertion capacity. This will ensure that comparisons can be made between participants.
Differences between cognitive subjective effort parameters before and after fatigue (from behavioral choice data)
Choice data will be fit to a model of the form u(x) = x^rho. The parameter rho is indicative of individuals' subjective preferences for effort. We will test if participants cognitive subjective effort parameters will be significantly different when comparing parameters extracted from pre-fatigue and post-fatigue choices. Effort levels will be expressed as a percentage of each individual's maximum exertion capacity. This will ensure that comparisons can be made between participants.
Mean of physical subjective effort parameters (from behavioral choice data)
Choice data will be fit to a model of the form u(x) = x^rho. The parameter rho is indicative of individuals' subjective preferences for effort. We will test if participants physical subjective effort parameters will be significantly different than zero. Effort levels will be expressed as a percentage of each individual's maximum exertion capacity. This will ensure that comparisons can be made between participants.
Differences between physical subjective effort parameters before and after fatigue (from behavioral choice data)
Choice data will be fit to a model of the form u(x) = x^rho. The parameter rho is indicative of individuals' subjective preferences for effort. We will test if participants physical subjective effort parameters will be significantly different when comparing parameters extracted from pre-fatigue and post-fatigue choices. Effort levels will be expressed as a percentage of each individual's maximum exertion capacity. This will ensure that comparisons can be made between participants.
Difference between cognitive effort cost parameters between the low and high reward stimuli
Choice data will be fit to a model of the form u(x) = x^rho. The parameter rho is indicative of individuals' subjective preferences for effort. We will test if participants subjective effort parameters will be significantly different when comparing parameters extracted from low and high reward stimuli trials. Effort levels will be expressed as a percentage of each individual's maximum exertion capacity. This will ensure that comparisons can be made between participants.
Difference between physical effort cost parameters between the low and high reward stimuli
Choice data will be fit to a model of the form u(x) = x^rho. The parameter rho is indicative of individuals' subjective preferences for effort. We will test if participants subjective effort parameters will be significantly different when comparing parameters extracted from low and high reward stimuli trials. Effort levels will be expressed as a percentage of each individual's maximum exertion capacity. This will ensure that comparisons can be made between participants.
Regions of the brain encoding cognitive effort
We will use a general linear model to examine brain activity that is positively and negatively correlated with chosen cognitive effort value.
Regions of the brain encoding physical effort
We will use a general linear model to examine brain activity that is positively and negatively correlated with chosen physical effort value.
Regions of the brain encoding changes cognitive effort value following cognitive fatigue
We will use a general linear model to examine brain activity that is positively and negatively correlated with fatigue-induced changes in cognitive effort value.
Regions of the brain encoding changes physical effort value following physical fatigue
We will use a general linear model to examine brain activity that is positively and negatively correlated with fatigue-induced changes in physical effort value.
Regions of the brain encoding differences in cognitive effort value resulting from reward-induced changes in motivation
We will use a general linear model to examine brain activity that is positively and negatively correlated with motivation-induced changes in cognitive effort value.
Regions of the brain encoding differences in physical effort value resulting from reward-induced changes in motivation
We will use a general linear model to examine brain activity that is positively and negatively correlated with motivation-induced changes in physical effort value.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04041154
First Posted
July 26, 2019
Last Updated
November 28, 2022
Sponsor
Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.
Collaborators
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04041154
Brief Title
Behavioral and Neural Representations of Subjective Effort Cost
Official Title
Behavioral and Neural Representations of Subjective Effort Cost
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
August 1, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 31, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
July 31, 2023 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.
Collaborators
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The goal of this proposal is to understand the common and distinct behavioral and neural representations of subjective effort valuation, and how these representations are influenced by fatigue and changes in motivation. It is hypothesized that the brain will use overlapping and distinct neural circuits to represent cognitive and physical effort value, and that fatigue and enhanced motivation will influence the subjective value of effort.
Detailed Description
How effortful a task feels is an integral aspect of human decision-making that shapes motivation. If a task feels very effortful one may be unwilling to perform the work required, whereas if a task feels less effortful one may be more likely to persevere. Despite the importance of these perceptions for decision-making, the behavioral and neural mechanisms of subjective effort valuation are not well understood. Furthermore, the National Institutes of Mental Health (NIMH) Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) has identified "Effort Valuation / Willingness to Work" as a key subconstruct for understanding deficits in motivated performance in mental disorders. The goal of this proposal is to understand the mechanisms of subjective valuation of physical and cognitive effort, and the common and distinct systems that underlie these representations. To this end, a combination of experiments in healthy human participants, computational modeling of behavior, and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) will be used. Aim 1 will identify common and distinct physical and cognitive effort valuation mechanisms. Computational models will be used to characterize participants' subjective valuation of physical and cognitive effort, and to test if there are similarities in subjective preferences for these different types of effort. Model-based fMRI will be used to examine the common and distinct brain regions that encode the subjective valuation of physical and cognitive effort, and the network of brain regions that incorporate such preferences to motivate effortful engagement. Aim 2 will investigate the behavioral and neural mechanisms by which physical and cognitive fatigue effect effort valuation. Participants will be fatigued with sustained physical or cognitive exertion to examine how being in a fatigued state influences subjective valuation of physical and cognitive effort; and associated signals in the brain's valuation network. Aim 3 will explore how motivational state modulates decisions to exert physical and cognitive effort. Choices for physical and cognitive effort will be paired with motivational cues (i.e., cues that formerly predicted reward) in order to modulate participants' motivational state. This manipulation will allow for behavioral and neural dissociations between motivation and effort valuation in order to understand how these processes interact to give rise to motivated physical and cognitive engagement. In sum, the proposed studies will have a broad impact on the field of decision-making by dissecting the behavioral and neural mechanisms responsible for physical and cognitive effort valuation. In the long term, these studies may reveal novel behavioral and neural markers to aid in the study, classification, and treatment of amotivation.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Fatigue
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
185 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Cognitive Fatigue
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
We will use a behavioral intervention. Participants will perform a cognitively demanding task, repeatedly, to induce cognitive fatigue.
Arm Title
Physical Fatigue
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
We will use a behavioral intervention. Participants will perform a physically demanding task (grip force exertion task), repeatedly, to induce cognitive fatigue.
Arm Title
Rewarding Stimuli
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
We will use a behavioral intervention. Reward-associated stimuli will be used to study how reward-induced changes in motivational state influence effort choices.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Cognitive Fatigue
Intervention Description
Participants will perform a cognitively demanding task (spatial attention task), repeatedly, to induce cognitive fatigue.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Physical Fatigue
Intervention Description
Participants will perform a physically demanding task (grip force exertion task), repeatedly, to induce cognitive fatigue.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Rewarding Stimuli
Intervention Description
Reward-associated stimuli will be used to study how reward-induced changes in motivational state influence effort choices.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean of cognitive subjective effort parameters (from behavioral choice data)
Description
Choice data will be fit to a model of the form u(x) = x^rho. The parameter rho is indicative of individuals' subjective preferences for effort. We will test if participants cognitive subjective effort parameters will be significantly different than zero. Effort levels will be expressed as a percentage of each individual's maximum exertion capacity. This will ensure that comparisons can be made between participants.
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Differences between cognitive subjective effort parameters before and after fatigue (from behavioral choice data)
Description
Choice data will be fit to a model of the form u(x) = x^rho. The parameter rho is indicative of individuals' subjective preferences for effort. We will test if participants cognitive subjective effort parameters will be significantly different when comparing parameters extracted from pre-fatigue and post-fatigue choices. Effort levels will be expressed as a percentage of each individual's maximum exertion capacity. This will ensure that comparisons can be made between participants.
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Mean of physical subjective effort parameters (from behavioral choice data)
Description
Choice data will be fit to a model of the form u(x) = x^rho. The parameter rho is indicative of individuals' subjective preferences for effort. We will test if participants physical subjective effort parameters will be significantly different than zero. Effort levels will be expressed as a percentage of each individual's maximum exertion capacity. This will ensure that comparisons can be made between participants.
Time Frame
1 days
Title
Differences between physical subjective effort parameters before and after fatigue (from behavioral choice data)
Description
Choice data will be fit to a model of the form u(x) = x^rho. The parameter rho is indicative of individuals' subjective preferences for effort. We will test if participants physical subjective effort parameters will be significantly different when comparing parameters extracted from pre-fatigue and post-fatigue choices. Effort levels will be expressed as a percentage of each individual's maximum exertion capacity. This will ensure that comparisons can be made between participants.
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Difference between cognitive effort cost parameters between the low and high reward stimuli
Description
Choice data will be fit to a model of the form u(x) = x^rho. The parameter rho is indicative of individuals' subjective preferences for effort. We will test if participants subjective effort parameters will be significantly different when comparing parameters extracted from low and high reward stimuli trials. Effort levels will be expressed as a percentage of each individual's maximum exertion capacity. This will ensure that comparisons can be made between participants.
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Difference between physical effort cost parameters between the low and high reward stimuli
Description
Choice data will be fit to a model of the form u(x) = x^rho. The parameter rho is indicative of individuals' subjective preferences for effort. We will test if participants subjective effort parameters will be significantly different when comparing parameters extracted from low and high reward stimuli trials. Effort levels will be expressed as a percentage of each individual's maximum exertion capacity. This will ensure that comparisons can be made between participants.
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Regions of the brain encoding cognitive effort
Description
We will use a general linear model to examine brain activity that is positively and negatively correlated with chosen cognitive effort value.
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Regions of the brain encoding physical effort
Description
We will use a general linear model to examine brain activity that is positively and negatively correlated with chosen physical effort value.
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Regions of the brain encoding changes cognitive effort value following cognitive fatigue
Description
We will use a general linear model to examine brain activity that is positively and negatively correlated with fatigue-induced changes in cognitive effort value.
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Regions of the brain encoding changes physical effort value following physical fatigue
Description
We will use a general linear model to examine brain activity that is positively and negatively correlated with fatigue-induced changes in physical effort value.
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Regions of the brain encoding differences in cognitive effort value resulting from reward-induced changes in motivation
Description
We will use a general linear model to examine brain activity that is positively and negatively correlated with motivation-induced changes in cognitive effort value.
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Regions of the brain encoding differences in physical effort value resulting from reward-induced changes in motivation
Description
We will use a general linear model to examine brain activity that is positively and negatively correlated with motivation-induced changes in physical effort value.
Time Frame
1 day
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
35 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Right-handed
Age between 18 and 35 years old - Male or female
Any ethnicity
Exclusion Criteria:
Individuals with a history of any of the following will be excluded from the study:
Neurological problems such as stroke, head injury, epilepsy, seizures, brain tumors, brain surgery, Parkinson's Disease (self- report)
Diagnosed history of severe psychiatric disease such as depression, schizophrenia (self-report)
Metal in the head or eyes
If they are pregnant or suspect that you may be pregnant
If they experience discomfort from the MRI scan, such as severe claustrophobia or excessive heating of tattoos
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Anthony Gonzalez
Phone
443-923-2716
Email
gonzalezan@kennedykrieger.org
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Vikram S. Chib, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Kennedy Krieger Institute and Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Kennedy Krieger Institute
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21209
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anthony Gonzalez
Phone
443-923-2716
Email
gonzalezan@kennedykrieger.org
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Behavioral and Neural Representations of Subjective Effort Cost
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs