search
Back to results

Sensory Neuromodulation Protocol for the Treatment of Post-stroke Oropharyngeal Dysphagia. (FIS2014)

Primary Purpose

Swallowing Disorder, Dysphagia, Stroke

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
rTMS active and sham
PES active and sham
Capsaicin active and placebo
Sponsored by
Hospital de Mataró
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Swallowing Disorder focused on measuring Oropharyngeal dysphagia, Stroke, Sensory stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients older than 18 years.
  • Patients with a diagnosis of stroke of more than 3 months of evolution.
  • Patients with clinical signs of dysphagia according to the volume viscosity swallowing test (V-VST).
  • Patients capable of complying with the study protocol.
  • Explained study and signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of severe neurodegenerative, digestive diseases, epilepsy or previous seizures.
  • Pacemaker or implanted defibrillator carriers.
  • Implanted electrode carriers or other stimulation systems.
  • Implant carriers or metal plates on the head or neck.
  • Cochlear implant carriers.
  • Medication pump carriers.
  • History of hearing loss associated with noise.
  • Cardiopulmonary instability.
  • Oropharyngeal dysphagia of structural causes.
  • History of head and neck surgery.
  • Alcohol or drug dependence.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Participate or have participated in another clinical interventionist trial in the 4 weeks prior to inclusion.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm 3

    Arm Type

    Active Comparator

    Active Comparator

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rtMS)

    Intrapharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES)

    Capsaicin

    Arm Description

    Acute repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the pharyngeal sensory cortex. Applied intensity 90% of the resting motor threshold, 1250 pulses at 5 Hz. Each treatment arm was placebo/sham compared with a time separation of one week. The assignment to either active or sham was randomized.

    Intrapharyngeal electrical stimulation applied to an intensity of 75% of the tolerance threshold with 0.2 ms pulses at 5 Hz during 10 min. Each treatment arm was placebo/sham compared with a time separation of one week. The assignment to either active or sham was randomized.

    100 mL of oral capsaicin solution at a concentration of 10-5M. Each treatment arm was placebo/sham compared with a time separation of one week. The assignment to either active or sham was randomized

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Pharyngeal motor evoked potential (pMEP): latency and amplitude
    Study the magnitude of the effect by calculating the change of the evoked potential from baseline immediately after the application of the intervention produced by the different treatments. This will be examined and compared between active and sham intervention.
    Pharyngeal sensory evoked potential (pSEP): latency and amplitude
    Study the magnitude of the effect by calculating the change of the evoked potential from baseline immediately after the application of the intervention produced by the different treatments. This will be examined and compared between active and sham intervention.
    Penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) score
    Study the magnitude of the effect by calculating the change on the prevalence of unsafe swallow (PAS≥2) in videofluoroscopy (VFS) from baseline immediately after the application of the intervention. This will be examined and compared between active and sham intervention.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Opening and closing time of the laryngeal vestibule
    Time of the laryngeal vestibule opening and closure ranges from 0 to 1000 ms.
    Prevalence of pharyngeal residue
    The presence of pharyngeal residue in individual subjects will be assessed.
    Resting motor threshold (RMT) of the pharyngeal cortex
    RMT is defined as the stimulation intensity in which the half of the stimuli are able to evoke a motor evoked potential of al least 10 uV of amplitude.
    Pharyngeal sensory thresholds
    First perception and tolerance thresholds (from 0 to 100 mA) to electrical stimulation of the pharynx will be assessed by asking subjects the exact moment of first perception of the stimulus and the moment in which stimulation is not further tolerated, respectively.
    Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
    Seizures are the most feared side effect associated with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Seizures are a rare side event during and/or subsequent to a TMS session (1.4%, Bae et al., 2007) commonly not occurring beyond a few days after the last session. No other major or significant side effects are expected associated with the interventions.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    August 2, 2019
    Last Updated
    August 9, 2019
    Sponsor
    Hospital de Mataró
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT04052178
    Brief Title
    Sensory Neuromodulation Protocol for the Treatment of Post-stroke Oropharyngeal Dysphagia.
    Acronym
    FIS2014
    Official Title
    Sensory Neuromodulation Protocol for the Treatment of Post-stroke Oropharyngeal Dysphagia. Short-term Neurophysiological Effects.
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    August 2019
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    February 10, 2016 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    December 21, 2018 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    December 21, 2018 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Hospital de Mataró

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Study design: Multicenter, experimental, randomized, crossed, double blind study (patient and results analysis). Aim: To evaluate the effect of different neurostimulation techniques on the neurophysiological and biomechanical swallowing mechanisms of patients with dysphagia associated with chronic stroke and select those techniques with the best results to be evaluated in the second phase of the study (medium-term effects). Outcome measures: Videofluoroscopy: prevalence of impaired efficacy and safety of swallow (penetrations and aspirations), penetration aspiration scale (PAS: from 0 to 8), biomechanical parameters (time to laryngeal vestibule closure, upper esophageal sphincter opening). Pharyngeal sensory evoked potentials (pSEP): latency and amplitude of obtained evoked potentials. Higher latency (0 onwards) means worse outcome and higher amplitude (0 onwards) means better outcome. Pharyngeal motor evoked potentials (pMEP): latency, amplitude, duration and area of obtained evoked potentials. Higher latency (0 onwards) means worse outcome and higher amplitude (0 onwards) means better outcome. Treatments and patients: 36 post-stroke patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia (PAS superior or equal to 2) randomized patients in 3 treatment arms (3 groups of 12 patients). Active and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): 90% of the resting motor threshold, 1250 pulses, 5 Hz. Active and sham Intrapharyngeal Electrical Stimulation (PES): 75% of tolerance threshold, pulses of 0.2 ms, 5 Hz, 10 min. Oral Capsaicin (active intervention, 10-5M, TRPV1 agonist) and placebo solution (sham): 100 mL, single administration. Administration of study therapies: The study will be performed in two visits separated for one week. In each visit patients will randomly receive active or sham treatment and a pre-post evaluation of biomechanics of deglutition (with VFS) and neurophysiological mechanisms (swallowing afferent and efferent pathways) will be performed in each visit. Acute randomized administration -> 1 active session (pre/post evaluation with VFS/pSEP/pMEP) + 1 separate control session 1 week apart (pre/post evaluation with VFS/pSEP/pMEP).

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Swallowing Disorder, Dysphagia, Stroke, Neurophysiologic Abnormality
    Keywords
    Oropharyngeal dysphagia, Stroke, Sensory stimulation

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Crossover Assignment
    Masking
    ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    36 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rtMS)
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Acute repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the pharyngeal sensory cortex. Applied intensity 90% of the resting motor threshold, 1250 pulses at 5 Hz. Each treatment arm was placebo/sham compared with a time separation of one week. The assignment to either active or sham was randomized.
    Arm Title
    Intrapharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES)
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Intrapharyngeal electrical stimulation applied to an intensity of 75% of the tolerance threshold with 0.2 ms pulses at 5 Hz during 10 min. Each treatment arm was placebo/sham compared with a time separation of one week. The assignment to either active or sham was randomized.
    Arm Title
    Capsaicin
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    100 mL of oral capsaicin solution at a concentration of 10-5M. Each treatment arm was placebo/sham compared with a time separation of one week. The assignment to either active or sham was randomized
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    rTMS active and sham
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Intervention Description
    Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the pharyngeal sensory cortex.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    PES active and sham
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Intrapharyngeal electrical stimulation
    Intervention Description
    Intrapharyngeal electrical stimulation with a catheter delivering electrical pulses.
    Intervention Type
    Dietary Supplement
    Intervention Name(s)
    Capsaicin active and placebo
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    TRPV1 agonist (capsaicin at 10-5M) or placebo
    Intervention Description
    Capsaicin solution (TRPV1 agonist) at a concentration of 10-5M or placebo solution.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Pharyngeal motor evoked potential (pMEP): latency and amplitude
    Description
    Study the magnitude of the effect by calculating the change of the evoked potential from baseline immediately after the application of the intervention produced by the different treatments. This will be examined and compared between active and sham intervention.
    Time Frame
    The event wil be assessed with pMEP immediately after the application of the intervention (time frame maximum up to 2 hours).
    Title
    Pharyngeal sensory evoked potential (pSEP): latency and amplitude
    Description
    Study the magnitude of the effect by calculating the change of the evoked potential from baseline immediately after the application of the intervention produced by the different treatments. This will be examined and compared between active and sham intervention.
    Time Frame
    The event wil be assessed with pSEPs immediately after the application of the intervention (time frame maximum up to 2 hours).
    Title
    Penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) score
    Description
    Study the magnitude of the effect by calculating the change on the prevalence of unsafe swallow (PAS≥2) in videofluoroscopy (VFS) from baseline immediately after the application of the intervention. This will be examined and compared between active and sham intervention.
    Time Frame
    The event wil be assessed with the PAS score immediately after the application of the intervention (time frame maximum up to 2 hours from first assessment).
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Opening and closing time of the laryngeal vestibule
    Description
    Time of the laryngeal vestibule opening and closure ranges from 0 to 1000 ms.
    Time Frame
    The event wil be assessed with VFS immediately after the application of the intervention (time frame maximum up to 2 hours from first assessment).
    Title
    Prevalence of pharyngeal residue
    Description
    The presence of pharyngeal residue in individual subjects will be assessed.
    Time Frame
    The event will be assessed with VFS immediately after the application of the intervention (time frame maximum up to 2 hours from first assessment).
    Title
    Resting motor threshold (RMT) of the pharyngeal cortex
    Description
    RMT is defined as the stimulation intensity in which the half of the stimuli are able to evoke a motor evoked potential of al least 10 uV of amplitude.
    Time Frame
    The event wil be assessed with TMS immediately after the application of the intervention (time frame maximum up to 2 hours from first assessment).
    Title
    Pharyngeal sensory thresholds
    Description
    First perception and tolerance thresholds (from 0 to 100 mA) to electrical stimulation of the pharynx will be assessed by asking subjects the exact moment of first perception of the stimulus and the moment in which stimulation is not further tolerated, respectively.
    Time Frame
    The event wil be assessed with pharyngeal electrical stimulation immediately after the application of the intervention (time frame maximum up to 2 hours from first assessment).
    Title
    Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
    Description
    Seizures are the most feared side effect associated with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Seizures are a rare side event during and/or subsequent to a TMS session (1.4%, Bae et al., 2007) commonly not occurring beyond a few days after the last session. No other major or significant side effects are expected associated with the interventions.
    Time Frame
    Although its occurrence is early after the TMS session, seizures and other side effects will be monitored up to 3 months after the intervention.

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Patients older than 18 years. Patients with a diagnosis of stroke of more than 3 months of evolution. Patients with clinical signs of dysphagia according to the volume viscosity swallowing test (V-VST). Patients capable of complying with the study protocol. Explained study and signed informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: History of severe neurodegenerative, digestive diseases, epilepsy or previous seizures. Pacemaker or implanted defibrillator carriers. Implanted electrode carriers or other stimulation systems. Implant carriers or metal plates on the head or neck. Cochlear implant carriers. Medication pump carriers. History of hearing loss associated with noise. Cardiopulmonary instability. Oropharyngeal dysphagia of structural causes. History of head and neck surgery. Alcohol or drug dependence. Pregnancy or breastfeeding. Participate or have participated in another clinical interventionist trial in the 4 weeks prior to inclusion.
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Pere Clavé, PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Hospital de Mataró
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No

    Learn more about this trial

    Sensory Neuromodulation Protocol for the Treatment of Post-stroke Oropharyngeal Dysphagia.

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs