Bicarbonate vs Heparin Catheter Lock in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients (BICATH)
Primary Purpose
End Stage Renal Disease, Vascular Access Complication, Catheter Complications
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Mexico
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Sodium Bicarbonate 7.5% Injection
Heparin Sodium, 1000 Units/mL Injectable Solution 1
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional prevention trial for End Stage Renal Disease focused on measuring Sodium bicarbonate lock, Heparin lock, Vascular access complication
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who accept participation and sign informed consent.
- Incident or prevalent chronic hemodialysis patients who receive at least 2 sessions per week with 1 month of clinical stability defined as: no hospitalizations, no vascular access infections, no changes in blood flow prescription due to vascular access dysfunction.
- Patients with temporal catheter (Niagra 13.5 French/20 cm length, BARD Access System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA) as vascular access for hemodialysis.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Catheter dysfunction at baseline
- On anticoagulation therapy
- Patients with known coagulopathy or hemophilia
- Patients with Child-Pugh B or C liver failure
- Patients with thrombocytopenia less than 100,000 u / L
- Patients with central vessel stenosis and vena cava syndrome, previously documented.
- Patients with vascular access exhaustion.
- Patients who have undergone more than 2 vascular approaches for hemodialysis catheters.
- Patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Sites / Locations
- Hospital General "Dr. Miguel Silva" de Morelia
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Sodium bicarbonate catheter lock group (SBCL)
Heparin catheter lock group (HCL)
Arm Description
Chronic hemodialysis patients with a catheter as a vascular access, will be lock with sodium bicarbonate 7.5% Injection.
Chronic hemodialysis patients with a catheter as a vascular access, will be lock with heparin, 1000 Units/mL injectable solution
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Arterial line pressure at fixed blood flow in sodium bicarbonate lock versus heparin lock catheters in chronic hemodialysis patients
Arterial line pressure[mmHg] at 300 mL/min blood flow will be compared between sodium bicarbonate lock and heparin lock in chronic hemodialysis patients.
Arterial line pressure at fixed blood flow in sodium bicarbonate lock versus heparin lock catheters in chronic hemodialysis patients
Arterial line pressure[mmHg] at 300 mL/min blood flow will be compared between sodium bicarbonate lock and heparin lock in chronic hemodialysis patients.
Arterial line pressure at fixed blood flow in sodium bicarbonate lock versus heparin lock catheters in chronic hemodialysis patients
Arterial line pressure[mmHg] at 300 mL/min blood flow will be compared between sodium bicarbonate lock and heparin lock in chronic hemodialysis patients.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Incidence rate of catheter related bloodstream infection
Catheter related bloodstream infection rate (events per 100 days/catheter) will be compare between sodium bicarbonate lock versus heparin lock in chronic hemodialysis patients
Incidence rate of catheter thrombosis
Catheter thrombosis rate (events per 100 days/catheter) will be compare between sodium bicarbonate lock versus heparin lock in chronic hemodialysis patients
Adverse events incidence
To compare the frequency of hemorrhagic event, anaphylaxis, hypernatremia or death between sodium bicarbonate lock vs heparin lock in chronic hemodialysis patients
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04054128
First Posted
July 23, 2019
Last Updated
April 28, 2020
Sponsor
Hospital General "Dr. Miguel Silva" de Morelia
Collaborators
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, NAUSLIFE HEMODIALYSIS CLINICS
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04054128
Brief Title
Bicarbonate vs Heparin Catheter Lock in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients
Acronym
BICATH
Official Title
Bicarbonate vs Heparin Catheter Lock in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
September 11, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 20, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 28, 2020 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Hospital General "Dr. Miguel Silva" de Morelia
Collaborators
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, NAUSLIFE HEMODIALYSIS CLINICS
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Prospective clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of catheter lock with bicarbonate vs heparin in chronic hemodialysis patients. Two groups will be created, sodium bicarbonate lock group (experimental group) and heparin lock group (control group). Catheter pressures, flow, patency and infection outcomes will be compare between groups at different time points (30, 60 and 90 days).
Detailed Description
A prospective, randomized, clinical, open-label trial at Hospital General "Dr. Miguel Silva" de Morelia, Mexico.
The study period will be between august 16, 2019 to November 16, 2019. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of catheter lock with bicarbonate vs heparin in chronic hemodialysis patients. Primary outcome will be catheter function. Secondary outcomes will be Infectious complications, thrombotic complications, and frequency of adverse effects between groups.
All patients provided written informed consent before enrollment. The trial protocol was approved by Hospital General "Dr. Miguel Silva" Internal Review Board, register number 17-CI-16053153, and Research & Ethics committee, with register number 16-CEI-004-20161212, Study registry # 479/01/9.
Patients between 18-65 years old, incident or prevalent chronic hemodialysis, with 1 month of clinical stability and with temporal catheter as vascular access for hemodialysis are eligible. A total of 60 patients will be included in the study. All patients will be randomly assigned into one of two groups: SBCL (n=30), intervention group and HCL (n=30), as control group.
Before each hemodialysis treatment, catheters and connections will be inspected for leaks, evidence of damage, exit-site infection and tunnel infection. Intraluminal SBCL or HCL solution will be removed before connecting the hemodialysis catheter to a dialysis machine prior to any treatment.
During each treatment, patients will be prescribed and monitored for complications and standard treatment will be provided to every patient. After each treatment, blood will be rinsed from dialysis lines with 0.9% saline solution back to the patient. Upon the conclusion of treatment, all catheters will be flushed with 10 mL 0.9% saline solution per blood line respectively, after saline flush, catheter lock will be prescribed; SBCL group with 7.5% sodium bicarbonate solution, at a dose of 2 milliliters per lumen, and HCL group with sodium heparin at a concentration of 1000 units per milliliter, at a dose of 2 milliliters per lumen. Catheter exit site dressing changes occurred after each HD treatment.
Niagra 13.5 French/20 cm non tunneled catheter will be the standard vascular access. All central venous catheters will be inserted by an expert operator under strict aseptic protocol. Catheter care will be performed by trained dialysis staff. At the end of dialysis, all catheters will be flushed and locked with the respectively arm solution.
Function assessment will be based on both, pressure and flow measurements on arterial line, as well as measurements of arterial and venous line pressures and flow during hemodialysis sessions. Infectious and thrombotic complications will be assessed as defined.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
End Stage Renal Disease, Vascular Access Complication, Catheter Complications, Hemodialysis Access Failure, Hemodialysis Catheter Infection
Keywords
Sodium bicarbonate lock, Heparin lock, Vascular access complication
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Prospective, open label, clinical trial in chronic hemodialysis patients with a catheter as a vascular access, randomized to bicarbonate lock or heparin lock (control) as standard treatment.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Sodium bicarbonate catheter lock group (SBCL)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Chronic hemodialysis patients with a catheter as a vascular access, will be lock with sodium bicarbonate 7.5% Injection.
Arm Title
Heparin catheter lock group (HCL)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Chronic hemodialysis patients with a catheter as a vascular access, will be lock with heparin, 1000 Units/mL injectable solution
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Sodium Bicarbonate 7.5% Injection
Other Intervention Name(s)
Bicarnat® arm
Intervention Description
Sodium bicarbonate solution for catheter lock; 7.5% sodium bicarbonate solution will be used for catheter lock in both catheter lumens, 1.9 mL in each catheter lumen will be infused after hemodialysis treatment during 3 months.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Heparin Sodium, 1000 Units/mL Injectable Solution 1
Other Intervention Name(s)
Inhepar® arm
Intervention Description
Heparin for catheter lock: 1000 u/mL heparin solution will be used for catheter lock in both catheter lumens as standard treatment, 1.9 mL in each catheter lumen will be infused after hemodialysis treatment during 3 months.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Arterial line pressure at fixed blood flow in sodium bicarbonate lock versus heparin lock catheters in chronic hemodialysis patients
Description
Arterial line pressure[mmHg] at 300 mL/min blood flow will be compared between sodium bicarbonate lock and heparin lock in chronic hemodialysis patients.
Time Frame
30 days.
Title
Arterial line pressure at fixed blood flow in sodium bicarbonate lock versus heparin lock catheters in chronic hemodialysis patients
Description
Arterial line pressure[mmHg] at 300 mL/min blood flow will be compared between sodium bicarbonate lock and heparin lock in chronic hemodialysis patients.
Time Frame
60 days
Title
Arterial line pressure at fixed blood flow in sodium bicarbonate lock versus heparin lock catheters in chronic hemodialysis patients
Description
Arterial line pressure[mmHg] at 300 mL/min blood flow will be compared between sodium bicarbonate lock and heparin lock in chronic hemodialysis patients.
Time Frame
90 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Incidence rate of catheter related bloodstream infection
Description
Catheter related bloodstream infection rate (events per 100 days/catheter) will be compare between sodium bicarbonate lock versus heparin lock in chronic hemodialysis patients
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Incidence rate of catheter thrombosis
Description
Catheter thrombosis rate (events per 100 days/catheter) will be compare between sodium bicarbonate lock versus heparin lock in chronic hemodialysis patients
Time Frame
90 days
Title
Adverse events incidence
Description
To compare the frequency of hemorrhagic event, anaphylaxis, hypernatremia or death between sodium bicarbonate lock vs heparin lock in chronic hemodialysis patients
Time Frame
90 days
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients who accept participation and sign informed consent.
Incident or prevalent chronic hemodialysis patients who receive at least 2 sessions per week with 1 month of clinical stability defined as: no hospitalizations, no vascular access infections, no changes in blood flow prescription due to vascular access dysfunction.
Patients with temporal catheter (Niagra 13.5 French/20 cm length, BARD Access System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA) as vascular access for hemodialysis.
Exclusion Criteria:
Catheter dysfunction at baseline
On anticoagulation therapy
Patients with known coagulopathy or hemophilia
Patients with Child-Pugh B or C liver failure
Patients with thrombocytopenia less than 100,000 u / L
Patients with central vessel stenosis and vena cava syndrome, previously documented.
Patients with vascular access exhaustion.
Patients who have undergone more than 2 vascular approaches for hemodialysis catheters.
Patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Israel Campos, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Hospital General "Dr. Miguel Silva" de Morelia
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital General "Dr. Miguel Silva" de Morelia
City
Morelia
State/Province
Michoacan
ZIP/Postal Code
58020
Country
Mexico
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23727169
Citation
Jha V, Garcia-Garcia G, Iseki K, Li Z, Naicker S, Plattner B, Saran R, Wang AY, Yang CW. Chronic kidney disease: global dimension and perspectives. Lancet. 2013 Jul 20;382(9888):260-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60687-X. Epub 2013 May 31. Erratum In: Lancet. 2013 Jul 20;382(9888):208.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23052655
Citation
Ma A, Shroff R, Hothi D, Lopez MM, Veligratli F, Calder F, Rees L. A comparison of arteriovenous fistulas and central venous lines for long-term chronic haemodialysis. Pediatr Nephrol. 2013 Feb;28(2):321-6. doi: 10.1007/s00467-012-2318-2. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22321404
Citation
Adib-Hajbaghery M, Molavizadeh N, Alavi NM. Quality of care of vascular access in hemodialysis patients in a hemodialysis center in Iran. J Vasc Nurs. 2012 Mar;30(1):24-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2011.10.002.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15855206
Citation
Agharazii M, Plamondon I, Lebel M, Douville P, Desmeules S. Estimation of heparin leak into the systemic circulation after central venous catheter heparin lock. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005 Jun;20(6):1238-40. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh841. Epub 2005 Apr 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18764795
Citation
Moran JE, Ash SR; ASDIN Clinical Practice Committee. Locking solutions for hemodialysis catheters; heparin and citrate--a position paper by ASDIN. Semin Dial. 2008 Sep-Oct;21(5):490-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2008.00466.x. Epub 2008 Aug 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23992231
Citation
Chen FK, Li JJ, Song Y, Zhang YY, Chen P, Zhao CZ, Gong HY, Yao DF. Concentrated sodium chloride catheter lock solution--a new effective alternative method for hemodialysis patients with high bleeding risk. Ren Fail. 2014 Feb;36(1):17-22. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2013.830207. Epub 2013 Sep 2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16170812
Citation
Palomo I, Pereira J, Alarcon M, Diaz G, Hidalgo P, Pizarro I, Jara E, Rojas P, Quiroga G, Moore-Carrasco R. Prevalence of heparin-induced antibodies in patients with chronic renal failure undergoing hemodialysis. J Clin Lab Anal. 2005;19(5):189-95. doi: 10.1002/jcla.20076.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23292266
Citation
Yon CK, Low CL. Sodium citrate 4% versus heparin as a lock solution in hemodialysis patients with central venous catheters. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013 Jan 15;70(2):131-6. doi: 10.2146/ajhp120300.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16627606
Citation
Shanks RM, Sargent JL, Martinez RM, Graber ML, O'Toole GA. Catheter lock solutions influence staphylococcal biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Aug;21(8):2247-55. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl170. Epub 2006 Apr 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24125729
Citation
Zhao Y, Li Z, Zhang L, Yang J, Yang Y, Tang Y, Fu P. Citrate versus heparin lock for hemodialysis catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Mar;63(3):479-90. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.08.016. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24949292
Citation
Beigi AA, HadiZadeh MS, Salimi F, Ghaheri H. Heparin compared with normal saline to maintain patency of permanent double lumen hemodialysis catheters: A randomized controlled trial. Adv Biomed Res. 2014 May 28;3:121. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.133192. eCollection 2014.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28063456
Citation
Zhong L, Wang HL, Xu B, Yuan Y, Wang X, Zhang YY, Ji L, Pan ZM, Hu ZS. Normal saline versus heparin for patency of central venous catheters in adult patients - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2017 Jan 8;21(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1585-x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7382058
Citation
Wong DW, Mishkin FS, Tanaka TT. The effects of bicarbonate on blood coagulation. JAMA. 1980 Jul 4;244(1):61-2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29264917
Citation
Farha MA, French S, Stokes JM, Brown ED. Bicarbonate Alters Bacterial Susceptibility to Antibiotics by Targeting the Proton Motive Force. ACS Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 9;4(3):382-390. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.7b00194. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22882263
Citation
Nostro A, Cellini L, Di Giulio M, D'Arrigo M, Marino A, Blanco AR, Favaloro A, Cutroneo G, Bisignano G. Effect of alkaline pH on staphylococcal biofilm formation. APMIS. 2012 Sep;120(9):733-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2012.02900.x. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Bicarbonate vs Heparin Catheter Lock in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs