search
Back to results

A Comparison of the Resection Rate for Cold and Hot Snare Polypectomy for 5-15 mm Colorectal Polyps

Primary Purpose

Adenomatous Polyps

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cold snare polypectomy
Hot snare polypectomy
Endoscopic margin observation method
Sponsored by
Yuqi He
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Adenomatous Polyps focused on measuring Cold snare polypectomy, Hot snare polypectomy, Colorectal polyps, CARE Study, Complete resection rate

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient ≥40 and <70 years old
  • Provide written informed consent
  • Patients are found to have colorectal polyps between 5 and 15mm in size

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of inflammatory bowel disease
  • Polyposis of the alimentary tract
  • Antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy 5 days before the procedure
  • Pregnancy
  • Haemodialysis
  • An American Society of Anaesthesiologists class III or higher
  • Depressed lesions and lesions highly suspected to be cancerous based on endoscopic appearance.

Sites / Locations

  • Department of Gastroenterology, 7th medical center of PLA general hospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Hot snare polypectomy (HSP)

Cold snare polypectomy (CSP)

Arm Description

The polyp size was measured using the tip of the snare catheter (2.5 mm). According to the randomized group, patients with HSP group were treated with HSP to excise 5-15 mm colorectal polyps. After resection, the jet stream will be used to thoroughly clean the mucosal defect. After the endoscopist carefully observed the edge of the resection to complete the polypectomy, a 2- or 4-quad biopsy was performed from the symmetrical margin of the mucosal defect to confirm the presence or absence of residual lesions.

The polyp size was measured using the tip of the snare catheter (2.5 mm). After randomization, patients in the CSP group will be treated with CSP to remove colorectal polyps of 10-15 mm size. After resection, the jet stream will be used to thoroughly clean the mucosal defect. After the endoscopic surgeon carefully observed the resection margin to complete the polypectomy, a 2- or 4-quad biopsy was performed from the symmetrical margin of the mucosal defect to confirm the presence or absence of residual lesions.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Complete resection rate
The primary endpoint was the complete resection rate, defined as no evidence of adenomatous tissue in the biopsied specimens, among all pathologically confirmed adenomatous polyps. The complete resection rates in the HSP and CSP groups of 5-15mm polyps were compared. The complete resection rates in the HSP and CSP groups of 5-9 mm polyps group were compared. and the complete resection rates in the HSP and CSP groups of 10-15 mm polyps group were also compared.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Methodological evaluation of Endoscopic margin observation method
After polypectomy, the operating assistant unfolded the retrieved polyp specimen in the natural shape and pinned flat on a cork board according to the ESD specimen fixation method. Then endoscopic view judged the margin of the unfolded polyp.If a complete normal mucosal margin is visible, it is considered a complete resection. Then, the complete resection rate of the method was compared with the complete resection rate of the traditional pathological biopsy to judge the accuracy of the method.
Polyp retrieval rate
Polyp specimens retrieval rate
Number of additional resections (snaring and/or biopsy)
snaring and/or biopsy
Rate of difficult/impossible resection by CSP
Difficult CSP resection was defined as a resection procedure that required ≥5s after snaring.An impossible CSP resection was defined as a resection procedure that needed high-frequency electric current.
Time required for resection
Time required for resection was defined as the time between the insertion of the snare into working channel to the end of polyp resection. The time was measured by endoscopists or assistant by using stopwatch that was built in the endoscopic system. When submucosal injection was conducted in the HSP group, the time required for resection was measured from the insertion of the injection needle into the working channel until the end of polyp resection.
The rates of procedure-related complications
Delayed bleeding was defined as haemorrhage after colonoscopy requiring endoscopic haemostasis. It should be noted that, if vascular stump is found on the wound surface after HSP, electrocoagulation treatment is required and the probability is recorded.After CSP, it is necessary to observe whether there is active bleeding.Titanium clips were not used for hemostasis in both groups.

Full Information

First Posted
July 29, 2019
Last Updated
August 14, 2021
Sponsor
Yuqi He
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04061005
Brief Title
A Comparison of the Resection Rate for Cold and Hot Snare Polypectomy for 5-15 mm Colorectal Polyps
Official Title
7th Medical Center of PLA General Hospital
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
August 20, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 20, 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 20, 2022 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Yuqi He

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
In 2015, there were approximately 1.7 million new cases of colorectal cancer(CRC), and the deaths was close to 832,000. CRC has become the third most common malignant tumor in the world and the second leading cause of cancer death. This is mainly because adenomatous polyps can be transformed into cancer through adenoma-cancer sequences. Screening for CRC has been shown to prevent CRC and related deaths, especially colonoscopy and endoscopic resection of adenomatous polyps. Currently, the main methods of resection for polyps below 20 mm include hot snare polypectomy (HSP) and cold snare polypectomy (CSP). Due to the use of electrocautery, HSP has been shown to cause damage to the deep submucosa, the muscularis propria and submucosal arteries, resulting in postoperative bleeding, perforation and other adverse events. Compared with HSP, the mechanical cutting method is called CSP without electrocautery. Due to the short operation time and low incidence of adverse events, especially after polypectomy, it has caused more and more attention of endoscopists. The removal of 5 mm polyps from CSP has been recommended as the preferred technique by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(ESGE) Guidelines. A recent multicenter, prospective study in Japan recommended CSP as the standard treatment for excision of 4-9mm polyps. However, the average diameter of polyps in this study was 5.4 mm, which was not sufficient for the safety of CSP in polyps above 5 mm. In addition, there are few prospective studies of CSP complete removal of colorectal polyps 10-15 mm. More importantly, the report pointed out that 10% of 5 to 20 mm polyps were not completely removed, and some studies have shown that the cut polyp specimens are not sufficient for adequate pathological evaluation, which the researchers do not fully recognize. In this study, the investigators were interested in comparing the complete resection rates of large (10 -15 mm) and small (4-9 mm) colorectal polyps with CSP and HSP and improved methods for evaluating complete resection.
Detailed Description
Participants who meet inclusion criteria will be asked to participate, investigators will include all patients with resectable polyps, but only adenomatous polyps will be included for analysis. See also inclusion and exclusion criteria. Colonoscopy, after bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol solution was performed using standard colonoscopes (GIF-HQ290I) and polypectomy snares. All procedures were performed by experienced endoscopists(each with over 1000 colonoscopies performed) including CSP and HSP. All patients with a colorectal 5-15 mm polyp detected will be randomized to receive HSP and CSP treatment. Polyp size will be measured using the tip of the snare catheter (2.5mm). Difficulty of resection will be grade by polyp resection time. Following the resection, jet stream of water will be used to wash mucosal defect thoroughly. After endoscopist's attestation that polyp removal was complete by carefully observe the resection margins with near focus mode, for large lesions(10-15mm)4 biopsies will be performed from all four quadrants of resection margins, for small lesions(4-9mm) biopsies were performed from two marginal sites located symmetrically on the left and right of the mucosal defects to confirm residual polyp tissue. Difficulty of resection will be grade by polyp resection time. Following the resection, jet stream of water will be used to wash mucosal defect thoroughly. After endoscopist's attestation that polyp removal was complete by carefully observe the resection margins with near focus mode, for large lesions(10-15mm)4 biopsies will be performed from all four quadrants of resection margins, for small lesions(4-9mm) biopsies were performed from two marginal sites located symmetrically on the left and right of the mucosal defects to confirm residual polyp tissue. If polyp resection is complicated by bleeding(not self-sustained), no biopsies will be taken and any additional polyps that will be found during the remaining examination will be excluded from analysis. Severe bleeding that will complicate resection margins examination will be excluded from analysis, Endoscopic haemostasis will be performed when active haemorrhage continued for ≥30s. A single research subject may have many eligible polyps. To avoid taking many biopsies, the investigators will not include more than 5 eligible polyps(the first 5 that are detected) per patient in the study.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Adenomatous Polyps
Keywords
Cold snare polypectomy, Hot snare polypectomy, Colorectal polyps, CARE Study, Complete resection rate

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
RCT-HSP-CSP
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
750 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Hot snare polypectomy (HSP)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The polyp size was measured using the tip of the snare catheter (2.5 mm). According to the randomized group, patients with HSP group were treated with HSP to excise 5-15 mm colorectal polyps. After resection, the jet stream will be used to thoroughly clean the mucosal defect. After the endoscopist carefully observed the edge of the resection to complete the polypectomy, a 2- or 4-quad biopsy was performed from the symmetrical margin of the mucosal defect to confirm the presence or absence of residual lesions.
Arm Title
Cold snare polypectomy (CSP)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The polyp size was measured using the tip of the snare catheter (2.5 mm). After randomization, patients in the CSP group will be treated with CSP to remove colorectal polyps of 10-15 mm size. After resection, the jet stream will be used to thoroughly clean the mucosal defect. After the endoscopic surgeon carefully observed the resection margin to complete the polypectomy, a 2- or 4-quad biopsy was performed from the symmetrical margin of the mucosal defect to confirm the presence or absence of residual lesions.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Cold snare polypectomy
Intervention Description
CSP, which does not include electrocautery to do a polypectomy with a snare.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Hot snare polypectomy
Intervention Description
HSP, which uses the electrocautery to do a polypectomy with a snare.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Endoscopic margin observation method
Intervention Description
Endoscopic margin observation method, After rinsing the polyp specimen with physiological saline, fully natural extension, fixing it to the foam board with a needle, and observing the margin with a colonoscope or a magnifying colonoscope near-focus mode to determine whether there is residual polyp tissue.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Complete resection rate
Description
The primary endpoint was the complete resection rate, defined as no evidence of adenomatous tissue in the biopsied specimens, among all pathologically confirmed adenomatous polyps. The complete resection rates in the HSP and CSP groups of 5-15mm polyps were compared. The complete resection rates in the HSP and CSP groups of 5-9 mm polyps group were compared. and the complete resection rates in the HSP and CSP groups of 10-15 mm polyps group were also compared.
Time Frame
six months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Methodological evaluation of Endoscopic margin observation method
Description
After polypectomy, the operating assistant unfolded the retrieved polyp specimen in the natural shape and pinned flat on a cork board according to the ESD specimen fixation method. Then endoscopic view judged the margin of the unfolded polyp.If a complete normal mucosal margin is visible, it is considered a complete resection. Then, the complete resection rate of the method was compared with the complete resection rate of the traditional pathological biopsy to judge the accuracy of the method.
Time Frame
six months
Title
Polyp retrieval rate
Description
Polyp specimens retrieval rate
Time Frame
six months
Title
Number of additional resections (snaring and/or biopsy)
Description
snaring and/or biopsy
Time Frame
six months
Title
Rate of difficult/impossible resection by CSP
Description
Difficult CSP resection was defined as a resection procedure that required ≥5s after snaring.An impossible CSP resection was defined as a resection procedure that needed high-frequency electric current.
Time Frame
six months
Title
Time required for resection
Description
Time required for resection was defined as the time between the insertion of the snare into working channel to the end of polyp resection. The time was measured by endoscopists or assistant by using stopwatch that was built in the endoscopic system. When submucosal injection was conducted in the HSP group, the time required for resection was measured from the insertion of the injection needle into the working channel until the end of polyp resection.
Time Frame
six months
Title
The rates of procedure-related complications
Description
Delayed bleeding was defined as haemorrhage after colonoscopy requiring endoscopic haemostasis. It should be noted that, if vascular stump is found on the wound surface after HSP, electrocoagulation treatment is required and the probability is recorded.After CSP, it is necessary to observe whether there is active bleeding.Titanium clips were not used for hemostasis in both groups.
Time Frame
six months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient ≥40 and <70 years old Provide written informed consent Patients are found to have colorectal polyps between 5 and 15mm in size Exclusion Criteria: History of inflammatory bowel disease Polyposis of the alimentary tract Antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy 5 days before the procedure Pregnancy Haemodialysis An American Society of Anaesthesiologists class III or higher Depressed lesions and lesions highly suspected to be cancerous based on endoscopic appearance.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
yuqi he, doctor
Phone
+801066721299
Email
endohe@163.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
tianyang zhang
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
tianyang zhang
Organizational Affiliation
Medical department
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Department of Gastroenterology, 7th medical center of PLA general hospital
City
Beijing
State/Province
Dongcheng District
ZIP/Postal Code
100700
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
yuqi he
Phone
+801066721299
Email
endohe@163.com

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28970290
Citation
Kawamura T, Takeuchi Y, Asai S, Yokota I, Akamine E, Kato M, Akamatsu T, Tada K, Komeda Y, Iwatate M, Kawakami K, Nishikawa M, Watanabe D, Yamauchi A, Fukata N, Shimatani M, Ooi M, Fujita K, Sano Y, Kashida H, Hirose S, Iwagami H, Uedo N, Teramukai S, Tanaka K. A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4-9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study). Gut. 2018 Nov;67(11):1950-1957. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314215. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28192823
Citation
Matsuura N, Takeuchi Y, Yamashina T, Ito T, Aoi K, Nagai K, Kanesaka T, Matsui F, Fujii M, Akasaka T, Hanaoka N, Higashino K, Tomita Y, Ito Y, Ishihara R, Iishi H, Uedo N. Incomplete resection rate of cold snare polypectomy: a prospective single-arm observational study. Endoscopy. 2017 Mar;49(3):251-257. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-100215. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

A Comparison of the Resection Rate for Cold and Hot Snare Polypectomy for 5-15 mm Colorectal Polyps

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs