Scar Location and Acute Haemodynamic Response to MultiPoint Pacing Study in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Scar Location and Acute Haemodynamic Response to MultiPoint Pacing Study in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

SCar Location and Acute Haemodynamic Response to MultiPoint Pacing in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (SCAR MPP Study)

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) is a proven treatment for heart failure. CRT consists of a special pacemaker with two/three leads (insulated wires which take the electrical impulses from the device to the heart), one in the right ventricle, one in a vein on the outer surface of the left ventricle (in a vessel called coronary sinus or CS) and sometimes one in the right atrium (right top chamber of the heart). Tiny electrical impulses are simultaneously sent to the ventricles to make them beating together again in a more synchronised pattern. This leads to a coordinated, synchronous pumping action that, in most patients, translates into improved heart failure symptoms and improved quality and quantity of life, reducing the chance of being admitted to hospital with worsening heart failure. Unfortunately up to one third of the patients do not benefit from CRT therapy and to date there are no useful criteria to predict the response to CRT. In an effort to improve the response rate to CRT, alternative methods have been developed. In particular, a new technology called MultiPoint Pacing (MPP) (St. Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA) has recently become available. It allows simultaneous stimulation of 2 different points in the left ventricle by using a single lead with four electrodes. This strategy should improve the pumping function of the heart by recruiting a larger mass of muscle. Although MPP is as safe and as effective as standard CRT pacing, the improvements to date in the heart pump function it gives over standard CRT pacing are variable and small. Recent evidence suggests that MPP pacing could be particularly beneficial in some subgroups of patients, in particular patients with a previous history of heart attack resulting in scar formation in the left ventricle. The investigators hypothesize that MPP works better when the lead is closer to the scar because this allows recruitment of areas with slow conduction, thus increasing synchronization further. To this aim, they plan to compare, in each patient, the acute response produced by MPP on the cardiac function when the CS lead is placed close to myocardial scar and when it is placed far from scar respectively.

A prospective single-centre pilot study will be conducted to investigate this topic. Fifteen patients, with a history of previous ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) resulting in myocardial scar and elected to CRT implant at the OUH, will be enrolled in this study. Compared to standard practice, additional research investigations will be a baseline visit for eligibility assessment, informed consent and pre-CRT implant cardiac MRI, a three-dimensional electroanatomical map reconstruction of the CS venous system during the standard CRT implant and the evaluation of the acute haemodynamic response (AHR, percentage increase of LV-dP/dT max) of MPP over conventional single-site LV pacing during the CRT implant. The cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) will be performed in each patient 1-2 weeks before the CRT implant during the baseline visit. It will provide information regarding presence and location of myocardial scar and anatomy of the CS venous system. A de-novo CRT implant will be performed under fluoroscopic guidance as per standard care. All subjects will be implanted with a regulatory approved St. Jude Medical CRT device compatible with MPP feature (models n° CD3271-40(Q), CD3371-40(Q), CD3371-40C(QC) or newer) and St. Jude Medical quadripolar left ventricular lead (Quartet 1458Q or newer). The choice of the right ventricular and right atrial leads will be left to the operator. After implant of the right ventricular and right atrial leads, a CS venogram will be then performed as per standard practice (see intervention section for more details). A three-dimensional electroanatomical map of the CS venous system will be constructed with Precision mapping system and a Biotronik Vision wire (Biotronik Se & Co. KG, Berlin, Germany) by using the CS venogram as a guide. The map will be merged with the correspondent cardiac MRI images in order to locate the myocardial scar in respect to the CS branches. This will allow the identification of two target CS branches for the study measurements, one located in the peri-infarct region and one located in the remote myocardium. A Certus PressureWire will be then introduced into the LV. A PhysioMon software (Radi Medical Systems, Uppsala, Sweden) will be used for electronic calculation of the LV-dP/dTmax from every heartbeat for a period of at least thirty seconds to ensure steady-state conditions. The baseline LV-dP/dTmax will be measured during ventricular spontaneous rhythm. A St. Jude Medical quadripolar left ventricular lead will be sequentially placed in the "peri-infarct" CS branch and in the "remote myocardium" CS branch. In each site the percentage increase in LV-dP/dTmax (Acute Haemodynamic Response, AHR) produced by both conventional single-site and MPP LV pacing to will be measured. All 4 poles of the quadripolar lead will be used in turn for conventional single-site LV pacing, 3 different configurations will be used in turn for MPP. The LV-dP/dTmax will be recorded for each pacing configuration in order to identify the MPP and the single-site LV pacing configurations producing the best AHR (best percentage increase of LV-dP/dTmax). The AHR produced by the best MPP configuration in peri-infarct region will be compared with the AHR produced by the best MPP configuration in the remote myocardium. Moreover, the percentage increase of LV-dP/dTmax produced by the best MPP configuration over the best conventional single-site LV pacing in the peri-infarct region will be compared with the same measurement obtained in the remote myocardium. The decision about the final position of the LV lead and the activation of MPP feature after the CRT implant will be left to operator preference.

Three dimensional mapping of coronary sinus venous system with Abbott Precision mapping system and Biotronik Vision wire Merge with MRI images of CS and myocardial scar

Advancement of pressure wire to LV cavity via femoral/radial arterial access. Real time measurement of LV-dP/dTmax during conventional CRT and MPP after consecutive placement of LV lead in two different CS branches (peri-infarct region and remote myocardium)

Comparison of Acute Haemodynamic Response Produced by MPP in Peri-infarct Region and in the Remote Myocardium

Comparison between percentage change of maximal left ventricular pressure over time (LV-dP/dTmax) produced by multipoint pacing (MPP) over spontaneous ventricular activation in the peri-infarct region and percentage change of maximal left ventricular pressure over time (LV-dP/dTmax) produced by multipoint pacing (MPP) over spontaneous ventricular activation in the remote myocardium

Percentage change of LV dP/dT max produced by MPP over conventional single-site LV pacing in the peri-infarct region compared to the remote myocardium Comparison between percentage change of maximal left ventricular pressure over time (LV-dP/dTmax) produced by multipoint pacing (MPP) over conventional CRT pacing in the peri-infarct region and percentage change of maximal left ventricular pressure over time (LV-dP/dTmax) produced by multipoint pacing (MPP) over conventional CRT in the remote myocardium

Inclusion Criteria: Age of 18 years or over Previous STEMI (> 3 months before enrolment) and consequent LV scar; Standard indication to CRT-D (NYHA functional class III-IV despite optimal medical therapy, LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35 %, QRS duration ≥120 msec, LBBB); Sinus rhythm; Will and ability to give informed consent for participation in the study. Exclusion Criteria: Pregnancy, trying for a baby or breast feeding; Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study, or the participant's ability to participate in the study; Inability to tolerate MRI scanning (e.g. claustrophobia, unable to lie flat) Contraindications to MRI scanning (e.g. implantable devices, cranial aneurysm clips, metallic ocular foreign bodies, hypersensitivity to gadolinium); Significantly impaired renal function (eGFR < 30ml/min); History of allergy to cardiac MRI contrast media; Severe claustrophobia.