search
Back to results

The Clinical Comparison of Somofilcon A 1 Day and Nelfilcon A Daily Disposable Contact Lenses

Primary Purpose

Ametropia

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
somofilcon A
nelfilcon A
Sponsored by
Coopervision, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Ametropia

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • They are of legal age (18) and capacity to volunteer.
  • They understand their rights as a research subject and are willing and able to sign a Statement of Informed Consent.
  • They are willing and able to follow the protocol.
  • They agree not to participate in other clinical research for the duration of this study.
  • They have a contact lens spherical prescription between -1.00 to - 6.00D (inclusive)
  • They have a maximum of -1.00DC ocular astigmatism in each eye.
  • They can be satisfactorily fitted with the study lens types.
  • At dispensing, they can attain at least 0.20 logMAR distance high contrast visual acuity in each eye with the study lenses within the available power range.
  • They currently use soft contact lenses or have done so in the previous six months.
  • They are willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least five days per week and for at least eight hours per day).
  • They own a wearable pair of spectacles.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • They have an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
  • They have a systemic disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
  • They are using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment.
  • They have had cataract surgery.
  • They have had corneal refractive surgery.
  • They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or have keratoconus.
  • They are pregnant or breast-feeding.
  • They have any ocular abnormality which would, in the opinion of the investigator, normally contraindicate contact lens wear.
  • They have any infectious disease which would, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicate contact lens wear or pose a risk to study personnel, or they have any immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV), or a history of anaphylaxis or severe allergic reaction.
  • They have taken part in any other contact lens or care solution clinical trial or research, within two weeks prior to starting this study.
  • They currently wear either the clariti 1day or the DAILIES AquaComfort Plus lens.

Sites / Locations

  • Eurolens Research

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

somofilcon A, then nelfilcon A

nelfilcon A, then somofilcon A

Arm Description

Subjects will bilaterally wear the somofilcon A lenses, then crossover to nelfilcon A lenses after one week of wear. Both lenses will be worn on a daily wear basis for one week.

Subjects will bilaterally wear the nelfilcon A lenses, then crossover to somofilcon A lenses after one week of wear. Both lenses will be worn on a daily wear basis for one week.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Subjective Comfort at Lens Dispensing
Subjective comfort at lens dispensing on scale 0-100 (0=Causes pain. Cannot be tolerated to 100=Excellent. Cannot be felt.).
Subjective Comfort at Start of Day
Subjective comfort at start of day on scale 0-100 (0=Causes pain. Cannot be tolerated to 100=Excellent. Cannot be felt.).
Subjective Comfort at End of Day
Subjective comfort at end of day on scale 0-100 (0=Causes pain. Cannot be tolerated to 100=Excellent. Cannot be felt.).
Overall Subjective Comfort
Overall subjective comfort on scale 0-100 (0=Causes pain. Cannot be tolerated to 100=Excellent. Cannot be felt.).
Overall Subjective Comfort
Overall subjective comfort on scale 0-100 (0=Causes pain. Cannot be tolerated to 100=Excellent. Cannot be felt.).
Subjective Vision
Subjective Vision rated on scale 0-100 (0=unacceptable, lens cannot be worn to 100=excellent, unaware of an visual loss.)
Subjective Vision
Subjective Vision rated on scale 0-100 (0=unacceptable, lens cannot be worn to 100=excellent, unaware of an visual loss.)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Biomicroscopy - Conjunctival Redness Score
Conjunctival redness - slit lamp biomicroscopy using Efron Grading Scale, 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
Biomicroscopy - Limbal Redness Score
Limbal redness - slit lamp biomicroscopy using Efron Grading Scale, 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
Biomicroscopy - Corneal Staining Score
Corneal staining - slit lamp biomicroscopy using Efron Grading Scale, 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
Biomicroscopy - Conjunctival Staining Score
Conjunctival staining - slit lamp biomicroscopy using Efron Grading Scale, 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
Biomicroscopy - Papillary Conjunctivitis Score
Papillary conjunctivitis- slit lamp biomicroscopy using Efron Grading Scale, 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
Horizontal Centration - Lens Fit
Horizontal centration graded by -2 to 2 (-2= Extremely nasal, -1 slightly nasal, 0=optimum, 1=slightly temporal, 2=extremely temporal).
Horizontal Centration - Lens Fit
Horizontal centration graded by -2 to 2 (-2= Extremely nasal, -1 slightly nasal, 0=optimum, 1=slightly temporal, 2=extremely temporal).
Vertical Centration Grade - Lens Fit
Vertical centration graded by -2 to 2 (-2= Extremely inferior, -1 slightly inferior, 0=optimum, 1=slightly superior, 2=extremely superior).
Vertical Centration Grade - Lens Fit
Vertical centration graded by -2 to 2 (-2= Extremely inferior, -1 slightly inferior, 0=optimum, 1=slightly superior, 2=extremely superior).
Corneal Coverage Grade
Corneal coverage graded by -2 to 2 (-2=extremely inadequate, -1=slightly inadequate, but acceptable, 0=optimum, 1=slightly excessive, but acceptable, 2=extremely excessive).
Corneal Coverage Grade
Corneal coverage graded by -2 to 2 (-2=extremely inadequate, -1=slightly inadequate, but acceptable, 0=optimum, 1=slightly excessive, but acceptable, 2=extremely excessive).
Post-Blink Movement Grade
Post-blink movement graded by -2 to 2 (-2=extremely inadequate, -1=slightly inadequate, but acceptable, 0=optimum, 1=slightly excessive, but acceptable, 2=extremely excessive).
Post-Blink Movement Grade
Post-blink movement graded by -2 to 2 (-2=extremely inadequate, -1=slightly inadequate, but acceptable, 0=optimum, 1=slightly excessive, but acceptable, 2=extremely excessive).
Ocular Redness Rating
Ocular redness rating rated on a scale 0-100 (0=extremely poor, intolerable levels of redness to 100 = excellent, no redness)

Full Information

First Posted
August 21, 2019
Last Updated
November 20, 2020
Sponsor
Coopervision, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04067141
Brief Title
The Clinical Comparison of Somofilcon A 1 Day and Nelfilcon A Daily Disposable Contact Lenses
Official Title
The Clinical Comparison of the Clariti 1 Day and DAILIES AquaComfort PLUS Daily Disposable Contact Lenses
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 4, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 5, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 20, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Coopervision, Inc.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This subject-masked, randomized, bilateral crossover study will compare the clinical performance and subjective acceptance of the somofilcon A 1 day soft contact lens with the nelfilcon A daily disposable lens when used on a daily wear, daily disposable basis.
Detailed Description
This will be a randomized, subject-masked, crossover, bilateral study, controlled by cross-comparison. This will compare the clinical performance and subjective acceptance of the somofilcon A 1 day soft contact lens with the nelfilcon A daily disposable lens when used on a daily wear, daily disposable basis. Subjects will use each lens type for a week in random sequence. Follow-up visits for each lens will be performed after one week of wear. Lenses will be worn on a daily wear, daily disposable wear schedule.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Ametropia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Model Description
This is a bilateral crossover study
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
70 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
somofilcon A, then nelfilcon A
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects will bilaterally wear the somofilcon A lenses, then crossover to nelfilcon A lenses after one week of wear. Both lenses will be worn on a daily wear basis for one week.
Arm Title
nelfilcon A, then somofilcon A
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects will bilaterally wear the nelfilcon A lenses, then crossover to somofilcon A lenses after one week of wear. Both lenses will be worn on a daily wear basis for one week.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
somofilcon A
Other Intervention Name(s)
somofilcon A 1 day, test lens, clariti 1 day
Intervention Description
Contact Lens
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
nelfilcon A
Other Intervention Name(s)
nelfilcon A Daily Disposable Contact Lens, control lens, DAILIES AquaComfort PLUS daily disposable
Intervention Description
Contact Lens
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Subjective Comfort at Lens Dispensing
Description
Subjective comfort at lens dispensing on scale 0-100 (0=Causes pain. Cannot be tolerated to 100=Excellent. Cannot be felt.).
Time Frame
Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense)
Title
Subjective Comfort at Start of Day
Description
Subjective comfort at start of day on scale 0-100 (0=Causes pain. Cannot be tolerated to 100=Excellent. Cannot be felt.).
Time Frame
1 week
Title
Subjective Comfort at End of Day
Description
Subjective comfort at end of day on scale 0-100 (0=Causes pain. Cannot be tolerated to 100=Excellent. Cannot be felt.).
Time Frame
1 week
Title
Overall Subjective Comfort
Description
Overall subjective comfort on scale 0-100 (0=Causes pain. Cannot be tolerated to 100=Excellent. Cannot be felt.).
Time Frame
Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense)
Title
Overall Subjective Comfort
Description
Overall subjective comfort on scale 0-100 (0=Causes pain. Cannot be tolerated to 100=Excellent. Cannot be felt.).
Time Frame
1 week
Title
Subjective Vision
Description
Subjective Vision rated on scale 0-100 (0=unacceptable, lens cannot be worn to 100=excellent, unaware of an visual loss.)
Time Frame
Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense)
Title
Subjective Vision
Description
Subjective Vision rated on scale 0-100 (0=unacceptable, lens cannot be worn to 100=excellent, unaware of an visual loss.)
Time Frame
1 week
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Biomicroscopy - Conjunctival Redness Score
Description
Conjunctival redness - slit lamp biomicroscopy using Efron Grading Scale, 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
Time Frame
One Week
Title
Biomicroscopy - Limbal Redness Score
Description
Limbal redness - slit lamp biomicroscopy using Efron Grading Scale, 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
Time Frame
One week
Title
Biomicroscopy - Corneal Staining Score
Description
Corneal staining - slit lamp biomicroscopy using Efron Grading Scale, 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
Time Frame
One week
Title
Biomicroscopy - Conjunctival Staining Score
Description
Conjunctival staining - slit lamp biomicroscopy using Efron Grading Scale, 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
Time Frame
One week
Title
Biomicroscopy - Papillary Conjunctivitis Score
Description
Papillary conjunctivitis- slit lamp biomicroscopy using Efron Grading Scale, 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
Time Frame
One week
Title
Horizontal Centration - Lens Fit
Description
Horizontal centration graded by -2 to 2 (-2= Extremely nasal, -1 slightly nasal, 0=optimum, 1=slightly temporal, 2=extremely temporal).
Time Frame
Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense)
Title
Horizontal Centration - Lens Fit
Description
Horizontal centration graded by -2 to 2 (-2= Extremely nasal, -1 slightly nasal, 0=optimum, 1=slightly temporal, 2=extremely temporal).
Time Frame
One Week
Title
Vertical Centration Grade - Lens Fit
Description
Vertical centration graded by -2 to 2 (-2= Extremely inferior, -1 slightly inferior, 0=optimum, 1=slightly superior, 2=extremely superior).
Time Frame
Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense)
Title
Vertical Centration Grade - Lens Fit
Description
Vertical centration graded by -2 to 2 (-2= Extremely inferior, -1 slightly inferior, 0=optimum, 1=slightly superior, 2=extremely superior).
Time Frame
One week
Title
Corneal Coverage Grade
Description
Corneal coverage graded by -2 to 2 (-2=extremely inadequate, -1=slightly inadequate, but acceptable, 0=optimum, 1=slightly excessive, but acceptable, 2=extremely excessive).
Time Frame
Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense)
Title
Corneal Coverage Grade
Description
Corneal coverage graded by -2 to 2 (-2=extremely inadequate, -1=slightly inadequate, but acceptable, 0=optimum, 1=slightly excessive, but acceptable, 2=extremely excessive).
Time Frame
One week
Title
Post-Blink Movement Grade
Description
Post-blink movement graded by -2 to 2 (-2=extremely inadequate, -1=slightly inadequate, but acceptable, 0=optimum, 1=slightly excessive, but acceptable, 2=extremely excessive).
Time Frame
Baseline (after 5 minutes of lens dispense)
Title
Post-Blink Movement Grade
Description
Post-blink movement graded by -2 to 2 (-2=extremely inadequate, -1=slightly inadequate, but acceptable, 0=optimum, 1=slightly excessive, but acceptable, 2=extremely excessive).
Time Frame
1 week
Title
Ocular Redness Rating
Description
Ocular redness rating rated on a scale 0-100 (0=extremely poor, intolerable levels of redness to 100 = excellent, no redness)
Time Frame
1 week

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: They are of legal age (18) and capacity to volunteer. They understand their rights as a research subject and are willing and able to sign a Statement of Informed Consent. They are willing and able to follow the protocol. They agree not to participate in other clinical research for the duration of this study. They have a contact lens spherical prescription between -1.00 to - 6.00D (inclusive) They have a maximum of -1.00DC ocular astigmatism in each eye. They can be satisfactorily fitted with the study lens types. At dispensing, they can attain at least 0.20 logMAR distance high contrast visual acuity in each eye with the study lenses within the available power range. They currently use soft contact lenses or have done so in the previous six months. They are willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least five days per week and for at least eight hours per day). They own a wearable pair of spectacles. Exclusion Criteria: They have an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear. They have a systemic disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear. They are using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment. They have had cataract surgery. They have had corneal refractive surgery. They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or have keratoconus. They are pregnant or breast-feeding. They have any ocular abnormality which would, in the opinion of the investigator, normally contraindicate contact lens wear. They have any infectious disease which would, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicate contact lens wear or pose a risk to study personnel, or they have any immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV), or a history of anaphylaxis or severe allergic reaction. They have taken part in any other contact lens or care solution clinical trial or research, within two weeks prior to starting this study. They currently wear either the clariti 1day or the DAILIES AquaComfort Plus lens.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Eurolens Research
City
Manchester
ZIP/Postal Code
M13 9PL
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

The Clinical Comparison of Somofilcon A 1 Day and Nelfilcon A Daily Disposable Contact Lenses

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs