search
Back to results

Virtual Reality for Improving Pain and Distress in Patients With Advanced Stage Colorectal Cancer (VR Blue)

Primary Purpose

Colorectal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
VR Blue
Sponsored by
Duke University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Colorectal Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 18-85
  • a diagnosis of stage IV colorectal cancer
  • clinical pain documented in medical chart (>4 on a 0-10 scale) and confirmed on the day of their study appointment (>4 on a 0-10 scale)
  • being able to read and speak English
  • self-reported normal or corrected to normal vision
  • self-reported normal hearing

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a serious mental illness (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder) as indicated by medical records
  • a medical condition that contraindicates safe participation in the study (e.g., recent myocardial infarction)
  • visual, hearing, or cognitive impairment that will interfere with the patient's ability to engage in the intervention

Sites / Locations

  • Duke Cancer Institute

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

VR Blue

Arm Description

VR Blue is a protocol for patients with advanced stage colorectal cancer who experience persistent pain. Participants will complete a single 30-minute laboratory-based virtual reality underwater/sea environment (VR Blue) session. VR Blue is an immersive computer-generated environment featuring calming scenic graphics and relaxing nature music.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Feasibility, Assessed by Examining Number of Participants Accrued
Feasibility was assessed by examining number of participants accrued.
Feasibility, Assessed by Examining Number of Participants With >80% Adherence to the Protocol
Feasibility will be assessed by examining protocol adherence (>80% adherence to the protocol [defined in this study as the degree to which participants are willing and able to complete the 30-minute VR exposure])
Feasibility, Assessed by Number of Participants With Completed Data
Feasibility will be assessed by examining completed data (>80% data collected at the study appointment, including pre-, midpoint, and post-VR assessments)
Acceptability Using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire
This questionnaire contains 10 items rated from 1=low acceptability to 4=high acceptability; scores are created by utilizing the Likert Scale to average Client Satisfaction Questionnaire answers resulting in a score range from 1-4. The participant will complete this acceptability questionnaire as part of their post-VR session assessment.
Number of Participants With VR Side Effects
Safety of the VR protocol will be assessed based on participants' report of VR side effects, such as motion sickness, dizziness, headache, nausea, or other negative physical reactions

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Pain Severity as Assessed With the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Pain will be assessed with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Patients will rate their "pain right now" from 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable. An average of the responses to these items is used to create a single pain severity score.
Pain Interference as Assessed With the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Pain Interference Scale
Pain interference will be assessed with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Pain Interference Scale. Patients will rate how much pain interfered with a variety of activities and mood states over the last 7 days from 0=does not interfere to 10=completely interferes. An average of the responses to these items is used to create a single pain severity score.
Change in Tension as Measured With the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) items are rated on a 0-100 scale. 0=no tension at all, 100=maximum tolerable tension. An average of the responses at each time-point were used to create a single score of change from pre-VR session to post-VR session.
Change in Distress as Measured With the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) items are rated on a 0-100 scale. 0=no stress at all, 100=maximum tolerable stress. An average of the responses at each time-point were used to create a single score of change from pre-VR session to post-VR session.
Change in Pain Catastrophizing as Measured With the Coping Strategies Questionnaire's Pain Catastrophizing Subscale
Items will be rated on a scale ranging from 0=never do to 6=always do when in pain. An average of the responses to these items is used to create a single score of change from pre-VR session to post-VR session.
Change in Pain Self-efficacy as Measured Using Items Adapted From the Self-efficacy for Pain Management Subscale of the Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale
Self-efficacy will be measured using items adapted from the self-efficacy for pain management subscale of the Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale. Items are rated on a 10-point scale ranging from 10=very uncertain to 100=very certain. Scores are averaged to give an overall value of change from pre-VR session to post-VR session for pain self-efficacy.

Full Information

First Posted
August 23, 2019
Last Updated
July 6, 2023
Sponsor
Duke University
Collaborators
University of Colorado, Denver, Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group, National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR), National Institutes of Health (NIH)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04069702
Brief Title
Virtual Reality for Improving Pain and Distress in Patients With Advanced Stage Colorectal Cancer
Acronym
VR Blue
Official Title
Pilot Testing a Virtual Reality Protocol for Improving Pain and Pain-Related Distress in Patients With Advanced Stage Colorectal Cancer
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 12, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 19, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 19, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Duke University
Collaborators
University of Colorado, Denver, Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group, National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR), National Institutes of Health (NIH)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Patients with advanced colorectal cancer often experience high levels of debilitating pain and pain-related psychological distress. Pain in cancer patients is typically treated with analgesics. There is growing agreement that non-pharmacological pain management strategies are needed to treat pain in advanced cancer patients. Recent evidence suggests Virtual Reality (VR) experiences can lead to reductions in acute pain; however, VR has not been tested in advanced cancer patients having persistent pain. VR could represent a valuable addition to our current armamentarium of treatments for persistent pain in palliative care patients. VR provides individuals with an immersive computer-generated environment that can reduce pain, tension and distress. The proposed study builds upon and extends preliminary research in healthy participants conducted by Luana Colloca, MD, PhD. Dr. Colloca is a consultant on this project and the proposed study would be the first to extend VR Blue to a clinical population and test its effects on clinical pain. The objective is to gather initial data on advanced colorectal cancer patients' immediate response to a single VR session. The investigators will examine feasibility, acceptability, safety, and impact of exposure to VR Blue on the clinical pain experience of advanced colorectal cancer patients. The study will collect data on pain, tension and distress pre-, midpoint, and post-VR. The investigators will also examine how pre- to post-VR changes in key cognitive variables (i.e., pain catastrophizing, pain self-efficacy) relate to VR-related changes in pain, tension and distress. The investigators will also collect qualitative data following participants' VR experience to better understand patients' preferences, thoughts and feelings about the VR experience. Data will be used to optimize VR Blue for future study, including developing an intervention to support a multi-session VR protocol for advanced colorectal cancer patients. The proposed study represents the first step in a program of clinical research that seeks to test the efficacy of VR in improving pain and pain-related symptoms in advanced colorectal cancer patients. In the proposed study, the investigators will collect quantitative and qualitative data on the impact of VR Blue on pain and pain-related outcomes in 20 advanced colorectal cancer patients.
Detailed Description
Patients with advanced colorectal cancer often experience high levels of debilitating pain and pain-related psychological distress. Pain in cancer patients is typically treated with analgesics. Unfortunately, analgesics are not uniformly effective and often are associated with poorly tolerated side effects (e.g., constipation, nausea, sedation). There is growing agreement that non-pharmacological pain management strategies are needed to treat pain in advanced cancer patients. Recent evidence suggests Virtual Reality (VR) experiences can lead to reductions in acute pain; however, VR has not been tested in advanced cancer patients having persistent pain. VR could represent a valuable addition to our current armamentarium of treatments for persistent pain in palliative care patients. VR provides individuals with an immersive computer-generated environment that can reduce pain, tension and distress. VR may be particularly likely to positively impact cognitive pathways by changing pain-related cognitions (e.g., decreasing pain catastrophizing, increasing self-efficacy for pain control). VR-based interventions have the potential to alter these negative ways of thinking, and advanced cancer patients with persistent pain and pain-related distress may be particularly likely to benefit. The proposed study builds upon and extends preliminary research in healthy participants conducted by Luana Colloca, MD, PhD. That study found that exposure to a 30-minute virtual underwater/sea environment (VR Blue) produced significant increases in pain tolerance for thermal pain stimuli compared to control conditions. Dr. Colloca is a consultant on this project and the proposed study would be the first to extend VR Blue to a clinical population and test its effects on clinical pain. The objective is to gather initial data on advanced colorectal cancer patients' immediate response to a single VR session. The investigators will examine feasibility, acceptability, safety, and impact of exposure to VR Blue on the clinical pain experience of advanced colorectal cancer patients. The study will collect data on pain, tension and distress pre-, midpoint, and post-VR. The investigators will also examine how pre- to post-VR changes in key cognitive variables (i.e., pain catastrophizing, pain self-efficacy) relate to VR-related changes in pain, tension and distress. The investigators will also collect qualitative data following participants' VR experience to better understand patients' preferences, thoughts and feelings about the VR experience. Data will be used to optimize VR Blue for future study, including developing an intervention to support a multi-session VR protocol for advanced colorectal cancer patients. The proposed study represents the first step in a program of clinical research that seeks to test the efficacy of VR in improving pain and pain-related symptoms in advanced colorectal cancer patients. In the proposed study, the investigators will collect quantitative and qualitative data on the impact of VR Blue on pain and pain-related outcomes in 20 advanced colorectal cancer patients. The long-term goal of this research is to improve quality of life in advanced colorectal cancer patients by decreasing pain, tension and distress. This project will provide preliminary data that will be used to inform and optimize development of a multi-session VR protocol to be tested in patients with advanced stage colorectal cancer that could be generalizable to other palliative care populations with pain.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Colorectal Cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
20 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
VR Blue
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
VR Blue is a protocol for patients with advanced stage colorectal cancer who experience persistent pain. Participants will complete a single 30-minute laboratory-based virtual reality underwater/sea environment (VR Blue) session. VR Blue is an immersive computer-generated environment featuring calming scenic graphics and relaxing nature music.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
VR Blue
Intervention Description
VR Blue provides patients with an immersive computer-generated environment that can reduce pain, tension and distress.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Feasibility, Assessed by Examining Number of Participants Accrued
Description
Feasibility was assessed by examining number of participants accrued.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Feasibility, Assessed by Examining Number of Participants With >80% Adherence to the Protocol
Description
Feasibility will be assessed by examining protocol adherence (>80% adherence to the protocol [defined in this study as the degree to which participants are willing and able to complete the 30-minute VR exposure])
Time Frame
30 minutes
Title
Feasibility, Assessed by Number of Participants With Completed Data
Description
Feasibility will be assessed by examining completed data (>80% data collected at the study appointment, including pre-, midpoint, and post-VR assessments)
Time Frame
90 minutes
Title
Acceptability Using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire
Description
This questionnaire contains 10 items rated from 1=low acceptability to 4=high acceptability; scores are created by utilizing the Likert Scale to average Client Satisfaction Questionnaire answers resulting in a score range from 1-4. The participant will complete this acceptability questionnaire as part of their post-VR session assessment.
Time Frame
90 minutes
Title
Number of Participants With VR Side Effects
Description
Safety of the VR protocol will be assessed based on participants' report of VR side effects, such as motion sickness, dizziness, headache, nausea, or other negative physical reactions
Time Frame
30 minutes
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Pain Severity as Assessed With the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Description
Pain will be assessed with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Patients will rate their "pain right now" from 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable. An average of the responses to these items is used to create a single pain severity score.
Time Frame
Pre-, post-VR session, approximately 90 minutes
Title
Pain Interference as Assessed With the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Pain Interference Scale
Description
Pain interference will be assessed with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Pain Interference Scale. Patients will rate how much pain interfered with a variety of activities and mood states over the last 7 days from 0=does not interfere to 10=completely interferes. An average of the responses to these items is used to create a single pain severity score.
Time Frame
Pre-VR session assessment
Title
Change in Tension as Measured With the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Description
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) items are rated on a 0-100 scale. 0=no tension at all, 100=maximum tolerable tension. An average of the responses at each time-point were used to create a single score of change from pre-VR session to post-VR session.
Time Frame
Pre-, post-VR session. Full study visit starting at pre-VR and ending at Post-VR is approximately 90 minutes.
Title
Change in Distress as Measured With the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Description
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) items are rated on a 0-100 scale. 0=no stress at all, 100=maximum tolerable stress. An average of the responses at each time-point were used to create a single score of change from pre-VR session to post-VR session.
Time Frame
Pre- and post-VR session, Full study visit starting at pre-VR and ending at Post-VR is approximately 90 minutes.
Title
Change in Pain Catastrophizing as Measured With the Coping Strategies Questionnaire's Pain Catastrophizing Subscale
Description
Items will be rated on a scale ranging from 0=never do to 6=always do when in pain. An average of the responses to these items is used to create a single score of change from pre-VR session to post-VR session.
Time Frame
Pre- and post-VR session, approximately 90 minutes
Title
Change in Pain Self-efficacy as Measured Using Items Adapted From the Self-efficacy for Pain Management Subscale of the Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale
Description
Self-efficacy will be measured using items adapted from the self-efficacy for pain management subscale of the Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale. Items are rated on a 10-point scale ranging from 10=very uncertain to 100=very certain. Scores are averaged to give an overall value of change from pre-VR session to post-VR session for pain self-efficacy.
Time Frame
Pre- and post-VR session, approximately 90 minutes

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: age 18-85 a diagnosis of stage IV colorectal cancer clinical pain documented in medical chart (>4 on a 0-10 scale) and confirmed on the day of their study appointment (>4 on a 0-10 scale) being able to read and speak English self-reported normal or corrected to normal vision self-reported normal hearing Exclusion Criteria: a serious mental illness (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder) as indicated by medical records a medical condition that contraindicates safe participation in the study (e.g., recent myocardial infarction) visual, hearing, or cognitive impairment that will interfere with the patient's ability to engage in the intervention
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sarah A Kelleher, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Duke University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Duke Cancer Institute
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27701
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
As part of the NIH data sharing directive, de-identified data from this study will be transferred to the PCRC De-Identified Data Repository located at the University of Colorado. The PCRC fully supports the Final NIH Statement on Sharing Research Data, and will assist all investigators and study personnel to ensure their compliance. Consistent with OMB Circular A-110 and subsequent NIH Grants Policy Statements, the PCRC will provide access to all de-identified data collected as part of PCRC-supported investigations, insofar as access is consistent with IRB/CHR rules, local, state, and Federal laws and regulations, and the HIPAA Privacy Rule.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data will become available after completion of the study and when summary data are published and otherwise made available. From this timepoint, data will be available for 5 years.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
The Principal Investigator will work with requesters and IRBs on a case by case basis.
Links:
URL
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.01.04.21268275v1
Description
Pre-print: Daily Lactobacillus Probiotic versus Placebo in COVID-19-Exposed Household Contacts (PROTECT-EHC): A Randomized Clinical Trial

Learn more about this trial

Virtual Reality for Improving Pain and Distress in Patients With Advanced Stage Colorectal Cancer

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs