Minimally Invasive Locking Plate Fixation vs Reamed Intramedullary Nail Fixation on Patients With Open Tibia Fracture
Primary Purpose
Open tíbia Fracture
Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Minimally Invasive Locking Plate Fixation
Intramedullary Nail Fixation
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Open tíbia Fracture
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Ages 18 - 60 years inclusive
- Open diaphyseal fracture
- Gustilo-Anderson Type I, II, IIIA
Exclusion Criteria:
- Closed, periarticular or pathological fracture
- Gustilo-Anderson Type IIIB,IIIC
- Patients with concomitant fractures in the ipsilateral limb
- The patient is unable to medically tolerate general anesthesia
- The patient is unable to provide informed consent or comply with completing questionnaires
- Tibia already infected as diagnosed by a surgeon
- The patient has been diagnosed with a severe psychiatric condition
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Minimally Invasive Locking Plate Fixation
Intramedullary Nail Fixation
Arm Description
Patients randomized to the Minimally Invasive Locking Plate Fixation arm will be treated with plate fixation. The plate may be applied in a percutaneous fashion. Any combination of locked and/or non-locked screws may be used.
Patients randomized to the Intramedullary Nail Fixation arm will be receive a standard locked intramedullary nail fixation. The nail must use at least one static interlock proximal to and one static interlock distal to the fracture site. The nail may be placed with a reamed technique.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
LEFS
failure.
Secondary Outcome Measures
EQ-5D
Reported Outcome and Quality of Life
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04072094
First Posted
August 19, 2019
Last Updated
May 9, 2020
Sponsor
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Collaborators
Taizhou Hospital, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, The First People's Hospital of Huzhou
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04072094
Brief Title
Minimally Invasive Locking Plate Fixation vs Reamed Intramedullary Nail Fixation on Patients With Open Tibia Fracture
Official Title
A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing the Effect of Minimally Invasive Locking Plate Fixation and Reamed Intramedullary Nail Fixation on Patients With Gustilo I-III A Open Tibia Fracture
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
June 2020 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
June 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 2025 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Collaborators
Taizhou Hospital, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, The First People's Hospital of Huzhou
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The best treatment for the open tibia fractures remains controversial. It is unknown whether minimally invasive locking plate or reamed intramedullary nail fixation will result in lower complication rates and better function.
Detailed Description
The best fixation method for open tibial fractures remains controversial. The current standard treatment options recommended the use of intramedullary nail for treating such fractures. Recent studies also showed favorable results for the use of plates in managing open tibial fractures. However, it is unknown whether locking plate or intramedullary nail fixation will result in lower complication rates and better function.
This study is a prospective, randomized trial to compare the safety and efficiency of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and reamed intramedullary nails in treating type I-II open tibial shaft fractures. The investigators hypothesize that neither intervention resulted in a superior disability rating at 12 months. Outcomes evaluated will include the rate of infection, the number of re-hospitalization for the complication, the time to bone healing, Patient-Reported outcome and quality of life and other complications.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Open tíbia Fracture
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
300 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Minimally Invasive Locking Plate Fixation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients randomized to the Minimally Invasive Locking Plate Fixation arm will be treated with plate fixation. The plate may be applied in a percutaneous fashion. Any combination of locked and/or non-locked screws may be used.
Arm Title
Intramedullary Nail Fixation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients randomized to the Intramedullary Nail Fixation arm will be receive a standard locked intramedullary nail fixation. The nail must use at least one static interlock proximal to and one static interlock distal to the fracture site. The nail may be placed with a reamed technique.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Minimally Invasive Locking Plate Fixation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Locking Plate Fixation
Intervention Description
Patients randomized to the Minimally Invasive Locking Plate Fixation arm will be treated with plate fixation. The plate may be applied in a percutaneous fashion. Any combination of locked and/or non-locked screws may be used.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Intramedullary Nail Fixation
Intervention Description
Patients randomized to the Intramedullary Nail Fixation arm will be receive a standard locked intramedullary nail fixation. The nail must use at least one static interlock proximal to and one static interlock distal to the fracture site. The nail may be placed with a reamed technique.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
LEFS
Description
failure.
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
EQ-5D
Description
Reported Outcome and Quality of Life
Time Frame
12 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
SF-12
Description
Reported Outcome and Quality of Life
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Fracture Healing
Description
Fracture healing is measured by the treating surgeon using standard clinical criteria.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Complications
Description
Soft tissue complications
Time Frame
12 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Ages 18 - 60 years inclusive
Open diaphyseal fracture
Gustilo-Anderson Type I, II, IIIA
Exclusion Criteria:
Closed, periarticular or pathological fracture
Gustilo-Anderson Type IIIB,IIIC
Patients with concomitant fractures in the ipsilateral limb
The patient is unable to medically tolerate general anesthesia
The patient is unable to provide informed consent or comply with completing questionnaires
Tibia already infected as diagnosed by a surgeon
The patient has been diagnosed with a severe psychiatric condition
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Zhao-ming Ye, MD
Phone
+86-571-87783553
Email
2192002@zju.edu.cn
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Ling-ling Sun, MD
Phone
+86-571-87783553
Email
sunlingling@zju.edu.cn
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Minimally Invasive Locking Plate Fixation vs Reamed Intramedullary Nail Fixation on Patients With Open Tibia Fracture
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs