A Study Comparing the Effectiveness and Convenience of Dietary Therapy for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
Primary Purpose
Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
dietary therapy
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Irritable Bowel syndrome - as defined by abdominal pain and altered bowel habit in the absence of organic pathology to explain the symptoms.This is the contemporary definition as provided by the Rome IV committee.
- Age 18-65 years
- English literate
- Can travel to hospital
- Telephone/internet access
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inflammatory bowel disease
- Coeliac disease
- Gastrointestinal cancer
- Previous abdominal surgery
- Scleroderma
- Poorly controlled diabetes
- Severe liver disease
- Severe renal disease
- Severe respiratory disease
- Severe cardiac disease
- Severe psychiatric disease
- Memory disorders
- Pregnant
- Current dietary interventions
- Recent/current use of Probiotics
- Recent/current use of Antibiotics
- Recent/current use of Narcotics
- Currently titrated antidepressants (i.e. not on a stable dose)
Sites / Locations
- Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Low FODMAP diet
Gluten Free Diet
British Dietetic Association diet
Arm Description
As part of their treatment for IBS participants may be randomised to a low FODMAP diet
As part of their treatment for IBS participants may be randomised to a gluten free diet
As part of their treatment for IBS participants may be randomised to the BDA diet
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Percentage with at least 50-point reduction in Irritable bowel syndrome Severity Scoring System questionnaire
A validated questionnaire to assess IBS symptoms and severity. The ranges of this questionnaire are included below:
How severe was your pain? 0 (no pain) -100 (very severe)
how severe is your abdominal (tummy) pain? 0 (no pain) - 100 (very severe)
how severe is your abdominal distention/tightness? 0 (no pain) - 100 (very severe)
How satisfied are you with your bowel habit? 0 (very happy) - 100 (very unhappy)
Please indicate with a cross on the line below how much your irritable bowel syndrome is affecting or interfering with your life in general. 0 (not at all) - 100 (completely)
A higher score on any scale represents a negative outcome.
A ≥ 50-point reduction in IBS-SSS following intervention represents a clinically significant improvement
Secondary Outcome Measures
Changes in proportion with anxiety and depression
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - is a psychological screening tool to which there are in total 14 items, seven each for depression and anxiety. Each item is rated from 0 (not present) to 3 (maximum), giving a cumulative score for each subscale to range from 0 to 21. A subscale score of ≥11 is used to indicate a clinically significant level of anxiety or depression.
Changes in somatization
The patient health questionnaire (PHQ)-12 non-GI somatic symptoms scale- The PHQ-12 records bothersome non-GI symptoms over the past month. The twelve symptoms assessed are back pain, limb pain, headaches, chest pain, dizziness, fainting spells, palpitations, breathlessness, menstrual cramps, dyspareunia, insomnia, and lethargy. Subjects were asked to rate how much they had been troubled by these 12 symptoms over the last four weeks as 0 ("not bothered at all"), 1 ("bothered a little"), or 2 ("bothered a lot"). Responses were used to calculate the number of sites reporting somatic symptoms (ranging from 0 to 12) and the somatisation severity score (ranging from 0 to 24), which was categorised as minimal (less than or equal to 3), low (4-7), medium (8-12) and high (≥ 13).
Changes in IBS-quality of life
The IBS quality of life (IBS-QOL) questionnaire - this consists of 34 questions which are summed and averaged for a total score, in addition to eight subscale scores (Dysphoria, Interference with Activity, Body Image, Health Worries, Food Avoidance, Social Reaction, Sexuality, Social Relationship). Total and subscale scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores indicate better IBS-specific QOL.
Acceptability of dietary restriction
The acceptability of dietary restriction questionnaire is based on the adapted nutrition related quality of life (QOL) questionnaire. Responses are recorded using a Likert scale, with the responses of agree, neutral and disagree.
Food related quality of life (QOL) questionnaire
The food related QOL questionnaire is a seven-item questionnaire based on the food-related QOL tool (Satisfaction with Food-related Life). Responses are recorded on Likert scale, as either agree, neutral and disagree.
Comprehensive Nutrition Assessment Questionnaire
The Comprehensive Nutrition Assessment Questionnaire is a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire, consisting of 297 questions, assessing macronutrient and micronutrient intake, as well as FODMAPs, fibre, starch, glycaemic index and glycaemic load
Changes in stool dysbiosis index
Participants will provide a stool sample both pre- and post-dietary intervention. Data will be analysed by using the GA-map™ Dysbiosis Test (Genetic Analysis AS, Oslo, Norway). Bacterial profiles will be assigned a dysbiosis index (DI), on a scale from 0 to 5, with a DI score of 2 or lower being classified as being within the non dysbiotic region compared to the normobiotic reference range. A DI score of greater than 2 will be considered to be dysbiotic, with a higher DI number indicating greater dysbiosis from the reference range.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04072991
First Posted
August 27, 2019
Last Updated
April 11, 2023
Sponsor
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04072991
Brief Title
A Study Comparing the Effectiveness and Convenience of Dietary Therapy for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
Official Title
E-C DIBS: Randomised Controlled Study: Comparing the Effectiveness and Convenience of Dietary Therapy for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 18, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 30, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 30, 2021 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Irritable bowel syndrome is a functional lower gastrointestinal disorder characterised by abdominal pain and altered bowel habit in the absence of organic pathology to explain the symptoms. Irritable bowel syndrome has a prevalence of approximately 10% in adults, shows a female preponderance, and is more common in younger individuals. In clinical practice, Irritable bowel syndrome accounts for almost a third of all gastroenterology cases seen in primary care, with a subsequent third of these being referred onto secondary-care for further evaluation. The economic burden of Irritable bowel syndrome, in terms of medical expense, work absenteeism and loss of productivity, is considerable.
The exact cause of irritable bowel syndrome is unknown. Accordingly there has been a huge surge in interest for dietary therapies to help manage Irritable bowel syndrome. To date, there are only a handful of small randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of dietary therapy in Irritable bowel syndrome. In light of this we plan to conduct the first randomized controlled trial directly comparing the effectiveness of the low-FODMAP diet, British Dietetic Association diet, and the gluten free diet in Irritable bowel syndrome. Moreover, such a trial allows for a direct comparison of nutritional and gut microbial changes, both of which can suffer detrimental consequences following the implementation of restrictive dietary therapies. This study is also unique in that it takes into consideration the patients' perspective with regards to the convenience and cost-effectiveness of implementing such diets into routine day-to-day life. The study will aim to recruit 100 patients from Sheffield Teaching Hospitals gastrointestinal clinics. Following recruitment patients will be seen by a hospital dietitian where they will be randomized to one of the 3 diets. Participants will complete a questionnaire portfolio weekly for one month as part of the study
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Irritable Bowel Syndrome
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
101 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Low FODMAP diet
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
As part of their treatment for IBS participants may be randomised to a low FODMAP diet
Arm Title
Gluten Free Diet
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
As part of their treatment for IBS participants may be randomised to a gluten free diet
Arm Title
British Dietetic Association diet
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
As part of their treatment for IBS participants may be randomised to the BDA diet
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
dietary therapy
Intervention Description
participants will undertake a four week diet as part of their IBS treatment
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage with at least 50-point reduction in Irritable bowel syndrome Severity Scoring System questionnaire
Description
A validated questionnaire to assess IBS symptoms and severity. The ranges of this questionnaire are included below:
How severe was your pain? 0 (no pain) -100 (very severe)
how severe is your abdominal (tummy) pain? 0 (no pain) - 100 (very severe)
how severe is your abdominal distention/tightness? 0 (no pain) - 100 (very severe)
How satisfied are you with your bowel habit? 0 (very happy) - 100 (very unhappy)
Please indicate with a cross on the line below how much your irritable bowel syndrome is affecting or interfering with your life in general. 0 (not at all) - 100 (completely)
A higher score on any scale represents a negative outcome.
A ≥ 50-point reduction in IBS-SSS following intervention represents a clinically significant improvement
Time Frame
Baseline to week 4
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Changes in proportion with anxiety and depression
Description
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - is a psychological screening tool to which there are in total 14 items, seven each for depression and anxiety. Each item is rated from 0 (not present) to 3 (maximum), giving a cumulative score for each subscale to range from 0 to 21. A subscale score of ≥11 is used to indicate a clinically significant level of anxiety or depression.
Time Frame
Baseline to week 4
Title
Changes in somatization
Description
The patient health questionnaire (PHQ)-12 non-GI somatic symptoms scale- The PHQ-12 records bothersome non-GI symptoms over the past month. The twelve symptoms assessed are back pain, limb pain, headaches, chest pain, dizziness, fainting spells, palpitations, breathlessness, menstrual cramps, dyspareunia, insomnia, and lethargy. Subjects were asked to rate how much they had been troubled by these 12 symptoms over the last four weeks as 0 ("not bothered at all"), 1 ("bothered a little"), or 2 ("bothered a lot"). Responses were used to calculate the number of sites reporting somatic symptoms (ranging from 0 to 12) and the somatisation severity score (ranging from 0 to 24), which was categorised as minimal (less than or equal to 3), low (4-7), medium (8-12) and high (≥ 13).
Time Frame
Baseline to week 4
Title
Changes in IBS-quality of life
Description
The IBS quality of life (IBS-QOL) questionnaire - this consists of 34 questions which are summed and averaged for a total score, in addition to eight subscale scores (Dysphoria, Interference with Activity, Body Image, Health Worries, Food Avoidance, Social Reaction, Sexuality, Social Relationship). Total and subscale scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores indicate better IBS-specific QOL.
Time Frame
Baseline to week 4
Title
Acceptability of dietary restriction
Description
The acceptability of dietary restriction questionnaire is based on the adapted nutrition related quality of life (QOL) questionnaire. Responses are recorded using a Likert scale, with the responses of agree, neutral and disagree.
Time Frame
Week 4
Title
Food related quality of life (QOL) questionnaire
Description
The food related QOL questionnaire is a seven-item questionnaire based on the food-related QOL tool (Satisfaction with Food-related Life). Responses are recorded on Likert scale, as either agree, neutral and disagree.
Time Frame
Week 4
Title
Comprehensive Nutrition Assessment Questionnaire
Description
The Comprehensive Nutrition Assessment Questionnaire is a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire, consisting of 297 questions, assessing macronutrient and micronutrient intake, as well as FODMAPs, fibre, starch, glycaemic index and glycaemic load
Time Frame
Baseline to week 4
Title
Changes in stool dysbiosis index
Description
Participants will provide a stool sample both pre- and post-dietary intervention. Data will be analysed by using the GA-map™ Dysbiosis Test (Genetic Analysis AS, Oslo, Norway). Bacterial profiles will be assigned a dysbiosis index (DI), on a scale from 0 to 5, with a DI score of 2 or lower being classified as being within the non dysbiotic region compared to the normobiotic reference range. A DI score of greater than 2 will be considered to be dysbiotic, with a higher DI number indicating greater dysbiosis from the reference range.
Time Frame
Baseline to week 4
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Irritable Bowel syndrome - as defined by abdominal pain and altered bowel habit in the absence of organic pathology to explain the symptoms.This is the contemporary definition as provided by the Rome IV committee.
Age 18-65 years
English literate
Can travel to hospital
Telephone/internet access
Exclusion Criteria:
Inflammatory bowel disease
Coeliac disease
Gastrointestinal cancer
Previous abdominal surgery
Scleroderma
Poorly controlled diabetes
Severe liver disease
Severe renal disease
Severe respiratory disease
Severe cardiac disease
Severe psychiatric disease
Memory disorders
Pregnant
Current dietary interventions
Recent/current use of Probiotics
Recent/current use of Antibiotics
Recent/current use of Narcotics
Currently titrated antidepressants (i.e. not on a stable dose)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Imran Aziz, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Royal Hallamshire Hospital
City
Sheffield
State/Province
South Yorkshire
ZIP/Postal Code
S10 2JF
Country
United Kingdom
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
IPD will not be shared
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35240330
Citation
Rej A, Sanders DS, Shaw CC, Buckle R, Trott N, Agrawal A, Aziz I. Efficacy and Acceptability of Dietary Therapies in Non-Constipated Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Randomized Trial of Traditional Dietary Advice, the Low FODMAP Diet, and the Gluten-Free Diet. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Dec;20(12):2876-2887.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.02.045. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
A Study Comparing the Effectiveness and Convenience of Dietary Therapy for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs