search
Back to results

The Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Treatment of Superficial Endometriosis for Managing Chronic Pelvic Pain (ESPriT1)

Primary Purpose

Endometriosis, Pelvic Pain

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
surgical removal of superficial peritoneal endometriosis
Sponsored by
University of Edinburgh
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Endometriosis focused on measuring endometriosis, laparoscopy, pelvic pain

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 55 Years (Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Undergoing laparoscopy for the investigation of chronic pelvic pain
  • In order to be randomised, isolated superficial peritoneal endometriosis (SPE) must be identified at laparoscopy (macroscopically)
  • Able to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous surgical diagnosis of endometriosis
  • Pregnant or are actively trying for pregnancy within the next six months
  • Deep endometriosis or ovarian endometrioma on imaging or at laparoscopy
  • Peritoneal 'pockets' only noted at laparoscopy

Sites / Locations

  • Royal Infirmary of EdinburghRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

No Intervention

Arm Label

Surgical treatment

No surgical treatment

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Proportion of women with suspected SPE undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy that were approached for the study an agreed to randomisation
The proportion of screened women who are eligible for the trial determined from the screening logs

Secondary Outcome Measures

Baseline characteristics of eligible women that agree to be randomised and those that decline participation
Baseline characteristics including age, social deprivation, ethnicity and duration of pain collected from screened women
Proportion of women having laparoscopy for investigation of chronic pelvic pain that are eligible (i.e. have only SPE) for the trial
The proportion of women undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy who go on to be diagnosed with SPE
Effects of treatment and variability in treatment outcomes
Intraoperative and postoperative complications
Improvement in quality of life
Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30)
Improvement in quality of life
Rome IV criteria
Improvement in quality of life
Pelvic Pain and Urgency/Frequency Patient (PUF) Symptom Scale
Improvement in quality of life
PainDetect TM
Improvement in quality of life
Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)
Improvement in quality of life
Pain Catastrophising Questionnaire (PCQ)
Improvement in quality of life
Fibromyalgia Scale
Improvement in quality of life
Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile 2 (MYMOP 2)
Improvement in quality of life
Working Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAIQ)
Improvement in quality of life
EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)
Effects of treatment and variability in treatment outcomes
Number of patients who needed analgesia after laparoscopy recorded during follow up.
Effects of treatment and variability in treatment outcomes
Number of patients who needed medical management with ovarian suppression after laparoscopy recorded during follow up.
Effects of treatment and variability in treatment outcomes
Adverse events (as reported by the participants)
To determine the most acceptable methods of recruitment and assessment tools
The proportion of completed trial questionnaires
To determine the most acceptable methods of assessment tools
Number of patients who remained blinded for 6 months after the surgery recorded by asking patient if they were told their allocation
To determine the most acceptable methods of recruitment, randomisation and assessment tools
Acceptability of the trial completed at 6 months after surgery will be compared between two arms.

Full Information

First Posted
August 15, 2019
Last Updated
December 3, 2019
Sponsor
University of Edinburgh
Collaborators
NHS Grampian, University of Nottingham
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04081532
Brief Title
The Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Treatment of Superficial Endometriosis for Managing Chronic Pelvic Pain
Acronym
ESPriT1
Official Title
The Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Treatment of Isolated Superficial Peritoneal Endometriosis for Managing Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women: a Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
September 30, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 2020 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
August 2020 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Edinburgh
Collaborators
NHS Grampian, University of Nottingham

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Endometriosis is a chronic, incurable condition that affects about 10% of women of reproductive age. It is defined as a growth of cells similar to the womb lining outside of the womb in the pelvis, and is associated with chronic pelvic pain, excessive period pain, pain with sexual intercourse and difficulties in getting pregnant. If the disease is found only on the lining of the pelvis it is known as "superficial peritoneal" and is usually treated during a laparoscopic surgery by cutting out (excision) or burning off (ablation). However, many women do not find improvement in their symptoms after the surgery and can have complications from the procedure. The aim of this study is to determine if removal of the superficial peritoneal endometriosis improves pain symptoms and quality of life, which method of removal (excision or ablation) is more effective or if surgical removal is of no benefit to the patients and can potentially cause harm. The investigators plan to recruit up to 90 women from four NHS hospitals in Scotland over a period of 12 months. Women who are attending gynaecology departments with pelvic pain who have not previously had a diagnosis of endometriosis via laparoscopy will be approached. Patients will be asked to read an information sheet about the trial. Women who consent to the trial will be randomised during the surgery, if superficial endometriosis is found, to either having the endometriosis removed or not. For this pilot, follow up will be at 3 and 6 months (and obtain permission to continue to follow them up at 12 and 24 months should time and finding permit). Patients who do not consent to take part in the trial will be asked if the investigators can collect data on their demographics and reasons on why they did not wish to take part.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Endometriosis, Pelvic Pain
Keywords
endometriosis, laparoscopy, pelvic pain

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
General Practitioner
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
90 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Surgical treatment
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
No surgical treatment
Arm Type
No Intervention
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
surgical removal of superficial peritoneal endometriosis
Intervention Description
In the active comparator group patients will have endometriosis lesions removed by ablation or excision. Patients randomised to no surgical treatment arm will not have lesions removed and will only be given diagnosis on whether endometriosis was found or not.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of women with suspected SPE undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy that were approached for the study an agreed to randomisation
Description
The proportion of screened women who are eligible for the trial determined from the screening logs
Time Frame
Screening
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Baseline characteristics of eligible women that agree to be randomised and those that decline participation
Description
Baseline characteristics including age, social deprivation, ethnicity and duration of pain collected from screened women
Time Frame
Screening
Title
Proportion of women having laparoscopy for investigation of chronic pelvic pain that are eligible (i.e. have only SPE) for the trial
Description
The proportion of women undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy who go on to be diagnosed with SPE
Time Frame
visit 2 (day of surgery)
Title
Effects of treatment and variability in treatment outcomes
Description
Intraoperative and postoperative complications
Time Frame
visit 2 (day of surgery), 30 days post surgery
Title
Improvement in quality of life
Description
Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30)
Time Frame
30 days post surgery, follow up at 3 and 6 months
Title
Improvement in quality of life
Description
Rome IV criteria
Time Frame
day of surgery, follow up at 3 and 6 months
Title
Improvement in quality of life
Description
Pelvic Pain and Urgency/Frequency Patient (PUF) Symptom Scale
Time Frame
day of surgery, follow up at 3 and 6 months
Title
Improvement in quality of life
Description
PainDetect TM
Time Frame
day of surgery, follow up at 3 and 6 months
Title
Improvement in quality of life
Description
Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)
Time Frame
day of surgery, follow up at 3 and 6 months
Title
Improvement in quality of life
Description
Pain Catastrophising Questionnaire (PCQ)
Time Frame
day of surgery, follow up at 3 and 6 months
Title
Improvement in quality of life
Description
Fibromyalgia Scale
Time Frame
day of surgery, follow up at 3 and 6 months
Title
Improvement in quality of life
Description
Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile 2 (MYMOP 2)
Time Frame
day of surgery, follow up at 3 and 6 months
Title
Improvement in quality of life
Description
Working Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAIQ)
Time Frame
day of surgery, follow up at 3 and 6 months
Title
Improvement in quality of life
Description
EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame
day of surgery, follow up at 3 and 6 months
Title
Effects of treatment and variability in treatment outcomes
Description
Number of patients who needed analgesia after laparoscopy recorded during follow up.
Time Frame
30 days post surgery, follow up at 3 and 6 months
Title
Effects of treatment and variability in treatment outcomes
Description
Number of patients who needed medical management with ovarian suppression after laparoscopy recorded during follow up.
Time Frame
30 days post surgery, follow up at 3 and 6 months
Title
Effects of treatment and variability in treatment outcomes
Description
Adverse events (as reported by the participants)
Time Frame
Throughout the trial starting from day of surgery until end of followup at 6 months
Title
To determine the most acceptable methods of recruitment and assessment tools
Description
The proportion of completed trial questionnaires
Time Frame
Questionnaires collected at Baseline (within a week of surgery), 3 and 6 months follow up
Title
To determine the most acceptable methods of assessment tools
Description
Number of patients who remained blinded for 6 months after the surgery recorded by asking patient if they were told their allocation
Time Frame
Throughout the trial until end of follow up at 6 months
Title
To determine the most acceptable methods of recruitment, randomisation and assessment tools
Description
Acceptability of the trial completed at 6 months after surgery will be compared between two arms.
Time Frame
6 months follow up

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
55 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Undergoing laparoscopy for the investigation of chronic pelvic pain In order to be randomised, isolated superficial peritoneal endometriosis (SPE) must be identified at laparoscopy (macroscopically) Able to give informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Previous surgical diagnosis of endometriosis Pregnant or are actively trying for pregnancy within the next six months Deep endometriosis or ovarian endometrioma on imaging or at laparoscopy Peritoneal 'pockets' only noted at laparoscopy
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Ann M Doust
Phone
01312429492
Email
Ann.Doust@ed.ac.uk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Magda Koscielniak, PhD
Phone
01312429492
Email
M.Koscielniak@ed.ac.uk
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Andrew W Horne, Prof
Organizational Affiliation
University of Edinburgh
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
City
Edinburgh
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nicola Watson

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33413677
Citation
Whitaker LHR, Doust A, Stephen J, Norrie J, Cooper K, Daniels J, Hummelshoj L, Cox E, Beatty L, Chien P, Madhra M, Vincent K, Horne AW. Laparoscopic treatment of isolated superficial peritoneal endometriosis for managing chronic pelvic pain in women: study protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial (ESPriT1). Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Jan 7;7(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00740-9.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

The Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Treatment of Superficial Endometriosis for Managing Chronic Pelvic Pain

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs