search
Back to results

An Emotional Regulation Brief Procedure (PbRE) for Fibromyalgia Using ICT's (PbRE)

Primary Purpose

Fibromyalgia, Chronic Pain

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
PBrE
PBrE-Control
Control
Sponsored by
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Fibromyalgia

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Met the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2010 research classification criteria for FM (Wolfe et al., 2010, 2011); as confirmed by a rheumatologist
  • A minimum of 18 years of age
  • Showed adequate reading comprehension
  • Were able to use a smartphone
  • Were able to sign an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Had any mental disorder treated by a psychiatrist
  • Were scheduled for surgery in the next 3 months.

Sites / Locations

  • Miguel A. Vallejo

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Other

Arm Label

Experimental PBrE

Control PBrE

Control

Arm Description

Participants are exposed to several words of emotional contents (positive, and negative). The differences between these words will allow the regulation and counter regulation of emotional processes (Schwager y Rothermund, 2013). The words are related to clinical and personal characteristics of the patients and they will promote an emotional identification that improve the emotional regulation (Kashdan, Barret y McKnight, 2015).

Participants are exposed to several neutral words. These words do not have any emotional content and there are no reasons to think that they have any effect over the emotional regulation.

Participants do not receive the intervention.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Combined Index of Severity in Fibromyalgia (ICAF). Change is being assessed
The Combined Index of Severity in Fibromyalgia (ICAF) is a questionnaire that allows the classification of patients by severity in clinical practice. This analysis is a self-report questionnaire of 59 items constructed with the most common clinical manifestations of FM (Vallejo, Rivera, & Esteve-Vives, 2010). The ICAF questionnaire offers total scores, where higher scores indicate a more severe disease. This questionnaire also provides four factors: emotional, physical (pain, fatigue, sleep quality and functional capacity), active coping, and passive coping. Similar to the total score, higher scores on each factor indicate greater severity, with the exception of the active coping factor, where higher scores indicate a better way to cope with the disease.
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ). Change is being assessed
The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) (Burckhardt, Clark, & Bennett, 1991; Rivera & González, 2004) is a self-report questionnaire designed to evaluate the impact of the FM on the life of the patient. This 10-item questionnaire is widely used and covers the principal areas of interest, including physical functioning, pain, sleep, mental health, and fatigue. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate a more severe impact of the disease.

Secondary Outcome Measures

EuroQol-5D-5L
The EuroQol-5D-L questionnaire (Herdman et al., 2011) is divided into 2 sections. The first section contains 5 questions about mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Five levels for answering are included (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems), ranging from 1 to 5. The second part is a VAS score, which records the responder's self-evaluated health, where 0 is worst imaginable health and 100 is best imaginable health.
Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ)
Patients' expectancy of treatment will be assessed with the Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) (Devilly and Borkovec, 2010). Both factors (credibility and expectancy) have been shown to be stable across different populations with high internal consistency within each factor. The scale consists of six questions, with answer options rated on a 10-point scale and on a 1-100 % scale.
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire
The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, in its 8-item version (CSQ-8; Larsen et al. 1979), has been used most commonly to assess satisfaction in mental health services. This tool includes a brief standardized scale with good psychometric properties that provides an overall assessment of satisfaction. We used the Spanish version of the CSQ-8 (Vázquez et al., 2017).
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) (Sullivan, Bishop, & Pivik, 1995) is a 13-item scale used to assess pain catastrophizing. Participants rated the frequency of 13 negative pain-related thoughts and feelings on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time). The range of scores is 0 to 54. Higher scores indicate greater catastrophizing. We used the Spanish version of the PCS (García Campayo et al., 2008).
Acceptance and Action Questionnaire - II
Acceptance and Action Questionnaire - II (Bond et al., 2011; Ruiz, et al., 2013). The AAQ-II is a general measure of experiential avoidance and psychological inflexibility. It consists of 7 items which are responded to by using a 7-point Likert scale. The items reflect an unwillingness to experience unwanted emotions and thoughts.
Short Form 12 Health Survey
The Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) (Vilagut et al., 2008; Ware & Keller, 1996) is a generic instrument used to assess health-related quality of life. It is a self-report survey of 12 items grouped into eight dimensions: physical functioning, physical role, body pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role and mental health. The score ranges from 0 to 100 for every scale, where higher scores indicate better health.
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (Gross & John, 2003; Cabello, Salgero, Fernández-Berrocal & Gross, 2013) consist of 10 items which are responded to by using a 7-point Likert scale. The items are grouped into two dimensions: cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression.

Full Information

First Posted
September 4, 2019
Last Updated
November 5, 2020
Sponsor
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
Collaborators
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04084873
Brief Title
An Emotional Regulation Brief Procedure (PbRE) for Fibromyalgia Using ICT's
Acronym
PbRE
Official Title
Emotional Regulation Brief Procedure for Fibromyalgia, Through the Internet
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
October 7, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 2021 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 2021 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
Collaborators
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The study aims is to test the efficacy of an emotional regulation procedure for fibromyalgia patients using Information and Communications Technologies (ICTs). This procedure is based in a task that implies exposition to emotional words. The principal hypothesis is that exposition will improve the clinical symptomatology because the procedure restore an adequate emotional regulation.
Detailed Description
Previous studies have demonstrated that FM patients have difficulties to process emotional words when they are compared to normal subjects (Mercado et al., 2013). This dysfunctional emotion regulation could show attentional bias and it could be a way to increase FM symptomatology as pain, and fatigue (Duscheck et al., 2014). The emotion generation and its regulation through an experimental task as reading words is a well stablished procedure (Lang, Bradley y Cuthbert, 1997). This paradigm has been shown efficacy in clinical context, to reduce anxiety in social phobia (Masia et al., 1999; Baños, Quero y Botella, 2008), generalized anxiety disorders (Fracalanza, Kroner y Antony, 2014), personality disorders (Arntz et al., 2012), and depression (Chuang et al., 2016). To address the gap between the experimental results of this form of emotional regulation in FM patients, and its clinical application, the aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a Brief Procedure of Emotional Regulation for Fibromyalgia (PbRE) PbRE is a word reading task implementing through an App developed for smartphones. The patient will choose emotional positive and negative words related to personal and clinical characteristics. This exercise has been shown useful in analogous tasks in relational frame theory (Hussey y Barnes-Holmes (2012) or in bias computer training (Salemink et al., 2014).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Fibromyalgia, Chronic Pain

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
50 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Experimental PBrE
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants are exposed to several words of emotional contents (positive, and negative). The differences between these words will allow the regulation and counter regulation of emotional processes (Schwager y Rothermund, 2013). The words are related to clinical and personal characteristics of the patients and they will promote an emotional identification that improve the emotional regulation (Kashdan, Barret y McKnight, 2015).
Arm Title
Control PBrE
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Participants are exposed to several neutral words. These words do not have any emotional content and there are no reasons to think that they have any effect over the emotional regulation.
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Participants do not receive the intervention.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
PBrE
Intervention Description
PbRE is a word reading task implementing through an App developed for smartphones. The patient will choose emotional positive and negative words related to personal and clinical characteristics.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
PBrE-Control
Intervention Description
Participants are exposed to several neutral words. These words do not have any emotional content and there are no reasons to think that they have any effect over the emotional regulation.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Control
Intervention Description
Participants do not receive the intervention.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Combined Index of Severity in Fibromyalgia (ICAF). Change is being assessed
Description
The Combined Index of Severity in Fibromyalgia (ICAF) is a questionnaire that allows the classification of patients by severity in clinical practice. This analysis is a self-report questionnaire of 59 items constructed with the most common clinical manifestations of FM (Vallejo, Rivera, & Esteve-Vives, 2010). The ICAF questionnaire offers total scores, where higher scores indicate a more severe disease. This questionnaire also provides four factors: emotional, physical (pain, fatigue, sleep quality and functional capacity), active coping, and passive coping. Similar to the total score, higher scores on each factor indicate greater severity, with the exception of the active coping factor, where higher scores indicate a better way to cope with the disease.
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Title
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ). Change is being assessed
Description
The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) (Burckhardt, Clark, & Bennett, 1991; Rivera & González, 2004) is a self-report questionnaire designed to evaluate the impact of the FM on the life of the patient. This 10-item questionnaire is widely used and covers the principal areas of interest, including physical functioning, pain, sleep, mental health, and fatigue. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate a more severe impact of the disease.
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
EuroQol-5D-5L
Description
The EuroQol-5D-L questionnaire (Herdman et al., 2011) is divided into 2 sections. The first section contains 5 questions about mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Five levels for answering are included (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems), ranging from 1 to 5. The second part is a VAS score, which records the responder's self-evaluated health, where 0 is worst imaginable health and 100 is best imaginable health.
Time Frame
Through treatment completion, an average of 6 weeks
Title
Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ)
Description
Patients' expectancy of treatment will be assessed with the Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) (Devilly and Borkovec, 2010). Both factors (credibility and expectancy) have been shown to be stable across different populations with high internal consistency within each factor. The scale consists of six questions, with answer options rated on a 10-point scale and on a 1-100 % scale.
Time Frame
Through treatment completion, an average of 6 weeks
Title
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire
Description
The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, in its 8-item version (CSQ-8; Larsen et al. 1979), has been used most commonly to assess satisfaction in mental health services. This tool includes a brief standardized scale with good psychometric properties that provides an overall assessment of satisfaction. We used the Spanish version of the CSQ-8 (Vázquez et al., 2017).
Time Frame
Through treatment completion, an average of 6 weeks
Title
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Description
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) (Sullivan, Bishop, & Pivik, 1995) is a 13-item scale used to assess pain catastrophizing. Participants rated the frequency of 13 negative pain-related thoughts and feelings on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time). The range of scores is 0 to 54. Higher scores indicate greater catastrophizing. We used the Spanish version of the PCS (García Campayo et al., 2008).
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Title
Acceptance and Action Questionnaire - II
Description
Acceptance and Action Questionnaire - II (Bond et al., 2011; Ruiz, et al., 2013). The AAQ-II is a general measure of experiential avoidance and psychological inflexibility. It consists of 7 items which are responded to by using a 7-point Likert scale. The items reflect an unwillingness to experience unwanted emotions and thoughts.
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Title
Short Form 12 Health Survey
Description
The Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) (Vilagut et al., 2008; Ware & Keller, 1996) is a generic instrument used to assess health-related quality of life. It is a self-report survey of 12 items grouped into eight dimensions: physical functioning, physical role, body pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role and mental health. The score ranges from 0 to 100 for every scale, where higher scores indicate better health.
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Title
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
Description
The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (Gross & John, 2003; Cabello, Salgero, Fernández-Berrocal & Gross, 2013) consist of 10 items which are responded to by using a 7-point Likert scale. The items are grouped into two dimensions: cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression.
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Met the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2010 research classification criteria for FM (Wolfe et al., 2010, 2011); as confirmed by a rheumatologist A minimum of 18 years of age Showed adequate reading comprehension Were able to use a smartphone Were able to sign an informed consent form. Exclusion Criteria: Had any mental disorder treated by a psychiatrist Were scheduled for surgery in the next 3 months.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Miguel A. Vallejo
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28040
Country
Spain

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22317755
Citation
Arntz A, Hawke LD, Bamelis L, Spinhoven P, Molendijk ML. Changes in natural language use as an indicator of psychotherapeutic change in personality disorders. Behav Res Ther. 2012 Mar;50(3):191-202. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2011.12.007. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25983704
Citation
Bennett MP, Meulders A, Baeyens F, Vlaeyen JW. Words putting pain in motion: the generalization of pain-related fear within an artificial stimulus category. Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 30;6:520. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00520. eCollection 2015.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24447855
Citation
Duschek S, Werner NS, Limbert N, Winkelmann A, Montoya P. Attentional bias toward negative information in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Pain Med. 2014 Apr;15(4):603-12. doi: 10.1111/pme.12360. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23557844
Citation
Mercado F, Gonzalez JL, Barjola P, Fernandez-Sanchez M, Lopez-Lopez A, Alonso M, Gomez-Esquer F. Brain correlates of cognitive inhibition in fibromyalgia: emotional intrusion of symptom-related words. Int J Psychophysiol. 2013 May;88(2):182-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.03.017. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16314601
Citation
Montoya P, Sitges C, Garcia-Herrera M, Izquierdo R, Truyols M, Blay N, Collado D. Abnormal affective modulation of somatosensory brain processing among patients with fibromyalgia. Psychosom Med. 2005 Nov-Dec;67(6):957-63. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000188401.55394.18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23237331
Citation
Schwager S, Rothermund K. Counter-regulation triggered by emotions: positive/negative affective states elicit opposite valence biases in affective processing. Cogn Emot. 2013;27(5):839-55. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.750599. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

An Emotional Regulation Brief Procedure (PbRE) for Fibromyalgia Using ICT's

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs