search
Back to results

Acupuncture Combined With Mindfulness: ACUMIND (ACUMIND)

Primary Purpose

Chronic Pain

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Music recording
Mindfulness recording
Sponsored by
University of Utah
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Chronic Pain focused on measuring Chronic Pain, Acupuncture, Mindfulness, Interoceptive Awareness

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is age 18 or older.
  • Patient is experiencing pain (rated ≥3 on a 0-10 scale) lasting for three or more months.
  • Able to provide informed consent and willing to sign an approved consent form that conforms to federal and institutional guidelines.
  • ONLY FOR THOSE WITH A DIAGNOSIS OF CANCER: ECOG status of 0 (asymptomatic), 1 (symptomatic but completely ambulatory) or 2 (symptomatic, <50% in bed during the day).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has received 5 or more acupuncture treatments in the last 2 months.

Sites / Locations

  • Huntsman Cancer Institute

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Other

Arm Label

Acupuncture + mindfulness

Acupuncture control

Arm Description

Participants will receive acupuncture treatment for chronic pain. After acupuncture needles have been inserted, participants will listen to a 15-minute mindfulness recording followed by music for 30 minutes. Acupuncture needles will then be removed.

Participants will receive acupuncture treatment for chronic pain. After acupuncture needles have been inserted, participants will listen music for 45 minutes. Acupuncture needles will then be removed.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Questions Regarding Pain and Other Symptoms
A questionnaire regarding pain as well as physical and mental awareness. A Likert scale 0-10 is used, where 0 is classified as "not at all" and 10 is classified "very much." Higher values are a worse outcome with questions 7-9 reverse scored.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Nondual Awareness Dimensional Assessment
A questionnaire regarding nondual awareness. Scored on a 10-point Likert scale (1=Not at all, 10=Very Much), higher values are a better outcome.
State Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale
A questionnaire regarding emotional awareness. Scored on a 5 point Likert scale (1=not at all, 5=completely), higher values are a better outcome.
Sensation Manikin
A map of the body used to identify and measure areas of pleasant and unpleasant sensations.
Retrospective Chart Review
To discover pain medications taken by participant in the last 90 days, including opioid dose (to be converted into morphine milligram equivalent, MME).
State Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness-2
A questionnaire regarding interoceptive awareness. Scored on a 6-point Likert scale (0=never, 5=always), higher values are a better outcome.
Acupuncture Questions
A questionnaire regarding changes in sensations experienced during the AT. This is scored on a 6-point Likert scale (0=not at all, 5=to all the time/every location), higher values are a better outcome.
Acceptability Questions
A questionnaire regarding the acceptability of the AT. This is scored on a 5 point Likert scale (1=completely disagree, 5=completely agree), higher values are a better outcome.
Qualitative Inquiry
A questionnaire regarding experiences during the AT. This consists of free response questions.
Qualitative Interoceptive Awareness and Emotional Regulation
A questionnaire regarding changes experienced since AT. This consists of open ended text questions.
Quantitative questions
A questionnaire regarding overall health since AT. Questions 1-3 are scored on a Likert scale 0-10 is used where 0 is classified as "not at all" and 10 is classified "very much" with higher values indicating a better score and question 1 is reverse scored. Questions 4-8 are measured on a 5 point Likert scale (1=not at all, 5=completely) with higher values indicating a better outcome. Question 9 is scored on a 1-5 Likert scale with lower values indicating a better outcome. Questions 10-19 are scored on a 3 point Likert scale with higher values indicating a better outcome.

Full Information

First Posted
September 10, 2019
Last Updated
May 2, 2021
Sponsor
University of Utah
Collaborators
Huntsman Cancer Institute
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04089319
Brief Title
Acupuncture Combined With Mindfulness: ACUMIND
Acronym
ACUMIND
Official Title
Acupuncture Combined With Mindfulness in the Context of Chronic Pain
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
COVID-19 prevented us from recruiting additional participants.
Study Start Date
September 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 3, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 3, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Utah
Collaborators
Huntsman Cancer Institute

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study aims to gather preliminary data regarding acupuncture and mindfulness in the treatment of chronic pain.
Detailed Description
Neither acupuncture nor mindfulness have been studied with respect to chronic pain in an outpatient integrative health (IH) oncology clinic in the USA. Likewise, the combination of acupuncture and mindfulness combined as not been studied. Given that both acupuncture and mindfulness have demonstrated some analgesic relief in an acute pain setting, each merit study for pain relief in an outpatient setting. The investigators are evaluating the impact of two different acupuncture approaches for patients reporting chronic pain. Acupuncture will be provided by a Licensed Acupuncturist for patients reporting chronic pain. Participants will be randomized to one of two treatments - acupuncture as usual or acupuncture plus mindfulness. The investigators will collect data regarding chronic pain, interoceptive awareness, emotion regulation, and acceptability. The study is open to participants with any etiology and any location of chronic pain.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Chronic Pain
Keywords
Chronic Pain, Acupuncture, Mindfulness, Interoceptive Awareness

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Care ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
30 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Acupuncture + mindfulness
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive acupuncture treatment for chronic pain. After acupuncture needles have been inserted, participants will listen to a 15-minute mindfulness recording followed by music for 30 minutes. Acupuncture needles will then be removed.
Arm Title
Acupuncture control
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Participants will receive acupuncture treatment for chronic pain. After acupuncture needles have been inserted, participants will listen music for 45 minutes. Acupuncture needles will then be removed.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Music recording
Intervention Description
Participants will listen to music for 45 minutes while they rest with acupuncture needles in place.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Mindfulness recording
Intervention Description
Participants will listen to a recording of mindfulness for 15 minutes and then listen to music for 30 minutes while they rest with acupuncture needles in place.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Questions Regarding Pain and Other Symptoms
Description
A questionnaire regarding pain as well as physical and mental awareness. A Likert scale 0-10 is used, where 0 is classified as "not at all" and 10 is classified "very much." Higher values are a worse outcome with questions 7-9 reverse scored.
Time Frame
2 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Nondual Awareness Dimensional Assessment
Description
A questionnaire regarding nondual awareness. Scored on a 10-point Likert scale (1=Not at all, 10=Very Much), higher values are a better outcome.
Time Frame
2 months
Title
State Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale
Description
A questionnaire regarding emotional awareness. Scored on a 5 point Likert scale (1=not at all, 5=completely), higher values are a better outcome.
Time Frame
2 months
Title
Sensation Manikin
Description
A map of the body used to identify and measure areas of pleasant and unpleasant sensations.
Time Frame
2 months
Title
Retrospective Chart Review
Description
To discover pain medications taken by participant in the last 90 days, including opioid dose (to be converted into morphine milligram equivalent, MME).
Time Frame
3 month
Title
State Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness-2
Description
A questionnaire regarding interoceptive awareness. Scored on a 6-point Likert scale (0=never, 5=always), higher values are a better outcome.
Time Frame
2 months
Title
Acupuncture Questions
Description
A questionnaire regarding changes in sensations experienced during the AT. This is scored on a 6-point Likert scale (0=not at all, 5=to all the time/every location), higher values are a better outcome.
Time Frame
2 months
Title
Acceptability Questions
Description
A questionnaire regarding the acceptability of the AT. This is scored on a 5 point Likert scale (1=completely disagree, 5=completely agree), higher values are a better outcome.
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Qualitative Inquiry
Description
A questionnaire regarding experiences during the AT. This consists of free response questions.
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Qualitative Interoceptive Awareness and Emotional Regulation
Description
A questionnaire regarding changes experienced since AT. This consists of open ended text questions.
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Quantitative questions
Description
A questionnaire regarding overall health since AT. Questions 1-3 are scored on a Likert scale 0-10 is used where 0 is classified as "not at all" and 10 is classified "very much" with higher values indicating a better score and question 1 is reverse scored. Questions 4-8 are measured on a 5 point Likert scale (1=not at all, 5=completely) with higher values indicating a better outcome. Question 9 is scored on a 1-5 Likert scale with lower values indicating a better outcome. Questions 10-19 are scored on a 3 point Likert scale with higher values indicating a better outcome.
Time Frame
1 day

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient is age 18 or older. Patient is experiencing pain (rated ≥3 on a 0-10 scale) lasting for three or more months. Able to provide informed consent and willing to sign an approved consent form that conforms to federal and institutional guidelines. ONLY FOR THOSE WITH A DIAGNOSIS OF CANCER: ECOG status of 0 (asymptomatic), 1 (symptomatic but completely ambulatory) or 2 (symptomatic, <50% in bed during the day). Exclusion Criteria: Patient has received 5 or more acupuncture treatments in the last 2 months.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lisa Taylor-Swanson, PhD, MAcOM
Organizational Affiliation
University of Utah College of Nursing
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Annie Budhathoki, LAc, DAOM
Organizational Affiliation
Huntsman Cancer Institute
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eric Garland
Organizational Affiliation
University of Utah College of Social Work, Huntsman Cancer Institute
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shelley White, PhD(C), MSW
Organizational Affiliation
Huntsman Cancer Institute
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Huntsman Cancer Institute
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84112
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Individual data is not useful data at this stage.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
12015237
Citation
Rainville P. Brain mechanisms of pain affect and pain modulation. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2002 Apr;12(2):195-204. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(02)00313-6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17019673
Citation
Lau MA, Bishop SR, Segal ZV, Buis T, Anderson ND, Carlson L, Shapiro S, Carmody J, Abbey S, Devins G. The Toronto Mindfulness Scale: development and validation. J Clin Psychol. 2006 Dec;62(12):1445-67. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20326.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17015072
Citation
Lang PJ, Davis M. Emotion, motivation, and the brain: reflex foundations in animal and human research. Prog Brain Res. 2006;156:3-29. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56001-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28373890
Citation
Froeliger B, Mathew AR, McConnell PA, Eichberg C, Saladin ME, Carpenter MJ, Garland EL. Restructuring Reward Mechanisms in Nicotine Addiction: A Pilot fMRI Study of Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement for Cigarette Smokers. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2017;2017:7018014. doi: 10.1155/2017/7018014. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21978149
Citation
Goldberg DS, McGee SJ. Pain as a global public health priority. BMC Public Health. 2011 Oct 6;11:770. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-770.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16150816
Citation
Koleva D, Krulichova I, Bertolini G, Caimi V, Garattini L. Pain in primary care: an Italian survey. Eur J Public Health. 2005 Oct;15(5):475-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cki033. Epub 2005 Sep 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11166473
Citation
Mantyselka P, Kumpusalo E, Ahonen R, Kumpusalo A, Kauhanen J, Viinamaki H, Halonen P, Takala J. Pain as a reason to visit the doctor: a study in Finnish primary health care. Pain. 2001 Jan;89(2-3):175-80. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00361-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19244085
Citation
Breivik H, Cherny N, Collett B, de Conno F, Filbet M, Foubert AJ, Cohen R, Dow L. Cancer-related pain: a pan-European survey of prevalence, treatment, and patient attitudes. Ann Oncol. 2009 Aug;20(8):1420-33. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp001. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27475042
Citation
Grissa MH, Baccouche H, Boubaker H, Beltaief K, Bzeouich N, Fredj N, Msolli MA, Boukef R, Bouida W, Nouira S. Acupuncture vs intravenous morphine in the management of acute pain in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Nov;34(11):2112-2116. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.07.028. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22965186
Citation
Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Maschino AC, Lewith G, MacPherson H, Foster NE, Sherman KJ, Witt CM, Linde K; Acupuncture Trialists' Collaboration. Acupuncture for chronic pain: individual patient data meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Oct 22;172(19):1444-53. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3654.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Merskey H, Bogduk N. Classification of Chronic Pain: Descriptions of Chronic Pain Syndromes and Definitions of Pain Terms. 2nd ed. Seattle, WA, USA: International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) Press; 1994.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26297011
Citation
Lavender JM, Tull MT, DiLillo D, Messman-Moore T, Gratz KL. Development and Validation of a State-Based Measure of Emotion Dysregulation. Assessment. 2017 Mar;24(2):197-209. doi: 10.1177/1073191115601218. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30513087
Citation
Mehling WE, Acree M, Stewart A, Silas J, Jones A. The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, Version 2 (MAIA-2). PLoS One. 2018 Dec 4;13(12):e0208034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208034. eCollection 2018.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30058824
Citation
Hanley AW, Nakamura Y, Garland EL. The Nondual Awareness Dimensional Assessment (NADA): New tools to assess nondual traits and states of consciousness occurring within and beyond the context of meditation. Psychol Assess. 2018 Dec;30(12):1625-1639. doi: 10.1037/pas0000615. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31246748
Citation
Hanley AW, Garland EL. Mapping the Affective Dimension of Embodiment With the Sensation Manikin: Validation Among Chronic Pain Patients and Modification by Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement. Psychosom Med. 2019 Sep;81(7):612-621. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000725.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1593914
Citation
Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Acupuncture Combined With Mindfulness: ACUMIND

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs