search
Back to results

Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Crisaborole in Adults With Stasis Dermatitis

Primary Purpose

Stasis Dermatitis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
crisaborole ointment
vehicle ointment
Sponsored by
Pfizer
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stasis Dermatitis focused on measuring Stasis Dermatitis, venous hypertension, venous insufficiency

Eligibility Criteria

45 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who are ≥45 years of age and in generally stable health
  • Participants who are in generally stable health and have a known diagnosis of Stasis Dermatitis or newly diagnosed Stasis Dermatitis
  • Participants whose mental and physical status allows them to be able to mostly perform their activities of daily living with minimal assistance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with clinically significant active or potentially recurrent dermatitis conditions and known genetic dermatological conditions that are not Stasis Dermatitis or overlap with Stasis Dermatitis
  • Participants with active venous stasis ulceration on either lower extremity.
  • Participants with current infection or suspected infection of any Stasis Dermatitis lesions
  • Women of child bearing potential (WOCBP) are not eligible for this study

Sites / Locations

  • Lightship
  • Hawthorne Effect, Inc
  • Verily Life Sciences LLC
  • Onco360 Oncology Pharmacy

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

crisaborole ointment

vehicle ointment

Arm Description

crisaborole ointment

vehicle ointment

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Sign Score (TSS) at Week 6: In-person Assessment
TSS assesses severity of stasis dermatitis lesions. There were following 4 clinical signs of all treatable stasis dermatitis lesions: erythema, papulation/elevation, superficial erosion/denudation, and scaling. Each of 4 signs were rated on a scale of 0 to 3 (0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe). TSS = sum of scores from all clinical signs; ranging from 0 (none) to 12 (most severe), where higher score indicated greater severity. The assessment was completed in person by the home visit practitioner.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Treatment Success Based on Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) at Week 6: In-person Assessment
ISGA is a global assessment of stasis dermatitis lesions severity based on erythema, papulation/elevation, superficial erosion/denudation, and scaling. ISGA excludes scalp from scoring and assessment. ISGA score ranged from 0 to 4; where 0 = clear (minor residual hypo/hyperpigmentation; no erythema or induration/papulation; no oozing/crusting), 1= almost clear (trace faint pink erythema, with barely perceptible induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting), 2= mild (faint pink erythema with mild induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting), 3= moderate (pink-red erythema with moderate induration/papulation with or without oozing/crusting), 4= severe (deep or bright red erythema with severe induration/papulation and with oozing/crusting). Higher scores indicated greater severity. The assessment was completed in person by the home visit practitioner. Treatment success was defined as ISGA score of clear/almost clear with at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Treatment Success Based on Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6: Central Readers Digital Images Assessment
ISGA: global assessment of stasis dermatitis lesions severity based on erythema, papulation/elevation, superficial erosion/denudation, and scaling, excluding scalp. ISGA score ranged from 0 to 4; 0 = clear (minor residual hypo/hyperpigmentation; no erythema or induration/papulation; no oozing/crusting), 1= almost clear (trace faint pink erythema, with barely perceptible induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting), 2= mild (faint pink erythema with mild induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting), 3= moderate (pink-red erythema with moderate induration/papulation with or without oozing/crusting), 4= severe (deep or bright red erythema with severe induration/papulation and with oozing/crusting). Higher scores = greater severity. Treatment success: ISGA score of clear/almost clear with at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline. Participants acquired static digital images of the lesions using sponsor-provisioned digital imaging equipment. Images were reviewed by central readers.
Percentage of Participants With an Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) at Week 6: In-person Assessment
ISGA is a global assessment of stasis dermatitis lesions severity based on erythema, papulation/elevation, superficial erosion/denudation, and scaling. ISGA excludes scalp from scoring and assessment. ISGA score ranged from 0 to 4; where 0 = clear (minor residual hypo/hyperpigmentation; no erythema or induration/papulation; no oozing/crusting), 1= almost clear (trace faint pink erythema, with barely perceptible induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting), 2= mild (faint pink erythema with mild induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting), 3= moderate (pink-red erythema with moderate induration/papulation with or without oozing/crusting), 4= severe (deep or bright red erythema with severe induration/papulation and with oozing/crusting). Higher scores indicated greater severity. The assessment was completed in person by the home visit practitioner.
Percentage of Participants With an Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6: Central Readers Digital Images Assessment
ISGA is a global assessment of stasis dermatitis lesions severity based on erythema, papulation/elevation, superficial erosion/denudation, and scaling. ISGA excludes scalp from scoring and assessment. ISGA score ranged from 0 to 4; where 0 = clear (minor residual hypo/hyperpigmentation; no erythema or induration/papulation; no oozing/crusting), 1= almost clear (trace faint pink erythema, with barely perceptible induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting), 2= mild (faint pink erythema with mild induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting), 3= moderate (pink-red erythema with moderate induration/papulation with or without oozing/crusting), 4= severe (deep or bright red erythema with severe induration/papulation and with oozing/crusting). Higher scores indicated greater severity. Participants acquired static digital images of the lesions using sponsor-provisioned digital imaging equipment. Images were reviewed by central readers.
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Sign Score (TSS) at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6: Central Readers Digital Images Assessment
TSS assesses severity of stasis dermatitis lesions. There were following 4 clinical signs of all treatable stasis dermatitis lesions: erythema, papulation/elevation, superficial erosion/denudation, and scaling. Each of 4 signs were rated on a scale of 0 to 3 (0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe). TSS = sum of scores from all clinical signs; ranging from 0 (none) to 12 (most severe), where higher score indicated greater severity. Participants acquired static digital images of the lesions using sponsor-provisioned digital imaging equipment. Images were reviewed by central readers.
Percent Change From Baseline in Stasis Dermatitis Lesional Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 6: In-person Assessment
Stasis dermatitis lesional BSA was calculated using handprint method. Number of handprints (size of participant's full palmer hand) fitting in affected area was counted. One handprint represented approximately 1% of lesional BSA. Percent BSA for a body region = total number of handprints in a body region * % surface area equivalent to 1 handprint. Higher % BSA indicated greater severity. The assessment was completed in person by the home visit practitioner.
Percent Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6: Central Readers Digital Images Assessment
Stasis dermatitis lesional BSA was calculated using handprint method. Number of handprints (size of participant's full palmer hand) fitting in affected area was counted. One handprint represented approximately 1% of lesional BSA. Percent BSA for a body region = total number of handprints in a body region * % surface area equivalent to 1 handprint. Higher % BSA indicated greater severity. Participants acquired static digital images of the lesions using sponsor-provisioned digital imaging equipment. Images were reviewed by central readers.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 4 weeks after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; Initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. TEAEs included both SAEs and all non-SAEs.

Full Information

First Posted
September 13, 2019
Last Updated
April 1, 2022
Sponsor
Pfizer
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04091087
Brief Title
Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Crisaborole in Adults With Stasis Dermatitis
Official Title
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Proof-of-Concept Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Local Tolerability of Crisaborole Ointment, 2%, in Adult Participants With Stasis Dermatitis Without Active Skin Ulceration
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 26, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 19, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 19, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Pfizer

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a Phase 2a, randomized, double blind, vehicle controlled, parallel group, proof of concept study that will include participants with stasis dermatitis without active skin ulceration, who will receive crisaborole ointment 2% or vehicle twice daily for 6 weeks.
Detailed Description
Study C3291038 is a Phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group, proof of concept study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and local tolerability of 6 weeks of treatment with crisaborole in adult participants with SD without active skin ulceration. Approximately 70 eligible participants will be randomized into the double blind treatment period in a 1:1 ratio to receive crisaborole ointment, 2% or vehicle twice daily for 6 weeks. The study will recruit male and female participants aged ≥ 45 years with a clinical diagnosis of SD. The total duration of participation in the study will be up to 14 weeks, including up to 4 weeks for screening, a 6 week double blind treatment period, and a follow-up period of 4 weeks after treatment completion. Study enrollment and management will be de centralized, where participants do not visit an investigator or a clinic for clinical assessment. The participants will participate in the study at home. The sponsor (or designee) will provide home visits by qualified home visit practitioners (HVP), remote contact by telemedicine (or telephone), and clinical database electronic case report forms (eCRFs), eDiary, and other electronic data entries from 3rd party vendors for study data collection.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stasis Dermatitis
Keywords
Stasis Dermatitis, venous hypertension, venous insufficiency

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
66 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
crisaborole ointment
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
crisaborole ointment
Arm Title
vehicle ointment
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
vehicle ointment
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
crisaborole ointment
Other Intervention Name(s)
Eucrisa
Intervention Description
crisaborole ointment
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
vehicle ointment
Intervention Description
vehicle ointment
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Sign Score (TSS) at Week 6: In-person Assessment
Description
TSS assesses severity of stasis dermatitis lesions. There were following 4 clinical signs of all treatable stasis dermatitis lesions: erythema, papulation/elevation, superficial erosion/denudation, and scaling. Each of 4 signs were rated on a scale of 0 to 3 (0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe). TSS = sum of scores from all clinical signs; ranging from 0 (none) to 12 (most severe), where higher score indicated greater severity. The assessment was completed in person by the home visit practitioner.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 6
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Treatment Success Based on Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) at Week 6: In-person Assessment
Description
ISGA is a global assessment of stasis dermatitis lesions severity based on erythema, papulation/elevation, superficial erosion/denudation, and scaling. ISGA excludes scalp from scoring and assessment. ISGA score ranged from 0 to 4; where 0 = clear (minor residual hypo/hyperpigmentation; no erythema or induration/papulation; no oozing/crusting), 1= almost clear (trace faint pink erythema, with barely perceptible induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting), 2= mild (faint pink erythema with mild induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting), 3= moderate (pink-red erythema with moderate induration/papulation with or without oozing/crusting), 4= severe (deep or bright red erythema with severe induration/papulation and with oozing/crusting). Higher scores indicated greater severity. The assessment was completed in person by the home visit practitioner. Treatment success was defined as ISGA score of clear/almost clear with at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline.
Time Frame
Week 6
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Treatment Success Based on Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6: Central Readers Digital Images Assessment
Description
ISGA: global assessment of stasis dermatitis lesions severity based on erythema, papulation/elevation, superficial erosion/denudation, and scaling, excluding scalp. ISGA score ranged from 0 to 4; 0 = clear (minor residual hypo/hyperpigmentation; no erythema or induration/papulation; no oozing/crusting), 1= almost clear (trace faint pink erythema, with barely perceptible induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting), 2= mild (faint pink erythema with mild induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting), 3= moderate (pink-red erythema with moderate induration/papulation with or without oozing/crusting), 4= severe (deep or bright red erythema with severe induration/papulation and with oozing/crusting). Higher scores = greater severity. Treatment success: ISGA score of clear/almost clear with at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline. Participants acquired static digital images of the lesions using sponsor-provisioned digital imaging equipment. Images were reviewed by central readers.
Time Frame
Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Title
Percentage of Participants With an Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) at Week 6: In-person Assessment
Description
ISGA is a global assessment of stasis dermatitis lesions severity based on erythema, papulation/elevation, superficial erosion/denudation, and scaling. ISGA excludes scalp from scoring and assessment. ISGA score ranged from 0 to 4; where 0 = clear (minor residual hypo/hyperpigmentation; no erythema or induration/papulation; no oozing/crusting), 1= almost clear (trace faint pink erythema, with barely perceptible induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting), 2= mild (faint pink erythema with mild induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting), 3= moderate (pink-red erythema with moderate induration/papulation with or without oozing/crusting), 4= severe (deep or bright red erythema with severe induration/papulation and with oozing/crusting). Higher scores indicated greater severity. The assessment was completed in person by the home visit practitioner.
Time Frame
Week 6
Title
Percentage of Participants With an Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6: Central Readers Digital Images Assessment
Description
ISGA is a global assessment of stasis dermatitis lesions severity based on erythema, papulation/elevation, superficial erosion/denudation, and scaling. ISGA excludes scalp from scoring and assessment. ISGA score ranged from 0 to 4; where 0 = clear (minor residual hypo/hyperpigmentation; no erythema or induration/papulation; no oozing/crusting), 1= almost clear (trace faint pink erythema, with barely perceptible induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting), 2= mild (faint pink erythema with mild induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting), 3= moderate (pink-red erythema with moderate induration/papulation with or without oozing/crusting), 4= severe (deep or bright red erythema with severe induration/papulation and with oozing/crusting). Higher scores indicated greater severity. Participants acquired static digital images of the lesions using sponsor-provisioned digital imaging equipment. Images were reviewed by central readers.
Time Frame
Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Sign Score (TSS) at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6: Central Readers Digital Images Assessment
Description
TSS assesses severity of stasis dermatitis lesions. There were following 4 clinical signs of all treatable stasis dermatitis lesions: erythema, papulation/elevation, superficial erosion/denudation, and scaling. Each of 4 signs were rated on a scale of 0 to 3 (0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe). TSS = sum of scores from all clinical signs; ranging from 0 (none) to 12 (most severe), where higher score indicated greater severity. Participants acquired static digital images of the lesions using sponsor-provisioned digital imaging equipment. Images were reviewed by central readers.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Stasis Dermatitis Lesional Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 6: In-person Assessment
Description
Stasis dermatitis lesional BSA was calculated using handprint method. Number of handprints (size of participant's full palmer hand) fitting in affected area was counted. One handprint represented approximately 1% of lesional BSA. Percent BSA for a body region = total number of handprints in a body region * % surface area equivalent to 1 handprint. Higher % BSA indicated greater severity. The assessment was completed in person by the home visit practitioner.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 6
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6: Central Readers Digital Images Assessment
Description
Stasis dermatitis lesional BSA was calculated using handprint method. Number of handprints (size of participant's full palmer hand) fitting in affected area was counted. One handprint represented approximately 1% of lesional BSA. Percent BSA for a body region = total number of handprints in a body region * % surface area equivalent to 1 handprint. Higher % BSA indicated greater severity. Participants acquired static digital images of the lesions using sponsor-provisioned digital imaging equipment. Images were reviewed by central readers.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Description
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 4 weeks after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; Initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. TEAEs included both SAEs and all non-SAEs.
Time Frame
Day 1 up to maximum of 4 weeks after the last dose (maximum for 10 weeks)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
45 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Participants who are ≥45 years of age and in generally stable health Participants who are in generally stable health and have a known diagnosis of Stasis Dermatitis or newly diagnosed Stasis Dermatitis Participants whose mental and physical status allows them to be able to mostly perform their activities of daily living with minimal assistance Exclusion Criteria: Participants with clinically significant active or potentially recurrent dermatitis conditions and known genetic dermatological conditions that are not Stasis Dermatitis or overlap with Stasis Dermatitis Participants with active venous stasis ulceration on either lower extremity. Participants with current infection or suspected infection of any Stasis Dermatitis lesions Women of child bearing potential (WOCBP) are not eligible for this study
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Organizational Affiliation
Pfizer
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Lightship
City
El Segundo
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90245
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hawthorne Effect, Inc
City
Lafayette
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94549
Country
United States
Facility Name
Verily Life Sciences LLC
City
South San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94080
Country
United States
Facility Name
Onco360 Oncology Pharmacy
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40223
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
IPD Sharing URL
https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests
Links:
URL
https://pmiform.com/clinical-trial-info-request?StudyID=C3291038
Description
To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.

Learn more about this trial

Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Crisaborole in Adults With Stasis Dermatitis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs