search
Back to results

Evaluation of Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) in Patients With End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) on Intermittent Hemodialysis (iHD).

Primary Purpose

Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Continuous Glucose Monitor
Sponsored by
University of Virginia
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Diabetes focused on measuring Dialysis, Hemodialysis, Diabetes, Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM)

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ages 18+
  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus on intermittent HD thrice weekly OR Type 2 diabetes mellitus on intermittent HD thrice weekly
  • Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits and study procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to comply with finger stick blood glucoses at least four times daily
  • Noncompliant with HD therapies
  • Pregnant women

Sites / Locations

  • Meaghan Stumpf, MD

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

CGM Use while on Hemodialysis Therapy

Arm Description

All subjects will use a CGM for 10 days. Subjects will continue their standard of care hemodialysis treatments during the study period.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Mean Absolute Relative Difference Between CGM Value and Capillary Blood Glucose (Self-monitoring Blood Glucose [SMBG])
Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) between CGM value and capillary blood glucose (SMBG) performed at home 4 to 7 times per day by the participant for 684 matched pairs.
Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) Between Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) Value and Venous Blood Glucose (vBGM)
Venous blood glucose samples were collected approximately 12 blood samples from the existing hemodialysis (HD) intravenous (IV) line during each (three) HD session the CGM sensor was worn. These blood samples were immediately processed using the i-STAT System. While the goal was to have the subject participate in three hemodialysis sessions, two sessions were acceptable. 624 matched data pairs were analyzed.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
September 16, 2019
Last Updated
November 29, 2022
Sponsor
University of Virginia
Collaborators
DexCom, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04094064
Brief Title
Evaluation of Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) in Patients With End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) on Intermittent Hemodialysis (iHD).
Official Title
Evaluation of Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) in Patients With End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) on Intermittent Hemodialysis (iHD).
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 19, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 29, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 29, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Virginia
Collaborators
DexCom, Inc.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Recent advances in continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) and availability of commercial CGM products to patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes has made the use of CGM more widespread. CGMs work by placing a probe underneath the skin of a patient, into the interstitial space. Patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) who are on intermittent hemodialysis (iHD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) undergo fluid shifts between the interstitial fluid and intravascular space during dialysis treatments.These fluid shifts, uremia, acidosis, and volume overload (increase in interstitial fluid volume due to ESRD) have the potential to impact the performance of the most advanced and commercially available CGMs; however, use of CGM in these patients has not yet been studied.Use of CGM, and potentially hybrid closed loop insulin delivery systems that are dependent on accurate continuous glucose monitoring, has the potential to improve glucose control and quality of life in these patients (7). This study team feels that this study will be valuable in collecting preliminary data needed with the goal of validating the use of CGM in this patient population. The specific aim is to conduct a pilot study to evaluate the accuracy of continuous glucose monitors (CGM) in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients on intermittent hemodialysis (iHD).
Detailed Description
Recent advances in continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) and availability of commercial CGM products to patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes has made the use of CGM more widespread (1). CGMs work by placing a probe underneath the skin of a patient, into the interstitial space. The probe is an electroenzymatic sensor which uses glucose oxidase to break down glucose to create hydrogen peroxidase and other elements. Hydrogen peroxidase then interacts with a base metal layer of the sensor and is oxidized, which results in release of electrons which creates a current. The current is proportional to the glucose concentration. The current is measured by the probe and transmits a calculated glucose concentration to a receiving device (2). Substances that are widely distributed in body water, and thereby present in the interstitial space, potentially affect this technology. Acetaminophen and aspirin are substances that are have been known to affect the accuracy of these devices (3); however, more recently developed CGMs such as the Dexcom G6, were able to demonstrate no interference by acetaminophen (4). Patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) who are on intermittent hemodialysis (iHD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) undergo fluid shifts between the interstitial fluid and intravascular space during dialysis treatments. They are also often uremic and have metabolic acidosis (5). These fluid shifts, uremia, acidosis, and volume overload (increase in interstitial fluid volume due to ESRD) have the potential to impact the performance of the most advanced and commercially available CGMs; however, use of CGM in these patients has not yet been studied (3). Moderate to severe CKD is associated with both increase in insulin resistance and decrease in insulin clearance, which results in often unpredictable and labile glucose concentrations and increased risk of hypoglycemia in these patients (6). Use of CGM, and potentially hybrid closed loop insulin delivery systems that are dependent on accurate continuous glucose monitoring, has the potential to improve glucose control and quality of life in these patients (7). This study team feels that this study will be valuable in collecting preliminary data needed with the goal of validating the use of CGM in this patient population.OBJECTIVE: The specific aim is to conduct a pilot study to evaluate the accuracy of continuous glucose monitors (CGM) in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients on intermittent hemodialysis (iHD). Accuracy will be assessed by calculating the mean absolute relative difference (MARD) between CGM values and concurrent finger stick or capillary blood glucose (CBG) in these patients during hemodialysis, and on non-dialysis days.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Keywords
Dialysis, Hemodialysis, Diabetes, Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM)

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
20 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
CGM Use while on Hemodialysis Therapy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
All subjects will use a CGM for 10 days. Subjects will continue their standard of care hemodialysis treatments during the study period.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Continuous Glucose Monitor
Intervention Description
Use of a continuous glucose monitor during study period.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean Absolute Relative Difference Between CGM Value and Capillary Blood Glucose (Self-monitoring Blood Glucose [SMBG])
Description
Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) between CGM value and capillary blood glucose (SMBG) performed at home 4 to 7 times per day by the participant for 684 matched pairs.
Time Frame
From CGM placement to CGM removal (10 days)
Title
Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) Between Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) Value and Venous Blood Glucose (vBGM)
Description
Venous blood glucose samples were collected approximately 12 blood samples from the existing hemodialysis (HD) intravenous (IV) line during each (three) HD session the CGM sensor was worn. These blood samples were immediately processed using the i-STAT System. While the goal was to have the subject participate in three hemodialysis sessions, two sessions were acceptable. 624 matched data pairs were analyzed.
Time Frame
From CGM placement to CGM removal (10 days)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Ages 18+ Type 1 diabetes mellitus on intermittent HD thrice weekly OR Type 2 diabetes mellitus on intermittent HD thrice weekly Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits and study procedures Exclusion Criteria: Inability to comply with finger stick blood glucoses at least four times daily Noncompliant with HD therapies Pregnant women
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Meaghan Stumpf, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Virginia
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Meaghan Stumpf, MD
City
Charlottesville
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22903
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
There are no current plans to share IPD for this study.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35485908
Citation
Villard O, Breton MD, Rao S, Voelmle MK, Fuller MR, Myers HE, McFadden RK, Luke ZS, Wakeman CA, Clancy-Oliveri M, Basu A, Stumpf MM. Accuracy of a Factory-Calibrated Continuous Glucose Monitor in Individuals With Diabetes on Hemodialysis. Diabetes Care. 2022 Jul 7;45(7):1666-1669. doi: 10.2337/dc22-0073.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Evaluation of Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) in Patients With End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) on Intermittent Hemodialysis (iHD).

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs