search
Back to results

A New Model to Reach Vulnerable Older Adults With Pain Self-management Support

Primary Purpose

Chronic Pain

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
STEPS (Seniors using Technology to Engage in Pain Self-management)
Sponsored by
University of Michigan
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Chronic Pain

Eligibility Criteria

60 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English-proficient
  • Age >= 60 years
  • Ambulatory with or without assistive device
  • Community-living
  • Have a cell or landline phone
  • Have Internet access (home or elsewhere)
  • Self-reported chronic musculoskeletal pain (pain in muscles or joints for > 3 months); >4 (0-10 scale) average pain level over last week; >1 day/previous 30 when pain made it difficult to do usual activities
  • Ability to attend a one-time study orientation session

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious acute illness or hospitalization in last month
  • Planned surgery in next three months
  • Significant cognitive impairment as indicated by affirmative response to question: "Do you have significant difficulties with your memory that get in the way of your usual daily activities?"
  • Other severe physical or psychiatric disorder judged by study team to pose significant barrier to deriving program benefit.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Michigan

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Intervention

Arm Description

Participants will engage in a 7-week chronic pain self-management program.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in pain interference
The Pain Interference 6-item subscale of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-43 Adult Profile. Items ask how much pain in the last 7 days has interfered with daily activities such as household chores and social activities (1=not at all to 5=very much); raw total scale scores range from 6 (low interference) to 30 (high interference)..
Participant engagement
Number of completed sessions with the community health worker (range 1 to 7).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Participant Global Impression of Change
Two items: 1) How participant thinks their pain has changed from baseline (much worse (-3) to much better(+3)). 2) How participant thinks their functioning has changed from baseline (much worse (-3) to much better(+3)).
Participant satisfaction: Likert-scale questions
Likert-scale questions about participant satisfaction with the program; e.g., whether participation increased understanding of pain management (Strongly Agree=1 to Strongly Disagree=5), and with selected program elements (e.g., community health workers, videos, website).

Full Information

First Posted
September 17, 2019
Last Updated
January 4, 2021
Sponsor
University of Michigan
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA), American Pain Society
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04095650
Brief Title
A New Model to Reach Vulnerable Older Adults With Pain Self-management Support
Official Title
A New Model to Reach Vulnerable Older Adults With Pain Self-management Support
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 20, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 14, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 14, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Michigan
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA), American Pain Society

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Learning chronic pain self-management skills can help patients improve daily functioning and quality of life, while avoiding risks associated with opioids and other pharmacological treatments. Community health workers (CHWs) may help make chronic pain self-management interventions more accessible to older adults living in underserved communities. The goal of this study is to conduct a feasibility test of a chronic pain self-management intervention delivered by CHWs, in conjunction with mobile health tools, in a sample of 25 older adults recruited from community sites in Detroit, Michigan. This study will involve the use of mixed quantitative and qualitative methods to assess participant engagement and satisfaction, and change in pain-related outcomes.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Chronic Pain

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
38 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will engage in a 7-week chronic pain self-management program.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
STEPS (Seniors using Technology to Engage in Pain Self-management)
Intervention Description
Participants will meet with a community health worker (CHW) at a one-hour in-person study orientation session. At this session, they will be introduced to the program, learn how to use the online modules and associated materials, and schedule six weekly telephone sessions with the CHW. Participants will be given a wearable physical activity tracker to use throughout the course of the program. They can choose to report daily step counts by automatically syncing to an app or via text message. Each week during the study period, participants will engage with content on the website, have a session with the community health worker, track their daily steps, and set and work toward pain-management goals.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in pain interference
Description
The Pain Interference 6-item subscale of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-43 Adult Profile. Items ask how much pain in the last 7 days has interfered with daily activities such as household chores and social activities (1=not at all to 5=very much); raw total scale scores range from 6 (low interference) to 30 (high interference)..
Time Frame
baseline and 8 weeks
Title
Participant engagement
Description
Number of completed sessions with the community health worker (range 1 to 7).
Time Frame
8 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Participant Global Impression of Change
Description
Two items: 1) How participant thinks their pain has changed from baseline (much worse (-3) to much better(+3)). 2) How participant thinks their functioning has changed from baseline (much worse (-3) to much better(+3)).
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Participant satisfaction: Likert-scale questions
Description
Likert-scale questions about participant satisfaction with the program; e.g., whether participation increased understanding of pain management (Strongly Agree=1 to Strongly Disagree=5), and with selected program elements (e.g., community health workers, videos, website).
Time Frame
8 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: English-proficient Age >= 60 years Ambulatory with or without assistive device Community-living Have a cell or landline phone Have Internet access (home or elsewhere) Self-reported chronic musculoskeletal pain (pain in muscles or joints for > 3 months); >4 (0-10 scale) average pain level over last week; >1 day/previous 30 when pain made it difficult to do usual activities Ability to attend a one-time study orientation session Exclusion Criteria: Serious acute illness or hospitalization in last month Planned surgery in next three months Significant cognitive impairment as indicated by affirmative response to question: "Do you have significant difficulties with your memory that get in the way of your usual daily activities?" Other severe physical or psychiatric disorder judged by study team to pose significant barrier to deriving program benefit.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mary Janevic, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Michigan School of Public Health
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Michigan
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48109
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

A New Model to Reach Vulnerable Older Adults With Pain Self-management Support

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs