Change in Self-Referential Encoding Task (SRET) performance
The SRET is a computerized task which involves a self-descriptive judgment phase where participants respond to trait adjectives presented as describing or not describing them, followed by a later recall phase where they attempt to remember the words presented. Only the self-descriptive judgment phase will be included in this study. Words from an SRET validated in predicting depressive relapse, the Revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales: Big Five Version (IASR-B5), as well as words based on the life events used in the LEC, will be incorporated into the SRET as the trait adjectives used in the self-descriptive judgment phase. The self-descriptive judgment phase of the SRET, as a measure of negative implicit self-referential cognition, is associated strongly with depression.
Change in Implicit Association Task (IAT) performance
The IAT is a computerized task which can be used to measure subconscious associations between mental representations of different concepts. For this study, it is designed specifically to assess attitudes towards therapy.
Change in Partner Go/No Go Association Task (P-GNAT) performance
The P-GNAT is a computerized task which is an implicit measure assessing personal evaluations of another individual. For this study, it is designed specifically to assess attitudes towards the therapist.
Change in Go/No Go Association Task (GNAT) performance
The GNAT is a computerized task to assess inhibitory control and processing speed.
Change in Letter-number Sequencing Task performance
Computerized task to assess working memory capabilities.
Change in Word Fluency Task performance
Computerized task to assess verbal functioning.
Change in Cognitive Style Questionnaire-Very Short Form (CSQ-VSF) score
The CSQ-VSF measures negative cognitive styles. Scores range from 7 to 35 on both the Globality subscale and Stability subscale, 10 to 50 on the Negative consequences subscale, and 3 to 15 on the Self-woth implications subscale, with higher scores representing more negative cognitive style. Subscale scores are summed to obtain the total score.
Change in Leiden Index of Depression Sensitivity-Revised Revised(LEIDS-RR) score
The LEIDS-RR measures cognitive reactivity to sadness across the domains of acceptance/coping (ACC), avoidant coping (AVC), perfectionism/control (CTR), aggression (AGG), and hopelessness/suicidality (HOP). Scores range from 0 to 24 on the ACC and AGG subscales, 0 to 32 on the AVC subscale, and 0 to 20 on the CTR and HOP subscales, with higher scores representing greater cognitive reactivity. Subscale scores are summed to obtain the total score.
Change in Reconstructed Depressive Experiences Questionnaire (RecDEQ) score
The RecDEQ measures and differentiates between the anaclitic (dependent) and introjective (self-critical) types of depression, with introjective depression associated with perfectionism. Scores range from 10 to 70 on the anaclitic depression subscale and 9 to 63 on the introjective depression subscale, with higher scores representing more severe depression.
Change in Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale (DAS-24) score
The DAS-24 measures maladaptive patterns of thinking. Scores range from 8 to 56 each on the Achievement, Self-control, and Dependence subscales, with higher scores representing greater maladaptive patterns of thinking.
Change in Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI) score
The ASI measures tendency to fear the physical and cognitive symptoms associated with anxiety. Total scores range from 0 to 64 with higher scores representing greater fear of symptoms associated with anxiety.
Change in Person's Relating to Others Questionnaire (PROQ3) score
PROQ3 measures people's interpersonal difficulties in the form of negative and maladaptive relating to others. It comprises of 8 scales, upper neutral (UN); upper close (UC); neutral close (NC); lower close (LC); lower neutral (LN); lower distant (LD); neutral distant (ND); and upper distant (UD), based upon the eight octants of a theoretical structure called the interpersonal octagon. Scores on each of these subscales range from 0 to 15, with higher scores representing greater interpersonal difficulties. Subscale scores can be summed to obtain the total score.
Change in Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale Short Form (DERS-SF) score
The DERS-SF measures problems with emotion regulation across six domains of non-acceptance of emotional responses (Non-acceptance subscale), difficulties engaging in goal-directed behavior (Goals subscale), impulse control difficulties (Impulse subscale), lack of emotional awareness (Awareness subscale), limited access to emotion regulation strategies (Strategies subscale), and lack of emotional clarity (Clarity subscale). Scores range from 3 to 15 on each of the subscales, with higher scores representing greater difficulty with emotional regulation. Subscale scores can be summed to obtain the total score.
Change in Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology (IDS) scores
The IDS-30 measures severity of depressive symptoms. Melancholic depression can be identified via an algorithm involving a selected 9 items of the IDS-30.
The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-16 (QIDS-16) is a shorter version derived from the IDS-30. QIDS-16 total scores are highly correlated with, and can be converted to, IDS-30 total scores.
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) questionnaire score
Anxiety scale. Total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores representing more severe anxiety. An additional open-ended question will query what stimuli usually results in the anxiety.
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-Panic Disorder (PHQ-PD) score
Measures frequency and severity of panic attacks. Total scores range from 0 to 15, with higher scores representing greater frequency or severity of panic attacks.
Change in Positive Mental Health Instrument (PMH) scores
The PMH measures mental health and well-being. The PMH-Short and PMH-Rapid are shorter versions derived from the PMH. Total scores can be converted to a range from 1 to 6, with higher scores representing more positive mental health.
Change in EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) Descriptive System scores
The EQ-5D-5L Descriptive System measures five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has scores ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores representing poorer quality of life.
Change in EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scale scores
The EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale measures perception of one's current health on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better health.
Change in modified Clinical Global Impression (self-report) scores
The modified CGI measures severity of illness (on a scale of 1 to 7, higher scores representing greater severity), global improvement (on a scale of 1 to 7, 1= Very much improved, 4 = no change, 7 = Very much worse), state of recovery (from 0% to 100% recovered) and the efficacy of treatment (on a scale of 1 to 16, with higher scores representing lower efficacy).
Change in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) scores
The Q-LES-Q-SF measures quality of life. Total scores range from 16 to 80, with higher scores representing better quality of life.
Change in Frequency of Actions and Thoughts Scale (FATS) score
The FATS measures patients' application of adaptive skills that have been taught during therapy. Total scores range from 0 to 48, with higher scores representing greater frequency of application of adaptive skills.
Change in Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-10 (CORE-10) score
The CORE-10 is a brief clinical outcome measure with total scores ranging from 0 to 40. Higher scores represent better clinical outcomes.
Change in Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised (WAI-SR)
The WAI-SR measures patient's perceptions of alliance in psychotherapy. Total scores range from 12 to 60, with higher scores representing better working alliance.
Feedback Questionnaire
A short open-ended questionnaire regarding patients' feedback on therapy. This questionnaire will consist of two Likert scale ratings (from 1-5) assessing patients' perception of how useful and how relevant the week's session was to their problems, followed by three open-ended questions for patients to elaborate on their feedback and specify particular aspects of the session (i.e., "What did you find to be the most helpful component of therapy this week?", "What did you find to be less or not helpful this week?", "What do you think can be improved this week?"). This questionnaire is aimed at obtaining consistent session-by-session feedback from patients that will further facilitate the focus groups.
Session Rating Scale (SRS)
The SRS is a four-item visual analogue scale designed to assess key dimensions of effective therapeutic relationships. Total scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores representing more effective therapeutics relationships.
Default rates
The proportion of patients who default or terminate early from therapy.
Change in Psychodynamic Functioning Scale (PFS) score
The PFS is a therapist-completed measure that assesses patients in 6 dimensions: 1. Quality of Family Relations, 2. Quality of friendships, 3. Romantic/sexual relationships, 4. Tolerance for affects, 5. Insight, 6. Problem solving and adaptive capacity. Each dimension is rated on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better outcomes.
Change in Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) score
The GAF is a therapist-completed measure that assesses the social, occupational and psychological functioning of a client. Total scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better functioning.
Change in Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised-Clinician (WAI-SR-C) score
The WAI-SR-C measures therapist's perceptions of alliance in psychotherapy. Total scores range from 10 to 50, with higher scores representing better working alliance.