search
Back to results

Use of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Cancer Patients With Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

Primary Purpose

Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Real repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Sponsored by
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy focused on measuring Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy, Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, Pain, Feasibility

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • have completed oxaliplatin-, paclitaxel-, or docetaxel-based chemotherapy for at least 3 months;
  • complain of persistent symptoms associated with CIPN such as numbness, tingling, burning, or pain with scores ≥ 4 on a numerical rating scale for average daily intensity (0-10, with 10 being the worst) and/or determined as grade 2 or higher CIPN by oncologist according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 (2017);
  • with decreased vibration and/or pinprick sensations according to neurological test (provided by the doctoral researcher when patients was referred by their oncologists);
  • have a Karnofsky Performance Score ≥ 70;
  • can travel to the research hospitals for receiving the study intervention.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • having brain tumor or brain metastasis;
  • having pregnancy;
  • having implanted medical devices;
  • having history of epilepsy, brain lesion, head trauma, neurosurgical procedures, or intracranial hypertension;
  • having a diagnosis of psychiatric disorder (e.g. bipolar, ongoing major depression, or schizophrenia) and/or treating with antipsychotic drugs;
  • having preexisting peripheral neuropathy before initiation of chemotherapy; g) withdrawing from alcohol or sedative medications;
  • having a life expectancy less than six months;
  • treating with naloxone, which can block analgesic effect of rTMS over M1;
  • previously treated with rTMS. Patients receiving any other treatment for CIPN may not be excluded, but they will be required not to change the type and dosage of the current treatments. Furthermore, such information will be collected as baseline clinical data and will be treated as confounding factors during data analysis.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Sham Comparator

    Arm Label

    Experimental group

    Control group

    Arm Description

    Real rTMS

    Sham rTMS

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Eligibility rate
    The proportion of screened patients meeting the inclusion criteria.
    Recruitment time
    The mean number of participants been recruited each month.
    Recruitment rate
    The proportion of eligible patients who are finally recruited in the study.
    Retention/attrition rate
    The proportion of recruited participants who complete the study or who drop out from the study with or without any reason.
    Appropriateness of clinical outcome measures
    The proportion of incomplete questionnaires and neurological tests.
    Participants' perceived effectiveness
    In this study, affective attitude and perceived effectiveness will be measured by using the Chinese version of the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale, a single-item 7-point numerical rating scale from 1 to 7 demonstrating participants' subjective perception of improvement and satisfaction after receiving the intervention (Hurst & Bolton, 2004). The PGIC scale has been recommended by the rTMS research guideline for pain (Klein et al., 2015).

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Pain perception
    The Chinese version of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) will be used to assess pain associated with CIPN. This instrument was developed and validated by Wang et al. (2009) for measuring severity (four scales) and interference (seven scales) of pain in cancer patients, which demonstrated good internal consistencies of both domains (Cronbach's α were 0.894 and 0.915, respectively).
    Neuropathic symptoms and signs
    Total Neuropathy Score-nurse© (TNSn©) is a validated instrument to evaluate symptoms and signs associated with CIPN based on both patient-reported and clinician-assessed data including three symptom questions (distribution areas of numbness, tingling/paresthesias, and neuropathic pain) and testing of vibration and pinprick; each of the symptoms and signs is scored from 0 to 4, with higher score indicating worse condition (Smith, Cohen, Pett & Beck, 2010).
    Miscellaneous symptoms associated with CIPN
    The Chinese version of Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (C-ESAS) validated by Dong et al. (2015) will be used to explore whether the intervention would bring any change in the concurrently reported symptoms among cancer patients including pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, sleep, well-being, shortness of breath, and potential miscellaneous symptoms that are not listed. Cronbach's α of the C-ESAS was 0.72, indicating an acceptable internal consistency.
    Health-related quality of life
    Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General questionnaire (FACT-G), a widely used self-reported questionnaire measuring health-related quality-of-life (QoL) in cancer patients, will be used in this study. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity subscale (FACT/GOG-Ntx) will be used to measure the participants' CIPN specific quality of life in this study. It is an 11-item tool added to the FACT measurement system for assessing cancer patients' symptoms and interference induced by neuropathy, which includes sensory, motor, and hearing problems, as well as dysfunctions associated with neuropathy. Good psychometrical properties of the FACT/GOG-Ntx have been demonstrated.
    Adverse Effects
    To determine the safety of rTMS in this population, participants will be asked to report any adverse effect occur during the study. The adverse effects, including the type, occurrence, and duration, will be recorded using a standard form. According to the guidelines (Klein et al., 2015; Rossi et al., 2009), the potential adverse effects associated with rTMS are transient seizures, headaches, transient hearing changes, local pain, neck pain, toothache, and paresthesia. These potential adverse effects will be listed in the standard form, and will be filled out by the designated therapists based on their observation and the participants' self-report after each treatment session. If any adverse effect occurs but is not listed in the form, the therapist will record the condition in the "Other" column.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    September 18, 2019
    Last Updated
    August 22, 2022
    Sponsor
    The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT04107272
    Brief Title
    Use of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Cancer Patients With Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
    Official Title
    Evaluating the Use of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Cancer Patients With Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized Feasibility Study
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    August 2022
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    December 2022 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    December 2023 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    March 2024 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The study aims to evaluate the feasibility of a repetitive transcranial magnetic simulation (rTMS) protocol developed for managing pain and other related symptoms associated with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in cancer patients.
    Detailed Description
    A total of 60 cancer patients who are aged 18 years or above and have persistent peripheral neuropathy for at least 3 months after completion of oxaliplatin-, paclitaxel-, or docetaxel-based chemotherapy will be recruited. After randomization, the experimental group (n = 30) will receive high-frequency rTMS, while the control group (n = 30) will receive sham rTMS. The rTMS will be delivered over M1 (hand representation) of dual hemispheres with 10 trains of 10 Hz pulses for 10 seconds, with a total of 1,000 pulses per hemisphere. The rTMS intensity will be set as 80% resting motor threshold and the interval between each train of pulses will be set as 50 seconds. The rTMS will be delivered as daily session for five consecutive days, followed by two fortnightly maintenance sessions during the follow-up period after the completion of five daily sessions. The rTMS will be delivered by designated physical therapists using "figure-of-8" shaped coil connected to an electromagnetic stimulator in the rehabilitation therapy room of the study hospitals in mainland China. The research outcomes are feasibility (1. recruitment: i.e. the length of time spent on recruiting participants, the mean number of participants been recruited each month, and the proportion of eligible patients who are finally recruited in the study; 2. eligibility: the proportion of screened patients meeting the inclusion criteria; 3. retention and attrition rates: the proportion of recruited participants who complete the study or who drop out from the study with or without any reason; and 4. appropriateness of clinical outcome measures: the proportion of incomplete questionnaires and neurological tests, as well as the characteristics of the missing data.), acceptability (Chinese version of the Patients' Global Impression of Change [PGIC] scale), safety, and trend of improvement in pain, other related symptoms, and quality of life by rTMS in cancer patients with CIPN.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy
    Keywords
    Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy, Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, Pain, Feasibility

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Supportive Care
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    60 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Experimental group
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Real rTMS
    Arm Title
    Control group
    Arm Type
    Sham Comparator
    Arm Description
    Sham rTMS
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Real repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Intervention Description
    The real rTMS will be delivered over M1 (hand representation) of dual hemispheres with 10 trains of 10 Hz pulses for 10 seconds, with a total of 1,000 pulses per hemisphere. The real rTMS intensity will be set as 80% resting motor threshold and the interval between each train of pulses will be set as 50 seconds. The real rTMS will be delivered as daily session for five consecutive days, followed by two fortnightly maintenance sessions during the follow-up period after the completion of five daily sessions. The real rTMS will be delivered by designated physical therapists using "figure-of-8" shaped coil.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Intervention Description
    The sham rTMS of this study will be delivered with the same active coil angled 90-degree way from the scalp. The intensity of sham rTMS will be set at lowest stimulator output that can generate similar noise to the real rTMS. The sham rTMS will be delivered in the same manner and duration with real rTMS.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Eligibility rate
    Description
    The proportion of screened patients meeting the inclusion criteria.
    Time Frame
    Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
    Title
    Recruitment time
    Description
    The mean number of participants been recruited each month.
    Time Frame
    Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
    Title
    Recruitment rate
    Description
    The proportion of eligible patients who are finally recruited in the study.
    Time Frame
    Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
    Title
    Retention/attrition rate
    Description
    The proportion of recruited participants who complete the study or who drop out from the study with or without any reason.
    Time Frame
    Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
    Title
    Appropriateness of clinical outcome measures
    Description
    The proportion of incomplete questionnaires and neurological tests.
    Time Frame
    Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
    Title
    Participants' perceived effectiveness
    Description
    In this study, affective attitude and perceived effectiveness will be measured by using the Chinese version of the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale, a single-item 7-point numerical rating scale from 1 to 7 demonstrating participants' subjective perception of improvement and satisfaction after receiving the intervention (Hurst & Bolton, 2004). The PGIC scale has been recommended by the rTMS research guideline for pain (Klein et al., 2015).
    Time Frame
    Baseline up to 5 weeks
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Pain perception
    Description
    The Chinese version of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) will be used to assess pain associated with CIPN. This instrument was developed and validated by Wang et al. (2009) for measuring severity (four scales) and interference (seven scales) of pain in cancer patients, which demonstrated good internal consistencies of both domains (Cronbach's α were 0.894 and 0.915, respectively).
    Time Frame
    Baseline up to 5 weeks
    Title
    Neuropathic symptoms and signs
    Description
    Total Neuropathy Score-nurse© (TNSn©) is a validated instrument to evaluate symptoms and signs associated with CIPN based on both patient-reported and clinician-assessed data including three symptom questions (distribution areas of numbness, tingling/paresthesias, and neuropathic pain) and testing of vibration and pinprick; each of the symptoms and signs is scored from 0 to 4, with higher score indicating worse condition (Smith, Cohen, Pett & Beck, 2010).
    Time Frame
    Baseline up to 5 weeks
    Title
    Miscellaneous symptoms associated with CIPN
    Description
    The Chinese version of Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (C-ESAS) validated by Dong et al. (2015) will be used to explore whether the intervention would bring any change in the concurrently reported symptoms among cancer patients including pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, sleep, well-being, shortness of breath, and potential miscellaneous symptoms that are not listed. Cronbach's α of the C-ESAS was 0.72, indicating an acceptable internal consistency.
    Time Frame
    Baseline up to 5 weeks
    Title
    Health-related quality of life
    Description
    Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General questionnaire (FACT-G), a widely used self-reported questionnaire measuring health-related quality-of-life (QoL) in cancer patients, will be used in this study. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity subscale (FACT/GOG-Ntx) will be used to measure the participants' CIPN specific quality of life in this study. It is an 11-item tool added to the FACT measurement system for assessing cancer patients' symptoms and interference induced by neuropathy, which includes sensory, motor, and hearing problems, as well as dysfunctions associated with neuropathy. Good psychometrical properties of the FACT/GOG-Ntx have been demonstrated.
    Time Frame
    Baseline up to 5 weeks
    Title
    Adverse Effects
    Description
    To determine the safety of rTMS in this population, participants will be asked to report any adverse effect occur during the study. The adverse effects, including the type, occurrence, and duration, will be recorded using a standard form. According to the guidelines (Klein et al., 2015; Rossi et al., 2009), the potential adverse effects associated with rTMS are transient seizures, headaches, transient hearing changes, local pain, neck pain, toothache, and paresthesia. These potential adverse effects will be listed in the standard form, and will be filled out by the designated therapists based on their observation and the participants' self-report after each treatment session. If any adverse effect occurs but is not listed in the form, the therapist will record the condition in the "Other" column.
    Time Frame
    Baseline up to 5 weeks

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: have completed oxaliplatin-, paclitaxel-, or docetaxel-based chemotherapy for at least 3 months; complain of persistent symptoms associated with CIPN such as numbness, tingling, burning, or pain with scores ≥ 4 on a numerical rating scale for average daily intensity (0-10, with 10 being the worst) and/or determined as grade 2 or higher CIPN by oncologist according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 (2017); with decreased vibration and/or pinprick sensations according to neurological test (provided by the doctoral researcher when patients was referred by their oncologists); have a Karnofsky Performance Score ≥ 70; can travel to the research hospitals for receiving the study intervention. Exclusion Criteria: having brain tumor or brain metastasis; having pregnancy; having implanted medical devices; having history of epilepsy, brain lesion, head trauma, neurosurgical procedures, or intracranial hypertension; having a diagnosis of psychiatric disorder (e.g. bipolar, ongoing major depression, or schizophrenia) and/or treating with antipsychotic drugs; having preexisting peripheral neuropathy before initiation of chemotherapy; g) withdrawing from alcohol or sedative medications; having a life expectancy less than six months; treating with naloxone, which can block analgesic effect of rTMS over M1; previously treated with rTMS. Patients receiving any other treatment for CIPN may not be excluded, but they will be required not to change the type and dosage of the current treatments. Furthermore, such information will be collected as baseline clinical data and will be treated as confounding factors during data analysis.
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Alex Molassiotis, PhD
    Phone
    (852) 2766-6396
    Email
    alex.molasiotis@polyu.edu.hk
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Mian Wang, MN
    Phone
    (86) 151-0711-4663
    Email
    mian.wang@connect.polyu.hk
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Alex Molassiotis, PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Learn more about this trial

    Use of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Cancer Patients With Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs