Efficacy of Silodosin in the Treatment of Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
Primary Purpose
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Bangladesh
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Silodosin
Tamsulosin
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Ambulatory male patients between 50 to 70 years and had diagnosis of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)
- International prostate symptoms score (IPSS)≥ 8
- Peak urinary flow rate (Qmax)<15ml/sec for a voided volume of 150 ml or more
- Post voidal residual urine volume ≥ 50 ml (by transabdominal ultrasonogram)
- Volume of prostate determine by transabdominal ultrasonogram ≥ 30 gm
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of prostate cancer/raised PSA>4 ng/ml
- Previous prostate surgery /Periurethral surgery.
- Patient undergone surgery to the bladder neck/Bladder neck contracture.
- Urethral stricture
- History of LUTS not due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
- Postvoid residual urine volume of >150ml
- Bladder stone
- Active urinary tract infection which might affect micturition
- Large intravesical protrusion > 2 cm
- Known hypersensitivity or history of active substance abuse
Sites / Locations
- Maidul islam
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Silodosin
Tamsulosin
Arm Description
8 mg daily by mouth, 12 weeks
0.4 mg daily by mouth, 12 weeks
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change in IPSS & Quality of life (QoL) score
Effectiveness of silodosin in benign prostatic hyperplasia assessed by symptom relief as assessed by IPSS. The total score was taken as the sum of the seven individual symptom scores. Each individual scored 0-5 (0 = Minimum; 5 = Maximum as worse as can be), yielding a total between 0 and 35. The Storage sub score was taken as the sum of the three individual symptom scores (Range 0-15) & the Voiding sub score was taken as the sum of the four individual symptom scores (Range 0-20). Quality of life (QoL) score assessment was done on a 7-point scale 0-6 (0= Delighted; 6= Terrible).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Changes in peak urine flow rate & post voidal residual urine (PVR)
Changes in peak urine flow rate by uroflowmetry & post voidal residual urine (PVR) by USG.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04107896
First Posted
September 4, 2019
Last Updated
September 26, 2019
Sponsor
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04107896
Brief Title
Efficacy of Silodosin in the Treatment of Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
Official Title
Efficacy of Silodosin in the Treatment of Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 31, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 31, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 31, 2018 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
In this study the investigators had evaluated the effectiveness SILODOSIN (8 mg daily orally) in Benign prostatic Hyperplasia in comparison to Tamsulosin (0.4 mg daily orally) in a randomized controlled trial design. Study population would be patients attending Urology OPD of BSMMU Hospital, Dhaka. Target sample size will be 136 evaluable patients in each group (assuming dropout rate 20%), suffering from Benign prostatic Hyperplasia .Subjects would be observed for 1 week without any drug. At the end of 1 week, they would be randomly allocated to Silodosin or Tamsulosin and treatment continued for 12 weeks. Interim follow-up visits would be at 1,4 and 12 weeks. USG confirmation of BPH would be required for recruitment. Effectiveness of the drugs would be assessed by International Prostate Symptom score, a quality of life (QoL) assessment done by a 7-point scale. Prostate weight/volume determination by USG, Change in post voidal residual urine (PVR) by USG and Changes in peak urine flow rate by uroflowmetry. Safety would be assessed by following up vital signs, treatment emergent adverse events and routine laboratory tests for drug safety.
Detailed Description
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common cause of lower urinary tract symptoms in elderly men. Selective α1-adrenergic antagonists are now first-line drugs in the medical management of BPH. This Hospital based randomized controlled clinical study designed to evaluate the efficacy of the new α1-blocker silodosin in the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).Ambulatory patients of age between 50 to 70 years, who were diagnosed as benign prostatic hyperplasia, were divided into two groups after fulfilling selection criteria. After informed consent & random sampling by lottery, silodosin 8 mg was given to group A (study) & tamsulosin 0.4 mg was given to group B (control). Total 149 patients were enrolled in this study but 8 patients were lost during follow up. Hence 141 patients completed the study, during the period of June 2017 to August 2018.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
141 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Silodosin
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
8 mg daily by mouth, 12 weeks
Arm Title
Tamsulosin
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
0.4 mg daily by mouth, 12 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Silodosin
Other Intervention Name(s)
Rapasin
Intervention Description
Cap silodosin
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tamsulosin
Other Intervention Name(s)
Uromax
Intervention Description
Cap tamsulosin
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in IPSS & Quality of life (QoL) score
Description
Effectiveness of silodosin in benign prostatic hyperplasia assessed by symptom relief as assessed by IPSS. The total score was taken as the sum of the seven individual symptom scores. Each individual scored 0-5 (0 = Minimum; 5 = Maximum as worse as can be), yielding a total between 0 and 35. The Storage sub score was taken as the sum of the three individual symptom scores (Range 0-15) & the Voiding sub score was taken as the sum of the four individual symptom scores (Range 0-20). Quality of life (QoL) score assessment was done on a 7-point scale 0-6 (0= Delighted; 6= Terrible).
Time Frame
Screening visit, baseline visit, follow up visit at 1th, 4th and 12th week
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Changes in peak urine flow rate & post voidal residual urine (PVR)
Description
Changes in peak urine flow rate by uroflowmetry & post voidal residual urine (PVR) by USG.
Time Frame
Screening visit, baseline visit, follow up visit at 1th, 4th and 12th week
10. Eligibility
Sex
Male
Gender Based
Yes
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Ambulatory male patients between 50 to 70 years and had diagnosis of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)
International prostate symptoms score (IPSS)≥ 8
Peak urinary flow rate (Qmax)<15ml/sec for a voided volume of 150 ml or more
Post voidal residual urine volume ≥ 50 ml (by transabdominal ultrasonogram)
Volume of prostate determine by transabdominal ultrasonogram ≥ 30 gm
Exclusion Criteria:
History of prostate cancer/raised PSA>4 ng/ml
Previous prostate surgery /Periurethral surgery.
Patient undergone surgery to the bladder neck/Bladder neck contracture.
Urethral stricture
History of LUTS not due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
Postvoid residual urine volume of >150ml
Bladder stone
Active urinary tract infection which might affect micturition
Large intravesical protrusion > 2 cm
Known hypersensitivity or history of active substance abuse
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
maidul islam, resident
Organizational Affiliation
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Maidul islam
City
Dhaka
Country
Bangladesh
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Efficacy of Silodosin in the Treatment of Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs