search
Back to results

Evaluation of Safety and Performance of the Atalante System With Patients With Lower Limb Paralysis

Primary Purpose

Spinal Cord Injuries, Paraplegia, Paralysis, Lower Limbs

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Use of the Atalante exoskeleton
Sponsored by
Wandercraft
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Spinal Cord Injuries focused on measuring Spinal Cord Injuries, Paraplegia, Paralysis, Lower Limbs, Lower Extremity, Robotics, Physiotherapy, Rehabilitation, Powered Exoskeleton, Walking, Ambulation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Motor complete traumatic Spinal Cord Injury (AIS A and B) since at least 4 months
  • Spinal Injury Level between AIS T5 and AIS T12
  • Able to verticalize on a daily basis

  • Height: between approximately 1.60 and 1.90 m. More specifically, Atalante is able to accommodate the following limb lengths:

    • Thigh: 380-460 mm

    • Distance between the ground and the joint space of the knee (to be measured while wearing the shoes they intend to wear with Atalante):

      • 457-607 mm for patient with an ankle dorsiflexion ≥ 16°
      • 457-577 mm for patient with an ankle dorsiflexion between 13° et 16°
      • 457-567 mm for patient with an ankle dorsiflexion between 10° et 13°
      • 457-557 mm for patient with an ankle dorsiflexion between 0° et 10° o Hip width less of equal to 460 mm when seated
  • Maximum weight: 90 kg
  • Patient having given his written consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients whose joint centers cannot be aligned Atalante's

  • Ranges of motion below:

    • Hip: 115° flexion, 15° extension, 17° abduction, 10° adduction, 10° medial rotation, 20° lateral rotation
    • Knee: 5° extension, 110° flexion
    • Ankle: 0° dorsiflexion, 9° plantar flexion, 18° inversion and eversion
  • Severe spasticity (greater than 3 on the modified Ashworth scale) of the adductor muscles, hamstrings, quadriceps and triceps surae
  • Pregnant or lactating woman
  • Unbalanced psychiatric or cognitive status which may interfere with an appropriate use of the device
  • Other neurological disorder
  • History of osteoporotic fracture and/or disease or treatment responsible for a secondary osteoporosis
  • Active implantable medical device
  • Evolutive intercurrent disease: pressure sore, infection, venous thrombosis
  • Unstable and unhealed limb and pelvic fracture
  • Unstable spine
  • Severe illness which may interfere with the verticalized posture and tolerance to effort
  • Evolutive osteoma
  • Syringomyelia

Sites / Locations

  • Centre Jacques Calvé - Fondation Hopale
  • Centre mutualiste de Rééducation et de Réadaptation de Kerpape

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Other

Arm Label

Spinal Cord Injury patients with motor complete paralysis

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The primary endpoint of the clinical investigation is defined by the success or failure at the 10 Meter Walk Test (10mWT) at the latest session.
The 10mWT is used to assess walking speed in meters/second (m/s) over a short distance. A clear pathway of at least 10-meter length is drawn. The start and the end point of a 10-m walkway is marked by lines. The patient starts a few steps prior the starting line; during the few steps needed to reach the starting line, the physiotherapist should stabilize the exoskeleton in the frontal plane. When the patient's first foot crosses the starting line, the test begins, and the stopwatch is started. The stopwatch is stopped at the end of the 10 meters in case of success, that is to say when the patient crosses the end line. The total time taken to ambulate is recorded. The distance covered is then divided by the total time (in seconds) taken to ambulate and recorded in meters per seconds. In case of failure, the distance walked by the patient is measured and recorded, and the speed to walk this distance is calculated as described above.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Capacity of patient in walking defined by Success / Failure on a 10mWT test at the 6th session.
The maximum distance walked during the 10mWT at the 6th and 12th sessions.
The average walking speeds during the 10mWT at the 6th and 12th sessions.
Capacity of the patient to perform verticalization as defined by the test "Stand-up" at the 6th and 12th sessions.
Capacity of a standing patient to reach a sitting position as defined by the test "Sit down" at the 6th and 12th sessions.
Ability of the patient to maintain a stand still position for 2 minutes as defined by the test "Stand without support for 2 minutes" at the 6th and 12th sessions.
Ability of the patient to lean with extended arm in a standing position (90° arms) at the 6th and 12th sessions.
Ability of the patient to perform a U-turn in less than 3 minutes as defined by the test "Make a U-turn" at the 6th and 12th sessions.
Average scores on Borg CR-10 simple perception scale for the perceived exertion at the 6th and 12th sessions.
Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) is a widely used and reliable indicator to monitor and guide exercise intensity. The scale allows individuals to subjectively rate their level of exertion during exercise or exercise testing. Developed by Gunnar Borg, it is often also referred to as the Borg Scale. Despite being a subjective measure of exercise intensity, RPE scales provide valuable information when used correctly. The revised category-ratio scale (0 to 10 scale) is used: 0 Null 1 Very easy 2 Somewhat easy 3 Moderate 4 Somewhat hard 5 Hard 6 7 Very hard 8 9 10 Very, very hard
Average scores of safety perceived by the patient on a 7-point Likert scale 7 levels at the 6th and 12th sessions.
A Likert scale is a psychometric scale commonly involved in research based on survey questionnaires. Here, the respondents specify their level of agreement or disagreement using a symmetric agree-disagree scale for a series of statements while responding to a particular Likert questionnaire item. The range of Likert scale captures the intensity of their feelings for a given item. The Likert scale ratings are: Strongly disagree Disagree Disagree somewhat Neither agree nor disagree Agree somewhat Agree Strongly agree The perceived safety is evaluated with the 7-point Likert scale on the following statement: "I felt safe during the test"
Observation of the skin condition was made before and after each session on the subject's back, thighs, knees and feet.
Comparison of the NBD score before the 1st session and after the 12th session.
The neurogenic bowel dysfunction score is a questionnaire including questions about background parameters, faecal incontinence, constipation, obstructed defecation, and impact on quality of life. The NBD score is constructed from items with acceptable reproducibility and validity that were significantly associated with impact on quality of life. The type of the stool depends on the time it spends in the colon.
Comparison of the Bristol scale before the 1st session and after the 12th session.
The Bristol Stool Chart is: Type 1: Separate hard lumps, like nuts (hard to pass); Type 2: Sausage-shaped but lumpy; Type 3: Like a sausage but with cracks on its surface; Type 4: Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft; Type 5: Soft blobs with clear-cut edges (passed easily); Type 6: Fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool; Type 7: Watery, no solid pieces. Entirety liquid. Type 1, 2 and 3 indicate constipation. Type 4 and 5 are ideal stools. Type 6 and 7 indicate diarrhea and urgency.
Definition of the voiding mode at the 1st and 12th sessions.
The management of neurogenic bladder dysfunction is crucial in the management of paraplegic patients as it affects the morbidity of these patients. The voiding mode is described. The self-survey is the standard treatment when the subject has an overactive bladder. The mictionnel mode will be informed before the first session, and at the end of the last session with the exoskeleton using an ISCOS questionnaire (International Spinal Cord Society questionnaire).
Qualiveen score at the 1st and 12th sessions.
The Qualiveen score is developed as a condition-specific quality of life measurement for individuals with SCI who have urinary disorders. It contains 4 domains: Limitation/ Inconvenience; Constrains/ Restrictions; Fears; Feelings/ Impact on Daily Life. The test-retest reliability is high6.
Spasticity according to the Modified Ashworth scale at the 1st and 12th sessions.
The Modified Ashworth Scale measures spasticity in patients with lesion of the Central Nervous System. The relationship between the raters' judgments was significant and the reliability was good. (PMID: 3809245) The scoring is: 0: No increase in muscle tone 1: Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension 1+: Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM 2: More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved 3: Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult 4: Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension Muscles evaluated are adductor, hamstring, triceps sural and quadriceps.
Heart rate measurement at rest and after the 10mWT at the 1st, 6th and 12th sessions.
Comparison of the Visual Analogue Pain Scale at the 1st and 12th sessions.
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale measures the subjective intensity of pain. The NPRS is an 11-points scale from 0 to 10: "0" = no pain; "10" = the most intense pain imaginable. The subject is asked to make pain rating corresponding to the current pain experienced.
Comparison of the NPSI scores at the 1st and 12th sessions.
NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Sumptom Inventory) renders it suitable for the evaluation of the different dimensions of neuropathic pain syndromes. The reliability of the different descriptors appears to be sufficient. It allows to quantify the various pain symptoms that can be grouped into five dimensions (burn, deep pain, paroxysmal pain, pain caused, paresthesia / dysesthesia)
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at the 12th session.
The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) is a global index that may be used to rate the response of the use of Atalante on the bowel function. The subject should check the number that best describes how the twelfth session condition is, compared with how it has been at the first session for the bowel function: Very much better Much better A little better No change A little worse Much worse Very much worse
Average scores of the 7-point Likert scale for ergonomics at the 12th session.
At the end of the twelfth session, the patient evaluates the interfaces and the ergonomics of Atalante (shape of the remote, mode, symbol) and the perceived safety and the level of assistance during transfer from the wheelchair to Atalante with a Likert scale. The Likert scale is a questionnaire where the subject chooses among seven-point scales: Strongly disagree Disagree Disagree somewhat Neither agree nor disagree Agree somewhat Agree Strongly agree
Time of installation of the patient in the exoskeleton at the 12th session.
Assistance level for each fastener at the 12th session.
The level of assistance is specified for each attachment (thigh, knee and foot straps). The levels of assistance are: Without assistance; With the assistance of one health professional; With the assistance of two health professional.
Average scores of the 7-point Likert scale for exoskeleton attachment questionnaire at the 12th session.
At the end of the twelfth session, the strapping system is evaluated using a 7-point Likert scale: Strongly disagree Disagree Disagree somewhat Neither agree nor disagree Agree somewhat Agree Strongly agree
Evaluation of sitting balance using the Boubee test at the 1st and 12th sessions.
This test evaluates the ability of the subject to balance in sitting position during disturbances induced by movements of the upper limbs. The subject is sitting without back's support and with both feet on the ground. The subject is asked to do six tasks from the easiest to the hardest. The subject must pass the task to test the next task. The score is defined by the last passed task. The sitting balance is evaluated at the first and at the last session.
Adverse events collection at each session.

Full Information

First Posted
September 26, 2019
Last Updated
October 2, 2019
Sponsor
Wandercraft
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04110561
Brief Title
Evaluation of Safety and Performance of the Atalante System With Patients With Lower Limb Paralysis
Official Title
Evaluation of Safety and Performance of the Atalante System With Patients With Lower Limb Paralysis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 5, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 16, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 16, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Wandercraft

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The study is a prospective, open, bicentric and observational study. It is conducted to assess the safety and performance of the Atalante exoskeleton system with patients with lower limb paralysis. The principal objective is to assess the performance of the Atalante system in performing ambulatory functions with motor complete SCI patients characterized by the success rate in performing a 10mWT at the last session of training with the Atalante system.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Spinal Cord Injuries, Paraplegia, Paralysis, Lower Limbs, Lower Extremity, Robotics
Keywords
Spinal Cord Injuries, Paraplegia, Paralysis, Lower Limbs, Lower Extremity, Robotics, Physiotherapy, Rehabilitation, Powered Exoskeleton, Walking, Ambulation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
12 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Spinal Cord Injury patients with motor complete paralysis
Arm Type
Other
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Use of the Atalante exoskeleton
Intervention Description
A session basically includes a stand up, walks over a distance of 10 meters, exercises, U-turns and a sitting
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The primary endpoint of the clinical investigation is defined by the success or failure at the 10 Meter Walk Test (10mWT) at the latest session.
Description
The 10mWT is used to assess walking speed in meters/second (m/s) over a short distance. A clear pathway of at least 10-meter length is drawn. The start and the end point of a 10-m walkway is marked by lines. The patient starts a few steps prior the starting line; during the few steps needed to reach the starting line, the physiotherapist should stabilize the exoskeleton in the frontal plane. When the patient's first foot crosses the starting line, the test begins, and the stopwatch is started. The stopwatch is stopped at the end of the 10 meters in case of success, that is to say when the patient crosses the end line. The total time taken to ambulate is recorded. The distance covered is then divided by the total time (in seconds) taken to ambulate and recorded in meters per seconds. In case of failure, the distance walked by the patient is measured and recorded, and the speed to walk this distance is calculated as described above.
Time Frame
At study completion, up to 3 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Capacity of patient in walking defined by Success / Failure on a 10mWT test at the 6th session.
Time Frame
At study mid-term, 10 days in average
Title
The maximum distance walked during the 10mWT at the 6th and 12th sessions.
Time Frame
At study mid-term, 10 days in average and at study completion, up to 3 weeks
Title
The average walking speeds during the 10mWT at the 6th and 12th sessions.
Time Frame
At study mid-term, 10 days in average and at study completion, up to 3 weeks
Title
Capacity of the patient to perform verticalization as defined by the test "Stand-up" at the 6th and 12th sessions.
Time Frame
At study mid-term, 10 days in average and at study completion, up to 3 weeks
Title
Capacity of a standing patient to reach a sitting position as defined by the test "Sit down" at the 6th and 12th sessions.
Time Frame
At study mid-term, 10 days in average and at study completion, up to 3 weeks
Title
Ability of the patient to maintain a stand still position for 2 minutes as defined by the test "Stand without support for 2 minutes" at the 6th and 12th sessions.
Time Frame
At study mid-term, 10 days in average and at study completion, up to 3 weeks
Title
Ability of the patient to lean with extended arm in a standing position (90° arms) at the 6th and 12th sessions.
Time Frame
At study mid-term, 10 days in average and at study completion, up to 3 weeks
Title
Ability of the patient to perform a U-turn in less than 3 minutes as defined by the test "Make a U-turn" at the 6th and 12th sessions.
Time Frame
At study mid-term, 10 days in average and at study completion, up to 3 weeks
Title
Average scores on Borg CR-10 simple perception scale for the perceived exertion at the 6th and 12th sessions.
Description
Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) is a widely used and reliable indicator to monitor and guide exercise intensity. The scale allows individuals to subjectively rate their level of exertion during exercise or exercise testing. Developed by Gunnar Borg, it is often also referred to as the Borg Scale. Despite being a subjective measure of exercise intensity, RPE scales provide valuable information when used correctly. The revised category-ratio scale (0 to 10 scale) is used: 0 Null 1 Very easy 2 Somewhat easy 3 Moderate 4 Somewhat hard 5 Hard 6 7 Very hard 8 9 10 Very, very hard
Time Frame
At study mid-term, 10 days in average and at study completion, up to 3 weeks
Title
Average scores of safety perceived by the patient on a 7-point Likert scale 7 levels at the 6th and 12th sessions.
Description
A Likert scale is a psychometric scale commonly involved in research based on survey questionnaires. Here, the respondents specify their level of agreement or disagreement using a symmetric agree-disagree scale for a series of statements while responding to a particular Likert questionnaire item. The range of Likert scale captures the intensity of their feelings for a given item. The Likert scale ratings are: Strongly disagree Disagree Disagree somewhat Neither agree nor disagree Agree somewhat Agree Strongly agree The perceived safety is evaluated with the 7-point Likert scale on the following statement: "I felt safe during the test"
Time Frame
At study mid-term, 10 days in average and at study completion, up to 3 weeks
Title
Observation of the skin condition was made before and after each session on the subject's back, thighs, knees and feet.
Time Frame
Throughout study completion, an average of 3 weeks
Title
Comparison of the NBD score before the 1st session and after the 12th session.
Description
The neurogenic bowel dysfunction score is a questionnaire including questions about background parameters, faecal incontinence, constipation, obstructed defecation, and impact on quality of life. The NBD score is constructed from items with acceptable reproducibility and validity that were significantly associated with impact on quality of life. The type of the stool depends on the time it spends in the colon.
Time Frame
At study start, day 1 and at study completion, up to 3 weeks
Title
Comparison of the Bristol scale before the 1st session and after the 12th session.
Description
The Bristol Stool Chart is: Type 1: Separate hard lumps, like nuts (hard to pass); Type 2: Sausage-shaped but lumpy; Type 3: Like a sausage but with cracks on its surface; Type 4: Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft; Type 5: Soft blobs with clear-cut edges (passed easily); Type 6: Fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool; Type 7: Watery, no solid pieces. Entirety liquid. Type 1, 2 and 3 indicate constipation. Type 4 and 5 are ideal stools. Type 6 and 7 indicate diarrhea and urgency.
Time Frame
At study start, day 1 and at study completion, up to 3 weeks
Title
Definition of the voiding mode at the 1st and 12th sessions.
Description
The management of neurogenic bladder dysfunction is crucial in the management of paraplegic patients as it affects the morbidity of these patients. The voiding mode is described. The self-survey is the standard treatment when the subject has an overactive bladder. The mictionnel mode will be informed before the first session, and at the end of the last session with the exoskeleton using an ISCOS questionnaire (International Spinal Cord Society questionnaire).
Time Frame
At study start, day 1 and at study completion, up to 3 weeks
Title
Qualiveen score at the 1st and 12th sessions.
Description
The Qualiveen score is developed as a condition-specific quality of life measurement for individuals with SCI who have urinary disorders. It contains 4 domains: Limitation/ Inconvenience; Constrains/ Restrictions; Fears; Feelings/ Impact on Daily Life. The test-retest reliability is high6.
Time Frame
At study start, day 1 and at study completion, up to 3 weeks
Title
Spasticity according to the Modified Ashworth scale at the 1st and 12th sessions.
Description
The Modified Ashworth Scale measures spasticity in patients with lesion of the Central Nervous System. The relationship between the raters' judgments was significant and the reliability was good. (PMID: 3809245) The scoring is: 0: No increase in muscle tone 1: Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension 1+: Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM 2: More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved 3: Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult 4: Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension Muscles evaluated are adductor, hamstring, triceps sural and quadriceps.
Time Frame
At study start, day 1 and at study completion, up to 3 weeks
Title
Heart rate measurement at rest and after the 10mWT at the 1st, 6th and 12th sessions.
Time Frame
At study start, day 1, at study mid-term, 10 days and at study completion, up to 3 weeks
Title
Comparison of the Visual Analogue Pain Scale at the 1st and 12th sessions.
Description
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale measures the subjective intensity of pain. The NPRS is an 11-points scale from 0 to 10: "0" = no pain; "10" = the most intense pain imaginable. The subject is asked to make pain rating corresponding to the current pain experienced.
Time Frame
At study start, day 1 and at study completion, up to 3 weeks
Title
Comparison of the NPSI scores at the 1st and 12th sessions.
Description
NPSI (Neuropathic Pain Sumptom Inventory) renders it suitable for the evaluation of the different dimensions of neuropathic pain syndromes. The reliability of the different descriptors appears to be sufficient. It allows to quantify the various pain symptoms that can be grouped into five dimensions (burn, deep pain, paroxysmal pain, pain caused, paresthesia / dysesthesia)
Time Frame
At study start, day 1 and at study completion, up to 3 weeks
Title
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at the 12th session.
Description
The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) is a global index that may be used to rate the response of the use of Atalante on the bowel function. The subject should check the number that best describes how the twelfth session condition is, compared with how it has been at the first session for the bowel function: Very much better Much better A little better No change A little worse Much worse Very much worse
Time Frame
At study completion, up to 3 weeks
Title
Average scores of the 7-point Likert scale for ergonomics at the 12th session.
Description
At the end of the twelfth session, the patient evaluates the interfaces and the ergonomics of Atalante (shape of the remote, mode, symbol) and the perceived safety and the level of assistance during transfer from the wheelchair to Atalante with a Likert scale. The Likert scale is a questionnaire where the subject chooses among seven-point scales: Strongly disagree Disagree Disagree somewhat Neither agree nor disagree Agree somewhat Agree Strongly agree
Time Frame
At study completion, up to 3 weeks
Title
Time of installation of the patient in the exoskeleton at the 12th session.
Time Frame
At study completion, up to 3 weeks
Title
Assistance level for each fastener at the 12th session.
Description
The level of assistance is specified for each attachment (thigh, knee and foot straps). The levels of assistance are: Without assistance; With the assistance of one health professional; With the assistance of two health professional.
Time Frame
At study completion, up to 3 weeks
Title
Average scores of the 7-point Likert scale for exoskeleton attachment questionnaire at the 12th session.
Description
At the end of the twelfth session, the strapping system is evaluated using a 7-point Likert scale: Strongly disagree Disagree Disagree somewhat Neither agree nor disagree Agree somewhat Agree Strongly agree
Time Frame
At study completion, up to 3 weeks
Title
Evaluation of sitting balance using the Boubee test at the 1st and 12th sessions.
Description
This test evaluates the ability of the subject to balance in sitting position during disturbances induced by movements of the upper limbs. The subject is sitting without back's support and with both feet on the ground. The subject is asked to do six tasks from the easiest to the hardest. The subject must pass the task to test the next task. The score is defined by the last passed task. The sitting balance is evaluated at the first and at the last session.
Time Frame
At study start, day 1 and at study completion, up to 3 weeks
Title
Adverse events collection at each session.
Time Frame
Throughout study completion, an average of 3 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Motor complete traumatic Spinal Cord Injury (AIS A and B) since at least 4 months Spinal Injury Level between AIS T5 and AIS T12 Able to verticalize on a daily basis Height: between approximately 1.60 and 1.90 m. More specifically, Atalante is able to accommodate the following limb lengths: Thigh: 380-460 mm Distance between the ground and the joint space of the knee (to be measured while wearing the shoes they intend to wear with Atalante): 457-607 mm for patient with an ankle dorsiflexion ≥ 16° 457-577 mm for patient with an ankle dorsiflexion between 13° et 16° 457-567 mm for patient with an ankle dorsiflexion between 10° et 13° 457-557 mm for patient with an ankle dorsiflexion between 0° et 10° o Hip width less of equal to 460 mm when seated Maximum weight: 90 kg Patient having given his written consent Exclusion Criteria: Patients whose joint centers cannot be aligned Atalante's Ranges of motion below: Hip: 115° flexion, 15° extension, 17° abduction, 10° adduction, 10° medial rotation, 20° lateral rotation Knee: 5° extension, 110° flexion Ankle: 0° dorsiflexion, 9° plantar flexion, 18° inversion and eversion Severe spasticity (greater than 3 on the modified Ashworth scale) of the adductor muscles, hamstrings, quadriceps and triceps surae Pregnant or lactating woman Unbalanced psychiatric or cognitive status which may interfere with an appropriate use of the device Other neurological disorder History of osteoporotic fracture and/or disease or treatment responsible for a secondary osteoporosis Active implantable medical device Evolutive intercurrent disease: pressure sore, infection, venous thrombosis Unstable and unhealed limb and pelvic fracture Unstable spine Severe illness which may interfere with the verticalized posture and tolerance to effort Evolutive osteoma Syringomyelia
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jacques Kerdraon, Dr
Organizational Affiliation
Centre mutualiste de Rééducation et de Réadaptation de Kerpape
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Centre Jacques Calvé - Fondation Hopale
City
Berck
ZIP/Postal Code
62600
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre mutualiste de Rééducation et de Réadaptation de Kerpape
City
Ploemeur
ZIP/Postal Code
56270
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Evaluation of Safety and Performance of the Atalante System With Patients With Lower Limb Paralysis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs