search
Back to results

Assessing Effectiveness of Community Acquired Pneumonia Treatment by Continuous Pneumonia Severity Score

Primary Purpose

Community-acquired Pneumonia

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
changes of Pneumonia Severity Score
Sponsored by
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Community-acquired Pneumonia focused on measuring Community-acquired Pneumonia, Pneumonia severity scores

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • community acquired pneumonia(by CTS or IDSA/ATS guidelines)
  • severe community acquired pneumonia(PSI scores >= 90 or Expand-CURB scores >= 4);

Exclusion Criteria:

  • HIV patients
  • Other immunodeficiency disorders (neutropenia, hematologic and solid tumors undergoing chemoradiotherapy, organ transplantation, and long-term treatment with glucocorticoid and cytokine antagonists).

Sites / Locations

  • SAHZhejiangU

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Comprehensive evaluation group

PSI evaluation group

Expand-CURB evaluation group

Prospective observational group

Arm Description

The effectiveness of initial treatment and the next treatment plan were determined based on the CAP guidelines of Chinese Thoracic Society (CTS) or Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society(IDSA/ATS). The evaluation process was independently evaluated and documented by at least two clinicians. In case of disagreement, the final determination shall vote on the majority of votes.

The changes of PSI scores and serum CRP were used to evaluate the therapeutic effects. If both PSI scores and CRP suggest that treatment is effective, the initial treatment will be maintained. If either of PSI scores or serum CRP suggest that treatment is effective, the initial treatment can be maintained, but need to be reviewed in the next 3-5 days. If both PSI scores and serum CRP suggest that the treatment is failed, the initial treatment should be changed. The change of initial treatment is not limited to antibiotics, but also include using glucocorticoid, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation according to the patients' condition.

The changes of Expand-CURB scores and serum CRP were used to evaluate the therapeutic effects. If both Expand-CURB scores and CRP suggest that treatment is effective, the initial treatment will be maintained. If either of Expand-CURB scores or serum CRP suggest that treatment is effective, the initial treatment can be maintained, but need to be reviewed in the next 3-5 days. If both Expand-CURB scores and serum CRP suggest that the treatment is failed, the initial treatment should be changed. The change of initial treatment is not limited to antibiotics, but also include using glucocorticoid, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation according to the patients' condition.

Patients' Expand-CURB scores, PSI scores and serum CRP before and after 3-5 days of initial treatment will be recorded. And the initial treatment, whether the initial treatment was changed 3-5 days of initial treatment and the final outcomes (ICU admission, 30-day mortality, average length of stay) will be recorded.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Rate of patients for ICU admission
Rate of patients who received ICU treatment during hospitalization. The numerator is the number of patients who received ICU treatment during hospitalization. The denominator is the number of all the enrolled patients.
Rate of all-caused mortality within 30 days.
Rate of all-caused death occurring within 30 days during hospitalization. The numerator is the number of patients who defined as death occurring within 30 days of hospitalization. The denominator is the number of enrolled patients.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Length of stay for patients
The duration of a single episode of hospitalization. Inpatient days are calculated by subtracting day of admission from day of discharge.

Full Information

First Posted
October 17, 2019
Last Updated
October 20, 2019
Sponsor
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04135183
Brief Title
Assessing Effectiveness of Community Acquired Pneumonia Treatment by Continuous Pneumonia Severity Score
Official Title
Assessing Effectiveness of Community Acquired Pneumonia Treatment by Continuous Pneumonia Severity Score: a Prospective Observational Study and Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
July 1, 2020 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
June 30, 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2022 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Community acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common respiratory infection and is the main cause of ICU admission and death in adults. Because of most patients were treated empirically against suspected causative microorganism, it is important to assess the effectiveness of treatment after 3 days of anti-infective therapy. However, the criteria for treatment failure is lack of a clear-cut and validated definition from the CAP guidelines. Pneumonia severity scores is a wide-used severity rating system for treatment selection and outcome prediction for CAP. So far, the pneumonia severity scores only used once before the treatment started. Considering the pneumonia severity scores could reflect the severity of pneumonia, it is reasonable to assume that the change of pneumonia severity scores could reflect the patients' condition and the effectiveness of the treatment. This trail will be designed to validate the feasibility of assessing effectiveness of CAP treatment by using continuous pneumonia severity score.
Detailed Description
The applicant has established a CAP patients database and found a new effective pneumonia severity score: Expand-CURB. According to the retrospective study results, applicant found the changes of pneumonia severity score could reflect the patients'condition and was the independent risk factor for 30-day mortality. More specifically, if the patients'Expand-CURB score was not improved after 3-5 days of initial treatment, the odds ratio of 30-day mortality was 5.571 and 5.249 (95%CI 1.831-15.051, P=0.002) by univariate analysis and multivariate analysis (the multivariate was adjusted by the initial severity of pneumonia). In addition, the applicant found the changes of serum CRP(C reactive protein ) before and after initial treatment also associated the patients'outcomes. If the serum CRP decreased less than 40% or not lower than 20mg/dl after the initial treatment, the odds ratio of 30-day mortality will be 3.692 and 3.806 (95%CI 1.867-7.756, P<0.001) by univariate analysis and multivariate analysis. In conclusion, the applicant established three criteria for assessing effectiveness of CAP treatment: Effective treatment by PSI: the PSI score decreased after 3-5 days the initial treatment. Effective treatment by Expand-CURB: the Expand-CURB score decreased after 3-5 days the initial treatment. Effective treatment by serum CRP: the serum CRP decreased more than 40% or lower than 20mg/dl after 3-5 days the initial treatment. Furthermore, the applicant found combined pneumonia severity scores with CRP could predict the 30-day mortality more efficiently. The OR for both CRP and PSI treatment failure was 2.377 (95%CI 1.100-5.136, P=0.028). And the OR for both CRP and Expand-CURB treatment failure was 7.332 (95%CI 1.563-34.385, P=0.012). Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the change of pneumonia severity scores and CRP could reflect the patients'condition and the effectiveness of the treatment. To validate the feasibility of assessing effectiveness of CAP treatment by using continuous pneumonia severity score and changes of CRP, applicant intend to randomly allocate the patients into three arms: Comprehensive evaluation group, PSI evaluation group and Expand-CURB evaluation group. Patients who did not agree to participate the randomized controlled study will be asked whether they agree to provide their clinical data for prospective observational studies. The primary outcomes will be 30-day mortality and ICU admission. The second outcome is length of hospital stay.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Community-acquired Pneumonia
Keywords
Community-acquired Pneumonia, Pneumonia severity scores

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
This study consisting of two parts: the randomized controlled study include three groups, comprehensive evaluation group (traditional treatment group), PSI evaluation group and Expand-CURB evaluation group.The prospective observational study include one group. There are a total of 4 groups in the present study.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
The present study is a randomized controlled open label trial. Patients and their physicians know the group and the treatment plan, and there are clear criteria for the final outcome (30-day fatality rate, length of stay). The masking is not required.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
2000 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Comprehensive evaluation group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The effectiveness of initial treatment and the next treatment plan were determined based on the CAP guidelines of Chinese Thoracic Society (CTS) or Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society(IDSA/ATS). The evaluation process was independently evaluated and documented by at least two clinicians. In case of disagreement, the final determination shall vote on the majority of votes.
Arm Title
PSI evaluation group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The changes of PSI scores and serum CRP were used to evaluate the therapeutic effects. If both PSI scores and CRP suggest that treatment is effective, the initial treatment will be maintained. If either of PSI scores or serum CRP suggest that treatment is effective, the initial treatment can be maintained, but need to be reviewed in the next 3-5 days. If both PSI scores and serum CRP suggest that the treatment is failed, the initial treatment should be changed. The change of initial treatment is not limited to antibiotics, but also include using glucocorticoid, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation according to the patients' condition.
Arm Title
Expand-CURB evaluation group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The changes of Expand-CURB scores and serum CRP were used to evaluate the therapeutic effects. If both Expand-CURB scores and CRP suggest that treatment is effective, the initial treatment will be maintained. If either of Expand-CURB scores or serum CRP suggest that treatment is effective, the initial treatment can be maintained, but need to be reviewed in the next 3-5 days. If both Expand-CURB scores and serum CRP suggest that the treatment is failed, the initial treatment should be changed. The change of initial treatment is not limited to antibiotics, but also include using glucocorticoid, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation according to the patients' condition.
Arm Title
Prospective observational group
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Patients' Expand-CURB scores, PSI scores and serum CRP before and after 3-5 days of initial treatment will be recorded. And the initial treatment, whether the initial treatment was changed 3-5 days of initial treatment and the final outcomes (ICU admission, 30-day mortality, average length of stay) will be recorded.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
changes of Pneumonia Severity Score
Intervention Description
assessing effectiveness of CAP treatment by using continuous pneumonia severity score
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rate of patients for ICU admission
Description
Rate of patients who received ICU treatment during hospitalization. The numerator is the number of patients who received ICU treatment during hospitalization. The denominator is the number of all the enrolled patients.
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 10 days
Title
Rate of all-caused mortality within 30 days.
Description
Rate of all-caused death occurring within 30 days during hospitalization. The numerator is the number of patients who defined as death occurring within 30 days of hospitalization. The denominator is the number of enrolled patients.
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 10 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Length of stay for patients
Description
The duration of a single episode of hospitalization. Inpatient days are calculated by subtracting day of admission from day of discharge.
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 10 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: community acquired pneumonia(by CTS or IDSA/ATS guidelines) severe community acquired pneumonia(PSI scores >= 90 or Expand-CURB scores >= 4); Exclusion Criteria: HIV patients Other immunodeficiency disorders (neutropenia, hematologic and solid tumors undergoing chemoradiotherapy, organ transplantation, and long-term treatment with glucocorticoid and cytokine antagonists).
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jinliang Liu, MD
Phone
+86 13867496840
Email
2511063@zju.edu.cn
Facility Information:
Facility Name
SAHZhejiangU
City
Hangzhou
State/Province
Zhejiang
ZIP/Postal Code
310000
Country
China
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jinliang Liu, MD
Phone
+86 13867496840
Email
2511063@zju.edu.cn

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17278083
Citation
Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, Dowell SF, File TM Jr, Musher DM, Niederman MS, Torres A, Whitney CG; Infectious Diseases Society of America; American Thoracic Society. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 1;44 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S27-72. doi: 10.1086/511159. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8995086
Citation
Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, Hanusa BH, Weissfeld LA, Singer DE, Coley CM, Marrie TJ, Kapoor WN. A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 1997 Jan 23;336(4):243-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199701233360402.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26987602
Citation
Liu JL, Xu F, Zhou H, Wu XJ, Shi LX, Lu RQ, Farcomeni A, Venditti M, Zhao YL, Luo SY, Dong XJ, Falcone M. Expanded CURB-65: a new score system predicts severity of community-acquired pneumonia with superior efficiency. Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 18;6:22911. doi: 10.1038/srep22911. Erratum In: Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 09;8:47005.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19296412
Citation
Welte T, Kohnlein T. Global and local epidemiology of community-acquired pneumonia: the experience of the CAPNETZ Network. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Apr;30(2):127-35. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1202941. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Assessing Effectiveness of Community Acquired Pneumonia Treatment by Continuous Pneumonia Severity Score

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs