The Nolix Feasibility Efficacy and Safety Study
Primary Purpose
Stress Urinary Incontinence
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Israel
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Nolix Device
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Stress Urinary Incontinence
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Females aged 22 and above.
- Suffering from Stress Urinary Incontinence.
- Women who can understand the nature of the study, are physically able to perform all required tasks and consent to it by signing a written Informed Consent Form prior to participation in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age ≤ 21 years.
- Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study.
- Vaginal birth or Cesarean section for the last 3 months prior to entering the study.
- Severely atrophic vagina.
- A history of Toxic Shock Syndrome (TSS).
- Active urinary tract or vaginal infection.
- Patients prone to recurrent vaginal or urinary tract infections (i.e. more than 3 times in the past year).
- Has experienced unusual or unexpected vaginal bleeding within the last 6 months.
- Vaginal surgery within the last 3 months prior to entering the study.
- Has experienced difficulties with the use of intra-vaginal devices, including tampons.
- Presence of any condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the data.
- Average daily PWG as measured in the baseline pad period is less than 4 grams /12 hours.
Sites / Locations
- Carmel Medical Center
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Nolix Device
Arm Description
Comparing use of device to non-treatment (pads only) phase
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Mean pad weight gain (PWG) change of >50% when comparing the PWG control phase as compared to the Nolix device phase.
The primary effectiveness endpoint is the percent change in the mean Pad Weight Gain (%PWG) between the device (during the last 7 days of the 14-days Nolix use period) and control periods , with the success criterion defined as at least >50% of the mean %PWG reduction during the last 7 days of the treatment phase as compared to the control phase.
Device-related adverse events
Discomfort / pain, vaginal irritation or itching, vaginal spotting, vaginal or urinary tract infections
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change in number of self-reported incontinence episodes.
Change in number of self-reported incontinence episodes per week from the control period to the Nolix device use period.
More than 50% reduction in the number of self-reported daily incontinence episodes.
Percentage of subjects who experience a greater than 50% reduction in the number of self-reported daily incontinence episodes from the baseline period to the Nolix device use period.
Changes in Quality of Life (QoL).
The QoL Questionnaire (measured on a 0-100 scale) will be performed at baseline and after the device-use period and refer to areas which may have been influenced or changed by accidental urine loss and/or prolapse. A lower score is considered less impact to quality of life and a higher score reflects more impact to quality of life. In the same manner, a reduction in scores from baseline reflects improved quality of life.
Changes in Leak Score.
Changes in Leak Score from the baseline period to the Nolix device use period, as measured using the Leak Score Questionnaire. The Leak Score Questionnaire will be performed (on a 0-3 scale) to evaluate the subjective perception of incontinence during eight effort demanding activities: coughing, laughing, sneezing, jumping, lifting heavy objects, walking, running, and going to the gym.
PWG measured continuously.
PWG measured continuously (as opposed to responder analysis), using the same definition of PWG as described above, without transformation to percent.
Comfort during Nolix device use.
Comfort during Nolix device use will be measured through the Satisfaction Questionnaire, using a 10-point scale (where 1 is the most negative response and 10 the most positive, during the use of the device).
Overall perception of improvement.
Overall perception of improvement following the use of the Nolix device, as measured using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Scale, measured on a 7-point scale (where 1 is the most positive response and 7 the most negative response).
Overall satisfaction: Patient Satisfaction Question (PSQ)
Overall satisfaction with the use of the Nolix device, as measured using the Patient Satisfaction Question (PSQ),selecting one of the following answers: 'Completely'; 'Somewhat'; or 'Not at all'.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04143867
Brief Title
The Nolix Feasibility Efficacy and Safety Study
Official Title
A Feasibility Efficacy and Safety Study of the Nolix Vaginal Device for the Temporary Management of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 31, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 31, 2020 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Gynamics LTD
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study is an open label, prospective, feasibility study with the Nolix device used for temporary treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) in subjects, serving as their own controls.
Detailed Description
This is an open label, prospective, feasibility study with the Nolix device used in subjects with SUI, serving as their own controls. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness (both objective and subjective) and safety of the Nolix device when used for the temporary management of SUI in women. In addition, the study is aimed to evaluate changes in the quality of life (QoL) and comfort during use of the Nolix device. The primary effectiveness endpoint is the percent change in the mean Pad Weight Gain (%PWG) between the device (during the last 7 days of the 14-days Nolix use period) and control periods , with the success criterion defined as at least >-50% of the mean %PWG change during the last 7 days of the treatment phase as compared to the control phase. Additional effectiveness endpoints include the number of self-reported SUI episodes per week, the percentage of subjects who experience a greater than -50% change in the number of self-reported daily incontinence episodes, as well as the changes in the QoL, leak scores and overall satisfaction levels. The safety of the Nolix device is also evaluated by assessing the adverse events, including the results of urinalysis, vaginal swab, and vaginal examination.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stress Urinary Incontinence
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Sequential Assignment
Model Description
A prospective, one-arm study with subjects serving as their own control.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
32 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Nolix Device
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Comparing use of device to non-treatment (pads only) phase
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Nolix Device
Intervention Description
For temporary management of SUI
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean pad weight gain (PWG) change of >50% when comparing the PWG control phase as compared to the Nolix device phase.
Description
The primary effectiveness endpoint is the percent change in the mean Pad Weight Gain (%PWG) between the device (during the last 7 days of the 14-days Nolix use period) and control periods , with the success criterion defined as at least >50% of the mean %PWG reduction during the last 7 days of the treatment phase as compared to the control phase.
Time Frame
21 days
Title
Device-related adverse events
Description
Discomfort / pain, vaginal irritation or itching, vaginal spotting, vaginal or urinary tract infections
Time Frame
21 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in number of self-reported incontinence episodes.
Description
Change in number of self-reported incontinence episodes per week from the control period to the Nolix device use period.
Time Frame
21 days
Title
More than 50% reduction in the number of self-reported daily incontinence episodes.
Description
Percentage of subjects who experience a greater than 50% reduction in the number of self-reported daily incontinence episodes from the baseline period to the Nolix device use period.
Time Frame
21 days
Title
Changes in Quality of Life (QoL).
Description
The QoL Questionnaire (measured on a 0-100 scale) will be performed at baseline and after the device-use period and refer to areas which may have been influenced or changed by accidental urine loss and/or prolapse. A lower score is considered less impact to quality of life and a higher score reflects more impact to quality of life. In the same manner, a reduction in scores from baseline reflects improved quality of life.
Time Frame
21 days
Title
Changes in Leak Score.
Description
Changes in Leak Score from the baseline period to the Nolix device use period, as measured using the Leak Score Questionnaire. The Leak Score Questionnaire will be performed (on a 0-3 scale) to evaluate the subjective perception of incontinence during eight effort demanding activities: coughing, laughing, sneezing, jumping, lifting heavy objects, walking, running, and going to the gym.
Time Frame
21 days
Title
PWG measured continuously.
Description
PWG measured continuously (as opposed to responder analysis), using the same definition of PWG as described above, without transformation to percent.
Time Frame
21 days
Title
Comfort during Nolix device use.
Description
Comfort during Nolix device use will be measured through the Satisfaction Questionnaire, using a 10-point scale (where 1 is the most negative response and 10 the most positive, during the use of the device).
Time Frame
21 days
Title
Overall perception of improvement.
Description
Overall perception of improvement following the use of the Nolix device, as measured using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Scale, measured on a 7-point scale (where 1 is the most positive response and 7 the most negative response).
Time Frame
21 days
Title
Overall satisfaction: Patient Satisfaction Question (PSQ)
Description
Overall satisfaction with the use of the Nolix device, as measured using the Patient Satisfaction Question (PSQ),selecting one of the following answers: 'Completely'; 'Somewhat'; or 'Not at all'.
Time Frame
21 days
10. Eligibility
Sex
Female
Gender Based
Yes
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Females aged 22 and above.
Suffering from Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Women who can understand the nature of the study, are physically able to perform all required tasks and consent to it by signing a written Informed Consent Form prior to participation in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
Age ≤ 21 years.
Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study.
Vaginal birth or Cesarean section for the last 3 months prior to entering the study.
Severely atrophic vagina.
A history of Toxic Shock Syndrome (TSS).
Active urinary tract or vaginal infection.
Patients prone to recurrent vaginal or urinary tract infections (i.e. more than 3 times in the past year).
Has experienced unusual or unexpected vaginal bleeding within the last 6 months.
Vaginal surgery within the last 3 months prior to entering the study.
Has experienced difficulties with the use of intra-vaginal devices, including tampons.
Presence of any condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the data.
Average daily PWG as measured in the baseline pad period is less than 4 grams /12 hours.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Boris Fridman, Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Carmel Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Carmel Medical Center
City
Haifa
Country
Israel
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
All personal data gathered in this trial will be treated in strictest confidence by investigators, monitors, sponsor's personnel and independent ethics committee.
Learn more about this trial
The Nolix Feasibility Efficacy and Safety Study
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs