Prediction Medical Device for Rheumatoid Arthritis (PREDIRA) (PREDIRA)
Primary Purpose
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
SinnoTest®
Biotherapy prescription without SinnoTest® software
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Arthritis, Rheumatoid focused on measuring Biological therapy, Predictive software, Quality of life
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients over 18 years old and under 70 years old,
- Patients with RA, defined according to the ACR / EULAR 2010 or ACR 1987 criteria,
- Patients failing a first anti-TNF, defined as:
- Ineffectiveness (which is defined as a DAS28-ESR ≥3.2 and an inadequate response to iTNF according to the usual rheumatologist, which generally includes one or more of the following conditions: persistent swollen and tender joints, persistence of disease activity according to the overall evaluation of the patient, high levels of acute phase reactants and/or dependence of analgesics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or corticosteroids); or
- Toxicity(defined as the appearance of any adverse event that the patient's rheumatologist relates to the medication and requires discontinuation),
- Effective contraception for patients of childbearing potential (oral contraceptive, intrauterine device, implant, spermicide, surgical sterilization or abstinence),
- Patients able to read and understand the modalities of the protocol,
- Patients who have dated and signed the informed consent form of the trial,
- Stability of treatments (no change) between the selection visit and the inclusion visit (M0).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a contraindication to any bDMARD or methotrexate,
- Patients included in another therapeutic evaluation study during this trial,
- Surgical intervention programmed during the trial,
- Patients with difficulties in understanding the Spanish language,
- Patients cannot be followed up 6 months,
- Psychosocial instability incompatible with regular monitoring (homelessness, addictive behaviour, antecedent of psychiatric pathology or any other comorbidity that would make it impossible for free and informed consent or limit adherence to the protocol),
- Breastfeeding and/or pregnancy. Although there are bDMARD that can be used in pregnancy, since SinnoTest can recommend one that discourages this condition, it is decided to exclude the inclusion of pregnant women.
Sites / Locations
- Hospital Universitario La Princesa
- Hospital Universitario Ramon y CajalRecruiting
- Hospital Universitario Clinico San CarlosRecruiting
- Hospital Universitario 12 de OctubreRecruiting
- Hospital Universitario de La PazRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
SinnoTest® software
Current practice
Arm Description
SinnoTest® is a therapeutic guidance device for patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis. Prescription of an original or biosimilar biotherapy (rituximab, adalimumab, abatacept) is possible.
Prescription of biotherapy without the SinnoTest® software which corresponds to current practice (all biotherapies).
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Incremental Cost Utility ratio at 6 months
This outcome will be calculated as the average differential cost per patient between both study arms (mean costs of the Sinnotest® Arm - mean costs of the Control Arm) divided by the diference in effectiveness between both study arms measured in the number of years of life weighted by the quality of life (QALY: quality-adjusted life year) generated by each of the strategies (mean QALY of the Sinnotest® Arm - mean QALY of the Control Arm).
QALY will be measured using the EuroQol-5D. Cost will be considered from a Societal perspective, including both direct and indirect costs The ratio will be expressed in cost (2019 Euros) per QALY earned, which represents the additional cost that will have to be spent to earn a healthy year of life
Secondary Outcome Measures
Budget impact analysis at 6 and 12 months
A budget impact analysis will be carried out if the innovation is deemed efficient.
This budget impact analysis will describe the resources consumed and the expenses generated by each scenario, a scenario with the use of SinnoTest® and a scenario without SinnoTest®.
Software's predictive model performance
Sensitivity, Especificity, positve and negative preddicted values of the predictive models using the biomarkers will be assessed on the new clinical data from the 6-month trial.
Description of the variation of the proteomic profile between M0 (biotherapy start date) and M6 (6 months visit)
Based on shotgun and semiquantitative proteomics, the diferences between the proteomic profile at baseline and at M6 will be analyzed
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04147026
First Posted
October 25, 2019
Last Updated
January 7, 2020
Sponsor
Hospital San Carlos, Madrid
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04147026
Brief Title
Prediction Medical Device for Rheumatoid Arthritis (PREDIRA)
Acronym
PREDIRA
Official Title
PRediction mEdical DevIce for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Scale-up of Unique Predictive Online Platform Highly Improving the Quality of Life of Rheumatoid Arthritis' Patient by Personalised and Efficient Biotherapies Prescription
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
January 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
December 16, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 1, 2020 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
January 1, 2021 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Hospital San Carlos, Madrid
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is one of the leading chronic inflammatory rheumatism, with a prevalence of about 0.4% of the population.
First-line therapy with synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (including methotrexate) is insufficiently effective in 40% of cases. These patients are then treated with biotherapies. The use of these bio-drugs increases each year, becoming a public health issue and a considerable economic burden. Besides, their growth is just beginning, as they are among the major purveyors of pharmacy innovations.
There are about ten bio-drugs currently on the market for rheumatoid arthritis with an average annual treatment cost of 8 to 12 K € per patient. This cost is 20 times higher than that of synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. However, among patients treated with biotherapies, clinical practice shows that about one-third will not respond to the selected drug. In the case of non-response, practitioners currently have no choice but to perform an empirical rotation between the different treatments, because no tool capable of predicting the response or non-response to these molecules is currently available.
The study is a prospective, phase III, controlled, multicenter, and randomized, single-blind (patient) clinical trial.
Intervention arm: Prescription of biotherapy (rituximab, adalimumab, abatacept) using SinnoTest® software
Control arm: Prescription of biotherapy without the SinnoTest® software which corresponds to current practice (all biotherapies).
In addition, a sub study will be carried out within this trial to analyse the proteomic profile of the patients included and their modification throughout the study.
To study the clinical and pharmacoeconomic impact after 6 months of the use of the SinnoTest® predictive tool in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have failed to a first anti-TNF biologic agent compared to usual care.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Keywords
Biological therapy, Predictive software, Quality of life
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
The study is a prospective, phase III, controlled, multicenter, and randomized in 2 parallel groups, single-blind (patient) with binded outcome assessment clinical trial.
Intervention arm: Prescription of biotherapy (rituximab, adalimumab, abatacept) using SinnoTest® software
Control arm: Prescription of biotherapy without the SinnoTest® software which corresponds to current practice (all biotherapies).
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The patient will not know if his bDMARD treatment was prescribed with or without the help of SinnoTest® software
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
180 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
SinnoTest® software
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
SinnoTest® is a therapeutic guidance device for patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis. Prescription of an original or biosimilar biotherapy (rituximab, adalimumab, abatacept) is possible.
Arm Title
Current practice
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Prescription of biotherapy without the SinnoTest® software which corresponds to current practice (all biotherapies).
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
SinnoTest®
Intervention Description
The selection of the biotherapy is carried out based on the recommendations of SinnoTest®. This test categorizes the bDMARDs based on the probability of response. It will allow to prescribe both original molecules, as well as biosimilars, in an equivalent way.
In the SinnoTest® arm, the investigator prescribes the treatment defined as the most effective by SinnoTest®, except in case of contraindication. If contraindicated, the investigator prescribes the second-choice treatment (if any) of SinnoTest® in terms of efficacy.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Biotherapy prescription without SinnoTest® software
Intervention Description
The rheumatologist will use the current guidelines of rheumatoid arthritis to choose the more adapted biotherapy treatment to the patient
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Incremental Cost Utility ratio at 6 months
Description
This outcome will be calculated as the average differential cost per patient between both study arms (mean costs of the Sinnotest® Arm - mean costs of the Control Arm) divided by the diference in effectiveness between both study arms measured in the number of years of life weighted by the quality of life (QALY: quality-adjusted life year) generated by each of the strategies (mean QALY of the Sinnotest® Arm - mean QALY of the Control Arm).
QALY will be measured using the EuroQol-5D. Cost will be considered from a Societal perspective, including both direct and indirect costs The ratio will be expressed in cost (2019 Euros) per QALY earned, which represents the additional cost that will have to be spent to earn a healthy year of life
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Budget impact analysis at 6 and 12 months
Description
A budget impact analysis will be carried out if the innovation is deemed efficient.
This budget impact analysis will describe the resources consumed and the expenses generated by each scenario, a scenario with the use of SinnoTest® and a scenario without SinnoTest®.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Software's predictive model performance
Description
Sensitivity, Especificity, positve and negative preddicted values of the predictive models using the biomarkers will be assessed on the new clinical data from the 6-month trial.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Description of the variation of the proteomic profile between M0 (biotherapy start date) and M6 (6 months visit)
Description
Based on shotgun and semiquantitative proteomics, the diferences between the proteomic profile at baseline and at M6 will be analyzed
Time Frame
Inclusion and 6 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Incremental Cost Effectiveness ratio at 6 months
Description
This outcome will be calculated as the average differential cost per patient between both study arms (mean costs of the Sinnotest® Arm - mean costs of the Control Arm) divided by the diference in effectiveness between both study arms measured as the percentage of patients achieving a good clinical response in each study arm (% in the Sinnotest® Arm - % in the Control Arm).
Good clinical response will be measured using the EULAR criteria of Good clinical response Cost will be considered from a Societal perspective, including both direct and indirect costs The ratio will be expressed in cost (2019 Euros) per increase in 1% of subjects achieving a Good Clinical Response, which represents the additional cost that will have to be spent to earn a healthy year of life
rates of treatment-response patients associated respectively with the usual strategy without SinnoTest® and with the strategy with SinnoTest®
Time Frame
6 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients over 18 years old and under 70 years old,
Patients with RA, defined according to the ACR / EULAR 2010 or ACR 1987 criteria,
Patients failing a first anti-TNF, defined as:
Ineffectiveness (which is defined as a DAS28-ESR ≥3.2 and an inadequate response to iTNF according to the usual rheumatologist, which generally includes one or more of the following conditions: persistent swollen and tender joints, persistence of disease activity according to the overall evaluation of the patient, high levels of acute phase reactants and/or dependence of analgesics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or corticosteroids); or
Toxicity(defined as the appearance of any adverse event that the patient's rheumatologist relates to the medication and requires discontinuation),
Effective contraception for patients of childbearing potential (oral contraceptive, intrauterine device, implant, spermicide, surgical sterilization or abstinence),
Patients able to read and understand the modalities of the protocol,
Patients who have dated and signed the informed consent form of the trial,
Stability of treatments (no change) between the selection visit and the inclusion visit (M0).
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with a contraindication to any bDMARD or methotrexate,
Patients included in another therapeutic evaluation study during this trial,
Surgical intervention programmed during the trial,
Patients with difficulties in understanding the Spanish language,
Patients cannot be followed up 6 months,
Psychosocial instability incompatible with regular monitoring (homelessness, addictive behaviour, antecedent of psychiatric pathology or any other comorbidity that would make it impossible for free and informed consent or limit adherence to the protocol),
Breastfeeding and/or pregnancy. Although there are bDMARD that can be used in pregnancy, since SinnoTest can recommend one that discourages this condition, it is decided to exclude the inclusion of pregnant women.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Luis Rodriguez-Rodriguez, MD, PhD
Phone
+34913303615
Ext
7560
Email
lrrodriguez@salud.madrid.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Dalifer Freites Nuñez, MD
Phone
+34913303615
Email
daliferdayanira.freites@salud.madrid.org
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Benjamín Fernández-Gutiérrez, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Hospital San Carlos, Madrid
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario La Princesa
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28006
Country
Spain
Individual Site Status
Active, not recruiting
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28034
Country
Spain
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mónica Vázquez-Díaz, MD, PhD
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Clinico San Carlos
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28040
Country
Spain
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Benjamin Fernandez-Gutierrez, MD, PhD
Phone
+34913303615
Ext
7803
Email
bfernandez.hcsc@salud.madrid.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Luis Rodriguez-Rodriguez, MD, PhD
Phone
+34913303615
Ext
7560
Email
lrrodriguez@salud.madrid.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dalifer Freites Nuñez, MD
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28041
Country
Spain
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
José Luis Pablos Álvarez, MD, PhD
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario de La Paz
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28046
Country
Spain
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alejandro Balsa Criado, MD, PhD
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29885551
Citation
Nguyen MVC, Baillet A, Romand X, Trocme C, Courtier A, Marotte H, Thomas T, Soubrier M, Miossec P, Tebib J, Grange L, Toussaint B, Lequerre T, Vittecoq O, Gaudin P. Prealbumin, platelet factor 4 and S100A12 combination at baseline predicts good response to TNF alpha inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2019 Mar;86(2):195-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30243783
Citation
Nguyen MVC, Adrait A, Baillet A, Trocme C, Gottenberg JE, Gaudin P. Identification of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein as biomarker predicting abatacept response in rheumatoid arthritis patients with insufficient response to a first anti-TNFalpha treatment. Joint Bone Spine. 2019 May;86(3):401-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Sep 19. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30919904
Citation
Baillet A, Trocme C, Romand X, Nguyen CMV, Courtier A, Toussaint B, Gaudin P, Epaulard O. Calprotectin discriminates septic arthritis from pseudogout and rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Sep 1;58(9):1644-1648. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez098.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20100792
Citation
Baillet A, Trocme C, Berthier S, Arlotto M, Grange L, Chenau J, Quetant S, Seve M, Berger F, Juvin R, Morel F, Gaudin P. Synovial fluid proteomic fingerprint: S100A8, S100A9 and S100A12 proteins discriminate rheumatoid arthritis from other inflammatory joint diseases. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 Apr;49(4):671-82. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep452. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18664547
Citation
Trocme C, Marotte H, Baillet A, Pallot-Prades B, Garin J, Grange L, Miossec P, Tebib J, Berger F, Nissen MJ, Juvin R, Morel F, Gaudin P. Apolipoprotein A-I and platelet factor 4 are biomarkers for infliximab response in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Aug;68(8):1328-33. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.093153. Epub 2008 Jul 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32867830
Citation
Freites-Nunez D, Baillet A, Rodriguez-Rodriguez L, Nguyen MVC, Gonzalez I, Pablos JL, Balsa A, Vazquez M, Gaudin P, Fernandez-Gutierrez B. Efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of a web-based platform delivering the results of a biomarker-based predictive model of biotherapy response for rheumatoid arthritis patients: a protocol for a randomized multicenter single-blind active controlled clinical trial (PREDIRA). Trials. 2020 Aug 31;21(1):755. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04683-7.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Prediction Medical Device for Rheumatoid Arthritis (PREDIRA)
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs