search
Back to results

A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Ifosfamide and Etoposide With or Without Lenvatinib in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults With Relapsed and Refractory Osteosarcoma

Primary Purpose

Osteosarcoma

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Lenvatinib
Ifosfamide
Etoposide
Lenvatinib
Sponsored by
Eisai Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Osteosarcoma focused on measuring Osteosarcoma, Lenvatinib, Ifosfamide, Etoposide, E7080, Relapsed or Refractory Osteosarcoma, Pediatrics, Chemotherapy

Eligibility Criteria

2 Years - 25 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of high grade osteosarcoma
  2. Refractory or relapsed osteosarcoma after 1 to 2 prior lines of systemic treatments
  3. Measurable or evaluable disease per RECIST 1.1.
  4. Life expectancy of 12 weeks or more
  5. Lansky play score greater than or equal to (>=) 50 Percent (%) or Karnofsky Performance Status score >=50%. Use Karnofsky for participants >=16 years of age and Lansky for participants less than (<)16 years of age. Participants who are unable to walk because of paralysis, but who are able to perform activities of daily living while wheelchair bound, will be considered ambulatory for the purpose of assessing the performance score
  6. Adequate organ function per blood work
  7. Adequate cardiac function as evidenced by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >=50% at baseline as determined by echocardiography or multigated acquisition (MUGA) scan
  8. Adequately controlled blood pressure (BP) with or without antihypertensive medications, defined as:

    BP <95th percentile for sex, age, and height/length at screening (as per National Heart Lung and Blood Institute guidelines) and no change in antihypertensive medications within 1 week prior to Cycle 1 Day 1. Participants >18 years of age should have BP less than or equal to (<=) 150/90 millimeters of Mercury at screening and no change in antihypertensive therapy within 1 week prior to Cycle 1 Day 1

  9. Washout before Cycle 1 Day 1 of 3 weeks in case of prior chemotherapy, 6 weeks if treatment included nitrosoureas; 4 weeks for definitive radiotherapy, 2 weeks for palliative radiotherapy; and 3 months from high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell rescue. For all other anti-cancer therapies, washout before Cycle 1 Day 1 of at least 5 half-lives (or at least 28 days, whichever is shorter). Participants must have recovered [to Grade <=1, except for alopecia, ototoxicity, and Grade <=2 peripheral neuropathy, per common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v5.0] from the acute toxic effects of all prior anticancer therapy before Cycle 1 Day 1
  10. Must have no prior history of lenvatinib treatment

Eligibility for optional lenvatinib crossover:

  1. Disease progression per RECIST 1.1 (as confirmed by IIR for all participants who crossover prior to the study data-cut)
  2. No new systemic anti-cancer medication administered after the last dose of study drugs
  3. Meets all safety parameters listed in the inclusion criteria and none listed in the exclusion criteria
  4. Study is ongoing

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any active infection or infectious illness unless fully recovered prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 (that is, no longer requiring systemic treatment)
  2. Participants with central nervous system metastases are not eligible, unless they have completed local therapy (example, whole brain radiation therapy, surgery or radiosurgery) and have discontinued the use of corticosteroids for this indication for at least 2 weeks before Cycle 1 Day 1
  3. Active second malignancy within 2 years prior to enrollment ([in addition to osteosarcoma], but not including definitively treated superficial melanoma, carcinoma-in-situ, basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin)
  4. Has had major surgery within 3 weeks prior to Cycle 1 Day 1. Note: Adequate wound healing after major surgery must be assessed clinically, independent of time elapsed for eligibility
  5. A clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormality, including a marked baseline prolonged QT or corrected QT (QTc) interval (example, a repeated demonstration of a QTc interval greater than [>] 480 millisecond [msec])
  6. Has clinically significant cardiovascular disease within 6 months from first dose of study intervention, including New York Heart Association Class III or IV congestive heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, cerebral vascular accident, or cardiac arrhythmia associated with hemodynamic instability. Note: Medically controlled arrhythmia would be permitted
  7. Gastrointestinal malabsorption, gastrointestinal anastomosis, or any other condition that in the opinion of the investigator might affect the absorption of lenvatinib
  8. Pre-existing Grade >=3 gastrointestinal or non-gastrointestinal fistula
  9. Gastrointestinal bleeding or active hemoptysis (bright red blood of at least 1 divided [/] by 2 teaspoon) within 3 weeks prior to Cycle 1 Day 1
  10. Radiographic evidence of intratumoral cavitation, encasement, or invasion of a major blood vessel. Additionally, the degree of proximity to major blood vessels should be considered for exclusion because of the potential risk of severe hemorrhage associated with tumor shrinkage/necrosis after lenvatinib therapy
  11. History of ifosfamide-related Grade >=3 nephrotoxicity or encephalopathy
  12. Known to be human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive
  13. Known active Hepatitis B (example, Hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] reactive) or Hepatitis C (example, hepatitis C virus [HCV] ribonucleic acid [RNA] [qualitative] is detected). Note: Testing for Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C is required at screening only when mandated by local health authority

Sites / Locations

  • Children's of Alabama
  • Loma Linda University Medical Center
  • Children's Hospital of Orange County
  • UCSF Benioff Children's Hospitals
  • Childrens Hospital Colorado
  • Children's National Medical Center
  • Riley Hospital For Children
  • Dana Farber Cancer Institute
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center
  • Hackensack University Medical Center
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • Children's Medical Center Dallas
  • Cook Children's Health Care System
  • Texas Children's Hospital
  • Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Hospital
  • Perth Childrens Hospital
  • Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne
  • Queensland Children's Hospital
  • Children's Hospital at Westmead
  • St. Anna Kinderspital
  • UZ Gent
  • Hospital For Sick Children
  • FN Brno 2 Detska Klinika
  • Fakultní nemocnice v Motole
  • Tampereen yliopistollinen sairaala
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Hopital Pellegrin
  • Centre Oscar Lambret
  • Centre Léon Berard
  • Hopitaux de La Timone
  • Hôpital de La Mère Et de L'enfant
  • CHU de Nice
  • Hôpital Armand Trousseau
  • Institut Curie
  • Hopital de Hautepierre
  • Hôpital Des Enfants
  • CHRU Nancy
  • Institut Gustave Roussy
  • Hong Kong Children's Hospital
  • Prince of Wales Hospital
  • Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin
  • Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel
  • Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli
  • Azienda Ospedaliera A Meyer
  • Istituto Giannina Gaslini
  • Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori
  • IRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù
  • National Cancer Center
  • Asan Medical Center
  • Samsung Medical Center
  • Seoul National University Hospital
  • Severance Hospital Yonsei University Health System
  • Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology
  • Auckland City Hospital
  • Starship Children's Hospital
  • KK Women's and Children's Hospital
  • National Cancer Centre
  • National University Hospital
  • Hospital Universitario de Cruces
  • Hospital Sant Joan de Deu
  • Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebrón
  • Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesus
  • Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jimenez Diaz
  • Hospital Universitario La Paz
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
  • Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe de Valencia
  • Drottning Silvias Barn Och Ungdomssjukhus
  • Skanes Universitetssjukhus Lund
  • Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset Solna
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
  • Kinderspital Zürich - Eleonorenstiftung
  • National Taiwan University Hospital
  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital
  • Birmingham Children's Hospital
  • The Royal Hospital for Children
  • Royal Hospital for Children
  • Leeds Children Hospital
  • Alder Hey Children's Hospital
  • UCL Cancer Institute
  • Royal Manchester Childrens Hospital
  • The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
  • Royal Victoria Infirmary
  • John Radcliffe Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Randomization Phase: Lenvatinib + Ifosfamide + Etoposide

Randomization Phase: Ifosfamide + Etoposide

Arm Description

Participants with relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma will receive lenvatinib in combination with ifosfamide and etoposide.

Participants with relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma will receive ifosfamide with etoposide. Participants with relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma may receive optional lenvatinib plus or minus chemotherapy (Ifosfamide and Etoposide) if disease progression is observed in study.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Independent Imaging Review (IIR) Assessment
PFS as assessed by IIR was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of PD or date of death (whichever occurred first), as determined using RECIST v1.1. PD was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase or 5 millimeter (mm) increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With PFS at Month 4 (PFS-4m Rate) by IIR Assessment
PFS rate at 4 months as assessed by IIR was defined as the percentage of participants who were alive and without PD at 4 months from the randomization date using RECIST v1.1. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase or 5 mm increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. The PFS-4m was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Final analysis data was reported for this outcome measure.
Percentage of Participants With PFS at 1 Year or Month 12 (PFS-1y Rate) by IIR Assessment
PFS-1y rate as assessed by IIR was defined as the percentage of participants who were alive and without PD at 1 year from randomization date using RECIST v1.1. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase or 5 mm increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PFS-1y rate was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Final analysis data was reported for this outcome measure.
Overall Survival (OS)
OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2025).
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival at 1 Year or Month 12 (OS-1y)
OS-1y was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause assessed up to 1 year. OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Final analysis data was reported for this outcome measure.
Objective Response Rate at Month 4 (ORR-4m) by IIR Assessment
ORR-4m was defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined by IIR using RECIST v1.1 within the first 4 months. CR: defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis to less than (<) 10 mm. PR: defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. 95% confidence interval (CI) of ORR was calculated using the method of Clopper and Pearson. Final analysis data was reported for this outcome measure.
ORR by IIR Assessment
ORR by IIR was defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response of CR or PR determined using RECIST v1.1. CR: defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis to <10 mm. PR: defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. 95% CI of ORR was calculated using the method of Clopper and Pearson. Final analysis data was reported for this outcome measure.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
TEAE was defined as an adverse event (AE) that emerged during time from first dose to 30 days following last dose of drug, having been absent at pretreatment or reemerged during treatment, having been present at pretreatment but stopped before treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to pretreatment state, when AE was continuous. SAE was defined as untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death; was life threatening; resulted in persistent or significant disability; was congenital anomaly or medically important due to other reasons than above mentioned criteria. Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2025).
Treatment Arm A: Plasma Concentration of Lenvatinib
Plasma concentration of lenvatinib in participants from Treatment Arm A (Lenvatinib + Ifosfamide + Etoposide) at different time points were reported. As planned, data for this outcome measure was analyzed for treatment arm A only. Lenvatinib concentration in plasma was quantified using a validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Final analysis data was reported for this outcome measure.
Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Scale: Generic Core Scale Score at Month 4
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scale is a multidimensional scale. It included assessment of 4 dimensions: physical functioning (8 items), emotional functioning (8 items), social functioning (8 items), and school functioning (5 items - children greater than or equal to [>=] 5 years, adults; 3 items - toddlers [aged 2-4 years]). Each item was reported using a 5-point Likert scale, items were then reverse-scored and linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Generic Core Scale total score: sum of all the items divided by the number of items answered across all the scales. Total score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores=better HRQoL, lower scores=worse HRQoL. Final analysis data was reported for this outcome measure.
Change From Baseline in PedsQL Scale: Cancer Module Scale Score at Month 4
HRQoL: PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module Scale measured pediatric cancer-specific HRQoL. It included assessment of 8 dimensions: pain and hurt (2 items), nausea (5 items), procedural anxiety (3 items), treatment anxiety (3 items), worry (3 items), cognitive problems (3 items - toddlers [aged 2-4], 4 items - young children [aged 5-7]; 5 items for children aged >=8 years, adults), perceived physical appearance (3 items), communication (3 items). Each item was reported using a 5-point Likert scale, items were then reverse-scored and linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Cancer Module total score: sum of all items divided by the number of items answered on all the scales. Total score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores=better HRQoL, lower scores=worse HRQoL. Final analysis data was reported for this outcome measure.
Number of Participants Categorized Based on Overall Palatability and Acceptability Questionnaire Responses for Suspension of Lenvatinib
The palatability and acceptability of lenvatinib oral suspension formulation was assessed using the Palatability Questionnaire. In the questionnaire, participants were asked to answer palatability and acceptability of lenvatinib suspension considering the following elements: taste, appearance, smell, how does it feel in the mouth and overall acceptability in terms of 7 responses: Super good, really good, good, may be good or may be bad, bad, really bad, super bad. In this outcome measure, number of participants have been reported per their overall palatability and acceptability responses. Final analysis data was reported for this outcome measure.

Full Information

First Posted
November 1, 2019
Last Updated
October 10, 2023
Sponsor
Eisai Inc.
Collaborators
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04154189
Brief Title
A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Ifosfamide and Etoposide With or Without Lenvatinib in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults With Relapsed and Refractory Osteosarcoma
Official Title
A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Phase 2 Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib in Combination With Ifosfamide and Etoposide Versus Ifosfamide and Etoposide in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Osteosarcoma (OLIE)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 23, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 22, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 17, 2023 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Eisai Inc.
Collaborators
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This Is a Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Phase 2 Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib in Combination with Ifosfamide and Etoposide Versus Ifosfamide and Etoposide in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults with Relapsed or Refractory Osteosarcoma.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteosarcoma
Keywords
Osteosarcoma, Lenvatinib, Ifosfamide, Etoposide, E7080, Relapsed or Refractory Osteosarcoma, Pediatrics, Chemotherapy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
81 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Randomization Phase: Lenvatinib + Ifosfamide + Etoposide
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants with relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma will receive lenvatinib in combination with ifosfamide and etoposide.
Arm Title
Randomization Phase: Ifosfamide + Etoposide
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants with relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma will receive ifosfamide with etoposide. Participants with relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma may receive optional lenvatinib plus or minus chemotherapy (Ifosfamide and Etoposide) if disease progression is observed in study.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Lenvatinib
Other Intervention Name(s)
E7080
Intervention Description
Lenvatinib 14 milligrams per square meter (mg/m^2) capsules will be administered once daily on Days 1 to 21 of each 21-day cycle until disease progression (PD), development of unacceptable toxicity, participant request, withdrawal of consent, or discontinuation of study by the sponsor. An extemporaneous suspension of lenvatinib capsules may be used for participants unable to swallow capsules.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ifosfamide
Intervention Description
Ifosfamide 3000 milligrams per square meter per day (mg/m^2/day) intravenous infusion will be administered on Days 1 to 3 of each 21-day cycle for a total of 5 cycles.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Etoposide
Intervention Description
Etoposide 100 mg/m^2/day intravenous infusion will be administered on Days 1 to 3 of each 21-day cycle for a total of 5 cycles.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Lenvatinib
Other Intervention Name(s)
E7080
Intervention Description
Lenvatinib 14 mg/m^2 capsules will be administered once daily on Days 1 to 21 of each 21-day cycle until the next PD (per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors [RECIST] 1.1 as assessed by investigator), development of unacceptable toxicity, participant request, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurs first.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Independent Imaging Review (IIR) Assessment
Description
PFS as assessed by IIR was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of PD or date of death (whichever occurred first), as determined using RECIST v1.1. PD was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase or 5 millimeter (mm) increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time Frame
From the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of PD or date of death, whichever occurred first (up to 14.2 months)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With PFS at Month 4 (PFS-4m Rate) by IIR Assessment
Description
PFS rate at 4 months as assessed by IIR was defined as the percentage of participants who were alive and without PD at 4 months from the randomization date using RECIST v1.1. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase or 5 mm increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. The PFS-4m was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Final analysis data was reported for this outcome measure.
Time Frame
Month 4
Title
Percentage of Participants With PFS at 1 Year or Month 12 (PFS-1y Rate) by IIR Assessment
Description
PFS-1y rate as assessed by IIR was defined as the percentage of participants who were alive and without PD at 1 year from randomization date using RECIST v1.1. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase or 5 mm increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PFS-1y rate was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Final analysis data was reported for this outcome measure.
Time Frame
Month 12 or 1 Year
Title
Overall Survival (OS)
Description
OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2025).
Time Frame
From the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause (up to approximately 59 months)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival at 1 Year or Month 12 (OS-1y)
Description
OS-1y was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause assessed up to 1 year. OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Final analysis data was reported for this outcome measure.
Time Frame
Month 12 or 1 Year
Title
Objective Response Rate at Month 4 (ORR-4m) by IIR Assessment
Description
ORR-4m was defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined by IIR using RECIST v1.1 within the first 4 months. CR: defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis to less than (<) 10 mm. PR: defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. 95% confidence interval (CI) of ORR was calculated using the method of Clopper and Pearson. Final analysis data was reported for this outcome measure.
Time Frame
Month 4
Title
ORR by IIR Assessment
Description
ORR by IIR was defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response of CR or PR determined using RECIST v1.1. CR: defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis to <10 mm. PR: defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. 95% CI of ORR was calculated using the method of Clopper and Pearson. Final analysis data was reported for this outcome measure.
Time Frame
From the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of CR or PR, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 14.2 months)
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Description
TEAE was defined as an adverse event (AE) that emerged during time from first dose to 30 days following last dose of drug, having been absent at pretreatment or reemerged during treatment, having been present at pretreatment but stopped before treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to pretreatment state, when AE was continuous. SAE was defined as untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death; was life threatening; resulted in persistent or significant disability; was congenital anomaly or medically important due to other reasons than above mentioned criteria. Data for this outcome measure will be reported after study completion (anticipated study completion date is March 2025).
Time Frame
From date of first dose up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug (up to approximately 60 months)
Title
Treatment Arm A: Plasma Concentration of Lenvatinib
Description
Plasma concentration of lenvatinib in participants from Treatment Arm A (Lenvatinib + Ifosfamide + Etoposide) at different time points were reported. As planned, data for this outcome measure was analyzed for treatment arm A only. Lenvatinib concentration in plasma was quantified using a validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Final analysis data was reported for this outcome measure.
Time Frame
Cycle 1 Day 1: 0.5-4 hours and 6-10 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 15: Pre-dose, 0.5-4 hours and 6-10 hours post-dose; Cycle 2 Day 1: Pre-dose (each Cycle length = 21 days)
Title
Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Scale: Generic Core Scale Score at Month 4
Description
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scale is a multidimensional scale. It included assessment of 4 dimensions: physical functioning (8 items), emotional functioning (8 items), social functioning (8 items), and school functioning (5 items - children greater than or equal to [>=] 5 years, adults; 3 items - toddlers [aged 2-4 years]). Each item was reported using a 5-point Likert scale, items were then reverse-scored and linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Generic Core Scale total score: sum of all the items divided by the number of items answered across all the scales. Total score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores=better HRQoL, lower scores=worse HRQoL. Final analysis data was reported for this outcome measure.
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 4
Title
Change From Baseline in PedsQL Scale: Cancer Module Scale Score at Month 4
Description
HRQoL: PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module Scale measured pediatric cancer-specific HRQoL. It included assessment of 8 dimensions: pain and hurt (2 items), nausea (5 items), procedural anxiety (3 items), treatment anxiety (3 items), worry (3 items), cognitive problems (3 items - toddlers [aged 2-4], 4 items - young children [aged 5-7]; 5 items for children aged >=8 years, adults), perceived physical appearance (3 items), communication (3 items). Each item was reported using a 5-point Likert scale, items were then reverse-scored and linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. Cancer Module total score: sum of all items divided by the number of items answered on all the scales. Total score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores=better HRQoL, lower scores=worse HRQoL. Final analysis data was reported for this outcome measure.
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 4
Title
Number of Participants Categorized Based on Overall Palatability and Acceptability Questionnaire Responses for Suspension of Lenvatinib
Description
The palatability and acceptability of lenvatinib oral suspension formulation was assessed using the Palatability Questionnaire. In the questionnaire, participants were asked to answer palatability and acceptability of lenvatinib suspension considering the following elements: taste, appearance, smell, how does it feel in the mouth and overall acceptability in terms of 7 responses: Super good, really good, good, may be good or may be bad, bad, really bad, super bad. In this outcome measure, number of participants have been reported per their overall palatability and acceptability responses. Final analysis data was reported for this outcome measure.
Time Frame
Cycle 1 Day 1 (Cycle length = 21 days)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
2 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
25 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of high grade osteosarcoma Refractory or relapsed osteosarcoma after 1 to 2 prior lines of systemic treatments Measurable or evaluable disease per RECIST 1.1. Life expectancy of 12 weeks or more Lansky play score greater than or equal to (>=) 50 Percent (%) or Karnofsky Performance Status score >=50%. Use Karnofsky for participants >=16 years of age and Lansky for participants less than (<)16 years of age. Participants who are unable to walk because of paralysis, but who are able to perform activities of daily living while wheelchair bound, will be considered ambulatory for the purpose of assessing the performance score Adequate organ function per blood work Adequate cardiac function as evidenced by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >=50% at baseline as determined by echocardiography or multigated acquisition (MUGA) scan Adequately controlled blood pressure (BP) with or without antihypertensive medications, defined as: BP <95th percentile for sex, age, and height/length at screening (as per National Heart Lung and Blood Institute guidelines) and no change in antihypertensive medications within 1 week prior to Cycle 1 Day 1. Participants >18 years of age should have BP less than or equal to (<=) 150/90 millimeters of Mercury at screening and no change in antihypertensive therapy within 1 week prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 Washout before Cycle 1 Day 1 of 3 weeks in case of prior chemotherapy, 6 weeks if treatment included nitrosoureas; 4 weeks for definitive radiotherapy, 2 weeks for palliative radiotherapy; and 3 months from high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell rescue. For all other anti-cancer therapies, washout before Cycle 1 Day 1 of at least 5 half-lives (or at least 28 days, whichever is shorter). Participants must have recovered [to Grade <=1, except for alopecia, ototoxicity, and Grade <=2 peripheral neuropathy, per common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v5.0] from the acute toxic effects of all prior anticancer therapy before Cycle 1 Day 1 Must have no prior history of lenvatinib treatment Eligibility for optional lenvatinib crossover: Disease progression per RECIST 1.1 (as confirmed by IIR for all participants who crossover prior to the study data-cut) No new systemic anti-cancer medication administered after the last dose of study drugs Meets all safety parameters listed in the inclusion criteria and none listed in the exclusion criteria Study is ongoing Exclusion Criteria: Any active infection or infectious illness unless fully recovered prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 (that is, no longer requiring systemic treatment) Participants with central nervous system metastases are not eligible, unless they have completed local therapy (example, whole brain radiation therapy, surgery or radiosurgery) and have discontinued the use of corticosteroids for this indication for at least 2 weeks before Cycle 1 Day 1 Active second malignancy within 2 years prior to enrollment ([in addition to osteosarcoma], but not including definitively treated superficial melanoma, carcinoma-in-situ, basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin) Has had major surgery within 3 weeks prior to Cycle 1 Day 1. Note: Adequate wound healing after major surgery must be assessed clinically, independent of time elapsed for eligibility A clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormality, including a marked baseline prolonged QT or corrected QT (QTc) interval (example, a repeated demonstration of a QTc interval greater than [>] 480 millisecond [msec]) Has clinically significant cardiovascular disease within 6 months from first dose of study intervention, including New York Heart Association Class III or IV congestive heart failure, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, cerebral vascular accident, or cardiac arrhythmia associated with hemodynamic instability. Note: Medically controlled arrhythmia would be permitted Gastrointestinal malabsorption, gastrointestinal anastomosis, or any other condition that in the opinion of the investigator might affect the absorption of lenvatinib Pre-existing Grade >=3 gastrointestinal or non-gastrointestinal fistula Gastrointestinal bleeding or active hemoptysis (bright red blood of at least 1 divided [/] by 2 teaspoon) within 3 weeks prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 Radiographic evidence of intratumoral cavitation, encasement, or invasion of a major blood vessel. Additionally, the degree of proximity to major blood vessels should be considered for exclusion because of the potential risk of severe hemorrhage associated with tumor shrinkage/necrosis after lenvatinib therapy History of ifosfamide-related Grade >=3 nephrotoxicity or encephalopathy Known to be human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive Known active Hepatitis B (example, Hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] reactive) or Hepatitis C (example, hepatitis C virus [HCV] ribonucleic acid [RNA] [qualitative] is detected). Note: Testing for Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C is required at screening only when mandated by local health authority
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Children's of Alabama
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35233
Country
United States
Facility Name
Loma Linda University Medical Center
City
Loma Linda
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92354
Country
United States
Facility Name
Children's Hospital of Orange County
City
Orange
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92868
Country
United States
Facility Name
UCSF Benioff Children's Hospitals
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94143
Country
United States
Facility Name
Childrens Hospital Colorado
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80045
Country
United States
Facility Name
Children's National Medical Center
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20010
Country
United States
Facility Name
Riley Hospital For Children
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02215
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Mississippi Medical Center
City
Jackson
State/Province
Mississippi
ZIP/Postal Code
39216
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hackensack University Medical Center
City
Hackensack
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07601
Country
United States
Facility Name
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10065
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45229
Country
United States
Facility Name
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37232
Country
United States
Facility Name
Children's Medical Center Dallas
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75235
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cook Children's Health Care System
City
Fort Worth
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Children's Hospital
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Hospital
City
Camperdown
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Perth Childrens Hospital
City
Nedlands
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne
City
Parkville
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Queensland Children's Hospital
City
South Brisbane
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Children's Hospital at Westmead
City
Westmead
Country
Australia
Facility Name
St. Anna Kinderspital
City
Wien
Country
Austria
Facility Name
UZ Gent
City
Gent
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Hospital For Sick Children
City
Toronto
Country
Canada
Facility Name
FN Brno 2 Detska Klinika
City
Brno
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Fakultní nemocnice v Motole
City
Prague
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Tampereen yliopistollinen sairaala
City
Tampere
State/Province
Länsi-Suomen Lääni
ZIP/Postal Code
FI-33520
Country
Finland
Facility Name
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Hopital Pellegrin
City
Bordeaux
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre Oscar Lambret
City
Lille
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre Léon Berard
City
Lyon
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopitaux de La Timone
City
Marseille
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital de La Mère Et de L'enfant
City
Nantes
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU de Nice
City
Nice
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital Armand Trousseau
City
Paris
Country
France
Facility Name
Institut Curie
City
Paris
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital de Hautepierre
City
Strasbourg
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital Des Enfants
City
Toulouse
Country
France
Facility Name
CHRU Nancy
City
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy
Country
France
Facility Name
Institut Gustave Roussy
City
Villejuif
Country
France
Facility Name
Hong Kong Children's Hospital
City
Hong Kong
Country
Hong Kong
Facility Name
Prince of Wales Hospital
City
Hong Kong
Country
Hong Kong
Facility Name
Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin
City
Dublin
Country
Ireland
Facility Name
Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel
City
Petach Tikva
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli
City
Bologna
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera A Meyer
City
Firenze
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Istituto Giannina Gaslini
City
Genova
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori
City
Milan
Country
Italy
Facility Name
IRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù
City
Roma
Country
Italy
Facility Name
National Cancer Center
City
Goyang-si
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Asan Medical Center
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Samsung Medical Center
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Seoul National University Hospital
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Severance Hospital Yonsei University Health System
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology
City
Utrecht
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Auckland City Hospital
City
Auckland
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Starship Children's Hospital
City
Auckland
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
KK Women's and Children's Hospital
City
Singapore
Country
Singapore
Facility Name
National Cancer Centre
City
Singapore
Country
Singapore
Facility Name
National University Hospital
City
Singapore
Country
Singapore
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario de Cruces
City
Barakaldo
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Sant Joan de Deu
City
Barcelona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebrón
City
Barcelona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesus
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jimenez Diaz
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario La Paz
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
City
Sevilla
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe de Valencia
City
Valencia
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Drottning Silvias Barn Och Ungdomssjukhus
City
Göteborg
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Skanes Universitetssjukhus Lund
City
Lund
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset Solna
City
Stockholm
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
City
Lausanne
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
Kinderspital Zürich - Eleonorenstiftung
City
Zürich
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
National Taiwan University Hospital
City
Taipei
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
City
Taipei
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Birmingham Children's Hospital
City
Birmingham
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
The Royal Hospital for Children
City
Bristol
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Royal Hospital for Children
City
Glasgow
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Leeds Children Hospital
City
Leeds
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Alder Hey Children's Hospital
City
Liverpool
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
UCL Cancer Institute
City
London
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Royal Manchester Childrens Hospital
City
Manchester
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
City
Manchester
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Royal Victoria Infirmary
City
Newcastle
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
John Radcliffe Hospital
City
Oxford
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Eisai's data sharing commitment and further information on how to request data can be found on our website http://eisaiclinicaltrials.com/.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34416158
Citation
Gaspar N, Venkatramani R, Hecker-Nolting S, Melcon SG, Locatelli F, Bautista F, Longhi A, Lervat C, Entz-Werle N, Casanova M, Aerts I, Strauss SJ, Thebaud E, Morland B, Nieto AC, Marec-Berard P, Gambart M, Rossig C, Okpara CE, He C, Dutta L, Campbell-Hewson Q. Lenvatinib with etoposide plus ifosfamide in patients with refractory or relapsed osteosarcoma (ITCC-050): a multicentre, open-label, multicohort, phase 1/2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Sep;22(9):1312-1321. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00387-9. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34382412
Citation
Gaspar N, Campbell-Hewson Q, Huang J, Okpara CE, Bautista F. OLIE, ITCC-082: a Phase II trial of lenvatinib plus ifosfamide and etoposide in relapsed/refractory osteosarcoma. Future Oncol. 2021 Nov;17(32):4249-4261. doi: 10.2217/fon-2021-0743. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Ifosfamide and Etoposide With or Without Lenvatinib in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults With Relapsed and Refractory Osteosarcoma

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs