Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Conventional Analgesia in Complex Spine Surgery (ESPB-Spine)
Primary Purpose
Opioid Use, Pain, Postoperative
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Bupivacaine
Dexamethasone
Saline
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Opioid Use
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-80
- Planned primary complex spine surgery: >2 level- lumbar and/or thoraco-lumbar spine fusion with or without decompression
- Planned stand-alone posterior surgical approach
- Able to follow study protocol
- Able to communicate in English (outcome questionnaires validated in English)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age <18 or >80
- Revision surgery
- BMI > 35
- planned prolonged intubation/intubation overnight on night of surgery
- Unable to communicate in English
- History of chronic pain condition requiring gabapentin/pregabalin/antidepressant medication longer than 3 months
- Opioid tolerance (>60 OME daily for >2 weeks)
- Allergy, intolerance or contraindication to any protocol component/study medication/technique
- Patient refusal of regional analgesia (ESPB)
Sites / Locations
- Hospital for Special Surgery
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
ESPB with Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
ESPB with saline placebo
Arm Description
23 complex spine surgery patients will be randomized to receive intraoperative ultrasound-guided bilateral ESPB with 0.375% bupivacaine plus 2 mg preservative free dexamethasone, 25-30 mL total per side according to patient weight.
23 complex spine surgery patients will be randomized to receive intraoperative ultrasound-guided bilateral ESPB with saline placebo, 25-30 mL total per side according to patient weight.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Total Opioid Consumption
Measured in mean oral morphine equivalents (OME)
Secondary Outcome Measures
Pain Scores at Rest
Measured by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain at rest (0 being no pain and 10 being as bad as you can imagine)
Pain Scores with Physical Therapy
Measured by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain with movement (0 being no pain and 10 being as bad as you can imagine)
Quality of Recovery: QoR15
Measured by QoR15 (Part A: 0 to 10 where 0=none of the time [poor] and 10=all the time [excellent]; Part B: 0 to 10 where 10=none of the time [poor] and 0=all the time [excellent])
Opioid Related Side Effects
Measured by 10 symptom ORSDS (symptom frequency: rarely to almost constantly; symptom severity: slight to very severe; symptom distress: not at all to very much)
Blinding Assessment
Measured by bang blinding index (choose between two treatment arms and provide explanation as to why arm was chosen)
Time to Opioid Use
Time to pressing IV PCA and to requesting first oral opioid
Total Opioid Consumption
Measured in mean oral morphine equivalents (OME)
Total Opioid Consumption
Measured in mean oral morphine equivalents (OME)
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04156581
First Posted
October 25, 2019
Last Updated
September 23, 2022
Sponsor
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04156581
Brief Title
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Conventional Analgesia in Complex Spine Surgery
Acronym
ESPB-Spine
Official Title
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Conventional Analgesia in Complex Spine Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 14, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 18, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 18, 2022 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) emphasize evidence-based, multimodal anesthetic and analgesic choices to minimize opioid consumption while providing adequate pain control after surgery. Although ERPs for spine surgery are now being described, few pathways include regional analgesia. The Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) may represent a novel opportunity to incorporate regional analgesia into ERPs for spine surgery. To date, there is minimal data to support the utility of ESPB in spine surgery, and this block has not yet been evaluated in complex spine surgery.
This study seeks to see whether ESPB will reduce opioid consumption and pain scores, and improve patient recovery during the first 24 hours after complex spine surgery when included in a comprehensive ERP.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Opioid Use, Pain, Postoperative
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
46 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
ESPB with Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
23 complex spine surgery patients will be randomized to receive intraoperative ultrasound-guided bilateral ESPB with 0.375% bupivacaine plus 2 mg preservative free dexamethasone, 25-30 mL total per side according to patient weight.
Arm Title
ESPB with saline placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
23 complex spine surgery patients will be randomized to receive intraoperative ultrasound-guided bilateral ESPB with saline placebo, 25-30 mL total per side according to patient weight.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Bupivacaine
Intervention Description
Bupivacaine is administered typically to reduce sensation in an area. It acts as a nerve block for surgical procedures.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Dexamethasone
Intervention Description
Dexamethasone is a corticosteroid that reduces inflammation.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Saline
Intervention Description
Saline is a mixture of NaCl and water that can be used as a placebo.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Total Opioid Consumption
Description
Measured in mean oral morphine equivalents (OME)
Time Frame
0-24 hours after surgery (intraoperative + immediately after surgery)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain Scores at Rest
Description
Measured by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain at rest (0 being no pain and 10 being as bad as you can imagine)
Time Frame
at baseline (holding area), PACU (hour 0), hour 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery
Title
Pain Scores with Physical Therapy
Description
Measured by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain with movement (0 being no pain and 10 being as bad as you can imagine)
Time Frame
on post-operative physical therapy day 0, 1, and 2
Title
Quality of Recovery: QoR15
Description
Measured by QoR15 (Part A: 0 to 10 where 0=none of the time [poor] and 10=all the time [excellent]; Part B: 0 to 10 where 10=none of the time [poor] and 0=all the time [excellent])
Time Frame
at baseline (holding area), 24 and 72 hours after surgery
Title
Opioid Related Side Effects
Description
Measured by 10 symptom ORSDS (symptom frequency: rarely to almost constantly; symptom severity: slight to very severe; symptom distress: not at all to very much)
Time Frame
at 24 hours after surgery
Title
Blinding Assessment
Description
Measured by bang blinding index (choose between two treatment arms and provide explanation as to why arm was chosen)
Time Frame
at 72 hours after surgery
Title
Time to Opioid Use
Description
Time to pressing IV PCA and to requesting first oral opioid
Time Frame
up to 24 hours after surgery
Title
Total Opioid Consumption
Description
Measured in mean oral morphine equivalents (OME)
Time Frame
0-12 hours after surgery (intraoperative + immediately after surgery)
Title
Total Opioid Consumption
Description
Measured in mean oral morphine equivalents (OME)
Time Frame
13-24 hours after surgery
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Age 18-80
Planned primary complex spine surgery: >2 level- lumbar and/or thoraco-lumbar spine fusion with or without decompression
Planned stand-alone posterior surgical approach
Able to follow study protocol
Able to communicate in English (outcome questionnaires validated in English)
Exclusion Criteria:
Age <18 or >80
Revision surgery
BMI > 35
planned prolonged intubation/intubation overnight on night of surgery
Unable to communicate in English
History of chronic pain condition requiring gabapentin/pregabalin/antidepressant medication longer than 3 months
Opioid tolerance (>60 OME daily for >2 weeks)
Allergy, intolerance or contraindication to any protocol component/study medication/technique
Patient refusal of regional analgesia (ESPB)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ellen Soffin, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital for Special Surgery
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10021
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Certain individual participant data will be available. Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in a future article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, appendices).
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal, in order to achieve aims in the approved proposal.
Learn more about this trial
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Conventional Analgesia in Complex Spine Surgery
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs