search
Back to results

Impact of Predilatation Between Self-expanding Valves (DIRECTII)

Primary Purpose

Aortic Stenosis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Greece
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation with ACURATE NEO/TF
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation with Medtronic CoreValve /Evolut R/Pro
Sponsored by
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Aortic Stenosis focused on measuring Aortic stenosis, DIRECT, ACURATE, TAVI, TAVR, transcatheter, valve

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis defined by a mean aortic gradient > 40 mmHg or peak jet velocity > 4.0 m/s or an aortic valve area (AVA) < 1cm2 or AVA indexed to body surface area (BSA) of <0.6 cm2/m2
  • Patient is symptomatic (heart failure with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class > I, angina or syncope)
  • Patients are considered at high risk for mortality with conventional surgical aortic valve replacement as assessed by a Heart Team consisting of a cardiologist and surgeon or as confirmed by a logistic EuroSCORE I ≥ 20% and / or EuroSCORE II ≥ 7% STS score ≥ 8% OR
  • Over 80 years old OR
  • Over 65 years old with 1 or 2 (but not more than two) from the following criteria:

Liver cirrhosis (Class A or B). Pulmonary insufficiency: VMS<1 liter. Previous heart surgery (CABG, vascular surgery). Porcelain aorta. Pulmonary artery systolic pressure >60 mmHg and high risk for heart surgery. Relapsing pulmonary embolism. Right ventricular insufficiency. Thoracic wall injuries that contraindicate an open heart surgery. History of radiation therapy of the mediastinum. Connective tissue disease that contraindicates an open heart surgery. Frailty/cachexia.

  • Aortic valve diameter of ≥20mm and ≤2 9mm as measured by echo.
  • Ascending aorta diameter ≤ 43 mm at the sinotubular junction.
  • Arterial aorto-iliac-femoral axis suitable for transfemoral access as assessed by conventional angiography and/or multi-detector computed tomographic angiography (access vessel diameter ≥ 6mm)
  • Patient understands the purpose, the potential risks as well as benefits of the trial and is willing to participate in all parts of the follow-up
  • Patient has given written consent to participate in the trial

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following which cannot be adequately pre-medicated: aspirin or heparin and bivalirudin, ticlodipine and clopidogrel, nitinol (titanium or nickel), contrast media
  • Ongoing sepsis, including active endocarditis.
  • Any percutaneous coronary or peripheral interventional procedure with a bare metal or drug eluting stent performed within 30 days prior to Heart Team assessment.
  • Echocardiographic evidence of LV or LA thrombus.
  • Mitral or tricuspid valve insufficiency (> grade II).
  • Previous aortic valve replacement (mechanical or bioprosthetic).
  • Recent (within 6 months of Heart Team assessment) cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA).
  • Patients with:

Femoral, iliac or aortic vascular disease (stenosis etc) that precludes the insertion of a transcatheter sheath.

OR Symptomatic carotid or vertebral artery disease (> 70% stenosis).

  • The patient has a bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy or denies blood transfusion.
  • Estimated life expectancy of less than 12 months due to associated non-cardiac co-morbid conditions.
  • Creatinine clearance < 20 ml/min.
  • Active gastritis or gastrointestinal ulcer.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Severe left ventricular dysfunction with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 20%.
  • Unicuspid aortic valve.
  • Mixed aortic valve disease (aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation> 2+).
  • Liver failure (Child-Pugh class C).
  • Severe dementia (resulting in either inability to provide informed consent for the study/procedure, prevents independent lifestyle outside of a chronic care facility, or will fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up visits).
  • Extreme aortic valve calcification and calcific asymmetry (Agatston score: grade 4 AgS>5000 AU).
  • Aortic valve area of < 0.4 cm2.

Sites / Locations

  • Hippocration Hospital First Department of Cardiology, University of Athens, Medical School

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Other

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Patients treated with Medtronic CoreValve/ Evolut R/Pro

Patients treated with ACURATE neo/TF

Arm Description

TAVI patients treated with Medtronic CoreValve /Evolut R - Evolut PRO Transcatheter Heart Valves, participated in the DIRECT trial

TAVI patients treated with ACURATE neo/TF Transcatheter Heart Valve recruited prospectively.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Device success
ACURATE NEO/TF device implantation success rates, as designated by the VARC-2 criteria

Secondary Outcome Measures

All cause Mortality
Death teates during the hospitalization of the patient, as designated by the VARC-2 criteria
All stroke
Cerebrovascular accident rates during and after the hospitalization of the patient, as designated by the VARC-2 criteria
New pacemaker implantation
New pacemaker implantation rates during and after the hospitalization of the patient, as designated by the VARC-2 criteria
Major Vascular complications
Vascular complications rates during and after the hospitalization of the patient, as designated by the VARC-2 criteria
Echocardiographic endpoint
Echocardiographic endpoint (Post TAVI aortic valve area in cm2)
Post-dilatation
Post-dilatation rates
Major Bleeding
Major bleeding during and after the hospitalization of the patient, as designated by the VARC-2 criteria
Acute kidney injury stage 2 or 3
AKI stage 2 or 3 during and after the hospitalization of the patient, as designated by the VARC-2 criteria
Device success
ACURATE NEO/TF device implantation success rates, as designated by the VARC-1 and VARC-3 criteria

Full Information

First Posted
October 30, 2019
Last Updated
January 28, 2023
Sponsor
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Collaborators
Naval Hospital, Athens, Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases, University General Hospital of Heraklion, Interbalkan Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04157920
Brief Title
Impact of Predilatation Between Self-expanding Valves
Acronym
DIRECTII
Official Title
Impact of Balloon Predilatation Between Self-expanding Valves in All Comers Undergoing TAVI
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 17, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 1, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 20, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Collaborators
Naval Hospital, Athens, Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases, University General Hospital of Heraklion, Interbalkan Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
A Multicenter, prospective, non-randomized, trial evaluating the safety and clinical efficacy of the next-generation, self-expandable Boston Scientific ACURATE NEO/TF Transcatheter Heart Valves, implanted in patients with severe aortic stenosis and the impact of predilatation in comparison with the Medtronic CoreValve EvolutT R/PRO systems from the DIRECT trial.
Detailed Description
The aim of the present prospective, multicenter, non-randomized trial is to compare the device success rate and the in-hospital and 30-day safety and echocardiographic clinical outcomes between TAVI with and without predilatation in all comers undergoing implantation of self-expanding valves. Primary endpoint will be device success rate as defined by the VARC-2 criteria. Secondary endpoints involve the composite endpoint of early safety at 30 days, according to the VARC-2 definitions, specifically all cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, stroke, acute kidney injury, life-threatening or disabling bleeding, major vascular complication, as well as the echocardiographic outcomes and valve performance as designated by the VARC-2 definitions at 30 days. VARC-1 and VARC-3 device success rates will be estimated as well. Study type: Observational Estimated Enrollment: 75 patients Allocation: Non - randomized, all comers Primary Purpose: Treatment Observational Model: Case-Control Condition or disease: Aortic valve stenosis Intervention/Treatment: Device: Boston Scientific ACURATE neoTM transfemoral TAVI system Time Perspective: Prospective Participating centers: Hippokration Hospital (Athens, Greece), Silesian Center for Heart Diseases (Zabrze, Poland), Athens Naval Hospital (Athens, Greece). It is possible that the number of the participating center may change. Methods: Patients treated with the Boston Scientific ACURATE NEO/TF system will be prospectively. All patients will be followed for at least 30 days. A primary study by Pagnesi et al. estimated the device success rate by ACURATE neo valve at 83% whereas Toutouzas et al. estimated the device success rate by Medtronic CoreValve/Evolut R/PRO at 76% (6, 17). Taking 83% as our point estimate, the steering committee of DIRECT II considers that ACURATE neo valve can be regarded as non-inferior to Medtronic CoreValve/Evolut R/PRO if the lower margin of the confidence interval does not lies under the rate of 83% by more than 5% (i.e. if it is not lower than 78%). Based on these assumptions, an expected sample size of 65 patients is required to achieve 80% power to demonstrate the efficacy of ACURATE neo valve, when type I error rate is set at 0.05. To eliminate possible impact of a small dropout rate, a total of 78 patients were recruited

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Aortic Stenosis
Keywords
Aortic stenosis, DIRECT, ACURATE, TAVI, TAVR, transcatheter, valve

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Patients undergoing TAVR for severe aortic stenosis with two different transcatheter devices. One arm received Medtronic Evolut R/Pro. The other is receiving Boston Scientific ACURATE NEO/TF
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
78 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Patients treated with Medtronic CoreValve/ Evolut R/Pro
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
TAVI patients treated with Medtronic CoreValve /Evolut R - Evolut PRO Transcatheter Heart Valves, participated in the DIRECT trial
Arm Title
Patients treated with ACURATE neo/TF
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
TAVI patients treated with ACURATE neo/TF Transcatheter Heart Valve recruited prospectively.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation with ACURATE NEO/TF
Other Intervention Name(s)
Boston Scientific ACURATE neo/TF
Intervention Description
Transcatheter implantation of the heart valve device ACURATE neo/TF in patients suffering from severe aortic stenosis and are candidates for this operation
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation with Medtronic CoreValve /Evolut R/Pro
Other Intervention Name(s)
Medtronic CoreValve /Evolut R/Pro
Intervention Description
Transcatheter implantation of the heart valve device Medtronic Evolut R/Pro in patients suffering from severe aortic stenosis and are candidates for this operation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Device success
Description
ACURATE NEO/TF device implantation success rates, as designated by the VARC-2 criteria
Time Frame
30 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
All cause Mortality
Description
Death teates during the hospitalization of the patient, as designated by the VARC-2 criteria
Time Frame
30 days
Title
All stroke
Description
Cerebrovascular accident rates during and after the hospitalization of the patient, as designated by the VARC-2 criteria
Time Frame
30 days
Title
New pacemaker implantation
Description
New pacemaker implantation rates during and after the hospitalization of the patient, as designated by the VARC-2 criteria
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Major Vascular complications
Description
Vascular complications rates during and after the hospitalization of the patient, as designated by the VARC-2 criteria
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Echocardiographic endpoint
Description
Echocardiographic endpoint (Post TAVI aortic valve area in cm2)
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Post-dilatation
Description
Post-dilatation rates
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Major Bleeding
Description
Major bleeding during and after the hospitalization of the patient, as designated by the VARC-2 criteria
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Acute kidney injury stage 2 or 3
Description
AKI stage 2 or 3 during and after the hospitalization of the patient, as designated by the VARC-2 criteria
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Device success
Description
ACURATE NEO/TF device implantation success rates, as designated by the VARC-1 and VARC-3 criteria
Time Frame
30 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis defined by a mean aortic gradient > 40 mmHg or peak jet velocity > 4.0 m/s or an aortic valve area (AVA) < 1cm2 or AVA indexed to body surface area (BSA) of <0.6 cm2/m2 Patient is symptomatic (heart failure with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class > I, angina or syncope) Patients are considered at high risk for mortality with conventional surgical aortic valve replacement as assessed by a Heart Team consisting of a cardiologist and surgeon or as confirmed by a logistic EuroSCORE I ≥ 20% and / or EuroSCORE II ≥ 7% STS score ≥ 8% OR Over 80 years old OR Over 65 years old with 1 or 2 (but not more than two) from the following criteria: Liver cirrhosis (Class A or B). Pulmonary insufficiency: VMS<1 liter. Previous heart surgery (CABG, vascular surgery). Porcelain aorta. Pulmonary artery systolic pressure >60 mmHg and high risk for heart surgery. Relapsing pulmonary embolism. Right ventricular insufficiency. Thoracic wall injuries that contraindicate an open heart surgery. History of radiation therapy of the mediastinum. Connective tissue disease that contraindicates an open heart surgery. Frailty/cachexia. Aortic valve diameter of ≥20mm and ≤2 9mm as measured by echo. Ascending aorta diameter ≤ 43 mm at the sinotubular junction. Arterial aorto-iliac-femoral axis suitable for transfemoral access as assessed by conventional angiography and/or multi-detector computed tomographic angiography (access vessel diameter ≥ 6mm) Patient understands the purpose, the potential risks as well as benefits of the trial and is willing to participate in all parts of the follow-up Patient has given written consent to participate in the trial Exclusion Criteria: A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following which cannot be adequately pre-medicated: aspirin or heparin and bivalirudin, ticlodipine and clopidogrel, nitinol (titanium or nickel), contrast media Ongoing sepsis, including active endocarditis. Any percutaneous coronary or peripheral interventional procedure with a bare metal or drug eluting stent performed within 30 days prior to Heart Team assessment. Echocardiographic evidence of LV or LA thrombus. Mitral or tricuspid valve insufficiency (> grade II). Previous aortic valve replacement (mechanical or bioprosthetic). Recent (within 6 months of Heart Team assessment) cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Patients with: Femoral, iliac or aortic vascular disease (stenosis etc) that precludes the insertion of a transcatheter sheath. OR Symptomatic carotid or vertebral artery disease (> 70% stenosis). The patient has a bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy or denies blood transfusion. Estimated life expectancy of less than 12 months due to associated non-cardiac co-morbid conditions. Creatinine clearance < 20 ml/min. Active gastritis or gastrointestinal ulcer. Pregnancy. Severe left ventricular dysfunction with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 20%. Unicuspid aortic valve. Mixed aortic valve disease (aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation> 2+). Liver failure (Child-Pugh class C). Severe dementia (resulting in either inability to provide informed consent for the study/procedure, prevents independent lifestyle outside of a chronic care facility, or will fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up visits). Extreme aortic valve calcification and calcific asymmetry (Agatston score: grade 4 AgS>5000 AU). Aortic valve area of < 0.4 cm2.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Konstantinos P Toutouzas, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
Professor of Cardiology
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hippocration Hospital First Department of Cardiology, University of Athens, Medical School
City
Athens
ZIP/Postal Code
11527
Country
Greece

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28169084
Citation
Arora S, Strassle PD, Ramm CJ, Rhodes JA, Vaidya SR, Caranasos TG, Vavalle JP. Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Lower Surgical Risk Scores: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Early Outcomes. Heart Lung Circ. 2017 Aug;26(8):840-845. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2016.12.003. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30091235
Citation
Adams HSL, Ashokkumar S, Newcomb A, MacIsaac AI, Whitbourn RJ, Palmer S. Contemporary review of severe aortic stenosis. Intern Med J. 2019 Mar;49(3):297-305. doi: 10.1111/imj.14071.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24421359
Citation
Saikrishnan N, Kumar G, Sawaya FJ, Lerakis S, Yoganathan AP. Accurate assessment of aortic stenosis: a review of diagnostic modalities and hemodynamics. Circulation. 2014 Jan 14;129(2):244-53. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002310. No abstract available. Erratum In: Circulation. 2014 Oct 7;130(15):e136.
Results Reference
background
Citation
4. Piérard L. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: indications. E-Journal of Cardiology Practice [Internet]. 2016 5 May 2019 [cited 2019 5 May 2019]; Volume 14 Available from: https://www.escardio.org/Journals/E-Journal-of-Cardiology-Practice/Volume-14/transcatheter-aortic-valve-implantation-indications
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24025946
Citation
Mollmann H, Diemert P, Grube E, Baldus S, Kempfert J, Abizaid A. Symetis ACURATE TF aortic bioprosthesis. EuroIntervention. 2013 Sep 10;9 Suppl:S107-10. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9SSA22. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26315740
Citation
Manoharan G, Walton AS, Brecker SJ, Pasupati S, Blackman DJ, Qiao H, Meredith IT. Treatment of Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis With a Novel Resheathable Supra-Annular Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve System. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug 24;8(10):1359-1367. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.05.015.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29348010
Citation
Forrest JK, Mangi AA, Popma JJ, Khabbaz K, Reardon MJ, Kleiman NS, Yakubov SJ, Watson D, Kodali S, George I, Tadros P, Zorn GL 3rd, Brown J, Kipperman R, Saul S, Qiao H, Oh JK, Williams MR. Early Outcomes With the Evolut PRO Repositionable Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve With Pericardial Wrap. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 22;11(2):160-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.10.014.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30928442
Citation
Toutouzas K, Benetos G, Voudris V, Drakopoulou M, Stathogiannis K, Latsios G, Synetos A, Antonopoulos A, Kosmas E, Iakovou I, Katsimagklis G, Mastrokostopoulos A, Moraitis S, Zeniou V, Danenberg H, Vavuranakis M, Tousoulis D. Pre-Dilatation Versus No Pre-Dilatation for Implantation of a Self-Expanding Valve in All Comers Undergoing TAVR: The DIRECT Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 22;12(8):767-777. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30846081
Citation
Pagnesi M, Kim WK, Conradi L, Barbanti M, Stefanini GG, Zeus T, Pilgrim T, Schofer J, Zweiker D, Testa L, Taramasso M, Hildick-Smith D, Abizaid A, Wolf A, Van Mieghem NM, Sedaghat A, Wohrle J, Khogali S, Van der Heyden JAS, Webb JG, Estevez-Loureiro R, Mylotte D, MacCarthy P, Brugaletta S, Hamm CW, Bhadra OD, Schafer U, Costa G, Tamburino C, Cannata F, Reimers B, Veulemans V, Asami M, Windecker S, Eitan A, Schmidt A, Bianchi G, Bedogni F, Saccocci M, Maisano F, Alsanjari O, Siqueira D, Jensen CJ, Naber CK, Ziviello F, Sinning JM, Seeger J, Rottbauer W, Brouwer J, Alenezi A, Wood DA, Tzalamouras V, Regueiro A, Colombo A, Latib A. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Next-Generation Self-Expanding Devices: A Multicenter, Retrospective, Propensity-Matched Comparison of Evolut PRO Versus Acurate neo Transcatheter Heart Valves. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Mar 11;12(5):433-443. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.11.036.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Impact of Predilatation Between Self-expanding Valves

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs