search
Back to results

Educational Nursing Intervention Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer During Chemotherapy

Primary Purpose

Patient Empowerment, Patient Activation, Self Care

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Finland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Educational nursing intervention on nutrition intake related chemotherapy induced side-effects' self-care among the patients with colorectal cancer
Sponsored by
University of Turku
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Patient Empowerment

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • able to speak and understand Finnish
  • receiving chemotherapy every three weeks in outpatient clinic: oxaliplatin+capecitabine= Xelox; irinotecan + capecitabine = Xeliri; Xelox or Xeliri + Bevacizumab

Exclusion Criteria:

  • weak physical, psychological or cognitive function that prevents participation
  • not able to understand Finnish

Sites / Locations

  • Helsinki University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Educational nursing intervention

Standard care

Arm Description

Patients in experimental group receive standard care and one-hour educational session. Patients are provided knowledge of healthy diet malnutrition, its prevalence and consequences for patients with CRC undergoing CT side effects impairing nutrition intake during CT treatment. prevention and self-care methods of the side effects Teach-back is used to verify participants' understanding. Empowering effect is confirmed by using active listening and asking patients' individual side effects, self-care strategies and need of additional knowledge in the beginning of the session and supporting patients' self-care methods when they have been applicable and effective. Additional knowledge of each theme is offered. To reinforce the intervention effect patients receive after the first CT a self-monitoring diary including assessment of side effects prevalence and intensity (NRS 0-10) before and after the self-care strategies. They return diaries by the 5th cycle of CT.

Patients in control group receive standard care, information of general CT induced side effects and their self-care; nausea, diarrhoea, obstipation and sores in the mouth, peripheral neuropathy symptoms, local venous irritation, heart symptoms, mucous and skin irritation side-effects' self-monitoring, fluid intake, medication dose changes, effect of CT weight control taste alteration cold sensitivity variable diet dietary supplements available dietitian services They receive a self-monitoring diary, which includes only side effects and their intensity (NRS 0-10).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The rate of knowledge level (Knowledge test of malnutrition, nutrition impact side effects and their self-care, RasOma, Tuominen et al. 2019)
Knowledge is seen as essential for empowerment (Rankinen et al. 2014; Castro et al. 2016). It is assumed that knowledge level is better in the intervention group compared to control group. Knowledge test was developed in the research group, which included an oncologist, a dietitian, oncology nurses and a researcher. The instrument includes 15 items (yes/no, right answer=1 point, wrong answer=0 points).
The rate of self care activation (Patient Activation Measure PAM, Insignia Health; Hibbard et al. 2004)
Activated individuals have the knowledge, skills and confidence to self-manage their health. PAM shows how ready, willing and able an individual is to manage his or her health and healthcare.It is assumed that patients in the intervention group are more activated to self-care their side effects. The activation score is based on a 0-100 point scale. A change of 3-4 points is associated with the difference between engaging and not engaging in particular behaviors. Activation self care is rated from 1 to 4 (1= low activation level; believing the patient role is important, 2=low activation level; having the confidence and knowledge necessary to take action, 3=moderate activation level; actually taking action to maintain and improve one's health, and 4=high activation level; staying the course even in stressful situations)(InsigniaHealth 2017).

Secondary Outcome Measures

The incidence of malnutrition risk (Nutritional Risk Screening NRS2002, Kondrup et al. 2003)
Nutrition consultations have affected positively on patients' food intake and nutritional status (Kiss & Krishnasamy 2014; Tu et al. 2013; Ravasco 2011, 2012). Patients with a total score of ≥3 are classified as nutritionally at risk. It is assumed that malnutrition risk is lesser in the intervention group compared to control group.
The rate of quality of life (The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale - Colorectal, FACT-C, Cella et al. 1993)
The risk of malnutrition is strongly associated with QoL in cancer patients initiating chemotherapy (Calderon et al. 2018).The FACT-C questionnaire consists of 36 items on a 5-point Likert scale in four areas of well-being: physical (0-28 points), social (0-28 points), emotional (0-24 points), functional (0-28 points) and CRC subscale (0-28 points). Higher score means better QoL (34 points=low level, 34-68 points= satisfactory, 68-102 points=average and 102-136 points=high)(Ganesh et al. 2016; Goździewicz et al. 2017).

Full Information

First Posted
November 5, 2019
Last Updated
May 23, 2022
Sponsor
University of Turku
Collaborators
Helsinki University Central Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04160650
Brief Title
Educational Nursing Intervention Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer During Chemotherapy
Official Title
Educational Nursing Intervention on Nutrition Impact Side-effects' Self-care Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer During Chemotherapy: A Research Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 21, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 15, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 15, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Turku
Collaborators
Helsinki University Central Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The prevalence of malnutrition is common among patients with colorectal cancer. Chemotherapy induced side effects may impact negatively on nutrition intake thus increase the risk of malnutrition and serious complications for patients. Purpose is to test the effect of empowering education on activation and knowledge level among patients with colorectal cancer during the chemotherapy. Secondary outcomes are quality of life and malnutrition. A two-arm, single center, patient blinded superiority trial with stratified randomization (1:1) and with repeated measures is used to measure the effectiveness of face-to-face education on nutrition intake related chemotherapy induced side-effects' self-care compared to standard care. Eligibility criteria are adult patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer and receiving intra venous chemotherapy treatment. Patients are recruited in one university hospital outpatient clinic in Finland. Experienced oncology nurse delivers the intervention two weeks after the first chemotherapy. Primary outcomes are activation in self-care and knowledge level. Secondary outcomes are quality of life and risk of malnutrition measured at baseline (M0) and after eight (M1) and 16 weeks (M2) after the intervention. The study will provide knowledge of nurse-led educational intervention on self-care among patients with colorectal cancer. The findings will contribute to patient education and self-care, thus better quality of life.
Detailed Description
The prevalence of malnutrition is common among patients with colorectal cancer. Chemotherapy induced side effects (nausea, vomiting, pain, mouth sores, fatigue, diarrhea, constipation, distress) may impact negatively on nutrition intake thus increase the risk of malnutrition thus serious complications for patients. Nurse-led empowering education may have positive effect on activation and knowledge level and enhance self-care of this patient group. Studies of nurse-led interventions that may enhance nutrition intake are scarce. Therefore, purpose of this study is to test the effect of educational nursing intervention on activation and knowledge level among patients with colorectal cancer during the chemotherapy. Secondary outcomes are quality of life and risk of malnutrition. A two-arm, single center, patient blinded superiority trial with stratified randomization (1:1) and with repeated measures is used to measure the effectiveness of face-to-face education on nutrition intake related chemotherapy induced side-effects' self-care compared to standard care. Eligibility criteria are adult patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer and receiving intra venous chemotherapy treatment. Patients are recruited in one university hospital outpatient clinic in Finland. Experienced oncology nurse delivers the intervention two weeks after the first chemotherapy. Primary outcomes are activation in self-care and knowledge level. Secondary outcomes are quality of life and malnutrition risk measured at baseline (M0) and after eight (M1) and 16 weeks (M2) after the intervention. The study will provide knowledge of the effectiveness of nurse-led empowering educational intervention on self-care related to chemotherapy-induced side effects that may deteriorate nutrition intake among patients with colorectal cancer. The findings will contribute to patient education and self-care, thus better quality of life.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Patient Empowerment, Patient Activation, Self Care, Cancer of Colon, Cancer of Rectum

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
A two-arm, single center, patient blinded superiority trial with stratified randomization (1:1) and with repeated measures
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
Participants are blinded after assignment to interventions, those in intervention and control groups are not aware which treatment they get.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
82 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Educational nursing intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients in experimental group receive standard care and one-hour educational session. Patients are provided knowledge of healthy diet malnutrition, its prevalence and consequences for patients with CRC undergoing CT side effects impairing nutrition intake during CT treatment. prevention and self-care methods of the side effects Teach-back is used to verify participants' understanding. Empowering effect is confirmed by using active listening and asking patients' individual side effects, self-care strategies and need of additional knowledge in the beginning of the session and supporting patients' self-care methods when they have been applicable and effective. Additional knowledge of each theme is offered. To reinforce the intervention effect patients receive after the first CT a self-monitoring diary including assessment of side effects prevalence and intensity (NRS 0-10) before and after the self-care strategies. They return diaries by the 5th cycle of CT.
Arm Title
Standard care
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Patients in control group receive standard care, information of general CT induced side effects and their self-care; nausea, diarrhoea, obstipation and sores in the mouth, peripheral neuropathy symptoms, local venous irritation, heart symptoms, mucous and skin irritation side-effects' self-monitoring, fluid intake, medication dose changes, effect of CT weight control taste alteration cold sensitivity variable diet dietary supplements available dietitian services They receive a self-monitoring diary, which includes only side effects and their intensity (NRS 0-10).
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Educational nursing intervention on nutrition intake related chemotherapy induced side-effects' self-care among the patients with colorectal cancer
Intervention Description
This is an educational intervention which aims to answer the questions: In patients with CRC what is the effect of empowering education versus standard education on knowledge level in 4 months follow-up? In patients with CRC what is the effect of empowering education versus standard education on activation level related to nutrition impact side effects' self-care in 4 months follow-up? In patients with CRC what is the effect of empowering education versus standard education on malnutrition risk in 4 months follow-up? In patients with CRC what is the effect of empowering education versus standard education on QoL in 4 months follow-up?
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The rate of knowledge level (Knowledge test of malnutrition, nutrition impact side effects and their self-care, RasOma, Tuominen et al. 2019)
Description
Knowledge is seen as essential for empowerment (Rankinen et al. 2014; Castro et al. 2016). It is assumed that knowledge level is better in the intervention group compared to control group. Knowledge test was developed in the research group, which included an oncologist, a dietitian, oncology nurses and a researcher. The instrument includes 15 items (yes/no, right answer=1 point, wrong answer=0 points).
Time Frame
From the baseline to 8 and 16 weeks after the intervention
Title
The rate of self care activation (Patient Activation Measure PAM, Insignia Health; Hibbard et al. 2004)
Description
Activated individuals have the knowledge, skills and confidence to self-manage their health. PAM shows how ready, willing and able an individual is to manage his or her health and healthcare.It is assumed that patients in the intervention group are more activated to self-care their side effects. The activation score is based on a 0-100 point scale. A change of 3-4 points is associated with the difference between engaging and not engaging in particular behaviors. Activation self care is rated from 1 to 4 (1= low activation level; believing the patient role is important, 2=low activation level; having the confidence and knowledge necessary to take action, 3=moderate activation level; actually taking action to maintain and improve one's health, and 4=high activation level; staying the course even in stressful situations)(InsigniaHealth 2017).
Time Frame
From the baseline to 8 and 16 weeks after the intervention
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The incidence of malnutrition risk (Nutritional Risk Screening NRS2002, Kondrup et al. 2003)
Description
Nutrition consultations have affected positively on patients' food intake and nutritional status (Kiss & Krishnasamy 2014; Tu et al. 2013; Ravasco 2011, 2012). Patients with a total score of ≥3 are classified as nutritionally at risk. It is assumed that malnutrition risk is lesser in the intervention group compared to control group.
Time Frame
From the baseline to 8 and 16 weeks after hte intervention
Title
The rate of quality of life (The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale - Colorectal, FACT-C, Cella et al. 1993)
Description
The risk of malnutrition is strongly associated with QoL in cancer patients initiating chemotherapy (Calderon et al. 2018).The FACT-C questionnaire consists of 36 items on a 5-point Likert scale in four areas of well-being: physical (0-28 points), social (0-28 points), emotional (0-24 points), functional (0-28 points) and CRC subscale (0-28 points). Higher score means better QoL (34 points=low level, 34-68 points= satisfactory, 68-102 points=average and 102-136 points=high)(Ganesh et al. 2016; Goździewicz et al. 2017).
Time Frame
From the baseline to 8 and 16 weeks after the intervention
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Incidence of interruption, transfer and cancellation of the treatments
Description
Better nutritional status is related to better treatment effect and better well-being, which may lead to better adherence to treatment schedule (Ravasco et al. 2012). Data is collected from patients' records.
Time Frame
From the baseline to 8 and 16 weeks after the intervention
Title
Incidence of morbidity
Description
Worse nutritional status is related to greater morbidity (Ravasco et al. 2012). Data is collected from patients' records.
Time Frame
From the baseline to 16 weeks after hte intervention

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: able to speak and understand Finnish receiving chemotherapy every three weeks in outpatient clinic: oxaliplatin+capecitabine= Xelox; irinotecan + capecitabine = Xeliri; Xelox or Xeliri + Bevacizumab Exclusion Criteria: weak physical, psychological or cognitive function that prevents participation not able to understand Finnish
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Helena Leino-Kilpi, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Turku
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Helsinki University Hospital
City
Helsinki
ZIP/Postal Code
00029
Country
Finland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34112154
Citation
Tuominen L, Ritmala-Castren M, Nikander P, Makela S, Vahlberg T, Leino-Kilpi H. Empowering patient education on self-care activity among patients with colorectal cancer - a research protocol for a randomised trial. BMC Nurs. 2021 Jun 10;20(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00617-z.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Educational Nursing Intervention Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer During Chemotherapy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs