search
Back to results

Shared Decision Making With Breast Cancer Patients

Primary Purpose

Shared Decision Making, Breast Neoplasms, Radiotherapy, Adjuvant

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Shared decision making supported by an in-consultation patient decision aid
Sponsored by
Vejle Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Shared Decision Making

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically verified breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ breast cancer
  • Candidate for adjuvant radiotherapy Danish Breast Cancer Group type F after breast-conserving surgery for T1-2, N0-Nmi, M0 disease according to national guidelines.
  • Signed confirmation of participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral breast cancer or suspicion of disseminated cancer
  • Unable to understand the information, the planned treatment or follow-up for any reason.
  • Earlier radiotherapy towards the thoracic region.

Sites / Locations

  • Aalborg Hospital
  • Aarhus University Hospital
  • Rigshospitalet
  • Herlev University Hospital
  • Sjaellands University Hospital
  • Odense University Hospital
  • Vejle Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Arm A: Shared decision making

Arm B: Usual practice

Arm Description

Patients will be informed by a doctor randomized to practice shared decision making and use the in-consultation PtDA during the consultation on adjuvant radiotherapy.

Patients will be informed by a doctor randomized to inform about adjuvant radiotherapy according to usual practice.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Participant engagement in the decision making process as measured by the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire 9.
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher the value the more patient engagement.

Secondary Outcome Measures

The doctor's perception of patient engagement in the decision making process as measured by the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire doctor 9
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher the value the more patient engagement.
The participant's fear of cancer recurrence as measured by the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Short form Questionnaire
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 36. The higher the value the more fear of recurrence.
The participant's engagement in the decision making process as measured by the Shared Decision Making Process 4 questionnaire
Minimum score: 0. Maximum score: 4. The higher the score the more patient engagement.
The participant's effectiveness in decision making as measured by the Decisional Conflict Scale questionnaire
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher the value the more effective decision making.
The participant's regret of the treatment decision as measured by the Decision Regret Scale questionnaire
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher the value the more regret.
The participant's engagement in the decision making process as measured by the CollaboRATE questionnaire
Minimum score: 0. Maximum score: 9. The higher the value the more patient engagement.
The participant's quality of life as measured by the EORCT QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) questionnaire, only question 29 + 30
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher the value the more quality of life.

Full Information

First Posted
November 20, 2019
Last Updated
January 9, 2023
Sponsor
Vejle Hospital
Collaborators
Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, University of Southern Denmark, Danish Comprehensive Cancer Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04177628
Brief Title
Shared Decision Making With Breast Cancer Patients
Official Title
Shared Decision Making With Breast Cancer Patients Offered Adjuvant Radiotherapy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
March 4, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 31, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Vejle Hospital
Collaborators
Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, University of Southern Denmark, Danish Comprehensive Cancer Center

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The aim of this project is to elucidate whether the use of shared decision making will influence patient engagement in the decision making process about adjuvant radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery for local breast cancer or early stages of local breast cancer.
Detailed Description
The risk of recurrence of breast cancer is lowered by adjuvant medical treatment as well as by radiotherapy (RT). On the other hand, all adjuvant treatments involve a risk of side effects; some are acute and transient while others are long-term. Considering the well-known side effects of irradiation, it seems appropriate to involve patients in the decision on whether to receive irradiation. In the shared decision making (SDM) process clinicians and patients work together to make appropriate health decisions based on clinical evidence and the patient's informed preferences. A patient decision aid (PtDA) is instrumental in the SDM process. This study is a multicenter, national trial randomizing doctors to either use or not use SDM and a PtDA when informing the patients about benefits and risks of receiving adjuvant radiotherapy. It is not expected that significantly less patients will receive radiotherapy as a consequence of SDM. The primary aim of the study is to evaluate whether patient engagement in decision making is affected by SDM and the use of an in-consultation PtDA.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Shared Decision Making, Breast Neoplasms, Radiotherapy, Adjuvant

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Half the doctors at each center will receive training in SDM. These doctors will practice SDM supported by the in-consultation PtDA during every consultation in this study. The other half of the doctors will continue usual practice of informing the patients.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
678 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arm A: Shared decision making
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients will be informed by a doctor randomized to practice shared decision making and use the in-consultation PtDA during the consultation on adjuvant radiotherapy.
Arm Title
Arm B: Usual practice
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Patients will be informed by a doctor randomized to inform about adjuvant radiotherapy according to usual practice.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Shared decision making supported by an in-consultation patient decision aid
Intervention Description
After having received training in SDM, the doctor will practice SDM supported by an in-consultation PtDA during the consultation with the participant.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Participant engagement in the decision making process as measured by the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire 9.
Description
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher the value the more patient engagement.
Time Frame
Within one week after the consultation
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The doctor's perception of patient engagement in the decision making process as measured by the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire doctor 9
Description
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher the value the more patient engagement.
Time Frame
Within one week after the consultation
Title
The participant's fear of cancer recurrence as measured by the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Short form Questionnaire
Description
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 36. The higher the value the more fear of recurrence.
Time Frame
Within one week after the consultation and again after six months
Title
The participant's engagement in the decision making process as measured by the Shared Decision Making Process 4 questionnaire
Description
Minimum score: 0. Maximum score: 4. The higher the score the more patient engagement.
Time Frame
Within one week after the consultation
Title
The participant's effectiveness in decision making as measured by the Decisional Conflict Scale questionnaire
Description
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher the value the more effective decision making.
Time Frame
Before (12 items) and within one week after the consultation (all 16 items)
Title
The participant's regret of the treatment decision as measured by the Decision Regret Scale questionnaire
Description
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher the value the more regret.
Time Frame
Six months after the consultation
Title
The participant's engagement in the decision making process as measured by the CollaboRATE questionnaire
Description
Minimum score: 0. Maximum score: 9. The higher the value the more patient engagement.
Time Frame
Within one week after the consultation
Title
The participant's quality of life as measured by the EORCT QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) questionnaire, only question 29 + 30
Description
Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher the value the more quality of life.
Time Frame
Six months

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Histologically verified breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ breast cancer Candidate for adjuvant radiotherapy Danish Breast Cancer Group type F after breast-conserving surgery for T1-2, N0-Nmi, M0 disease according to national guidelines. Signed confirmation of participation. Exclusion Criteria: Bilateral breast cancer or suspicion of disseminated cancer Unable to understand the information, the planned treatment or follow-up for any reason. Earlier radiotherapy towards the thoracic region.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Karina D Steffensen, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
Vejle Hospital
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stine R Sondergaard, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Vejle Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Aalborg Hospital
City
Aalborg
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Aarhus University Hospital
City
Aarhus
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Rigshospitalet
City
Copenhagen
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Herlev University Hospital
City
Herlev
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Sjaellands University Hospital
City
Næstved
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Odense University Hospital
City
Odense
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Vejle Hospital
City
Vejle
Country
Denmark

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Shared Decision Making With Breast Cancer Patients

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs