Hemopatch to Prevent Lymphatic Leak After Robotic Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection
Primary Purpose
Prostate Cancer
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Hong Kong
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Hemopatch
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Prostate Cancer focused on measuring Prostate cancer, Hemopatch
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 years and above
- Able to give informed consent
- Suitable for minimally-invasive surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any component of Hemopatch®
- Known hypersensitivity to bovine proteins or brilliant blue
- Patients with prior pelvic radiotherapy
- Patients with non-correctable coagulopathy
- Patients who are on anticoagulants
- Contraindication to general anaesthesia
- Previous transurethral resection of the prostate or prostatic surgery
- Untreated active infection
Sites / Locations
- Prince of Wales Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
No Intervention
Arm Label
Hemopatch
Control
Arm Description
The RARP and BPLND are performed in the usual manner. Towards the end of the operation, Hemopatch is laid over the ends of raw truncated lymphatic tissue.
The RARP and BPLND are performed in the usual manner. Hemopatch will not be applied to control group.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Total volume of drain output
Cumulative volume of output from the drain
Secondary Outcome Measures
Operating time
Duration of operation
Blood loss
Volume of blood loss during operation
Duration of drainage
Number of days between insertion and removal of drain
Volume of drainage per post-operative day
Average volume of drain output per post-operative day
Length of hospital stay
Patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy have an average hospital stay of three days
Transfusion requirement
Number of units of packed cells being transfused
Lymph node yield
Number of lymph nodes yielded upon pelvic lymph node dissection
30-day complications
Complications which occur within 30 days after the operation
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04185922
First Posted
December 3, 2019
Last Updated
June 24, 2022
Sponsor
Chinese University of Hong Kong
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04185922
Brief Title
Hemopatch to Prevent Lymphatic Leak After Robotic Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection
Official Title
Hemopatch to Prevent Lymphatic Leak After Robotic Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 27, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 21, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 10, 2022 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Chinese University of Hong Kong
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Robotic prostatectomy (RARP) is a surgery for treatment localized prostate cancer. Bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection (BPLND) will also be performed if there is an estimated risk of occult nodal metastases exceeding 5%. BPLND in general is a well-tolerated procedure. Lymphatic leak is one of the possible complications after lymph node dissection (BPLND). Lymphocele is a collection of lymphatic fluid after operation. Hemopatch is a material used during operation that may prevent lymphorrhoea. This is a randomizedcontrolled trial that aims at investigating the application of Hemopatch to raw lymphatic tissue in preventing lymphorrhoea. Patients would be divided into 2 groups: with or without the use of Hemopatch during operation. They will be followed up on day 30 to monitor the course of recovery and any complications.
Detailed Description
In prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), the current European Association of Urology (EAU) prostate cancer guidelines recommend bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection (BPLND) for those with an estimated risk of occult nodal metastases exceeding 5%.(1) In a systematic review of 66 studies involving 275, 269 patients, lymphadenectomy can identify node positive patients who may benefit from adjuvant treatment (2).
BPLND in general is a well-tolerated procedure. However, when complications do occur, significant morbidity results. The benefits of BPLND must be carefully weighed against its potential complications. The most common complication of BPLND is lymphocoele formation. Lymphatic vessels have no muscular layer as opposed to blood vessels. Transection of a blood vessel will lead to vasoconstriction and eventual cessation of bleeding. This is not the case with lymphatic vessels, and transection will lead to prolonged lymphorrhoea. The incidence of lymphocoele varies from series to series, ranging from 0.8% to 33%, depending on the extent of lymphadenectomy, surgical technique, operative approach, and the diagnostic approach (3,4). The most common symptoms are pelvic pain, abdominal distension, lower extremity or scrotal oedema, lower urinary tract symptom, frank bladder outlet obstruction, sepsis and even anastomotic disruption. Prolonged lymphorrhoea lengthens hospital stay, places the patient at risk for nosocomial infection and has significant cost implications for the healthcare system.
Hemopatch is a haemostatic pad consisting of a collagen sheet derived from bovine dermis with an NHS-PEG (pentaerythritol polyethylene glycol ether tetra-succinimidyl glutarate) coated active surface. These two components act together to provide effective tissue adherence, sealing and haemostasis (5). Upon tissue contact, NHS-PEG molecules on the active surface form covalent bonds with tissue proteins. Cross-linking NHS-PEG and proteins forms a hydrogel which acts as an effective tissue seal. Older generation NHS-PEG products in the form of solutions of flowable sealants are quickly washed away by blood or other leaking body fluids, rendering them ineffective in the presence of active bleeding or fluid leakage. Hemopatch is a novel NHSPEG delivery vehicle designed to overcome this limitation. Due to the open pore structure of the collagen, excess tissue fluids are readily absorbed and direct contact of NHS-PEG to tissue surface can be achieved. The collagen pad is optimized to be soft, thin, pliable, and has a high liquid absorption capacity. The pad is resorbed and replaced by host tissue in six to eight weeks with little tissue reaction.
The investigators hypothesise that the application of Hemopatch to raw lymphatic tissue can prevent lymphorrhoea through its unique combination of tissue adherence, sealing and fluid absorption. This can potentially prevent lymphatic leak, reduce drain output and facilitate earlier discharge.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Prostate Cancer
Keywords
Prostate cancer, Hemopatch
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
This is a prospective; single-centre phase 3 randomised controlled trial conducted to investigate the efficacy of Hemopatch for preventing lymphatic leak after RARP and BPLND.
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
Patients are randomized to receive RARP and BPLND, with or without Hemopatch, with an allocation ratio of 1:1.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
32 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Hemopatch
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The RARP and BPLND are performed in the usual manner. Towards the end of the operation, Hemopatch is laid over the ends of raw truncated lymphatic tissue.
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
The RARP and BPLND are performed in the usual manner. Hemopatch will not be applied to control group.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Hemopatch
Intervention Description
As stated in Hemopatch arm description
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Total volume of drain output
Description
Cumulative volume of output from the drain
Time Frame
Three days after the allocated treatment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Operating time
Description
Duration of operation
Time Frame
Immediately post-operative
Title
Blood loss
Description
Volume of blood loss during operation
Time Frame
Immediately post-operative
Title
Duration of drainage
Description
Number of days between insertion and removal of drain
Time Frame
Three days after the allocated treatment
Title
Volume of drainage per post-operative day
Description
Average volume of drain output per post-operative day
Time Frame
Three days after the allocated treatment
Title
Length of hospital stay
Description
Patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy have an average hospital stay of three days
Time Frame
Three days after the allocated treatment
Title
Transfusion requirement
Description
Number of units of packed cells being transfused
Time Frame
Three days after the allocated treatment
Title
Lymph node yield
Description
Number of lymph nodes yielded upon pelvic lymph node dissection
Time Frame
One week after the allocated treatment
Title
30-day complications
Description
Complications which occur within 30 days after the operation
Time Frame
Thirty days after the allocated treatment
10. Eligibility
Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Age 18 years and above
Able to give informed consent
Suitable for minimally-invasive surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any component of Hemopatch®
Known hypersensitivity to bovine proteins or brilliant blue
Patients with prior pelvic radiotherapy
Patients with non-correctable coagulopathy
Patients who are on anticoagulants
Contraindication to general anaesthesia
Previous transurethral resection of the prostate or prostatic surgery
Untreated active infection
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jeremy Yuen Chun Teoh, MBBS, FRCSEd
Organizational Affiliation
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Prince of Wales Hospital
City
Hong Kong
Country
Hong Kong
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27568654
Citation
Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, Fossati N, Gross T, Henry AM, Joniau S, Lam TB, Mason MD, Matveev VB, Moldovan PC, van den Bergh RCN, Van den Broeck T, van der Poel HG, van der Kwast TH, Rouviere O, Schoots IG, Wiegel T, Cornford P. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):618-629. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28126351
Citation
Fossati N, Willemse PM, Van den Broeck T, van den Bergh RCN, Yuan CY, Briers E, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Cornford P, De Santis M, MacPepple E, Henry AM, Mason MD, Matveev VB, van der Poel HG, van der Kwast TH, Rouviere O, Schoots IG, Wiegel T, Lam TB, Mottet N, Joniau S. The Benefits and Harms of Different Extents of Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol. 2017 Jul;72(1):84-109. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.003. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27592524
Citation
Gilbert DR, Angell J, Abaza R. Evaluation of Absorbable Hemostatic Powder for Prevention of Lymphoceles Following Robotic Prostatectomy With Lymphadenectomy. Urology. 2016 Dec;98:75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.071. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19762048
Citation
Simonato A, Varca V, Esposito M, Venzano F, Carmignani G. The use of a surgical patch in the prevention of lymphoceles after extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer: a randomized prospective pilot study. J Urol. 2009 Nov;182(5):2285-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.033. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26730213
Citation
Lewis KM, Kuntze CE, Gulle H. Control of bleeding in surgical procedures: critical appraisal of HEMOPATCH (Sealing Hemostat). Med Devices (Auckl). 2015 Dec 22;9:1-10. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S90591. eCollection 2016.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Hemopatch to Prevent Lymphatic Leak After Robotic Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs