search
Back to results

Cetuximab as Salvage Therapy in Patients With Neo Wild-type RAS/RAF Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Liver Metastases. (CETIDYL)

Primary Purpose

Cancer Colorectal

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cetuximab
Irinotecan
Sponsored by
GCS IHFB Cognacq-Jay
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cancer Colorectal focused on measuring Liver metastasis, KRAS, NRAS

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Provision of signed and dated informed consent and stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study,
  2. Male or female subjects, ≥18 years of age,
  3. ECOG performance status (ECOG PS, Appendix 15.1) ≤2,
  4. Unresectable metastatic RAS mutant (either KRAS or NRAS tumor gene mutation) colorectal cancer,
  5. At least one (≥1) measurable and/or evaluable liver metastasis,
  6. Prior therapy (resistant or intolerant) with fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, irinotecan and antiangiogenic agent (ie, bevacizumab and/or aflibercept),
  7. Adequate hematologic and end-organ function, defined by the following laboratory test results, obtained within 14 days prior to initiation of study treatment:

    Hematological status: neutrophils (ANC) ≥1.5x109/L; platelets ≥100x109/L; haemoglobin ≥9g/dL Adequate renal function: serum creatinine clearance (MDRD) ≥ 50 mL/min/1,73 m2 Adequate liver function: serum bilirubin ≤1.5x upper normal limit (ULN), alkaline phosphatase <5xULN, AST and ALT ≤5xULN, Adequate serum electrolyte levels (magnesium, potassium, calcium) prior to initiation of study treatment,

  8. Negative pregnancy test within 7 days prior to initiation of the study drug for female patients of childbearing potential,
  9. Effective contraception for both male and female subjects if the risk of conception exists
  10. Registration in a national health care system.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known allergy or hypersensitivity reactions to any study drug,
  2. Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding,
  3. Inability to comply with study and follow-up procedures as judged by the Investigator,
  4. Patient with BRAF mutant colorectal cancer
  5. History of interstitial lung disease
  6. Treatment with strong CYP3A4-enzyme inducers such as anticonvulsants (phenytoin, phenobarbital or carbamazepine), rifampin, rifabutin and St. John's wort for patients of cohort #2
  7. Treatment with strong CYP3A4-enzyme inhibitors (e.g. grapefruit juice, clarithromycin, indinavir, itraconazole, lopinavir, nefazodone, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, telaprevir, voriconazole) for patients of cohort #2
  8. Treatment with strong UGT1A inhibitors (e.g. atazanavir, gemfibrozil, indinavir) for patients of cohort # 2
  9. Patients of cohort #2 with known UGT1A deficiency
  10. Uncontrolled illness, including but not limited to ongoing bacterial, viral or fungal infection requiring systemic therapy, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination/ clinical laboratory finding that leads to a reasonable suspicion of a disease/condition that contraindicates the use of any of investigational drugs that may affect the interpretation of the results, or that may render the subject at high risk of treatment complications.
  11. Patient with current intestinal obstruction or history of chronic inflammatory bowel disease
  12. Subjects under guardianship, curatorship or judicial protection

Sites / Locations

  • Franco-British Hospital - GCS IHFB Cognacq-JayRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Cohort #1

Cohort #2

Arm Description

Cetuximab monotherapy (500mg/m² IV, day 1)

Cetuximab and irinotecan (cetuximab 500mg/m² IV, day 1; irinotecan 180mg/m² IV, day 1).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

response rate
Tumor measurements will be obtained at baseline and every 8 weeks following treatment initiation. At the investigator's discretion, tumor assessments may be repeated at any time if progressive disease is suspected. Tumor response and progression will be assessed by the Investigator using RECIST v1.1.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Overall survival
OS is defined as the time interval from the date of inclusion to the date of death from any cause. Alive patients will be censored at the last date known to be alive, either during study treatment period or during follow-up period.
Progression-free survival
PFS is defined as the time interval from the date of inclusion to the date of first documented disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Alive patients without progression will be censored at the last tumor assessment, either during study treatment period or during follow-up period.
Disease Control rate
Disease control rate (DCR) is defined as the percentage of patients achieving CR, PR, or stable disease (SD).
Tolerance
Frequency of adverse events using NCI-CTCAE v5.0

Full Information

First Posted
November 27, 2019
Last Updated
June 9, 2023
Sponsor
GCS IHFB Cognacq-Jay
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04189055
Brief Title
Cetuximab as Salvage Therapy in Patients With Neo Wild-type RAS/RAF Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Liver Metastases.
Acronym
CETIDYL
Official Title
Cetuximab as Salvage Therapy in Patients With Neo Wild-type RAS/RAF Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Liver Metastases. A Proof-of-concept Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
January 7, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
July 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
GCS IHFB Cognacq-Jay

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of cetuximab or cetuximab-irinotecan in patients with neo wild-type colorectal cancer who have been previously treated for metastatic disease. Patients will be included in cohort #1 or cohort #2. The inclusion in cohort #2 will start when the results of the cohort #1 are available. Patient will receive either cetuximab alone (cohort #1) or cetuximab with irinotecan (cohort #2).
Detailed Description
Background - Rationale KRAS and NRAS mutations are present in roughly 50% of patients with advanced colorectal cancer and predict failure of anti-EGFR mabs therapies, thus genotyping colorectal cancer (CRC) is mandatory for personalized treatments. Research has been selectively concentrated on the emergence of resistant clones in the blood of patients with wild-type (WT) RAS CRC as biomarker of anti-EGFR therapy resistance. It has been suggested that patients with metastatic CRC harboring mutated primary tumors, thus not candidate to EGFR inhibitors, frequently have WT RAS circulating tumor cells in blood. Preliminary data suggest that patients with mutant KRAS colon cancer can frequently (50%) switch to a prevalent WT KRAS disease in course of treatment with anti-angiogenic drugs. In patients with RAS wild-type colorectal cancer who previously received standard therapies, anti-EGFR mabs achieve a response rate of 20% as monotherapy and 30-40% in combination with irinotecan. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of cetuximab in patients with pretreated neo wild-type colorectal cancer using liquid biopsies for RAS molecular assessment Study Objectives Primary: • To evaluate the response rate using RECIST 1.1 Secondary: To evaluate progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) To evaluate disease control rate (DCR) To evaluate safety Exploratory: Frequency of neo wild-type tumors Frequency of RAS and BRAF neomutations during treatment Study Design Prospective multicentric single-arm open-label phase II study in to 2 successive patient cohorts (cohort #1 followed by cohort #2). Molecular screening using Idylla™ (Biocartis) ctKRAS and ctNRAS/BRAF Mutation Assays. Cohort #1: Patients will be treated with cetuximab monotherapy (cetuximab 500mg/m² IV, day 1). Cohort #2: Patients will be treated with cetuximab and irinotecan (cetuximab 500mg/m² IV, day 1; irinotecan 180mg/m² IV, day 1). In both cohorts, treatment will be given intravenously every 14 days (q2w) until disease progression or limiting toxicity. Tumor evaluations will be done with CT-scan (or MRI) every 8 weeks using RECIST v1.1.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cancer Colorectal
Keywords
Liver metastasis, KRAS, NRAS

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
72 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Cohort #1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Cetuximab monotherapy (500mg/m² IV, day 1)
Arm Title
Cohort #2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Cetuximab and irinotecan (cetuximab 500mg/m² IV, day 1; irinotecan 180mg/m² IV, day 1).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cetuximab
Other Intervention Name(s)
Erbitux
Intervention Description
Cetuximab 500mg/m² IV, day 1
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Irinotecan
Other Intervention Name(s)
Campto
Intervention Description
Irinotecan 180mg/m² IV, day 1
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
response rate
Description
Tumor measurements will be obtained at baseline and every 8 weeks following treatment initiation. At the investigator's discretion, tumor assessments may be repeated at any time if progressive disease is suspected. Tumor response and progression will be assessed by the Investigator using RECIST v1.1.
Time Frame
4 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall survival
Description
OS is defined as the time interval from the date of inclusion to the date of death from any cause. Alive patients will be censored at the last date known to be alive, either during study treatment period or during follow-up period.
Time Frame
time interval from inclusion to the date of death from any cause. Assessed up to 12 months after the beginning of the study
Title
Progression-free survival
Description
PFS is defined as the time interval from the date of inclusion to the date of first documented disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Alive patients without progression will be censored at the last tumor assessment, either during study treatment period or during follow-up period.
Time Frame
the time interval from inclusion to the date of first documented disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Assessed up to 12 months after the beginning of the study
Title
Disease Control rate
Description
Disease control rate (DCR) is defined as the percentage of patients achieving CR, PR, or stable disease (SD).
Time Frame
from baseline until end of treatment, assessed up to 12 months after the beginning of the study
Title
Tolerance
Description
Frequency of adverse events using NCI-CTCAE v5.0
Time Frame
Assessed from study entry to 1 month after last study drug administration, assessed up to 12 months after the beginning of the study
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Tumor biomarkers
Description
Tumor biomarkers will be tested : mismatch repair system (pMMR vs dMMR), HER1 (EGFR expression), HER2 expression, amphiregulin (AREG) and HER1 (EGFR GCN, cut-off 4.0), HER2, PI3KCA, PTEN, IRS2,
Time Frame
Assessed from study entry to end of study treatment, assessed up to 12 months after the beginning of the study

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Provision of signed and dated informed consent and stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study, Male or female subjects, ≥18 years of age, ECOG performance status (ECOG PS, Appendix 15.1) ≤2, Unresectable metastatic RAS mutant (either KRAS or NRAS tumor gene mutation) colorectal cancer, At least one (≥1) measurable and/or evaluable liver metastasis, Prior therapy (resistant or intolerant) with fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, irinotecan and antiangiogenic agent (ie, bevacizumab and/or aflibercept), Adequate hematologic and end-organ function, defined by the following laboratory test results, obtained within 14 days prior to initiation of study treatment: Hematological status: neutrophils (ANC) ≥1.5x109/L; platelets ≥100x109/L; haemoglobin ≥9g/dL Adequate renal function: serum creatinine clearance (MDRD) ≥ 50 mL/min/1,73 m2 Adequate liver function: serum bilirubin ≤1.5x upper normal limit (ULN), alkaline phosphatase <5xULN, AST and ALT ≤5xULN, Adequate serum electrolyte levels (magnesium, potassium, calcium) prior to initiation of study treatment, Negative pregnancy test within 7 days prior to initiation of the study drug for female patients of childbearing potential, Effective contraception for both male and female subjects if the risk of conception exists Registration in a national health care system. Exclusion Criteria: Known allergy or hypersensitivity reactions to any study drug, Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding, Inability to comply with study and follow-up procedures as judged by the Investigator, Patient with BRAF mutant colorectal cancer History of interstitial lung disease Treatment with strong CYP3A4-enzyme inducers such as anticonvulsants (phenytoin, phenobarbital or carbamazepine), rifampin, rifabutin and St. John's wort for patients of cohort #2 Treatment with strong CYP3A4-enzyme inhibitors (e.g. grapefruit juice, clarithromycin, indinavir, itraconazole, lopinavir, nefazodone, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, telaprevir, voriconazole) for patients of cohort #2 Treatment with strong UGT1A inhibitors (e.g. atazanavir, gemfibrozil, indinavir) for patients of cohort # 2 Patients of cohort #2 with known UGT1A deficiency Uncontrolled illness, including but not limited to ongoing bacterial, viral or fungal infection requiring systemic therapy, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination/ clinical laboratory finding that leads to a reasonable suspicion of a disease/condition that contraindicates the use of any of investigational drugs that may affect the interpretation of the results, or that may render the subject at high risk of treatment complications. Patient with current intestinal obstruction or history of chronic inflammatory bowel disease Subjects under guardianship, curatorship or judicial protection
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Benoist CHIBAUDEL, MD
Phone
0147595965
Ext
33
Email
benoist.chibaudel@ihfb.org
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Benoist CHIBAUDEL, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Franco-British Hospital - GCS IHFB Cognacq-Jay
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Franco-British Hospital - GCS IHFB Cognacq-Jay
City
Levallois-Perret
ZIP/Postal Code
92300
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
18316791
Citation
Amado RG, Wolf M, Peeters M, Van Cutsem E, Siena S, Freeman DJ, Juan T, Sikorski R, Suggs S, Radinsky R, Patterson SD, Chang DD. Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 1;26(10):1626-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.7116. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23041588
Citation
Andre T, Blons H, Mabro M, Chibaudel B, Bachet JB, Tournigand C, Bennamoun M, Artru P, Nguyen S, Ebenezer C, Aissat N, Cayre A, Penault-Llorca F, Laurent-Puig P, de Gramont A; GERCOR. Panitumumab combined with irinotecan for patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy: a GERCOR efficacy, tolerance, and translational molecular study. Ann Oncol. 2013 Feb;24(2):412-419. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds465. Epub 2012 Oct 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30207593
Citation
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12. Erratum In: CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jul;70(4):313.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15269313
Citation
Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S, Khayat D, Bleiberg H, Santoro A, Bets D, Mueser M, Harstrick A, Verslype C, Chau I, Van Cutsem E. Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jul 22;351(4):337-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa033025.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25319061
Citation
Elez E, Kocakova I, Hohler T, Martens UM, Bokemeyer C, Van Cutsem E, Melichar B, Smakal M, Csoszi T, Topuzov E, Orlova R, Tjulandin S, Rivera F, Straub J, Bruns R, Quaratino S, Tabernero J. Abituzumab combined with cetuximab plus irinotecan versus cetuximab plus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: the randomised phase I/II POSEIDON trial. Ann Oncol. 2015 Jan;26(1):132-140. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu474. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17671985
Citation
Hecht JR, Patnaik A, Berlin J, Venook A, Malik I, Tchekmedyian S, Navale L, Amado RG, Meropol NJ. Panitumumab monotherapy in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer. 2007 Sep 1;110(5):980-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22915.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18003960
Citation
Jonker DJ, O'Callaghan CJ, Karapetis CS, Zalcberg JR, Tu D, Au HJ, Berry SR, Krahn M, Price T, Simes RJ, Tebbutt NC, van Hazel G, Wierzbicki R, Langer C, Moore MJ. Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 15;357(20):2040-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071834.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18946061
Citation
Karapetis CS, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker DJ, O'Callaghan CJ, Tu D, Tebbutt NC, Simes RJ, Chalchal H, Shapiro JD, Robitaille S, Price TJ, Shepherd L, Au HJ, Langer C, Moore MJ, Zalcberg JR. K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 23;359(17):1757-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804385.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18281264
Citation
Pfeiffer P, Nielsen D, Bjerregaard J, Qvortrup C, Yilmaz M, Jensen B. Biweekly cetuximab and irinotecan as third-line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer after failure to irinotecan, oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Ann Oncol. 2008 Jun;19(6):1141-5. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn020. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Cetuximab as Salvage Therapy in Patients With Neo Wild-type RAS/RAF Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Liver Metastases.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs