search
Back to results

Changes in Radicular Pain and Pain Modulation

Primary Purpose

Back Pain, Back Pain With Radiation

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Pressure pain assessment using computer controlled cuff algometry
Temporal summation (TS)
Conditioned pain modulation (CPM)
Low back pain rating scale (LBPRS-pain)
Oswestry Disability Index
Sponsored by
Spine Centre of Southern Denmark
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional basic science trial for Back Pain focused on measuring low back pain, radiculopathy, conditioned pain modulation, temporal summation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 60 Years (Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Patient group

  • Radiating leg pain due to nerve root compression verified by MRI
  • Clinical findings in accordance with MRI findings
  • Average leg pain ≥ 3/10 on a numeric pain rating scale Controls
  • No current or previous history of ongoing musculoskeletal pain

Exclusion Criteria:

Applies for both groups.

  • Other specific medical conditions e.g. rheumatologic disease, diabetes or vascular diseases.
  • Pregnancy

Sites / Locations

  • Spine Centre of Southern Denmark

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Radiculopathy due to nerve root compression

Healthy controls

Arm Description

Participants with radicular leg pain due to lumbar disc herniation or to foraminal- or recess stenosis. Baseline assessments of pain intensities are performed through questionnaires prior to protocol. Data regarding initial pain, function, age, gender, pain-duration, weight and height is retrieved from the clinical registry SpineData. Pain sensitivity, temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation are assessed at the first visit in the treatment program. The protocol is repeated at the last visit in the treatment program.

Healthy controls Healthy age and gender-matched controls. Gender, weight and height are registered on questionnaires prior to protocol. Pain sensitivity, temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation are assessed at the first visit. The tests are repeated at the next visit. The interval between the two sessions will be determined by the averaged interval between tests in the patient group.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Cuff sensitivity, measured with computer-controlled cuff algometry
Change in pain sensitivity between baseline and follow-up. Cuff is placed around the lower leg and on the upper arm and gradually inflated (1kPa/sec) on each location separately. In patients, the cuff is placed on the non-painful leg and left upper arm, in healthy controls, half of the participants the cuff is placed on the left leg and half on the right leg, while the other cuff is placed on the left upper arm. First, the pressure needed to evoke an onset of pain (pain detection threshold, PDT), the pressure at pain intensity VAS 6 (Measured on an electronic visual analogue scale: 0=No pain, 10=worst pain imaginable pain) and pain tolerance threshold (PTT) is assessed on the lower leg. Secondly, the PDT and the PTT is assessed on the left upper arm.
Temporal summation of pain (increase in pain during repeated pain stimuli at same intensity) measured with computer-controlled cuff algometry
Change in pain intensity between baseline and follow-up. Cuff is placed on the lower leg. In patients the non-painful leg is used, in healthy controls, half of the participants will be tested on the left leg and half on the right leg. 10 painful stimuli are performed with a one-second interval in between. After each stimulus, the participant rates the pain intensities using an electronic VAS ( 0=No pain, 10=worst pain imaginable pain). The increase in pain intensity is defined as temporal summation.
Conditioned pain modulation (change in pain sensitivity during a competing pain stimulus) measured with computer-controlled cuff algometry
Change in pain intensity between baseline and follow-up. Cuff is placed on the lower leg. In patients the non-painful leg is used, in healthy controls, half of the participants will be tested on the left leg and half on the right leg. 10 painful stimuli are performed with a one-second interval in between. After each stimulus, the participant rates the pain intensities using an electronic VAS ( 0=No pain, 10=worst pain imaginable pain). The increase in pain intensity is defined as temporal summation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Leg pain (measured on the low back pain rating scale)
Change in pain between post-treatment and pre-treatment. The average pain during the last two weeks, the worst pain experienced during the same period and current pain is rated by the patient. Range 0-30. 0=no pain, 30= Worst pain imaginable.
Back pain and leg pain (measured on the low back pain rating scale)
Change in pain between post-treatment and pre-treatment. Low back pain rating scale (LBPRS - pain): Two questionnaires with three numeric 11-point box scales (0-10) regarding low back pain and leg pain respectively. The average pain during the last two weeks, the worst pain experienced during the same period and current pain is rated by the patient. Range 0-60. 0=no pain, 60= Worst pain imaginable.
Disability (Measured on the Oswestry Disability index)
Change in disability between post-treatment and pretreatment. Range 0-100, 0= No disability, 100 maximum disability possible.

Full Information

First Posted
November 24, 2019
Last Updated
May 6, 2022
Sponsor
Spine Centre of Southern Denmark
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04193969
Brief Title
Changes in Radicular Pain and Pain Modulation
Official Title
The Association Between Changes in Radicular Pain and Pain Modulation Among Patients With Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Pilot Study.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 1, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 21, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Spine Centre of Southern Denmark

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The objectives of this study are: 1)To investigate the difference in pain modulatory mechanisms using quantitative sensory testing (QST) between healthy controls and patients with radicular leg pain due to nerve root compression. 2) To investigate the association between changes in radiating leg pain and pain modulation among the patient group.
Detailed Description
Few studies have investigated pain modulatory mechanisms using QST in patients with lumbar radiculopathy due to nerve root compression. Knowledge about the association between changes in the experience of pain and changes measures of pain modulation is to our knowledge limited. The results could potentially contribute to knowledge about mechanisms involved in lumbar radiculopathy and facilitate future studies. The hypotheses of the study are: 1) Measures of pain modulation will be less efficient among patients with lumbar radiculopathy showing reduced pain inhibition and facilitated temporal summation compared to healthy controls. 2) Improvements in pain modulation will be associated with improvements in clinical pain outcomes

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Back Pain, Back Pain With Radiation
Keywords
low back pain, radiculopathy, conditioned pain modulation, temporal summation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
The study has a cohort design and will include a patient group (male and female) attending a treatment program at the Spine Centre of Southern Denmark and an equally large control group matched on age and gender.
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
The participants are not informed about test results during or after the sessions. The test equipment is computer controlled and user independent.
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
80 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Radiculopathy due to nerve root compression
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants with radicular leg pain due to lumbar disc herniation or to foraminal- or recess stenosis. Baseline assessments of pain intensities are performed through questionnaires prior to protocol. Data regarding initial pain, function, age, gender, pain-duration, weight and height is retrieved from the clinical registry SpineData. Pain sensitivity, temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation are assessed at the first visit in the treatment program. The protocol is repeated at the last visit in the treatment program.
Arm Title
Healthy controls
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Healthy controls Healthy age and gender-matched controls. Gender, weight and height are registered on questionnaires prior to protocol. Pain sensitivity, temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation are assessed at the first visit. The tests are repeated at the next visit. The interval between the two sessions will be determined by the averaged interval between tests in the patient group.
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
Pressure pain assessment using computer controlled cuff algometry
Other Intervention Name(s)
Assessment of pain sensitivity
Intervention Description
Pressure pain sensitivity is assessed. The pressure is gradually increased and pain is rated by the participant on an electronic visual analogue pain rating scale (VAS) which is connected to the equipment. The assessment is performed on the lower leg and the upper arm. The pain free leg and the left upper arm is used in the patient group. The leg used in the control group will be chosen in a balanced manner meaning that half will receive pressure on the left leg and the other half on the right leg. The pain detection threshold (PDT), pain pressure tolerance threshold (PPT) and pressure pain intensity perceived as 6 on the VAS (VAS6) at the leg site is registered. The PDT and PPT on the arm site is registered.
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
Temporal summation (TS)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Repeated pressure pain
Intervention Description
10 repeated inflations on the lower leg with a 1 sec interval. The pressure used at each pressure is equivalent the PPT measured at baseline. Each inflation is rated on the VAS. TS is registered as the increase pain intensity.
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
Conditioned pain modulation (CPM)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Pain inhibition
Intervention Description
The cuff on the upper arm is inflated until 70% of the PPT is reached. While the pressure on the arm is kept constant the cuff on the leg is inflated. PDT, PPT and VAS6 pressure at the leg site is registered during the tonic stimulation (pressure on the left arm). The procedure on the leg is repeated within 30 seconds after the pressure is released on the arm site.
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
Low back pain rating scale (LBPRS-pain)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Pain intensity
Intervention Description
A questionnaire measuring the intensities of low back pain and leg pain currently, on average the last two weeks and the worst pain within the same period.
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
Oswestry Disability Index
Other Intervention Name(s)
Disability
Intervention Description
A questionnaire measuring the disability in relation to low back pain and leg pain.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cuff sensitivity, measured with computer-controlled cuff algometry
Description
Change in pain sensitivity between baseline and follow-up. Cuff is placed around the lower leg and on the upper arm and gradually inflated (1kPa/sec) on each location separately. In patients, the cuff is placed on the non-painful leg and left upper arm, in healthy controls, half of the participants the cuff is placed on the left leg and half on the right leg, while the other cuff is placed on the left upper arm. First, the pressure needed to evoke an onset of pain (pain detection threshold, PDT), the pressure at pain intensity VAS 6 (Measured on an electronic visual analogue scale: 0=No pain, 10=worst pain imaginable pain) and pain tolerance threshold (PTT) is assessed on the lower leg. Secondly, the PDT and the PTT is assessed on the left upper arm.
Time Frame
At baseline and at discharge from treatment throughout study completion, an average of 6 months. The timeframe between the baseline test and follow up test for controls will be matched the patient group.
Title
Temporal summation of pain (increase in pain during repeated pain stimuli at same intensity) measured with computer-controlled cuff algometry
Description
Change in pain intensity between baseline and follow-up. Cuff is placed on the lower leg. In patients the non-painful leg is used, in healthy controls, half of the participants will be tested on the left leg and half on the right leg. 10 painful stimuli are performed with a one-second interval in between. After each stimulus, the participant rates the pain intensities using an electronic VAS ( 0=No pain, 10=worst pain imaginable pain). The increase in pain intensity is defined as temporal summation.
Time Frame
At baseline and at discharge from treatment throughout study completion, an average of 6 months. The timeframe between the baseline test and follow up test for controls will be matched the patient group.
Title
Conditioned pain modulation (change in pain sensitivity during a competing pain stimulus) measured with computer-controlled cuff algometry
Description
Change in pain intensity between baseline and follow-up. Cuff is placed on the lower leg. In patients the non-painful leg is used, in healthy controls, half of the participants will be tested on the left leg and half on the right leg. 10 painful stimuli are performed with a one-second interval in between. After each stimulus, the participant rates the pain intensities using an electronic VAS ( 0=No pain, 10=worst pain imaginable pain). The increase in pain intensity is defined as temporal summation.
Time Frame
At baseline and at discharge from treatment throughout study completion, an average of 6 months. The timeframe between the baseline test and follow up test for controls will be matched the patient group.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Leg pain (measured on the low back pain rating scale)
Description
Change in pain between post-treatment and pre-treatment. The average pain during the last two weeks, the worst pain experienced during the same period and current pain is rated by the patient. Range 0-30. 0=no pain, 30= Worst pain imaginable.
Time Frame
At baseline and at discharge from treatment throughout study completion, an average of 6 months.
Title
Back pain and leg pain (measured on the low back pain rating scale)
Description
Change in pain between post-treatment and pre-treatment. Low back pain rating scale (LBPRS - pain): Two questionnaires with three numeric 11-point box scales (0-10) regarding low back pain and leg pain respectively. The average pain during the last two weeks, the worst pain experienced during the same period and current pain is rated by the patient. Range 0-60. 0=no pain, 60= Worst pain imaginable.
Time Frame
At baseline and at discharge from treatment throughout study completion, an average of 6 months.
Title
Disability (Measured on the Oswestry Disability index)
Description
Change in disability between post-treatment and pretreatment. Range 0-100, 0= No disability, 100 maximum disability possible.
Time Frame
At baseline and at discharge from treatment throughout study completion, an average of 6 months.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient group Radiating leg pain due to nerve root compression verified by MRI Clinical findings in accordance with MRI findings Average leg pain ≥ 3/10 on a numeric pain rating scale Controls No current or previous history of ongoing musculoskeletal pain Exclusion Criteria: Applies for both groups. Other specific medical conditions e.g. rheumatologic disease, diabetes or vascular diseases. Pregnancy
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Berit Schiøtzz-Christensen, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
Research department of Spine Center of Southern Denmark
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Spine Centre of Southern Denmark
City
Middelfart
ZIP/Postal Code
5500
Country
Denmark

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28344100
Citation
Vaegter HB, Palsson TS, Graven-Nielsen T. Facilitated Pronociceptive Pain Mechanisms in Radiating Back Pain Compared With Localized Back Pain. J Pain. 2017 Aug;18(8):973-983. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28575334
Citation
Mehta V, Snidvongs S, Ghai B, Langford R, Wodehouse T. Characterization of peripheral and central sensitization after dorsal root ganglion intervention in patients with unilateral lumbosacral radicular pain: a prospective pilot study. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Jun 1;118(6):924-931. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex089.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25789433
Citation
Yarnitsky D. Role of endogenous pain modulation in chronic pain mechanisms and treatment. Pain. 2015 Apr;156 Suppl 1:S24-S31. doi: 10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460343.46847.58.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27859944
Citation
Graven-Nielsen T, Izumi M, Petersen KK, Arendt-Nielsen L. User-independent assessment of conditioning pain modulation by cuff pressure algometry. Eur J Pain. 2017 Mar;21(3):552-561. doi: 10.1002/ejp.958. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26172551
Citation
Graven-Nielsen T, Vaegter HB, Finocchietti S, Handberg G, Arendt-Nielsen L. Assessment of musculoskeletal pain sensitivity and temporal summation by cuff pressure algometry: a reliability study. Pain. 2015 Nov;156(11):2193-2202. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000294.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Changes in Radicular Pain and Pain Modulation

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs