A Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Course for Orthopedic Surgery Residents
Primary Purpose
Tendon Disorder
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ultrasound education curriculum
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional other trial for Tendon Disorder focused on measuring point of care ultrasound, musculoskeletal ultrasound, sonography, resident education, orthopaedic surgery, online curriculum
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Be an orthopedic surgery resident
- Training at the University of Manitoba
- Post-graduate year (PGY) one to five
Exclusion Criteria:
- Residents having less than six months of training left before graduation
- Residents on extended leave (for example: completing graduate studies abroad, parental leave, and sabbatical)
Sites / Locations
- University of Manitoba
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Teaching arm
Arm Description
This group received the teaching intervention and was evaluated before and after the intervention. Improvement was compared to their performance prior to the intervention.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change in Musculoskeletal ultrasound knowledge after the course
A 13 questions written examination was given to the residents using an online platform at each endpoint. The exam covered the basics of ultrasound physics; how to use the machine; the normal and pathologic appearance of tendons, ligaments, and muscles; and ultrasound appearance of the musculoskeletal anatomy described in the course. The score was reported on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 being the best score.
Change in Musculoskeletal ultrasound knowledge at 6 months
A 13 questions written examination was given to the residents using an online platform at each endpoint. The exam covered the basics of ultrasound physics; how to use the machine; the normal and pathologic appearance of tendons, ligaments, and muscles; and ultrasound appearance of the musculoskeletal anatomy described in the course. The score was reported on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 being the best score.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Practical shoulder ultrasound exam
Each participant underwent a practical examination assessing ultrasound proficiency at each endpoint. The residents were assessed by one of the author of the study on their ability to perform a shoulder ultrasound exam as well as the different tasks related to the MSK-US. For each task, the assessor rated the participant on a scale of 0 to 2, where :
0 means an inability to perform the task,
1 means the task is only partially completed,
2 means that the task that is performed correctly.
The final score was then be calculated and reported in percentage (with 100 being a perfect score) for the analysis.
Ultrasound comfort in clinical setting
A questionnaire covering different aspect of ultrasound use by the residents was given using the online platform at each endpoint. The questionnaire inquired about the comfort level when using MSK-US for different examinations and procedure (Numeric Analog Scale from 0 to 10, with 0 being very uncomfortable and 10 being very comfortable). Each numeric analog scale was reported independently and not compound score was created:
Setting up the ultrasound machine
Choosing the appropriate probe
Adjusting the depth and contrast
Diagnosing a ligament, tendon, muscle, nerve, or bone injury
Performing a joint injection or aspiration
Performing an injection or aspiration in any other region than a joint
Guiding the reduction of a fracture in the forearm
Guiding the reduction of any other fracture than the forearm
Performing ultrasound in general
Ultrasound use in clinical setting
The questionnaire inquired about the number of time ultrasound was used in the last 6 months for different examinations and procedures. This was reported as an absolute number for each aspect of ultrasound use:
Diagnosing a ligament, tendon, muscle, nerve, or bone injury
Performing a joint injection or aspiration
Performing an injection or aspiration of any other region than a joint
Guiding the reduction of a fracture in the adult patient
Guiding the reduction of a pediatric fracture
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04204369
First Posted
December 15, 2019
Last Updated
December 17, 2019
Sponsor
Université de Sherbrooke
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04204369
Brief Title
A Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Course for Orthopedic Surgery Residents
Official Title
Usefulness of a Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Course in an Orthopedic Surgery Residency Training Program
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 6, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 6, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 6, 2018 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Université de Sherbrooke
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
A group of orthopedic surgery residents underwent a structured online and practical musculoskeletal ultrasound course. Their proficiency on a written and practical exam, as well as frequency and comfort when using was recorded prior to the course, immediately after, and 6 months after the course.
Detailed Description
Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK-US) can have many uses for orthopedic surgeons, such as assisting in clinical diagnosis for muscle, tendon and ligament injuries, providing direct guidance for joint injections, or assessing the adequacy of a reduction in the emergency department. However, proficiency in sonography is not a requirement for certification in orthopedic surgery in Canada, and orthopedic trainees are rarely exposed to the subject. This project aims assess the usefulness in clinical education of a newly implemented MSK-US course in an orthopedic surgery program.
An MSK-US course for orthopedic surgery residents has been developed. An online survey covering the level of training of the resident, their prior experience with ultrasound (number of times used by month) and their comfort level with different parts of the examination (numeric analog scale - NAS), was filled by the participants prior to the course. A pre-course written and practical test was also given to the residents. Following the course, the participants were reassessed with the same tests and surveys on the same day as the course, and at 6 months post. Change in frequency of use, comfort level and test scores were assessed using a Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and post-hoc Wilcoxon tests.
It was expected that residents' frequency of use, comfort level and tests scores would improve following the implementation of the course. The results were expected to be maintained at the 6 months endpoint.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tendon Disorder
Keywords
point of care ultrasound, musculoskeletal ultrasound, sonography, resident education, orthopaedic surgery, online curriculum
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
One group receiving intervention. Assessement prior to intervention, immediately after, and at 6 months.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
10 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Teaching arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
This group received the teaching intervention and was evaluated before and after the intervention. Improvement was compared to their performance prior to the intervention.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Ultrasound education curriculum
Intervention Description
Participants were enrolled in a musculoskeletal ultrasound course including 2 components:
An online course (1-2 hours) to be done before the practical session. The videos were made available one (1) month prior to the practical course. This component reviewed the basics of ultrasonography, as well as the normal and abnormal appearance of relevant musculoskeletal structures (bone, tendon, ligaments, muscles, bursas, and nerves), and the ultrasound anatomy of high yield regions of the musculoskeletal system (shoulder, elbow, knee, ankle)
A practical session (4-6 hours) done during one of the usual academic days of the orthopedic residency program. This session covered the use of the ultrasound; the examination of the shoulder, elbow, knee, and ankle; ultrasound-guided musculoskeletal injections and aspirations; and ultrasound-guided distal radius fracture reductions. Ample practice time was given to the residents using means such as phantom models, cadavers, and real patients.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Musculoskeletal ultrasound knowledge after the course
Description
A 13 questions written examination was given to the residents using an online platform at each endpoint. The exam covered the basics of ultrasound physics; how to use the machine; the normal and pathologic appearance of tendons, ligaments, and muscles; and ultrasound appearance of the musculoskeletal anatomy described in the course. The score was reported on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 being the best score.
Time Frame
Before the course (within a month), immediately after the course (same day)
Title
Change in Musculoskeletal ultrasound knowledge at 6 months
Description
A 13 questions written examination was given to the residents using an online platform at each endpoint. The exam covered the basics of ultrasound physics; how to use the machine; the normal and pathologic appearance of tendons, ligaments, and muscles; and ultrasound appearance of the musculoskeletal anatomy described in the course. The score was reported on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 being the best score.
Time Frame
Before the course (within a month), 6 months after the course
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Practical shoulder ultrasound exam
Description
Each participant underwent a practical examination assessing ultrasound proficiency at each endpoint. The residents were assessed by one of the author of the study on their ability to perform a shoulder ultrasound exam as well as the different tasks related to the MSK-US. For each task, the assessor rated the participant on a scale of 0 to 2, where :
0 means an inability to perform the task,
1 means the task is only partially completed,
2 means that the task that is performed correctly.
The final score was then be calculated and reported in percentage (with 100 being a perfect score) for the analysis.
Time Frame
Immediately after the course (same day), 6 months after the course
Title
Ultrasound comfort in clinical setting
Description
A questionnaire covering different aspect of ultrasound use by the residents was given using the online platform at each endpoint. The questionnaire inquired about the comfort level when using MSK-US for different examinations and procedure (Numeric Analog Scale from 0 to 10, with 0 being very uncomfortable and 10 being very comfortable). Each numeric analog scale was reported independently and not compound score was created:
Setting up the ultrasound machine
Choosing the appropriate probe
Adjusting the depth and contrast
Diagnosing a ligament, tendon, muscle, nerve, or bone injury
Performing a joint injection or aspiration
Performing an injection or aspiration in any other region than a joint
Guiding the reduction of a fracture in the forearm
Guiding the reduction of any other fracture than the forearm
Performing ultrasound in general
Time Frame
Before the course (within a month), 6 months after the course
Title
Ultrasound use in clinical setting
Description
The questionnaire inquired about the number of time ultrasound was used in the last 6 months for different examinations and procedures. This was reported as an absolute number for each aspect of ultrasound use:
Diagnosing a ligament, tendon, muscle, nerve, or bone injury
Performing a joint injection or aspiration
Performing an injection or aspiration of any other region than a joint
Guiding the reduction of a fracture in the adult patient
Guiding the reduction of a pediatric fracture
Time Frame
Before the course (within a month), 6 months after the course
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Socio-demographic questionnaire
Description
This questionnaire was presented to participants once at the moment of their inclusion in the study. It covered the residents' level of training (post-graduate year), age, sex, the amount of prior exposure to ultrasound (in approximate hours), and the different settings in which the residents have been exposed to MSK-US.
Time Frame
Before the course (within a month)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Be an orthopedic surgery resident
Training at the University of Manitoba
Post-graduate year (PGY) one to five
Exclusion Criteria:
Residents having less than six months of training left before graduation
Residents on extended leave (for example: completing graduate studies abroad, parental leave, and sabbatical)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Samuel Larrivee, MD-MSc
Organizational Affiliation
University of Manitoba
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Manitoba
City
Winnipeg
State/Province
Manitoba
ZIP/Postal Code
R3A1R9
Country
Canada
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
IPD will not be shared to other researcher. Because of the small size of the orthopedic surgery program, sharing IPD would make identification of individuals unavoidable.
Learn more about this trial
A Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Course for Orthopedic Surgery Residents
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs