Enhancing Abilities in Amputees and Patients With Peripheral Neuropathy Through Restoration of Sensory Feedback
Primary Purpose
Lower Limb Amputation Knee, Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury), Lower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury)
Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Switzerland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Sensory Feedback
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional supportive care trial for Lower Limb Amputation Knee
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- transfemoral amputation or transtibial amputation or knee disarticulation or diabetic peripheral neuropathy
- the subject should be healthy other than the amputation and the diabetic neuropathy and in the range of 18-70 years old
- the subject should be able to comfortably walk, sit and stand alone
Exclusion Criteria:
- cognitive impairment
- pregnancy
- Prior or current psychological diseases such as borderline, schizophrenia, Depression or Maniac Depression
- acquired brain injury with residual impairment
- excessive sensitivity or pain to electrical stimulation with surface electrodes
- cybersickness
Sites / Locations
- ETH ZurichRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
experimental group
Arm Description
amputees or diabetics receiving intervention
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change from baseline in Visual Analogue scale for pain throughout the study
Subjects will complete VAS scale to measure pain level (from 0 to 10, 10 is worst pain immaginable)
Change between tasks with sensory feedback and with no sensory feedback in Ground Reaction Forces
GRF will be assessed during motor perfomances of the subjects
Change between tasks with sensory feedback and with no sensory feedback in Centre of Mass and Pressure
CoM and CoP will be assessed during motor perfomances of the subjects
Change from baseline and between tasks with sensory feedback and with no sensory feedback in Vo2 consumption
metabolic consumption is going to be measured with mobile spiroergometry and compared after walking with and without sensory feedback
Change from baseline between tasks with sensory feedback and with no sensory feedback in Embodiment
Embodiment will be measured with questionnaires (from -3 to +3, +3 totally agrees; two questions are from 1 to 10 (to measure vividness, where 10 is max vividness) and from 1 to 100 (to measure prevalence, where 100 is max duration of the embodiment feeling))
Change between tasks with sensory feedback and with no sensory feedback in Visual Analogue scale for confidence
Subjects will complete VAS scale to measure confidence level (from 0 to 10, where 10 is max confidence)
Change between tasks with sensory feedback and with no sensory feedback in Joint torque
kinematic measurement
Change in Proprioceptive drift between different conditions
To measure embodiment subjects will be asked after VR sessions to indicate where they feel their leg without looking at the limb in real world. This is a measure of embodiment.
Change in Telescoping measures between different conditions
To measure embodiment subjects will be asked after VR sessions to indicate how long they feel their leg without looking at the limb in real world. This is a measure of embodiment.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experiences Scales
Subjects will fill the TAPES to measure their satisfaction with the prosthesis (Scores range from 5 to 25, with higher scores indicating greater levels of adjustment)
Change in Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders
QoL will be assessed through questionnaires to see if the intevention had impact on this aspect (All Neuro-QOL banks and scales are scored such that a high score reflects more of what is being measured)
Amputee Mobility Predictor
Subjects will perform AMPRO to assess K level (scores range from 0 to 47, correspoding to levels of mobility from 1(K1) to 4(K4), where 4 is the best level of mobility)
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04217005
Brief Title
Enhancing Abilities in Amputees and Patients With Peripheral Neuropathy Through Restoration of Sensory Feedback
Official Title
Enhancing Functional and Cognitive Performances in People With Amputation and Peripheral Neuropathy Through the Restoration of Sensory Feedback in Real World and Virtual Reality Environments
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
December 13, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 15, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
January 15, 2024 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
ETH Zurich
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Many amputees suffer from Phantom Limb Pain (PLP), a condition where painful perceptions arise from the missing limb. Leg amputees wear prostheses that do not provide any sensory feedback, apart from the stump-socket interaction. Increased physical effort associated with prosthesis use as well as discomfort often lead to rejection of artificial limbs. Additionally, the perception of the missing limb and its brain representation, do not match-up with what amputees see (the prosthesis) and this is made worse by the absence of sensory feedback. Therefore, re-establishing the sensory flow of information between the subject's brain and the prosthetic device is extremely important to avoid this mismatch, which creates inadequate embodiment. This study focuses on improving functional abilities and decreasing PLP in amputees thanks to the use of a system able to generate a sensory feedback (SF), which will be provided with a non-invasive electrical stimulation (ES). First, the possibility of enhancing the performance in different functional tasks thanks to the use of SF will be explored. Furthermore, it will be evaluated if SF enhances the prosthesis embodiment and helps restoring a multisensory integration (visuo-tactile), potentially providing also a pain relief. Once tested this system on amputees, also people with peripheral neuropathy and sensory loss will be recruited. Diabetic patients can suffer from symmetrical polyneuropathy (DSPN), which is a common complication caused by prolonged glucose unbalanced levels that lead to nerve damage. Non-invasive ES has been proposed and used as a therapy to treat the chronic pain conditions. In particular, TENS (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) is a type of non-invasive ES, which is able to activate large diameter afferent fibers. The gate control theory of pain states that these large diameter fibers inhibit central nociceptive transmission with a resultant decrease in pain perception. Therefore, also these patients will be recruited to see whether adding a non-invasive SF can enhance their functional motor abilities while diminishing their pain.
The subjects will perform a pool of the following tasks, depending on their residual abilities: motor tasks (walking on ground level and on stairs), cognitive tasks (dual tasks), subjective evaluation of prosthesis weight and description of sensations from ES.
Some tasks will be performed in Virtual Reality environments with and without an active stimulation.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Lower Limb Amputation Knee, Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury), Lower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury), Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
20 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
experimental group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
amputees or diabetics receiving intervention
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sensory Feedback
Intervention Description
Subjects will receive a sensory feedback provided by electrical stimulation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change from baseline in Visual Analogue scale for pain throughout the study
Description
Subjects will complete VAS scale to measure pain level (from 0 to 10, 10 is worst pain immaginable)
Time Frame
one month before the study, 2 weeks before the study, immediately before the intervention, immediately after the intervento, after tasks with and without sensory feedback, 2 weeks after last intervention, 1 month after last intervention
Title
Change between tasks with sensory feedback and with no sensory feedback in Ground Reaction Forces
Description
GRF will be assessed during motor perfomances of the subjects
Time Frame
during motor tasks up to 3 weeks
Title
Change between tasks with sensory feedback and with no sensory feedback in Centre of Mass and Pressure
Description
CoM and CoP will be assessed during motor perfomances of the subjects
Time Frame
during motor tasks up to 3 weeks
Title
Change from baseline and between tasks with sensory feedback and with no sensory feedback in Vo2 consumption
Description
metabolic consumption is going to be measured with mobile spiroergometry and compared after walking with and without sensory feedback
Time Frame
during motor tasks up to 3 weeks
Title
Change from baseline between tasks with sensory feedback and with no sensory feedback in Embodiment
Description
Embodiment will be measured with questionnaires (from -3 to +3, +3 totally agrees; two questions are from 1 to 10 (to measure vividness, where 10 is max vividness) and from 1 to 100 (to measure prevalence, where 100 is max duration of the embodiment feeling))
Time Frame
immediately after sessions up to 3 weeks
Title
Change between tasks with sensory feedback and with no sensory feedback in Visual Analogue scale for confidence
Description
Subjects will complete VAS scale to measure confidence level (from 0 to 10, where 10 is max confidence)
Time Frame
immediately after sessions up to three weeks
Title
Change between tasks with sensory feedback and with no sensory feedback in Joint torque
Description
kinematic measurement
Time Frame
during motor tasks up to three weeks
Title
Change in Proprioceptive drift between different conditions
Description
To measure embodiment subjects will be asked after VR sessions to indicate where they feel their leg without looking at the limb in real world. This is a measure of embodiment.
Time Frame
Immediately after sessions in Virtual Reality up to three weeks
Title
Change in Telescoping measures between different conditions
Description
To measure embodiment subjects will be asked after VR sessions to indicate how long they feel their leg without looking at the limb in real world. This is a measure of embodiment.
Time Frame
Immediately after sessions in Virtual Reality up to three weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experiences Scales
Description
Subjects will fill the TAPES to measure their satisfaction with the prosthesis (Scores range from 5 to 25, with higher scores indicating greater levels of adjustment)
Time Frame
Immediately before intervention
Title
Change in Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders
Description
QoL will be assessed through questionnaires to see if the intevention had impact on this aspect (All Neuro-QOL banks and scales are scored such that a high score reflects more of what is being measured)
Time Frame
one week before first session and one week after last session
Title
Amputee Mobility Predictor
Description
Subjects will perform AMPRO to assess K level (scores range from 0 to 47, correspoding to levels of mobility from 1(K1) to 4(K4), where 4 is the best level of mobility)
Time Frame
Immediately before the intervention
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
transfemoral amputation or transtibial amputation or knee disarticulation or diabetic peripheral neuropathy
the subject should be healthy other than the amputation and the diabetic neuropathy and in the range of 18-70 years old
the subject should be able to comfortably walk, sit and stand alone
Exclusion Criteria:
cognitive impairment
pregnancy
Prior or current psychological diseases such as borderline, schizophrenia, Depression or Maniac Depression
acquired brain injury with residual impairment
excessive sensitivity or pain to electrical stimulation with surface electrodes
cybersickness
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
greta preatoni, PhD
Phone
766274077
Ext
0041
Email
gretapreatoni1@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
michele marazzi, PhD
Phone
446322840
Ext
0041
Email
michele.marazzi@hest.ethz.ch
Facility Information:
Facility Name
ETH Zurich
City
Zürich
ZIP/Postal Code
8006
Country
Switzerland
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Greta Preatoni, PhD
Phone
0766274077
Ext
0041
Email
gretapreatoni1@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michele Marazzi, PhD
Phone
+41446322840
Ext
0041
Email
michele.marazzi@hest.ethz.ch
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21852677
Citation
Abbott CA, Malik RA, van Ross ER, Kulkarni J, Boulton AJ. Prevalence and characteristics of painful diabetic neuropathy in a large community-based diabetic population in the U.K. Diabetes Care. 2011 Oct;34(10):2220-4. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1108. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
6875582
Citation
Archer AG, Watkins PJ, Thomas PK, Sharma AK, Payan J. The natural history of acute painful neuropathy in diabetes mellitus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1983 Jun;46(6):491-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.46.6.491.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
150823
Citation
Burke MJ, Roman V, Wright V. Bone and joint changes in lower limb amputees. Ann Rheum Dis. 1978 Jun;37(3):252-4. doi: 10.1136/ard.37.3.252.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23278223
Citation
Antfolk C, D'Alonzo M, Rosen B, Lundborg G, Sebelius F, Cipriani C. Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013 Jan;10(1):45-54. doi: 10.1586/erd.12.68.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26952132
Citation
Oddo CM, Raspopovic S, Artoni F, Mazzoni A, Spigler G, Petrini F, Giambattistelli F, Vecchio F, Miraglia F, Zollo L, Di Pino G, Camboni D, Carrozza MC, Guglielmelli E, Rossini PM, Faraguna U, Micera S. Intraneural stimulation elicits discrimination of textural features by artificial fingertip in intact and amputee humans. Elife. 2016 Mar 8;5:e09148. doi: 10.7554/eLife.09148.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29855427
Citation
Charkhkar H, Shell CE, Marasco PD, Pinault GJ, Tyler DJ, Triolo RJ. High-density peripheral nerve cuffs restore natural sensation to individuals with lower-limb amputations. J Neural Eng. 2018 Oct;15(5):056002. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aac964. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10917257
Citation
Chow DH, Cheng CT. Quantitative analysis of the effects of audio biofeedback on weight-bearing characteristics of persons with transtibial amputation during early prosthetic ambulation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000 May-Jun;37(3):255-60.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25298320
Citation
Tan DW, Schiefer MA, Keith MW, Anderson JR, Tyler J, Tyler DJ. A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception. Sci Transl Med. 2014 Oct 8;6(257):257ra138. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008669.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23900134
Citation
Dailey DL, Rakel BA, Vance CGT, Liebano RE, Amrit AS, Bush HM, Lee KS, Lee JE, Sluka KA. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain, fatigue and hyperalgesia while restoring central inhibition in primary fibromyalgia. Pain. 2013 Nov;154(11):2554-2562. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.07.043. Epub 2013 Jul 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27071179
Citation
Dosen S, Markovic M, Strbac M, Belic M, Kojic V, Bijelic G, Keller T, Farina D. Multichannel Electrotactile Feedback With Spatial and Mixed Coding for Closed-Loop Control of Grasping Force in Hand Prostheses. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017 Mar;25(3):183-195. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2550864. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7105581
Citation
Clippinger FW, Seaber AV, McElhaney JH, Harrelson JM, Maxwell GM. Afferent sensory feedback for lower extremity prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982 Sep;(169):202-6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30100550
Citation
Rognini G, Petrini FM, Raspopovic S, Valle G, Granata G, Strauss I, Solca M, Bello-Ruiz J, Herbelin B, Mange R, D'Anna E, Di Iorio R, Di Pino G, Andreu D, Guiraud D, Stieglitz T, Rossini PM, Serino A, Micera S, Blanke O. Multisensory bionic limb to achieve prosthesis embodiment and reduce distorted phantom limb perceptions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;90(7):833-836. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-318570. Epub 2018 Aug 12. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10996295
Citation
Sadeghi H, Allard P, Prince F, Labelle H. Symmetry and limb dominance in able-bodied gait: a review. Gait Posture. 2000 Sep;12(1):34-45. doi: 10.1016/s0966-6362(00)00070-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18281705
Citation
Naschitz JE, Lenger R. Why traumatic leg amputees are at increased risk for cardiovascular diseases. QJM. 2008 Apr;101(4):251-9. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcm131. Epub 2008 Feb 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9353612
Citation
Kumar D, Marshall HJ. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy: amelioration of pain with transcutaneous electrostimulation. Diabetes Care. 1997 Nov;20(11):1702-5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.20.11.1702.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9702441
Citation
Kumar D, Alvaro MS, Julka IS, Marshall HJ. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Effectiveness of electrotherapy and amitriptyline for symptomatic relief. Diabetes Care. 1998 Aug;21(8):1322-5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.8.1322.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18177603
Citation
Lotze M, Moseley GL. Role of distorted body image in pain. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2007 Dec;9(6):488-96. doi: 10.1007/s11926-007-0079-x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
5320816
Citation
Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science. 1965 Nov 19;150(3699):971-9. doi: 10.1126/science.150.3699.971. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31501600
Citation
Petrini FM, Bumbasirevic M, Valle G, Ilic V, Mijovic P, Cvancara P, Barberi F, Katic N, Bortolotti D, Andreu D, Lechler K, Lesic A, Mazic S, Mijovic B, Guiraud D, Stieglitz T, Alexandersson A, Micera S, Raspopovic S. Sensory feedback restoration in leg amputees improves walking speed, metabolic cost and phantom pain. Nat Med. 2019 Sep;25(9):1356-1363. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0567-3. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31578244
Citation
Petrini FM, Valle G, Bumbasirevic M, Barberi F, Bortolotti D, Cvancara P, Hiairrassary A, Mijovic P, Sverrisson AO, Pedrocchi A, Divoux JL, Popovic I, Lechler K, Mijovic B, Guiraud D, Stieglitz T, Alexandersson A, Micera S, Lesic A, Raspopovic S. Enhancing functional abilities and cognitive integration of the lower limb prosthesis. Sci Transl Med. 2019 Oct 2;11(512):eaav8939. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aav8939.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28204796
Citation
Crea S, Edin BB, Knaepen K, Meeusen R, Vitiello N. Time-Discrete Vibrotactile Feedback Contributes to Improved Gait Symmetry in Patients With Lower Limb Amputations: Case Series. Phys Ther. 2017 Feb 1;97(2):198-207. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150441. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25739747
Citation
Bruce D, Hunter M, Peters K, Davis T, Davis W. Fear of falling is common in patients with type 2 diabetes and is associated with increased risk of falls. Age Ageing. 2015 Jul;44(4):687-90. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv024. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Enhancing Abilities in Amputees and Patients With Peripheral Neuropathy Through Restoration of Sensory Feedback
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs