Does ICG Fluorescence Cholangiography Identify Critical View of Safety Earlier in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Primary Purpose
Cholelithiasis
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Malaysia
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Fluorescence Cholangiography
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional other trial for Cholelithiasis focused on measuring Symptomatic and Complicated Cholelithiasis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Symptomatic cholelithiasis for elective cholecystectomy
- American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) classification of physical status I or II
- Normal kidney function
- Normal liver function
Exclusion Criteria:
- Liver cirrhosis
- Hepatits B or C
- Allergies to iodine or seafood
Sites / Locations
- University Malaya Medical Centre
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
No Intervention
Arm Label
ICGFC-LC
Conventional LC
Arm Description
ICG fluorescence cholangiography assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ICGFC-LC) arm patients received intravenous bolus of 2.5mg of ICG before the induction of anaesthesia. Near infrared laparoscopic light camera was utilized intermittently during dissection of Calot's triangle until critical view of safety was achieved.
Conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) arm patients underwent standard white light laparoscopic cholecystectomy without fluorescence cholangiography.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Time to identification of critical view of safety
Compare time to identification of critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy which is defined as time of gallbladder retraction until establishment of critical view of safety.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Complications
Compare rate of complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy such as bile duct injury, major haemorrhage, intraabdominal collections and surgical site infection
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04228835
First Posted
November 27, 2019
Last Updated
January 12, 2020
Sponsor
University of Malaya
Collaborators
Ummi Surgical Sdn Bhd
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04228835
Brief Title
Does ICG Fluorescence Cholangiography Identify Critical View of Safety Earlier in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Official Title
Does ICG Fluorescence Cholangiography Identify Critical View of Safety Earlier in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Results From a Randomized Controlled Study in University Malaya Medical Centre
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
January 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 1, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 31, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 31, 2019 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Malaya
Collaborators
Ummi Surgical Sdn Bhd
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Achievement of critical view of safety (CVS) is recommended to reduce risk of hilar injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence cholangiography, a novel technique of real time biliary visualization, is postulated to assist dissection during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). However, its use in providing a faster and safer LC has yet to be established. The main objective of this study is to evaluate whether the use of ICG enhanced fluorescence cholangiography will help in earlier identification critical view of safety during LC.
Detailed Description
Indocyanine green (ICG) is excreted exclusively in the biliary system and emits fluorescence light when viewed using near infrared imaging. This enables extrahepatic biliary tree anatomy to be delineated during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Indocyanine green fluorescence cholangiography also enables earlier detection of cystic duct and common bile duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This is reported in two studies which showed that cystic duct can be identified 11 minutes and 8.6 minutes earlier and common bile duct 10 and 11 minutes earlier than white light imaging.
To date, there is no data published on the use of fluorescent cholangiography in reducing operative time of identification of critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which is an integral part of the surgery. Theoretically achievement of critical view of safety maybe facilitated by fluorescent cholangiography as this technique facilitates identification of biliary structures.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether an earlier identification of CVS can be obtained by using ICG fluorescence cholangiography as an adjunct to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Secondary outcomes assessed are the presence of minor or major complications between this two groups.
Patients are randomly assigned into two arms; ICG fluorescence cholangiography assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ICGFC- LC) and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), using a computer-generated block randomization. Patients in the ICGFC- LC group received intravenous bolus of 2.5mg of ICG before the induction of anaesthesia. All the surgeries are performed using standard four ports technique. Near infrared light camera by Karl Storz Endoscopy is used intermittently during dissection for the ICGFC-LC group.
Time to identification of CVS is defined by time of gallbladder retraction to time of establishment of critical view of safety. Critical view of safety is achieved when all the three criteria set by Strasberg is met. Mean time to identification of CVS in the two groups of patients were then compared. All patients are followed up for one month to identify any post-operative complications.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cholelithiasis
Keywords
Symptomatic and Complicated Cholelithiasis
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Patients are divided into two arms: ICG enhanced fluorescence cholangiography assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ICGFC- LC) and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
72 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
ICGFC-LC
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
ICG fluorescence cholangiography assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ICGFC-LC) arm patients received intravenous bolus of 2.5mg of ICG before the induction of anaesthesia. Near infrared laparoscopic light camera was utilized intermittently during dissection of Calot's triangle until critical view of safety was achieved.
Arm Title
Conventional LC
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) arm patients underwent standard white light laparoscopic cholecystectomy without fluorescence cholangiography.
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
Fluorescence Cholangiography
Intervention Description
Administration of ICG for fluorescence cholangiography
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to identification of critical view of safety
Description
Compare time to identification of critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy which is defined as time of gallbladder retraction until establishment of critical view of safety.
Time Frame
Time of surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Complications
Description
Compare rate of complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy such as bile duct injury, major haemorrhage, intraabdominal collections and surgical site infection
Time Frame
up to 30 days post operative
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Symptomatic cholelithiasis for elective cholecystectomy
American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) classification of physical status I or II
Normal kidney function
Normal liver function
Exclusion Criteria:
Liver cirrhosis
Hepatits B or C
Allergies to iodine or seafood
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jun Kit Koong, MS
Organizational Affiliation
University of Malaya
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Malaya Medical Centre
City
Kuala Lumpur
State/Province
Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur
ZIP/Postal Code
59100
Country
Malaysia
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23877766
Citation
Schols RM, Bouvy ND, van Dam RM, Masclee AA, Dejong CH, Stassen LP. Combined vascular and biliary fluorescence imaging in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2013 Dec;27(12):4511-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3100-7. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25974072
Citation
van Dam DA, Ankersmit M, van de Ven P, van Rijswijk AS, Tuynman JB, Meijerink WJ. Comparing Near-Infrared Imaging with Indocyanine Green to Conventional Imaging During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Crossover Study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 Jun;25(6):486-92. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0248. Epub 2015 May 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33223453
Citation
Koong JK, Ng GH, Ramayah K, Koh PS, Yoong BK. Early identification of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy using indocyanine green fluorescence cholangiography: A randomised controlled study. Asian J Surg. 2021 Mar;44(3):537-543. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Does ICG Fluorescence Cholangiography Identify Critical View of Safety Earlier in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs