Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Combined Spinal Epidural With Epidural Volume Extension in Labor Analgesia
Primary Purpose
Labor Pain
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Turkey
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Epidural
Intrathecal+Epidural
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Labor Pain
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- ASA I and II parturients
- Pregnant patients in active labor
- active labor with cervical dilation < 5cm
- 37-42 weeks of gestational age
- Pregnant women between the ages of 18 and 45
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who do not want to participate voluntarily in the study
- Pregnant women outside the age range of 18 - 45
- Pregnants other than Nullipar
- Patients with allergic reactions to anesthesia and analgesia drugs to be used
- Severe systemic disease (kidney, liver, pulmonary, endocrine, cardiac)
- Gestational comorbidity (preeclampsia, eclampsia, diabetes mellitus, etc.)
- Substance abuse history
- Chronic pain history
- Psychiatric problems and communication difficulties
- BMI> 35 kg / m2
- Failure in neuraxial interventions
Sites / Locations
- Ataturk University
- Erzurum Regional Training Research Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Dural puncture epidural
Combined spinal-epidural with epidural volume extension
Arm Description
2 µg/ml fentanyl + %0,125 bupivacaine (20 ml) to epidural
10 µg fentanyl + 2 mg bupivacaine to intrathecal 7.4 ml saline volume to epidural
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
First Epidural top-up time
Time elapsed between the end of local anesthetic injection and the return of pain >4 on the NPRS.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Sacral analgesia time
Blockade of the S2 dermatome
Performance time
interval between skin disinfection and epidural catheter fixation to the skin
Incidence of Side Effect
maternal motor block, hypotension, pruritis, headache and fetal bradycardia
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04234178
Brief Title
Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Combined Spinal Epidural With Epidural Volume Extension in Labor Analgesia
Official Title
The Effects of Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Combined Spinal Epidural With Epidural Volume Extension Techniques on Birth Variables in Labor Analgesia
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 1, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 1, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 7, 2021 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Ataturk University
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Labor is the process where the cervix is prepared to allow the baby to pass from the uterine cavity to the outside world. In the ordinary course, it ends with spontaneous or instrumental vaginal delivery or cesarean section. Traditionally, the first stage in which the cervix is passively dilated in response to uterine contractions consists of the second stage in which the mother passes the baby through the vagina and the third stage, the exit of the placenta.
In the first stage of labor, pain is caused by uterine contractions and pressure on the cervix. Pain is transmitted through the T10-L2 spinal nerves and is felt in the abdominal wall, waist, hips, or thighs. In the second stage, pain from the vagina and perineum is added to uterine pain. This pain is transmitted by the pudendal nerves through the S2-4 nerve roots.
In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of dural puncture epidural analgesia versus combined spinal-epidural analgesia with epidural volume extension on labor variables.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Labor Pain
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Dural puncture epidural
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
2 µg/ml fentanyl + %0,125 bupivacaine (20 ml) to epidural
Arm Title
Combined spinal-epidural with epidural volume extension
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
10 µg fentanyl + 2 mg bupivacaine to intrathecal 7.4 ml saline volume to epidural
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Epidural
Intervention Description
2 µg/ml fentanyl + %0,125 bupivacaine (20 ml) to epidural
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Intrathecal+Epidural
Intervention Description
10 µg fentanyl + 2 mg bupivacaine to intrathecal 7.4 ml saline volume to epidural
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
First Epidural top-up time
Description
Time elapsed between the end of local anesthetic injection and the return of pain >4 on the NPRS.
Time Frame
First 24 hours
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Sacral analgesia time
Description
Blockade of the S2 dermatome
Time Frame
First 24 hours
Title
Performance time
Description
interval between skin disinfection and epidural catheter fixation to the skin
Time Frame
First 24 hours
Title
Incidence of Side Effect
Description
maternal motor block, hypotension, pruritis, headache and fetal bradycardia
Time Frame
First 24 hours
10. Eligibility
Sex
Female
Gender Based
Yes
Gender Eligibility Description
Pregnant patients
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
45 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
ASA I and II parturients
Pregnant patients in active labor
active labor with cervical dilation < 5cm
37-42 weeks of gestational age
Pregnant women between the ages of 18 and 45
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients who do not want to participate voluntarily in the study
Pregnant women outside the age range of 18 - 45
Pregnants other than Nullipar
Patients with allergic reactions to anesthesia and analgesia drugs to be used
Severe systemic disease (kidney, liver, pulmonary, endocrine, cardiac)
Gestational comorbidity (preeclampsia, eclampsia, diabetes mellitus, etc.)
Substance abuse history
Chronic pain history
Psychiatric problems and communication difficulties
BMI> 35 kg / m2
Failure in neuraxial interventions
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Muhammed En Aydin
Organizational Affiliation
Ataturk University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Ataturk University
City
Erzurum
State/Province
Yakutiye
ZIP/Postal Code
25100
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Erzurum Regional Training Research Hospital
City
Erzurum
State/Province
Yakutiye
ZIP/Postal Code
25100
Country
Turkey
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31118278
Citation
Contreras F, Morales J, Bravo D, Layera S, Jara A, Riano C, Pizarro R, De La Fuente N, Aliste J, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. Dural puncture epidural analgesia for labor: a randomized comparison between 25-gauge and 27-gauge pencil point spinal needles. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 May 22:rapm-2019-100608. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100608. Online ahead of print.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28067707
Citation
Chau A, Bibbo C, Huang CC, Elterman KG, Cappiello EC, Robinson JN, Tsen LC. Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Improves Labor Analgesia Quality With Fewer Side Effects Compared With Epidural and Combined Spinal Epidural Techniques: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):560-569. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001798.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Combined Spinal Epidural With Epidural Volume Extension in Labor Analgesia
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs