search
Back to results

Intramuscular Ketamine Versus Aripiprazole and Escitalopram in the Treatment of Resistant Depression (KETProject)

Primary Purpose

Depressive Disorder

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ketamine
Cognition
Suicide risk
Depression thoughts
Quality of life and disability
Clinical and epidemiological factors
Safety of ketamine IM
Tolerability of ketamine IM
Sponsored by
University of Sao Paulo
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Depressive Disorder focused on measuring Ketamine, Treatment Resistant Depression

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 40 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of TRD, according to clinical evaluation and confirmed by SCID-IV (Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM);
  2. Moderate to severe intensity of the disease;
  3. Female patients in fertile conditions should be using a clinically accepted contraceptive method (oral contraceptive and/or condom);

    a. Blood test will be requested at the diagnostic stage and in case of clinical doubt as to the patient's gestational status,

  4. Literate and able to understand the tasks requested;
  5. With clinical comorbidities, however compensated;
  6. Patients and/or legal representatives should understand the nature of the study and sign the Informed Consent Form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Imminent risk of suicide;
  2. Patients with psychoactive substance dependence;
  3. Intellectual deficit and psychotic symptoms;
  4. Bipolar spectrum disorders and other primary psychiatric diagnoses;
  5. Allergic to ketamine;
  6. Glaucoma;
  7. Treatment with reversible MAOI (monoamine oxidase inhibitor) in the week prior to visit 0;
  8. Treatment with irreversible MAOI in two weeks prior to visit 0;
  9. Fluoxetine treatment within 4 weeks prior to visit 0;
  10. Treatment with others antidepressants;
  11. Treatment with antipsychotics, lithium, benzodiazepines or other psychotropic drugs within 7 days prior to visit 0;

    a. Lorazepam and zolpidem may be used;

  12. Patients who become pregnant will be excluded from the study and referred for obstetric care.

Sites / Locations

  • Núcleo de Pesquisas em Saúde Mental

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Rapid-acting antidepressant

Comparator

Arm Description

Subjects eligible to participate in the study will receive IM ketamine and will use 2 placebo tablets as randomized.

Subjects eligible to participate in the study will receive IM saline and will use escitalopram 15 mg and aripiprazole 5 mg as randomized

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in depressive symptoms
Montomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale ([0-60] higher scores: worse outcome). No improvement: MADRS ≤ 25% Partial response: MADRS ≥ 25% and < 50% Response: MADRS ≥ 50% Remission: MADRS ≤10
Change in depressive symptoms
Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale ([0-60] higher scores: worse outcome). Recovery: Maintenance ≥ 6-8 months Relapse: Full return of symptoms once remission has occurred or worsening ≤ 75% with lower percentage of improvement (HAM-D inclusion criteria)
Change in depressive symptoms
Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale ([0-60] higher scores: worse outcome). Relapse: Full return of symptoms once remission has occurred or worsening ≤ 75% with lower percentage of improvement (HAM-D inclusion criteria).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Depression symptoms
Hamiltom Depression Ratins Scale (HAM-D [0-50] higher scores: worse outcome).
Clinical impressions-S
Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI [0-7] higher scores: worse outcome).
Clinical impressions-I
Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI [0-7] higher scores: worse outcome).
Electrocardiographic monitoring
P wave, PR interval, QRS complex, J-point, ST segment, T wave, Corrected QT interval and U wave Rhythm (irregular rhythm: worse outcome).
Blood Pressure (BP [mmHg]).
BP low <90/60 (systolic/diastolic) mmHg and high >140/90 mmHg ( (systolic/diastolic).
Heart rate (HR [bpm]).
Anormal HR <60 bpm or >100 bpm.
Digital pulse oximetry (%).
Low oxygen saturation <95%.
Respiratory rate (RR [cycles/min])
Anormal RR <10 cycles/min or >20 cycles/min.
Suicide risk 1
Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (item 10 [0-6] higher scores: worse outcome).
Suicide risk 2
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (item 3 [0-4] higher scores: worse outcome).
General side effects
Ugvalg for Kliniske Undersgelser-Side Effect Rating Scale (UKU-SERS [48 specific symptoms).
Hypo/maniac symptoms
Young Mania Rating Scale (YOUNG [0-58] higher scores: worse outcome).
Dissociative symptoms
Clinician-Administered Dissociative State Scale (CADSS [0-108] higher scores: worse outcome)
Psychotic symptoms
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (item 12 [0-6] higher scores: worse outcome).
Depression thoughts
Depression Thoughts Scale (EPD [1-78] higher scores: worse outcome)
Stimate intelligence quocient
Wechsler Abreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI [70-160 percentille] higher scores: better outcomes).
Intelligence quocient
Wechsler Scale of Intelligence (WAIS III [70-155 percentille] higher scores: better outcomes).
Attention
Trial Making Test (5-95 percentille, higher scores: better outcomes).
Memory
Rey figures (10-100 percentille, higher scores: better outcomes)
Executive functions 1
Wisconsin Test (50->80 score, higher scores: better outcomes).
Executive functions 2
Stroop Color Word Test (5-95 percentille, higher scores: better outcomes)
Verbal fluency 1
Verbal Fluency Test (FAS [10-90 percentille], higher scores: better outcomes))
Verbal fluency 2
The Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT [5-95 percentille], higher scores: better outcomes).
Functional recovery 1
World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-brief [4 domains, 26 questions higher scores: better outcome]).
Functional recovery 2
Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS [0-30] higher scores: worse outcome).
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Weight and height (kg/m2).
Clinical and psychiatric features 1
Disease intensity (HAM-D [% of patients], moderate or severe)
Clinical and psychiatric features 2
Number of episodes (questionnaire [incidence])
Clinical and psychiatric features 3
Current episode duration (questionnaire [years])
Clinical and psychiatric features 4
Suicide attempts (questionnaire [% of pacients])
Clinical and psychiatric features 5
History of physical abuse (questionnaire [% of pacients])
Clinical and psychiatric features 6
History of sexual abuse (questionnaire [% of pacients])
Clinical and psychiatric features 7
Psychiatric hospitalizations (questionnaire [% of pacients])
Clinical and psychiatric features 8
Clinical comorbidities (questionnaire [% of patients]).
Clinical and psychiatric features 9
Family history of depression (questionnaire [% of patients])
Clinical and psychiatric features 10
Family history of bipolar disorders (questionnaire [% of patients)
Clinical and psychiatric features 11
Family history of other mental disorders (questionnaire [% of patients]).
Epidemiological features 1
Age (questionnaire [years]).
Epidemiological features 2
Gender (questionnaire [% of patients]; male/female)
Epidemiological features 3
Marital status (questionnaire [% of patients] single, married, separated, divorced or widower).
Epidemiological features 4
Ethnicity (questionnaire [% of patients])
Epidemiological features 5
Religion (questionnaire [% of patients] protestant, pentecostal or neopentecostal, spiritism, afro-brazilian, no religion or atheism and others]).
Epidemiological features 6
Occupation (questionnaire [% of patients])
Epidemiological features 7
Education (questionnaire [years])
Epidemiological features 8
Individual income (questionnaire [dollars]).
Epidemiological features 9
Family income (questionnaire [dollars]).

Full Information

First Posted
October 7, 2019
Last Updated
January 15, 2020
Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04234776
Brief Title
Intramuscular Ketamine Versus Aripiprazole and Escitalopram in the Treatment of Resistant Depression
Acronym
KETProject
Official Title
Intramuscular Ketamine Versus Escitalopram and Aripiprazole in Acute and Maintenance Treatment of Patients With Treatment-resistant Depression
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
April 3, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 3, 2020 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 3, 2021 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The treatment of resistant depression should be optimized aiming at complete remission of symptoms, a complex condition due to several factors. Approximately 1/3 of patients with depressive disorders do not even respond to available antidepressants. Consequently, new molecules with robust action, fast effects and sustained improvement are currently being researched worldwide. Ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, has emerged as a promising alternative due to its involvement in neurogenesis, synaptogenesis and consequent rapid improvement of depressive and suicidal symptoms with traditional intravenous (IV) use in sub dose (0.5 mg / kg). The therapeutic response of IV use has been short and requires monitoring in a hospital setting. There are no studies evaluating response to long-term ketamine use. Recent research has focused on identifying other routes of ketamine use such as intranasal and intramuscular (IM). The use of ketamine IM, despite the fact that there are few studies and small samples, can demonstrate efficacy in acute treatment and maintenance of depression, as well as low profile of side effects, greater accessibility potential, reduced costs and risks, patient comfort and possible expansion of resistant depression treatment capabilities in different settings.
Detailed Description
Compare the response of ketamine IM versus active control in treatment-resistant depression (TRD [primary outcome]) and find safety and tolerability of ketamine IM, evaluate changes in life quality, cognition and suicidal risk (secondary outcomes)

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Depressive Disorder
Keywords
Ketamine, Treatment Resistant Depression

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Subjects will receive IM ketamine or IM saline applications as randomized. Applications will occur three times a week. It will be 4 weeks of IM application (12 initial applications). Injections will occur into the subjects' glutes (0.75 mg / kg). The ketamine group will use 2 placebo tablets and the parallel group escitalopram 15 mg and aripiprazole 5 mg. Thereafter, participants will receive weekly ketamine doses over 6 months as maintenance treatment. Research members will be submitted to Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM for diagnostic categorization and will be evaluated from other scales. Vital signs will be checked continuously for a period of 2 hours with each infusion. Patients will be observed in a quiet, comfortable room and subjected to medical monitoring for 2 hours. They will leave the environment in the company of a competent adult.
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
88 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Rapid-acting antidepressant
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects eligible to participate in the study will receive IM ketamine and will use 2 placebo tablets as randomized.
Arm Title
Comparator
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects eligible to participate in the study will receive IM saline and will use escitalopram 15 mg and aripiprazole 5 mg as randomized
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ketamine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Active comparator (escitalopram plus aripiprazole), Placebo
Intervention Description
(0,75 mg/kg) saline solution (15 mg) Escitalopram (5 mg) Aripiprazole
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
Cognition
Intervention Description
Composite tools
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Suicide risk
Intervention Description
MADRS (10) and HAM-D (3)
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Depression thoughts
Intervention Description
EPD
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Quality of life and disability
Intervention Description
Quality of life and disability
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Clinical and epidemiological factors
Intervention Description
Variables and categories
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Safety of ketamine IM
Intervention Description
Vital signs
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Tolerability of ketamine IM
Intervention Description
UKU-SERS, YOUNG, CADSS and BPRS-12.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in depressive symptoms
Description
Montomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale ([0-60] higher scores: worse outcome). No improvement: MADRS ≤ 25% Partial response: MADRS ≥ 25% and < 50% Response: MADRS ≥ 50% Remission: MADRS ≤10
Time Frame
3 times a week in once month (Phase II)
Title
Change in depressive symptoms
Description
Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale ([0-60] higher scores: worse outcome). Recovery: Maintenance ≥ 6-8 months Relapse: Full return of symptoms once remission has occurred or worsening ≤ 75% with lower percentage of improvement (HAM-D inclusion criteria)
Time Frame
Once a week in six months (Phase III)
Title
Change in depressive symptoms
Description
Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale ([0-60] higher scores: worse outcome). Relapse: Full return of symptoms once remission has occurred or worsening ≤ 75% with lower percentage of improvement (HAM-D inclusion criteria).
Time Frame
Once a week in once month (Phase IV)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Depression symptoms
Description
Hamiltom Depression Ratins Scale (HAM-D [0-50] higher scores: worse outcome).
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Clinical impressions-S
Description
Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI [0-7] higher scores: worse outcome).
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Clinical impressions-I
Description
Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI [0-7] higher scores: worse outcome).
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Electrocardiographic monitoring
Description
P wave, PR interval, QRS complex, J-point, ST segment, T wave, Corrected QT interval and U wave Rhythm (irregular rhythm: worse outcome).
Time Frame
3 times a week in once month (Fase II) and once a week in six months (Phase III)
Title
Blood Pressure (BP [mmHg]).
Description
BP low <90/60 (systolic/diastolic) mmHg and high >140/90 mmHg ( (systolic/diastolic).
Time Frame
3 times a week in once month (Fase II) and once a week in six months (Phase III)
Title
Heart rate (HR [bpm]).
Description
Anormal HR <60 bpm or >100 bpm.
Time Frame
3 times a week in once month (Fase II) and once a week in six months (Phase III)
Title
Digital pulse oximetry (%).
Description
Low oxygen saturation <95%.
Time Frame
3 times a week in once month (Fase II) and once a week in six months (Phase III)
Title
Respiratory rate (RR [cycles/min])
Description
Anormal RR <10 cycles/min or >20 cycles/min.
Time Frame
3 times a week in once month (Fase II) and once a week in six months (Phase III)
Title
Suicide risk 1
Description
Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (item 10 [0-6] higher scores: worse outcome).
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Suicide risk 2
Description
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (item 3 [0-4] higher scores: worse outcome).
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
General side effects
Description
Ugvalg for Kliniske Undersgelser-Side Effect Rating Scale (UKU-SERS [48 specific symptoms).
Time Frame
3 times a week in once month (Phase II) and once a week in six months (Phase III)
Title
Hypo/maniac symptoms
Description
Young Mania Rating Scale (YOUNG [0-58] higher scores: worse outcome).
Time Frame
3 times a week in once month (Phase II) and once a week in six months (Phase III)
Title
Dissociative symptoms
Description
Clinician-Administered Dissociative State Scale (CADSS [0-108] higher scores: worse outcome)
Time Frame
3 times a week in once month (Phase II) and once a week in six months (Phase III)
Title
Psychotic symptoms
Description
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (item 12 [0-6] higher scores: worse outcome).
Time Frame
3 times a week in once month (Phase II) and once a week in six months (Phase III)
Title
Depression thoughts
Description
Depression Thoughts Scale (EPD [1-78] higher scores: worse outcome)
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Stimate intelligence quocient
Description
Wechsler Abreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI [70-160 percentille] higher scores: better outcomes).
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Intelligence quocient
Description
Wechsler Scale of Intelligence (WAIS III [70-155 percentille] higher scores: better outcomes).
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Attention
Description
Trial Making Test (5-95 percentille, higher scores: better outcomes).
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Memory
Description
Rey figures (10-100 percentille, higher scores: better outcomes)
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Executive functions 1
Description
Wisconsin Test (50->80 score, higher scores: better outcomes).
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Executive functions 2
Description
Stroop Color Word Test (5-95 percentille, higher scores: better outcomes)
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Verbal fluency 1
Description
Verbal Fluency Test (FAS [10-90 percentille], higher scores: better outcomes))
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Verbal fluency 2
Description
The Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT [5-95 percentille], higher scores: better outcomes).
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Functional recovery 1
Description
World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-brief [4 domains, 26 questions higher scores: better outcome]).
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Functional recovery 2
Description
Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS [0-30] higher scores: worse outcome).
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Description
Weight and height (kg/m2).
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Clinical and psychiatric features 1
Description
Disease intensity (HAM-D [% of patients], moderate or severe)
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Clinical and psychiatric features 2
Description
Number of episodes (questionnaire [incidence])
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Clinical and psychiatric features 3
Description
Current episode duration (questionnaire [years])
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Clinical and psychiatric features 4
Description
Suicide attempts (questionnaire [% of pacients])
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Clinical and psychiatric features 5
Description
History of physical abuse (questionnaire [% of pacients])
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Clinical and psychiatric features 6
Description
History of sexual abuse (questionnaire [% of pacients])
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Clinical and psychiatric features 7
Description
Psychiatric hospitalizations (questionnaire [% of pacients])
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Clinical and psychiatric features 8
Description
Clinical comorbidities (questionnaire [% of patients]).
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Clinical and psychiatric features 9
Description
Family history of depression (questionnaire [% of patients])
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Clinical and psychiatric features 10
Description
Family history of bipolar disorders (questionnaire [% of patients)
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Clinical and psychiatric features 11
Description
Family history of other mental disorders (questionnaire [% of patients]).
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Epidemiological features 1
Description
Age (questionnaire [years]).
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Epidemiological features 2
Description
Gender (questionnaire [% of patients]; male/female)
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Epidemiological features 3
Description
Marital status (questionnaire [% of patients] single, married, separated, divorced or widower).
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Epidemiological features 4
Description
Ethnicity (questionnaire [% of patients])
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Epidemiological features 5
Description
Religion (questionnaire [% of patients] protestant, pentecostal or neopentecostal, spiritism, afro-brazilian, no religion or atheism and others]).
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Epidemiological features 6
Description
Occupation (questionnaire [% of patients])
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Epidemiological features 7
Description
Education (questionnaire [years])
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Epidemiological features 8
Description
Individual income (questionnaire [dollars]).
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Epidemiological features 9
Description
Family income (questionnaire [dollars]).
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of TRD, according to clinical evaluation and confirmed by SCID-IV (Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM); Moderate to severe intensity of the disease; Female patients in fertile conditions should be using a clinically accepted contraceptive method (oral contraceptive and/or condom); a. Blood test will be requested at the diagnostic stage and in case of clinical doubt as to the patient's gestational status, Literate and able to understand the tasks requested; With clinical comorbidities, however compensated; Patients and/or legal representatives should understand the nature of the study and sign the Informed Consent Form. Exclusion Criteria: Imminent risk of suicide; Patients with psychoactive substance dependence; Intellectual deficit and psychotic symptoms; Bipolar spectrum disorders and other primary psychiatric diagnoses; Allergic to ketamine; Glaucoma; Treatment with reversible MAOI (monoamine oxidase inhibitor) in the week prior to visit 0; Treatment with irreversible MAOI in two weeks prior to visit 0; Fluoxetine treatment within 4 weeks prior to visit 0; Treatment with others antidepressants; Treatment with antipsychotics, lithium, benzodiazepines or other psychotropic drugs within 7 days prior to visit 0; a. Lorazepam and zolpidem may be used; Patients who become pregnant will be excluded from the study and referred for obstetric care.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ricardo A Moreno, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Department and Institute of Psychiatry, University of Sao Paulo
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Núcleo de Pesquisas em Saúde Mental
City
Blumenau
State/Province
Santa Catarina
ZIP/Postal Code
89.020-070
Country
Brazil

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17074942
Citation
Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, Nierenberg AA, Stewart JW, Warden D, Niederehe G, Thase ME, Lavori PW, Lebowitz BD, McGrath PJ, Rosenbaum JF, Sackeim HA, Kupfer DJ, Luther J, Fava M. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;163(11):1905-17. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1905.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25305428
Citation
Bennabi D, Aouizerate B, El-Hage W, Doumy O, Moliere F, Courtet P, Nieto I, Bellivier F, Bubrovsky M, Vaiva G, Holztmann J, Bougerol T, Richieri R, Lancon C, Camus V, Saba G, Haesbaert F, d'Amato T, Charpeaud T, Llorca PM, Leboyer M, Haffen E. Risk factors for treatment resistance in unipolar depression: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2015 Jan 15;171:137-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.09.020. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20151847
Citation
Philip NS, Carpenter LL, Tyrka AR, Price LH. Pharmacologic approaches to treatment resistant depression: a re-examination for the modern era. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010 Apr;11(5):709-22. doi: 10.1517/14656561003614781.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
27486148
Citation
Kennedy SH, Lam RW, McIntyre RS, Tourjman SV, Bhat V, Blier P, Hasnain M, Jollant F, Levitt AJ, MacQueen GM, McInerney SJ, McIntosh D, Milev RV, Muller DJ, Parikh SV, Pearson NL, Ravindran AV, Uher R; CANMAT Depression Work Group. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Section 3. Pharmacological Treatments. Can J Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;61(9):540-60. doi: 10.1177/0706743716659417. Epub 2016 Aug 2. Erratum In: Can J Psychiatry. 2017 May;62(5):356.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25586212
Citation
Saveanu R, Etkin A, Duchemin AM, Goldstein-Piekarski A, Gyurak A, Debattista C, Schatzberg AF, Sood S, Day CV, Palmer DM, Rekshan WR, Gordon E, Rush AJ, Williams LM. The international Study to Predict Optimized Treatment in Depression (iSPOT-D): outcomes from the acute phase of antidepressant treatment. J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Feb;61:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.12.018. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23380715
Citation
Perlis RH. A clinical risk stratification tool for predicting treatment resistance in major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2013 Jul 1;74(1):7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.12.007. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24314926
Citation
McIntyre RS, Filteau MJ, Martin L, Patry S, Carvalho A, Cha DS, Barakat M, Miguelez M. Treatment-resistant depression: definitions, review of the evidence, and algorithmic approach. J Affect Disord. 2014 Mar;156:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.10.043. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23554581
Citation
Spielmans GI, Berman MI, Linardatos E, Rosenlicht NZ, Perry A, Tsai AC. Adjunctive atypical antipsychotic treatment for major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of depression, quality of life, and safety outcomes. PLoS Med. 2013;10(3):e1001403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001403. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25836356
Citation
Millan MJ, Goodwin GM, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Ove Ogren S. Learning from the past and looking to the future: Emerging perspectives for improving the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015 May;25(5):599-656. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.01.016. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24223526
Citation
Ferrari AJ, Charlson FJ, Norman RE, Patten SB, Freedman G, Murray CJ, Vos T, Whiteford HA. Burden of depressive disorders by country, sex, age, and year: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. PLoS Med. 2013 Nov;10(11):e1001547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001547. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
27733282
Citation
GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1545-1602. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31678-6. Erratum In: Lancet. 2017 Jan 7;389(10064):e1.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
30025524
Citation
Machado MO, Veronese N, Sanches M, Stubbs B, Koyanagi A, Thompson T, Tzoulaki I, Solmi M, Vancampfort D, Schuch FB, Maes M, Fava GA, Ioannidis JPA, Carvalho AF. The association of depression and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. BMC Med. 2018 Jul 20;16(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1101-z.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
27667656
Citation
Evans-Lacko S, Knapp M. Global patterns of workplace productivity for people with depression: absenteeism and presenteeism costs across eight diverse countries. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;51(11):1525-1537. doi: 10.1007/s00127-016-1278-4. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24789696
Citation
Mrazek DA, Hornberger JC, Altar CA, Degtiar I. A review of the clinical, economic, and societal burden of treatment-resistant depression: 1996-2013. Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Aug 1;65(8):977-87. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300059.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23429808
Citation
Lepine BA, Moreno RA, Campos RN, Couttolenc BF. Treatment-resistant depression increases health costs and resource utilization. Braz J Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;34(4):379-88. doi: 10.1016/j.rbp.2012.05.009.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18425072
Citation
Sanacora G, Zarate CA, Krystal JH, Manji HK. Targeting the glutamatergic system to develop novel, improved therapeutics for mood disorders. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008 May;7(5):426-37. doi: 10.1038/nrd2462.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21827775
Citation
Sanacora G, Treccani G, Popoli M. Towards a glutamate hypothesis of depression: an emerging frontier of neuropsychopharmacology for mood disorders. Neuropharmacology. 2012 Jan;62(1):63-77. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.07.036. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25643025
Citation
Hillhouse TM, Porter JH. A brief history of the development of antidepressant drugs: from monoamines to glutamate. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 Feb;23(1):1-21. doi: 10.1037/a0038550.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
26423481
Citation
Newport DJ, Carpenter LL, McDonald WM, Potash JB, Tohen M, Nemeroff CB; APA Council of Research Task Force on Novel Biomarkers and Treatments. Ketamine and Other NMDA Antagonists: Early Clinical Trials and Possible Mechanisms in Depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;172(10):950-66. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15040465.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28649673
Citation
Hare BD, Ghosal S, Duman RS. Rapid Acting Antidepressants in Chronic Stress Models: Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms. Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks). 2017 Feb;1:2470547017697317. doi: 10.1177/2470547017697317. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25582770
Citation
Rasmussen KG. Has psychiatry tamed the "ketamine tiger?" Considerations on its use for depression and anxiety. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2016 Jan 4;64:218-24. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24388038
Citation
Naughton M, Clarke G, O'Leary OF, Cryan JF, Dinan TG. A review of ketamine in affective disorders: current evidence of clinical efficacy, limitations of use and pre-clinical evidence on proposed mechanisms of action. J Affect Disord. 2014 Mar;156:24-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.11.014. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23295207
Citation
Dwyer JM, Duman RS. Activation of mammalian target of rapamycin and synaptogenesis: role in the actions of rapid-acting antidepressants. Biol Psychiatry. 2013 Jun 15;73(12):1189-98. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.11.011. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21907221
Citation
Duman RS, Li N, Liu RJ, Duric V, Aghajanian G. Signaling pathways underlying the rapid antidepressant actions of ketamine. Neuropharmacology. 2012 Jan;62(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.08.044. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23732839
Citation
Akinfiresoye L, Tizabi Y. Antidepressant effects of AMPA and ketamine combination: role of hippocampal BDNF, synapsin, and mTOR. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013 Nov;230(2):291-8. doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-3153-2. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
2650898
Citation
Reich DL, Silvay G. Ketamine: an update on the first twenty-five years of clinical experience. Can J Anaesth. 1989 Mar;36(2):186-97. doi: 10.1007/BF03011442.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
1308374
Citation
Haas DA, Harper DG. Ketamine: a review of its pharmacologic properties and use in ambulatory anesthesia. Anesth Prog. 1992;39(3):61-8.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22516044
Citation
Zarate CA Jr, Brutsche N, Laje G, Luckenbaugh DA, Venkata SL, Ramamoorthy A, Moaddel R, Wainer IW. Relationship of ketamine's plasma metabolites with response, diagnosis, and side effects in major depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2012 Aug 15;72(4):331-8. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.03.004. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23866089
Citation
Stahl SM. Mechanism of action of ketamine. CNS Spectr. 2013 Aug;18(4):171-4. doi: 10.1017/S109285291300045X.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
9928972
Citation
Green SM, Hummel CB, Wittlake WA, Rothrock SG, Hopkins GA, Garrett W. What is the optimal dose of intramuscular ketamine for pediatric sedation? Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Jan;6(1):21-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00089.x.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15800181
Citation
Bonanno G, Giambelli R, Raiteri L, Tiraboschi E, Zappettini S, Musazzi L, Raiteri M, Racagni G, Popoli M. Chronic antidepressants reduce depolarization-evoked glutamate release and protein interactions favoring formation of SNARE complex in hippocampus. J Neurosci. 2005 Mar 30;25(13):3270-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5033-04.2005.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21292242
Citation
Li N, Liu RJ, Dwyer JM, Banasr M, Lee B, Son H, Li XY, Aghajanian G, Duman RS. Glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists rapidly reverse behavioral and synaptic deficits caused by chronic stress exposure. Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Apr 15;69(8):754-61. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.12.015. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
26630613
Citation
Vasavada MM, Leaver AM, Espinoza RT, Joshi SH, Njau SN, Woods RP, Narr KL. Structural connectivity and response to ketamine therapy in major depression: A preliminary study. J Affect Disord. 2016 Jan 15;190:836-841. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.018. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
10686270
Citation
Berman RM, Cappiello A, Anand A, Oren DA, Heninger GR, Charney DS, Krystal JH. Antidepressant effects of ketamine in depressed patients. Biol Psychiatry. 2000 Feb 15;47(4):351-4. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00230-9.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23982301
Citation
Murrough JW, Iosifescu DV, Chang LC, Al Jurdi RK, Green CE, Perez AM, Iqbal S, Pillemer S, Foulkes A, Shah A, Charney DS, Mathew SJ. Antidepressant efficacy of ketamine in treatment-resistant major depression: a two-site randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Oct;170(10):1134-42. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13030392.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24922494
Citation
Niciu MJ, Luckenbaugh DA, Ionescu DF, Guevara S, Machado-Vieira R, Richards EM, Brutsche NE, Nolan NM, Zarate CA Jr. Clinical predictors of ketamine response in treatment-resistant major depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 May;75(5):e417-23. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08698.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24821196
Citation
Lapidus KA, Levitch CF, Perez AM, Brallier JW, Parides MK, Soleimani L, Feder A, Iosifescu DV, Charney DS, Murrough JW. A randomized controlled trial of intranasal ketamine in major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Dec 15;76(12):970-6. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.03.026. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24268616
Citation
Shiroma PR, Johns B, Kuskowski M, Wels J, Thuras P, Albott CS, Lim KO. Augmentation of response and remission to serial intravenous subanesthetic ketamine in treatment resistant depression. J Affect Disord. 2014 Feb;155:123-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.10.036. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22840761
Citation
Murrough JW, Perez AM, Pillemer S, Stern J, Parides MK, aan het Rot M, Collins KA, Mathew SJ, Charney DS, Iosifescu DV. Rapid and longer-term antidepressant effects of repeated ketamine infusions in treatment-resistant major depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2013 Aug 15;74(4):250-6. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.06.022. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
27056608
Citation
Singh JB, Fedgchin M, Daly EJ, De Boer P, Cooper K, Lim P, Pinter C, Murrough JW, Sanacora G, Shelton RC, Kurian B, Winokur A, Fava M, Manji H, Drevets WC, Van Nueten L. A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Frequency Study of Intravenous Ketamine in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2016 Aug 1;173(8):816-26. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16010037. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
29282469
Citation
Daly EJ, Singh JB, Fedgchin M, Cooper K, Lim P, Shelton RC, Thase ME, Winokur A, Van Nueten L, Manji H, Drevets WC. Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine Adjunctive to Oral Antidepressant Therapy in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 1;75(2):139-148. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.3739.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24688759
Citation
Caddy C, Giaroli G, White TP, Shergill SS, Tracy DK. Ketamine as the prototype glutamatergic antidepressant: pharmacodynamic actions, and a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2014 Apr;4(2):75-99. doi: 10.1177/2045125313507739.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25010396
Citation
McGirr A, Berlim MT, Bond DJ, Fleck MP, Yatham LN, Lam RW. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of ketamine in the rapid treatment of major depressive episodes. Psychol Med. 2015 Mar;45(4):693-704. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714001603. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
26664100
Citation
Erratum: Acute Antidepressant Effects of Intramuscular Versus Intravenous Ketamine: Erratum. Indian J Psychol Med. 2015 Jul-Sep;37(3):379. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.162911.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19897179
Citation
aan het Rot M, Collins KA, Murrough JW, Perez AM, Reich DL, Charney DS, Mathew SJ. Safety and efficacy of repeated-dose intravenous ketamine for treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Jan 15;67(2):139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.08.038.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
27028832
Citation
Loo CK, Galvez V, O'Keefe E, Mitchell PB, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, Leyden J, Harper S, Somogyi AA, Lai R, Weickert CS, Glue P. Placebo-controlled pilot trial testing dose titration and intravenous, intramuscular and subcutaneous routes for ketamine in depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2016 Jul;134(1):48-56. doi: 10.1111/acps.12572. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
35935445
Citation
Cigognini MA, Guirado AG, van de Meene D, Schneider MA, Salomon MS, de Alexandria VS, Adriano JP, Thaler AM, Fernandes FDS, Carneiro A, Moreno RA. Intramuscular ketamine vs. escitalopram and aripiprazole in acute and maintenance treatment of patients with treatment-resistant depression: A randomized double-blind clinical trial. Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 22;13:830301. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.830301. eCollection 2022.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Intramuscular Ketamine Versus Aripiprazole and Escitalopram in the Treatment of Resistant Depression

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs