search
Back to results

Effects of Early Palliative Care Integration on Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Primary Purpose

Multiple Myeloma

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Palliative Care
FACT-MM questionnaire
HADS questionnaire
Sponsored by
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Multiple Myeloma

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be within eight weeks of being diagnosed with symptomatic MM based on current diagnostic criteria
  • Able to read and respond to questions in English
  • Have an ECOG performance status of 0, 1, 2 or 3
  • Receiving oncologic care at a Cleveland Clinic facility

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have seen a PC provider in any setting (i.e., inpatient, outpatient or home-based)
  • Need immediate referral to PC for hospice transition

Sites / Locations

  • Cleveland Clinic, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Early Palliative Care Integration

Arm Description

12 months of PC with concurrent standard treatment for MM, QOL assessments

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores The questionnaire is a combination of the original widely used and validated FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) questionnaire (27 items), and 14 MM-specific items. FACT-MM total scores range from 0 to 164, with FACT-G sections ranging from 0 to 108 and MM-specific section ranging from 0 to 56. Higher scores mean better QOL for all sections and total scores.
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores The questionnaire is a combination of the original widely used and validated FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) questionnaire (27 items), and 14 MM-specific items. FACT-MM total scores range from 0 to 164, with FACT-G sections ranging from 0 to 108 and MM-specific section ranging from 0 to 56. Higher scores mean better QOL for all sections and total scores.
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores The questionnaire is a combination of the original widely used and validated FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) questionnaire (27 items), and 14 MM-specific items. FACT-MM total scores range from 0 to 164, with FACT-G sections ranging from 0 to 108 and MM-specific section ranging from 0 to 56. Higher scores mean better QOL for all sections and total scores.
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores The questionnaire is a combination of the original widely used and validated FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) questionnaire (27 items), and 14 MM-specific items. FACT-MM total scores range from 0 to 164, with FACT-G sections ranging from 0 to 108 and MM-specific section ranging from 0 to 56. Higher scores mean better QOL for all sections and total scores.
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores The questionnaire is a combination of the original widely used and validated FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) questionnaire (27 items), and 14 MM-specific items. FACT-MM total scores range from 0 to 164, with FACT-G sections ranging from 0 to 108 and MM-specific section ranging from 0 to 56. Higher scores mean better QOL for all sections and total scores.
Change in QOL relative to baseline as measured by FACT-MM scores
Change in QOL relative to baseline as measured by FACT-MM scores. The questionnaire is a combination of the original widely used and validated FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) questionnaire (27 items), and 14 MM-specific items. FACT-MM total scores range from 0 to 164, with FACT-G sections ranging from 0 to 108 and MM-specific section ranging from 0 to 56. Higher scores mean better QOL for all sections and total scores.
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety as measured by HADS questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 14 items, two subscales (depression and anxiety) of seven questions each for depression and anxiety. Each subsection has a possible score range of 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A score of greater than or equal to eight on either subscale is considered clinically significant (i.e., probable depression or anxiety).
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety as measured by HADS questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 14 items, two subscales (depression and anxiety) of seven questions each for depression and anxiety. Each subsection has a possible score range of 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A score of greater than or equal to eight on either subscale is considered clinically significant (i.e., probable depression or anxiety).
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety as measured by HADS questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 14 items, two subscales (depression and anxiety) of seven questions each for depression and anxiety. Each subsection has a possible score range of 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A score of greater than or equal to eight on either subscale is considered clinically significant (i.e., probable depression or anxiety).
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety as measured by HADS questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 14 items, two subscales (depression and anxiety) of seven questions each for depression and anxiety. Each subsection has a possible score range of 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A score of greater than or equal to eight on either subscale is considered clinically significant (i.e., probable depression or anxiety).
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety as measured by HADS questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 14 items, two subscales (depression and anxiety) of seven questions each for depression and anxiety. Each subsection has a possible score range of 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A score of greater than or equal to eight on either subscale is considered clinically significant (i.e., probable depression or anxiety).
Number of PC visits made in the first 12 months after diagnosis
Feasibility of monthly PC visits as measured by the number of PC visits made in the first 12 months after diagnosis
Health services utilization as measured by number of ER visits, hospital admissions or ICU admissions
Health services utilization as measured by number of ER visits, hospital admissions or ICU admissions

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
January 23, 2020
Last Updated
July 21, 2023
Sponsor
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04248244
Brief Title
Effects of Early Palliative Care Integration on Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
Official Title
A Pilot Study to Determine the Effects of Early Palliative Care Integration on Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
February 17, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 30, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a common type of cancer involving the cells in the blood (commonly affecting bones, kidneys and blood). Although it remains incurable, MM has become a highly treatable form cancer thanks to new and improved treatment modalities. As patients deal with this disease, they often suffer from multiple symptoms that are caused by both the disease itself and the different drugs used to treat it. Research has shown that the most common symptoms patients suffer from include pain, constipation, tiredness, tingling in hands and feet, breathlessness, sadness and difficulty remembering things. These symptoms may negatively affect the quality of life of patients. Palliative care (PC) is a type of treatment aimed at relieving symptoms and promoting the most optimal quality of life (QOL) for patients and their caregivers. Research has shown that patients with certain types of cancers, such as colon cancer and lung cancer, do better if they are seen by a PC provider early in the course of their disease. This study seeks to determine the effects of early PC involvement on participants with newly diagnosed MM
Detailed Description
This is a pilot study with a prospective cohort design, and based in the outpatient or ambulatory care setting. Each participant will be followed for 12 months. Twenty eligible patients will be enrolled, and within eight weeks of diagnosis. Patients will meet with a member of the outpatient PC team, which consists of board-certified PC physicians, advance practice providers and nurse care coordinators, within three weeks of enrollment. Additional visits may be scheduled at the discretion of participants, oncologists or PC providers and participants will receive routine oncologic care throughout the study period. The primary objective of this study is to obtain preliminary data on the effects of early PC involvement in a cohort of patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic MM The secondary objectives of this study are to assess self-reported QOL, estimate the change in QOL relative to baseline, estimate number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety, to determine if monthly PC visits are feasible for participants, and to estimate health services utilization.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Multiple Myeloma

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
20 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Early Palliative Care Integration
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
12 months of PC with concurrent standard treatment for MM, QOL assessments
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Palliative Care
Intervention Description
Early PC Integration - Participants will meet with a member of the outpatient PC team, which consists of board-certified PC physicians, advance practice providers and nurse care coordinators, within three weeks of enrollment. Participants will be scheduled to meet with a PC provider at least once per month. Additional visits may be scheduled at the discretion of participants, oncologists or PC providers. All participants will receive routine oncologic care throughout the study period.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
FACT-MM questionnaire
Intervention Description
FACT-MM questionnaires will be administered by a research coordinator upon enrollment and at four time points from the date of enrollment: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months. All questionnaires will be administered in handwritten paper-based form, and while patients are in clinic. There is a +/- two-week window for completion of questionnaires to accommodate patient schedules. The assessment battery takes approximately 20 minutes to complete.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
HADS questionnaire
Intervention Description
HADS questionnaires will be administered by a research coordinator upon enrollment and at four time points from the date of enrollment: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months. All questionnaires will be administered in handwritten paper-based form, and while patients are in clinic. There is a +/- two-week window for completion of questionnaires to accommodate patient schedules. The assessment battery takes approximately 20 minutes to complete.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores
Description
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores The questionnaire is a combination of the original widely used and validated FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) questionnaire (27 items), and 14 MM-specific items. FACT-MM total scores range from 0 to 164, with FACT-G sections ranging from 0 to 108 and MM-specific section ranging from 0 to 56. Higher scores mean better QOL for all sections and total scores.
Time Frame
At baseline
Title
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores
Description
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores The questionnaire is a combination of the original widely used and validated FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) questionnaire (27 items), and 14 MM-specific items. FACT-MM total scores range from 0 to 164, with FACT-G sections ranging from 0 to 108 and MM-specific section ranging from 0 to 56. Higher scores mean better QOL for all sections and total scores.
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores
Description
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores The questionnaire is a combination of the original widely used and validated FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) questionnaire (27 items), and 14 MM-specific items. FACT-MM total scores range from 0 to 164, with FACT-G sections ranging from 0 to 108 and MM-specific section ranging from 0 to 56. Higher scores mean better QOL for all sections and total scores.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores
Description
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores The questionnaire is a combination of the original widely used and validated FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) questionnaire (27 items), and 14 MM-specific items. FACT-MM total scores range from 0 to 164, with FACT-G sections ranging from 0 to 108 and MM-specific section ranging from 0 to 56. Higher scores mean better QOL for all sections and total scores.
Time Frame
9 months
Title
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores
Description
Self-reported QOL as measured by FACT-MM scores The questionnaire is a combination of the original widely used and validated FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) questionnaire (27 items), and 14 MM-specific items. FACT-MM total scores range from 0 to 164, with FACT-G sections ranging from 0 to 108 and MM-specific section ranging from 0 to 56. Higher scores mean better QOL for all sections and total scores.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Change in QOL relative to baseline as measured by FACT-MM scores
Description
Change in QOL relative to baseline as measured by FACT-MM scores. The questionnaire is a combination of the original widely used and validated FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) questionnaire (27 items), and 14 MM-specific items. FACT-MM total scores range from 0 to 164, with FACT-G sections ranging from 0 to 108 and MM-specific section ranging from 0 to 56. Higher scores mean better QOL for all sections and total scores.
Time Frame
3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months
Title
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety
Description
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety as measured by HADS questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 14 items, two subscales (depression and anxiety) of seven questions each for depression and anxiety. Each subsection has a possible score range of 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A score of greater than or equal to eight on either subscale is considered clinically significant (i.e., probable depression or anxiety).
Time Frame
At baseline
Title
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety
Description
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety as measured by HADS questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 14 items, two subscales (depression and anxiety) of seven questions each for depression and anxiety. Each subsection has a possible score range of 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A score of greater than or equal to eight on either subscale is considered clinically significant (i.e., probable depression or anxiety).
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety
Description
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety as measured by HADS questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 14 items, two subscales (depression and anxiety) of seven questions each for depression and anxiety. Each subsection has a possible score range of 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A score of greater than or equal to eight on either subscale is considered clinically significant (i.e., probable depression or anxiety).
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety
Description
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety as measured by HADS questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 14 items, two subscales (depression and anxiety) of seven questions each for depression and anxiety. Each subsection has a possible score range of 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A score of greater than or equal to eight on either subscale is considered clinically significant (i.e., probable depression or anxiety).
Time Frame
9 months
Title
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety
Description
Number of participants with self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety as measured by HADS questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 14 items, two subscales (depression and anxiety) of seven questions each for depression and anxiety. Each subsection has a possible score range of 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A score of greater than or equal to eight on either subscale is considered clinically significant (i.e., probable depression or anxiety).
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of PC visits made in the first 12 months after diagnosis
Description
Feasibility of monthly PC visits as measured by the number of PC visits made in the first 12 months after diagnosis
Time Frame
At 12 months
Title
Health services utilization as measured by number of ER visits, hospital admissions or ICU admissions
Description
Health services utilization as measured by number of ER visits, hospital admissions or ICU admissions
Time Frame
At 12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Must be within eight weeks of being diagnosed with symptomatic MM based on current diagnostic criteria Able to read and respond to questions in English Have an ECOG performance status of 0, 1, 2 or 3 Receiving oncologic care at a Cleveland Clinic facility Exclusion Criteria: Have seen a PC provider in any setting (i.e., inpatient, outpatient or home-based) Need immediate referral to PC for hospice transition
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Renato Samala, MD
Organizational Affiliation
The Cleveland Clinic
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Data from this pilot study will be used to design and power a larger prospective study.

Learn more about this trial

Effects of Early Palliative Care Integration on Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs