search
Back to results

Cognitive Training and Brain Stimulation in Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease (AD-Stim)

Primary Purpose

Subjective Cognitive Decline, Mild Cognitive Impairment

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
anodal tDCS
Intensive cognitive training
Sponsored by
University Medicine Greifswald
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Subjective Cognitive Decline focused on measuring memory, brain stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

60 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Older adults (60 - 80 years);
  • Right handedness;
  • subjective cognitive decline (SCD) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dementia or other neurodegenerative neurological disorders; epilepsy or history of seizures; close relatives with epilepsy or history of seizures; previous stroke;
  • Severe and untreated medical conditions that precludes participation in the training, as determined by responsible physician;
  • History of severe alcoholism or use of drugs;
  • Severe psychiatric disorders such as depression (if not in remission) or psychosis

Sites / Locations

  • University Medicine Greifswald

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

Stimulation group

Sham group

Arm Description

Anodal tDCS + intensive cognitive training

Sham tDCS + intensive cognitive training

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Working memory training performance (Letter Updating task)
Performance in a memory training task (Letter updating) under anodal tDCS compared to sham condition; operationalized by working Memory Updating performance assessed with number of correctly recalled letter lists in the letter updating task, analyzed immediately after training period (anodal condition versus sham)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Working memory training performance (Markov task)
Performance in second memory training task (Markov decision making) under anodal tDCS compared to sham condition, analyzed immediately after training period (anodal condition versus sham)
Transfer outcomes: numerical n-back task (% correct)
Comparing performance immediately before and after training period (anodal condition versus sham)
Transfer outcomes: AVLT (auditory verbal learning test) (sum of correctly recalled items trials 1-5)
Comparing performance immediately before and after training period (anodal condition versus sham)
Transfer outcomes: Wiener Matrices Test (no. correct)
Comparing performance immediately before and after training period (anodal condition versus sham)
Long-term outcomes: Letter Updating task (no. of correctly recalled lists)
Comparing performance immediately before and after training period with performance at 4 weeks and 7-months after training period (anodal condition versus sham)
Long-term outcomes: Markov decision making task (% optimal actions)
Comparing performance immediately before and after training period with performance at 4 weeks and 7-months after training period (anodal condition versus sham)
Long-term outcomes: numerical n-back task (% correct)
Comparing performance immediately before and after training period with performance at 4 weeks and 7-months after training period (anodal condition versus sham)
Long-term outcomes: AVLT (auditory verbal learning test) (sum of correctly recalled items trials 1-5)
Comparing performance immediately before and after training period with performance at 4 weeks and 7-months after training period (anodal condition versus sham)
Long-term outcomes: Wiener Matrices Test (no. correct)
Comparing performance immediately before and after training period with performance at 4 weeks and 7-months after training period (anodal condition versus sham)
Neural correlates: Structural neural correlates of tDCS effect
- structural neural correlates; assessed by grey matter volumes, cortical thickness, white matter microstructure (diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) measures: fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity) before the intervention and at 7-months after training period (correlations in anodal group)
Neural correlates: Functional neural correlates of tDCS effect
- functional neural correlates; assessed by resting-state fMRI analyses to obtain functional connectivities (seed-based connectivity: correlation of BOLD-timeseries between a seed/ROI and every voxel/location in the brain) before the intervention and at 7-months after training period (correlations in anodal group)

Full Information

First Posted
February 3, 2020
Last Updated
November 3, 2022
Sponsor
University Medicine Greifswald
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04265378
Brief Title
Cognitive Training and Brain Stimulation in Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease
Acronym
AD-Stim
Official Title
Effects of Cognitive Training and Brain Stimulation in Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease - Randomised, Sham Controlled, Interventional Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 10, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 10, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Medicine Greifswald

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to investigate whether a tDCS-accompanied intensive cognitive training of working memory leads to performance improvement in individuals with prodromal Alzheimer's disease.
Detailed Description
The goal of the present study is to assess behavioral (primary) effects of a multi-session cognitive training combined with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Many studies to date have found tDCS to be an efficient method to enhance various cognitive functions by modulating cortical excitability in young adults, but its behavioral impact and underlying mechanisms in pathological aging still need to be elucidated. Individuals with prodromal Alzheimer's disease, will participate in a three-week cognitive training with concurrent online tDCS application. Cognitive performance (primary) will be examined before, during and after the intervention, in order to draw conclusions about the effect of tDCS. In addition to cognitive training, a control group, receiving sham stimulation during training, will be assessed. Follow-up sessions to assess long-term effects are planned four weeks and seven months after the post assessment. Furthermore, to assess potential predictors of tDCS effects, functional and structural parameters will be measured with MRI. The results of the study will offer valuable insights into efficacy of combined tDCS and cognitive training, as compared to training alone, in individuals with prodromal stages of Alzheimer's disease. Moreover, improved understanding of tDCS effects on cognitive training performance and underlying neural correlates may help to develop novel approaches for modulating cognitive decline in healthy and pathological aging.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Subjective Cognitive Decline, Mild Cognitive Impairment
Keywords
memory, brain stimulation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
46 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Stimulation group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Anodal tDCS + intensive cognitive training
Arm Title
Sham group
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Sham tDCS + intensive cognitive training
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
anodal tDCS
Intervention Description
Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), 9 sessions with 20 minutes stimulation each (current intensity of 1mA)
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Intensive cognitive training
Intervention Description
Intensive cognitive training of a letter memory updating task and a 3-stage Markov decision making task, 9 sessions
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Working memory training performance (Letter Updating task)
Description
Performance in a memory training task (Letter updating) under anodal tDCS compared to sham condition; operationalized by working Memory Updating performance assessed with number of correctly recalled letter lists in the letter updating task, analyzed immediately after training period (anodal condition versus sham)
Time Frame
3 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Working memory training performance (Markov task)
Description
Performance in second memory training task (Markov decision making) under anodal tDCS compared to sham condition, analyzed immediately after training period (anodal condition versus sham)
Time Frame
3 weeks
Title
Transfer outcomes: numerical n-back task (% correct)
Description
Comparing performance immediately before and after training period (anodal condition versus sham)
Time Frame
3 weeks
Title
Transfer outcomes: AVLT (auditory verbal learning test) (sum of correctly recalled items trials 1-5)
Description
Comparing performance immediately before and after training period (anodal condition versus sham)
Time Frame
3 weeks
Title
Transfer outcomes: Wiener Matrices Test (no. correct)
Description
Comparing performance immediately before and after training period (anodal condition versus sham)
Time Frame
3 weeks
Title
Long-term outcomes: Letter Updating task (no. of correctly recalled lists)
Description
Comparing performance immediately before and after training period with performance at 4 weeks and 7-months after training period (anodal condition versus sham)
Time Frame
4 weeks and 7 months after training
Title
Long-term outcomes: Markov decision making task (% optimal actions)
Description
Comparing performance immediately before and after training period with performance at 4 weeks and 7-months after training period (anodal condition versus sham)
Time Frame
4 weeks and 7 months after training
Title
Long-term outcomes: numerical n-back task (% correct)
Description
Comparing performance immediately before and after training period with performance at 4 weeks and 7-months after training period (anodal condition versus sham)
Time Frame
4 weeks and 7 months after training
Title
Long-term outcomes: AVLT (auditory verbal learning test) (sum of correctly recalled items trials 1-5)
Description
Comparing performance immediately before and after training period with performance at 4 weeks and 7-months after training period (anodal condition versus sham)
Time Frame
4 weeks and 7 months after training
Title
Long-term outcomes: Wiener Matrices Test (no. correct)
Description
Comparing performance immediately before and after training period with performance at 4 weeks and 7-months after training period (anodal condition versus sham)
Time Frame
4 weeks and 7 months after training
Title
Neural correlates: Structural neural correlates of tDCS effect
Description
- structural neural correlates; assessed by grey matter volumes, cortical thickness, white matter microstructure (diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) measures: fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity) before the intervention and at 7-months after training period (correlations in anodal group)
Time Frame
before training; 7 months after training
Title
Neural correlates: Functional neural correlates of tDCS effect
Description
- functional neural correlates; assessed by resting-state fMRI analyses to obtain functional connectivities (seed-based connectivity: correlation of BOLD-timeseries between a seed/ROI and every voxel/location in the brain) before the intervention and at 7-months after training period (correlations in anodal group)
Time Frame
before training; 7 months after training

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Older adults (60 - 80 years); Right handedness; subjective cognitive decline (SCD) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) Exclusion Criteria: Dementia or other neurodegenerative neurological disorders; epilepsy or history of seizures; close relatives with epilepsy or history of seizures; previous stroke; Severe and untreated medical conditions that precludes participation in the training, as determined by responsible physician; History of severe alcoholism or use of drugs; Severe psychiatric disorders such as depression (if not in remission) or psychosis
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Medicine Greifswald
City
Greifswald
ZIP/Postal Code
17475
Country
Germany

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33160420
Citation
Thams F, Kuzmina A, Backhaus M, Li SC, Grittner U, Antonenko D, Floel A. Cognitive training and brain stimulation in prodromal Alzheimer's disease (AD-Stim)-study protocol for a double-blind randomized controlled phase IIb (monocenter) trial. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020 Nov 7;12(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s13195-020-00692-5.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Cognitive Training and Brain Stimulation in Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs