Augmented BLAdder NecK rEconstruction Trial for Improved Urinary Function After Radical Prostatectomy (BLANKET)
Primary Purpose
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence, Surgery
Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Augmented Bladder Neck Reconstruction
Standard Bladder Neck Reconstruction
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional prevention trial for Prostate Cancer
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Men aged 40 to 70 years of age with localized prostate cancer (clinical stage T2c or less, Gleason grade 5+5=10 or less without any evidence of distant metastases)
- Scheduled to undergo curative robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Planned pre-operative or post-operative (within 1 month) androgen therapy
- Planned pre-operative or post-operative (within 1 month) radiation therapy
- History of spinal trauma or surgery to the brain or spinal cord
- Pre-operative history of stress urinary incontinence
Sites / Locations
- Johns Hopkins Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Augmented Bladder Neck Reconstruction
Standard Bladder Neck Reconstruction
Arm Description
Augmented Bladder Neck Reconstruction (Sling + Intussusception)
Standard Bladder Neck Reconstruction (Intussusception Only)
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
EPIC Urinary Incontinence subscale score
Score of 0-100 on questionnaire with higher scores reflecting better health-related quality of life related to urinary incontinence (closer to 0 is more incontinence, closer to 100 is less incontinence).
Secondary Outcome Measures
EPIC Urinary Incontinence subscale score
Score of 0-100 on questionnaire with higher scores reflecting better health-related quality of life related to urinary incontinence (closer to 0 is more incontinence, closer to 100 is less incontinence).
EPIC Urinary Incontinence subscale score
Score of 0-100 on questionnaire with higher scores reflecting better health-related quality of life related to urinary incontinence (closer to 0 is more incontinence, closer to 100 is less incontinence).
EPIC Urinary Incontinence subscale score
Score of 0-100 on questionnaire with higher scores reflecting better health-related quality of life related to urinary incontinence (closer to 0 is more incontinence, closer to 100 is less incontinence).
EPIC Urinary Incontinence subscale score
Score of 0-100 on questionnaire with higher scores reflecting better health-related quality of life related to urinary incontinence (closer to 0 is more incontinence, closer to 100 is less incontinence).
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04305379
First Posted
March 10, 2020
Last Updated
March 15, 2021
Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04305379
Brief Title
Augmented BLAdder NecK rEconstruction Trial for Improved Urinary Function After Radical Prostatectomy
Acronym
BLANKET
Official Title
Augmented BLAdder NecK rEconstruction Trial for Improved Urinary Function After Radical Prostatectomy
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Stopped due to COVID-19 pandemic, low priority among initiatives and officially terminated.
Study Start Date
January 16, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 1, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 1, 2021 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The investigators are conducting a prospective, randomized trial to investigate whether patients randomized to receive an augmented bladder neck reconstruction (aBNR) at the time of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy experience improved urinary function post-operatively compared to patients who undergo prostatectomy with a standard BNR. An aBNR here consists of the autologous medial umbilical ligament sling as well as a bladder neck intussusception stitch. The standard BNR group will receive the intussusception stitch only.
Detailed Description
A bladder neck reconstruction is a standard step in performing a radical prostatectomy. Over the years, various maneuvers to improve continence have been tried and studied including intussusception stitches and slings. Slings of various origins have been used by surgeons at the time of radical prostatectomy without consistent evidence demonstrating a benefit (vas deferens, biologic). However, use of the medial umbilical ligament to create a sling has not previously been studied in a randomized trial.
The medial umbilical ligaments are normally cut during intraperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy to allow the surgeon access to the Retzius space between the bladder and pubic bone. To create a medial umbilical ligament autologous sling, the ligaments are dissected out and wrapped around the vesicourethral anastomosis.
The investigators are conducting a prospective, randomized trial to investigate whether patients randomized to receive an augmented bladder neck reconstruction (aBNR) at the time of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy experience improved urinary function post-operatively compared to patients who undergo prostatectomy with a standard BNR. An aBNR here consists of the autologous medial umbilical ligament sling as well as a bladder neck intussusception stitch. The standard BNR group will receive the intussusception stitch only.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence, Surgery
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The surgeon will be masked until the time of bladder neck reconstruction during the radical prostatectomy.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
31 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Augmented Bladder Neck Reconstruction
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Augmented Bladder Neck Reconstruction (Sling + Intussusception)
Arm Title
Standard Bladder Neck Reconstruction
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Standard Bladder Neck Reconstruction (Intussusception Only)
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Augmented Bladder Neck Reconstruction
Intervention Description
Augmented Bladder Neck Reconstruction including a Medial Umbilical Ligament Sling plus Intussusception
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Standard Bladder Neck Reconstruction
Intervention Description
Standard Bladder Neck Reconstruction with Intussusception Only
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
EPIC Urinary Incontinence subscale score
Description
Score of 0-100 on questionnaire with higher scores reflecting better health-related quality of life related to urinary incontinence (closer to 0 is more incontinence, closer to 100 is less incontinence).
Time Frame
1 Month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
EPIC Urinary Incontinence subscale score
Description
Score of 0-100 on questionnaire with higher scores reflecting better health-related quality of life related to urinary incontinence (closer to 0 is more incontinence, closer to 100 is less incontinence).
Time Frame
2 Weeks
Title
EPIC Urinary Incontinence subscale score
Description
Score of 0-100 on questionnaire with higher scores reflecting better health-related quality of life related to urinary incontinence (closer to 0 is more incontinence, closer to 100 is less incontinence).
Time Frame
3 Months
Title
EPIC Urinary Incontinence subscale score
Description
Score of 0-100 on questionnaire with higher scores reflecting better health-related quality of life related to urinary incontinence (closer to 0 is more incontinence, closer to 100 is less incontinence).
Time Frame
6 Months
Title
EPIC Urinary Incontinence subscale score
Description
Score of 0-100 on questionnaire with higher scores reflecting better health-related quality of life related to urinary incontinence (closer to 0 is more incontinence, closer to 100 is less incontinence).
Time Frame
12 Months
10. Eligibility
Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Men aged 40 to 70 years of age with localized prostate cancer (clinical stage T2c or less, Gleason grade 5+5=10 or less without any evidence of distant metastases)
Scheduled to undergo curative robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
Exclusion Criteria:
Planned pre-operative or post-operative (within 1 month) androgen therapy
Planned pre-operative or post-operative (within 1 month) radiation therapy
History of spinal trauma or surgery to the brain or spinal cord
Pre-operative history of stress urinary incontinence
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mohamad E Allaf, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Johns Hopkins University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins Hospital
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21287
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Augmented BLAdder NecK rEconstruction Trial for Improved Urinary Function After Radical Prostatectomy
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs