search
Back to results

Finding the Optimal Regimen for Mycobacterium Abscessus Treatment (FORMaT)

Primary Purpose

Pulmonary Disease Due to Mycobacteria (Diagnosis)

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Amikacin
Tigecycline
Imipenem
Cefoxitin
Azithromycin
Clarithromycin
Clofazimine
Ethambutol
Amikacin
Linezolid
co-trimoxazole
Doxycycline
Moxifloxacin
Bedaquiline
Rifabutin
Sponsored by
The University of Queensland
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Pulmonary Disease Due to Mycobacteria (Diagnosis) focused on measuring Mycobacterium abscessus, Pulmonary disease, Microbiological, Regimen, Radiological, Quality of life, Health economics, Biomarkers

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Intervention Cohort Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with respiratory cultures positive for M. abscessus (MABS) (sub species abscessus, sub species bolletii, or subspecies massiliense) are required to meet all 3 American Thoracic Society criteria (clinical, radiological and microbiological) for MABS pulmonary disease (PD).
  • Subjects with mixed NTM infections (slow growers + MABS) (adding ethambutol will be permitted if required by the treating physician).
  • Willingness and ability to comply with trial regimens and the study visit requirements.

Intervention cohort Exclusion Criteria:

  • Receiving active treatment for MABS within the previous 12 months, except azithromycin for participants with cystic fibrosis and bronchiectasis.
  • Healthy volunteers may not participate.
  • Pregnancy

Observation Cohort Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least one positive MABS culture
  • Willingness and ability to comply with the study visit requirements.

Observation cohort Exclusion Criteria for:

  • Receiving active treatment for MABS within the previous 12 months, except azithromycin for participants with cystic fibrosis and bronchiectasis.
  • Healthy volunteers may not participate.

Sites / Locations

  • Queensland Children's HospitalRecruiting
  • Princess Alexandra HospitalRecruiting
  • Royal Adelaide HospitalRecruiting
  • Sunshine Coast University HospitalRecruiting
  • Cairns Base Hospital
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
  • The Prince Charles HospitalRecruiting
  • Monash Children's Hospital
  • Monash Medical Centre
  • Concord Repatriation Hospital
  • Gladstone Hospital
  • Gold Coast University HospitalRecruiting
  • Greenslopes Private Hospital,Recruiting
  • Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital
  • Royal Hobart Hospital
  • Mackay base Hospital
  • Sir Charles Gardiner Hospital
  • John Hunter Hospital
  • Perth Children's Hospital
  • The Alfred
  • Sydney Children's Hospital
  • Rockhampton Hospital
  • Mater Adult Hospital
  • Townsville Hospital
  • The Children's Hospital at Westmead
  • Westmead Hospital
  • St Michaels Hospital
  • The Hospital for Sick Kids
  • Skejby University Hospital
  • RigshospitaletRecruiting
  • Hospital Cochin
  • St Vincent's University Hospital
  • Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital
  • Starship Children's Hosptial
  • St George's Hospital
  • Tan Tock Seng Hospital Pte Ltd
  • Royal Brompton Hosptial
  • Nottingham Children's Hosptial

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Intensive Therapy A

Intensive Therapy B

Intensive Therapy C

Consolidation A

Consolidation B

Arm Description

Following Randomisation 1, Participants will receive intensive drug therapy in the form of IV amikacin, IV tigecycline, IV cefoxitin/imipenem + oral azithromycin AND clofazimine.

Following Randomisation 1, Participants will receive inhaled amikacin (IA), IV tigecycline, IV cefoxitin/imipenem + oral azithromycin/oral clarithromycin AND clofazimine.

Following Randomisation 1, Participants will receive intensive drug therapy in the form of IV amikacin, IV tigecycline, IV cefoxitin/imipenem + oral azithromycin/oral clarithromycin.

Oral clofazimine + oral azithromycin/oral clarithromycin in combination with one to three of the following oral antibiotics: oral linezolid, oral co-trimoxazole, oral doxycycline, oral moxifloxacin, oral bedaquiline (adults only), oral rifabutin.

Inhaled amikacin (IA), oral clofazimine + oral azithromycin/oral clarithromycin in combination with one to three of the following oral antibiotics: oral linezolid, oral co-trimoxazole, oral doxycycline, oral moxifloxacin, oral bedaquiline (adults only), oral rifabutin.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Appendix A1 - MABS clearance from respiratory samples with tolerance at final outcome
The probability of MABS clearance with good tolerance at final outcome. MABS clearance defined as: Negative MABS cultures from 4 consecutive sputum samples with one of those sputum specimens collected four weeks after the completion of consolidation therapy or a MABS negative BAL collected four weeks after completion of consolidation. Tolerance will be defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 5.0). Only adverse events that are attributed as either possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug will be assessed in the determination of tolerance. "Good" tolerance defined as no adverse events occurring or only adverse events coded as CTCAE grades 1 and 2. "Poor" as any adverse events coded as CTCAE grades 3, 4, or 5.
Nested Study A1.1 Short Intensive Therapy - MABS Clearance
The number of patients in each group with microbiological clearance of MABS with good tolerance (in accordance with CTCAE). MABs clearance based on results from 3 sputum specimens or one BAL. Tolerance will be defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 5.0). Only adverse events that are attributed as either possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug will be assessed in the determination of tolerance. "Good" tolerance defined as no adverse events occurring or only adverse events coded as CTCAE grades 1 and 2. "Poor" as any adverse events coded as CTCAE grades 3, 4, or 5.
Nested study A1.1.1 Efficacy of inhaled Amikacin during intensive therapy in comparison to intravenous Amikacin in the treatment of MABS-PD
The number of patients in each group with microbiological clearance of MABS with good tolerability at completion of short intensive therapy with the use of inhaled amikacin (Arm B) and with the use of IV amikacin (Arm A) given during intensive phase. Clearance will be based on results from 3 consecutive sputum or 1 BAL sample.Tolerance will be defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 5.0). Only adverse events that are attributed as either possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug will be assessed in the determination of tolerance. "Good" tolerance defined as no adverse events occurring or only adverse events coded as CTCAE grades 1 and 2. "Poor" as any adverse events coded as CTCAE grades 3, 4, or 5.
Nested Study A1.1.2 Efficacy of additional clofazimine during short intensive therapy in comparison to no additional clofazimine for treatment of MABS-PD
The number of patients in each group with microbiological clearance of MABS with good tolerability at completion of short intensive therapy with the use of additional clofazimine (Arm A) and without the use of additional clofazimine (Arm C) given during intensive phase. Clearance will be based on results from 3 consecutive sputum or 1 BAL sample.Tolerance will be defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 5.0). Only adverse events that are attributed as either possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug will be assessed in the determination of tolerance. "Good" tolerance defined as no adverse events occurring or only adverse events coded as CTCAE grades 1 and 2. "Poor" as any adverse events coded as CTCAE grades 3, 4, or 5.
Nested Study A1.2 - Comparison of microbiological clearance of MABS with good tolerability at 12 weeks in patients with MABS positive cultures at 6 weeks and allocated to prolonged intensive therapy and those allocated to consolidation therapy.
The number of patients in each group with clearance of MABS at 12 weeks with good tolerance. Clearance will be based on the results of 3 consecutive sputum samples or 1 BAL sample.Tolerance will be defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 5.0). Only adverse events that are attributed as either possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug will be assessed in the determination of tolerance. "Good" tolerance defined as no adverse events occurring or only adverse events coded as CTCAE grades 1 and 2. "Poor" as any adverse events coded as CTCAE grades 3, 4, or 5.
Nested Study 1.3 Consolidation Therapy - Comparison of MABS clearance between those allocated to consolidation therapy with oral treatment and those allocated to consolidation with oral therapy and additional inhaled amikacin
The number of patients with microbiological clearance of MABS with good tolerability between those allocated to consolidation therapy with oral treatment and those allocated to consolidation therapy with oral therapy and additional inhaled amikacin. MABS clearance based on 3 consecutive sputum samples or 1 BAL sample.Tolerance will be defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 5.0). Only adverse events that are attributed as either possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug will be assessed in the determination of tolerance. "Good" tolerance defined as no adverse events occurring or only adverse events coded as CTCAE grades 1 and 2. "Poor" as any adverse events coded as CTCAE grades 3, 4, or 5.

Secondary Outcome Measures

The probability of microbiological clearance of MABS at time point final, irrespective of toxicity for participants according to treatment path.
Probability of microbiological clearance irrespective of adverse event reporting.
The safety of the treatment combinations in patients with MABS
The number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE version 5 at completion of short IT, at completion of prolonged IT, at completion of CT and at final outcomes.
The relative change in FEV1 z-score between treatment groups for time point final compared with time point start in patients who do and who do not clear MABS at time point final.
Relative change in FEV1 z score compared between treatment groups
Change in % Bronchiectasis scored using PRAGMA in chest CTs between Day 0 (screening) and at 12 weeks and at final outcome and between those who clear and those who do not clear MABS
Change in % Bronchiectasis using PRAGMA CT between screening Day 0 and at 12 weeks and at final outcome
Change in % Air Trapping scored using PRAGMA in chest CTs between Day 0 (screening) and at 12 weeks and at final outcome and between those who clear and those who do not clear MABS
Change in % Trapped Air using PRAGMA CT between screening Day 0 and at 12 weeks and at final outcome
Change in % Disease scored using PRAGMA in chest CTs between Day 0 (screening) and at 12 weeks and at final outcome and between those who clear and those who do not clear MABS
Change in % Disease using PRAGMA CT between screening Day 0 and at 12 weeks and at final outcome
The predictive value of structural abnormalities at Day 0 (screening) CTs for sputum conversion and for progression of structural changes in relation to therapy.
Association between structural abnormalities (%Bronchiectasis, %Air trapping and %Disease) at screening Day 0 and clearance of MABs at 12 weeks and at final outcome and with change in %Bronchiectasis, %Air trapping and %Disease between screening day 0 and at 12 weeks and at final outcome
The change in CFQ-R respiratory domain for those with CF between treatment groups for short intensive, prolonged intensive and consolidation phases as well as between Day 0 and final outcome and between participants with and without MABS clearance.
The change in CFQ-R respiratory domain for patients with CF between baseline and at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 56 weeks for those that had short intensive therapy and 62 weeks for those who received prolonged intensive therapy
The change in HRQOL in adults, between treatment groups for short intensive, prolonged intensive and consolidation phases as well as between Day 0 and final outcome and between participants with and without MABS clearance.
Change in HRQOL measured using the SF36
The change in HRQoL in Children between treatment groups for short intensive, prolonged intensive and consolidation phases as well as between Day 0 and final outcome and between participants with and without MABS clearance.
Change in HRQOL measured using the Peds-QL™
The cost effectiveness of the proposed treatment combinations across both intensive and consolidation phases of the trial.
Total cost between treatments calculated as the sum product of health resource utilisation and resource unit price during treatment period.
The change in six minute walk distance for adult participants from the date of randomization to up to 62 weeks according to treatment path and in participants who do and do not clear MABS at time point final.
Change in 6 minute walk distance using the six minute walk test in adult participants

Full Information

First Posted
February 28, 2020
Last Updated
August 3, 2023
Sponsor
The University of Queensland
Collaborators
Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Children's Hospital Foundation, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Newcastle University, Griffith University, Erasmus Medical Center, Monash University, University of Copenhagen, Hôpital Cochin, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Melbourne, James Cook University, Queensland, Australia, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04310930
Brief Title
Finding the Optimal Regimen for Mycobacterium Abscessus Treatment
Acronym
FORMaT
Official Title
Finding the Optimal Regimen for Mycobacterium Abscessus Treatment (FORMaT)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
March 2, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 30, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
August 31, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
The University of Queensland
Collaborators
Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Children's Hospital Foundation, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Newcastle University, Griffith University, Erasmus Medical Center, Monash University, University of Copenhagen, Hôpital Cochin, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Melbourne, James Cook University, Queensland, Australia, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Mycobacterium abscessus (MABS) is a group of rapid-growing, multi-drug resistant non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) causing infections in humans. MABS pulmonary disease (MABS-PD) can result in significant morbidity, increased healthcare utilisation, accelerated lung function decline, impaired quality of life, more challenging lung transplantation, and increased mortality. While the overall numbers affected is small, the prevalence of infections is increasing worldwide. The Finding the Optimal Regimen for Mycobacterium abscessus Treatment (FORMaT) trial aims to produce high quality evidence for the best treatment regimens to maximise health outcomes and minimise toxicity and treatment burden, as well as developing biomarkers (serology, gene expression signatures, and radiology) to guide decisions for starting treatment and measuring disease severity in patients with MABS PD.
Detailed Description
Mycobacterium abscessus (MABS) are a group of non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) found in water and soil habitats that exhibit high levels of intrinsic multi-drug resistance. They are recognised opportunistic human pathogens capable of causing chronic pulmonary disease (MABS-PD), predominantly in individuals with underlying inflammatory lung diseases. Finding the Optimal Regimen for Mycobacterium abscessus Treatment (FORMaT) is an iterative, standing, platform trial with innovative and adaptive properties that evaluate and develop the optimal combinations of therapies for children and adults with MABS-PD to clear MABS infection with acceptable tolerance. We will use these opportunities afforded by the clinical trial platform to establish discovery studies to: (i) understand the effects of disease and treatment on health-related quality of life, (ii) determine cost effectiveness of interventions, (iii) optimise pharmacokinetic drug dosing, (iv) understand susceptibility to MABs-PD, (v) develop biomarkers of clinical disease, (vi) investigate genomics of MABs strains causing MABs-PD and development of antimicrobial resistance. FORMaT provides a pragmatic design to address challenges to develop an evidence base for the first time for MABS-PD. Initially, the trial has been designed to test therapies that are currently the basis for treatment guidelines for MABS-PD. The trial has the capacity to add new treatments and to eliminate therapies because of futility as they either lack efficacy or cause unacceptable toxicity. Novel therapeutic approaches are then tested against the previously determined optimal approaches, thus leading in an iterative fashion to improve microbiological clearance, and health outcomes associated with MABS-PD. The trial is designed as a series of trials within the main trial to enable investigation of the different phases of treatment; intensive (intravenous treatment phase) and consolidation (oral and or inhaled treatment phase) based on clinical guidelines. The primary outcome for each trial is microbiological clearance with clinical tolerance (Grade 1 or 2) based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5). This enables subjects to continue in the trial even if tolerance is poor or they change treatments in a specific phase of the trial as those events contribute to the primary outcome determination.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pulmonary Disease Due to Mycobacteria (Diagnosis)
Keywords
Mycobacterium abscessus, Pulmonary disease, Microbiological, Regimen, Radiological, Quality of life, Health economics, Biomarkers

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2, Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
There are 2 different phases of treatment; intensive therapy (IT) followed by consolidation therapy (CT). Intervention cohort participants will be randomised to 1 of 3 treatment arms for 6 weeks of IT. After the first 6 weeks of IT participants who are culture positive for MABS are randomised to either prolonged IT (additional 6 weeks of IT) then CT, or to commence CT. If, at week 6 participants are MABS culture-negative they will commence CT. Participants commencing CT are randomised to one of two treatment arms for 50 weeks. There are 12 possible paths through the trial. This standing platform trial design enables assessment of short IT, prolonged IT, and CT components individually as well as the overall combination of IT and CT. After 100 patients have completed short IT an interim analysis will be conducted, and Bayesian adaptive randomisation (BAR) will be implemented. New interventions may be added or stopped in the future due to lack of benefit at interim analyses.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
The FORMAT trial may include placebo controlled double blind randomised interventions in the future, but the initial intervention program is randomised but open label. There will be three stages of randomisation in the intervention program of this study, dictating the treatment the participant will receive. Randomisation at each level will be conducted using the method of minimisation. Each randomisation level will be planned to enable flexibility via pre-planned adaptations.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
300 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intensive Therapy A
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Following Randomisation 1, Participants will receive intensive drug therapy in the form of IV amikacin, IV tigecycline, IV cefoxitin/imipenem + oral azithromycin AND clofazimine.
Arm Title
Intensive Therapy B
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Following Randomisation 1, Participants will receive inhaled amikacin (IA), IV tigecycline, IV cefoxitin/imipenem + oral azithromycin/oral clarithromycin AND clofazimine.
Arm Title
Intensive Therapy C
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Following Randomisation 1, Participants will receive intensive drug therapy in the form of IV amikacin, IV tigecycline, IV cefoxitin/imipenem + oral azithromycin/oral clarithromycin.
Arm Title
Consolidation A
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Oral clofazimine + oral azithromycin/oral clarithromycin in combination with one to three of the following oral antibiotics: oral linezolid, oral co-trimoxazole, oral doxycycline, oral moxifloxacin, oral bedaquiline (adults only), oral rifabutin.
Arm Title
Consolidation B
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Inhaled amikacin (IA), oral clofazimine + oral azithromycin/oral clarithromycin in combination with one to three of the following oral antibiotics: oral linezolid, oral co-trimoxazole, oral doxycycline, oral moxifloxacin, oral bedaquiline (adults only), oral rifabutin.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Amikacin
Intervention Description
Adults: Intravenous amikacin 5mg/kg once daily or 7.5mg/kg twice daily or 20-25 mg/kg thrice weekly. Children:Intravenous amikacin 15-30 mg/kg once daily, maximum dose 1500mg
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tigecycline
Intervention Description
Adults: Intravenous Tigecycline 25 mg increasing by 5 mg every two doses until either maximum dose reached (50mg) or until patient is unable to tolerate twice daily. Children (≥8 years of age) intravenous tigecycline: Day 1- 0.6mg/kg twice daily to a maximum of 25mg. Day 2- 0.6mg/kg (maximum 25mg) in the morning, 1.2 mg/kg (maximum 50mg) at night. Day 3- 1.2mg/kg (maximum 50 mg) twice daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Imipenem
Intervention Description
Adults: Intravenous Imipenem (≥50kg) 500mg twice daily (<50kg) 15 mg/kg twice daily. Children: intravenous imipenem Day 1- 2- 25mg/kg (maximum 1g) twice daily. DAY 3- 25mg/kg (maximum 1g) four times daily (drop to 3 if not tolerated).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cefoxitin
Intervention Description
Adults: If imipenem is poorly tolerated intravenous cefoxitin 200 mg/kg thrice daily. Children: if imipenem is poorly tolerated intravenous cefoxitin 50mg/kg (maximum 4g) four times daily.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Azithromycin
Intervention Description
Adults: Oral azithromycin 500mg (≥40kg) once daily, (<40kg) 250mg once daily.During consolidaiton: 500mg (≥40kg) thrice weekly, (<40kg) 250mg thrice weekly. Children: Oral azithromycin:10mg/kg (maximum 500mg) once daily. During consolidation 10mg/kg once daily maximum 500mg.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Clarithromycin
Intervention Description
Adult: If azithromycin is poorly tolerated use oral clarithromycin 500mg twice daily.Children: If azithromycin is poorly tolerated use oral clarithromycin. In children 1 month old- 11years of age the following dosing applies: <8kg: 7.5mg/kg twice daily, maximum dose 62.5mg, 8-11kg: 62.5mg twice daily, maximum dose 62.5mg, 12-19 kg: 125mg twice daily, maximum dose 125mg, 20-29 kg: 187.5mg twice daily, maximum dose 187.5mg, 30-40 kg: 250mg twice daily, maximum dose 250mg, Children 12-18 years of age: 500 mg twice daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Clofazimine
Intervention Description
Adult: Oral clofazimine 100mg once daily. Children: Oral clofazimine: 3-5mg/kg once daily. Maximum dose of 50mg once daily if <40kg or 100mg if ≥40kg once daily.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ethambutol
Intervention Description
Adults: with confirmed mixed NTM infections (slow growers + MABS) oral ethambutol can be added at either 15 mg/kg once daily or 25mg/kg thrice weekly. Children with confirmed mixed NTM infections (slow growers + MABS) oral ethambutol can be added at 20 mg/kg once daily.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Amikacin
Intervention Description
adult: Inhaled amikacin 500mg twice daily. Children: Inhaled amikacin 500mg twice daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Linezolid
Intervention Description
Adult: during consolidation in combination with one to three oral antibiotics (co-trimoxazole, doxycycline, moxifloxacin, bedaquiline or rifabutin) guided by participant susceptibility and tolerance. Oral linezolid 600mg once daily. Children: during consolidation in combination with one to three oral antibiotics (co-trimoxazole, doxycycline, moxifloxacin or rifabutin) guided by participant susceptibility and tolerance. Age 1 week - 9 years 10mg/kg twice daily maximum dose of 300mg. Age 10-12 years 10mg/kg twice daily maximum dose of 600mg. >12 years 600mg once daily.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
co-trimoxazole
Intervention Description
Adult: during consolidation in combination with one to three oral antibiotics (co-trimoxazole, doxycycline, moxifloxacin, bedaquiline or rifabutin) guided by participant susceptibility and tolerance. Oral Co-trimoxazole (TMP-SMX) 160/800mg twice daily. Children: During consolidation in combination with one to three oral antibiotics (co-trimoxazole, doxycycline, moxifloxacin or rifabutin) guided by participant susceptibility and tolerance. Oral co-trimoxazole 5mg TMP/kg maximum dose of 160mg TMP/ 800mg SMX twice daily.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Doxycycline
Intervention Description
Adult: during consolidation in combination with one to three oral antibiotics (co-trimoxazole, doxycycline, moxifloxacin, bedaquiline or rifabutin) guided by participant susceptibility and tolerance. Oral doxycycline 100mg once daily. Children: During consolidation in combination with one to three oral antibiotics (co-trimoxazole, doxycycline, moxifloxacin or rifabutin) guided by participant susceptibility and tolerance. Oral doxycycline (ages ≥ 8 years) 2mg/kg once daily maximum dose 100mg.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Moxifloxacin
Intervention Description
Adult: during consolidation in combination with one to three oral antibiotics (co-trimoxazole, doxycycline, moxifloxacin, bedaquiline or rifabutin) guided by participant susceptibility and tolerance. Oral moxifloxacin 400mg once daily. Children: During consolidation in combination with one to three oral antibiotics (co-trimoxazole, doxycycline, moxifloxacin or rifabutin) guided by participant susceptibility and tolerance. Oral moxifloxacin 10-15mg/kg once daily, maximum dose 400mg
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Bedaquiline
Intervention Description
Adult: during consolidation in combination with one to three oral antibiotics (co-trimoxazole, doxycycline, moxifloxacin, bedaquiline or rifabutin) guided by participant susceptibility and tolerance. Oral bedaquiline (18-64 years of age) 400mg once daily for the first two weeks followed by 400mg thrice weekly for 22 weeks (maximum duration of 6 months).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Rifabutin
Intervention Description
Adult: during consolidation in combination with one to three oral antibiotics (co-trimoxazole, doxycycline, moxifloxacin, bedaquiline or rifabutin) guided by participant susceptibility and tolerance. Oral rifabutin: 5mg/kg once daily, maximum 300-450mg. Children: During consolidation in combination with one to three oral antibiotics (co-trimoxazole, doxycycline, moxifloxacin or rifabutin) guided by participant susceptibility and tolerance. Oral rifabutin 5mg/kg once daily
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Appendix A1 - MABS clearance from respiratory samples with tolerance at final outcome
Description
The probability of MABS clearance with good tolerance at final outcome. MABS clearance defined as: Negative MABS cultures from 4 consecutive sputum samples with one of those sputum specimens collected four weeks after the completion of consolidation therapy or a MABS negative BAL collected four weeks after completion of consolidation. Tolerance will be defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 5.0). Only adverse events that are attributed as either possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug will be assessed in the determination of tolerance. "Good" tolerance defined as no adverse events occurring or only adverse events coded as CTCAE grades 1 and 2. "Poor" as any adverse events coded as CTCAE grades 3, 4, or 5.
Time Frame
56 weeks for participants who received short intensive therapy and 62 weeks for participants who received prolonged intensive therapy.
Title
Nested Study A1.1 Short Intensive Therapy - MABS Clearance
Description
The number of patients in each group with microbiological clearance of MABS with good tolerance (in accordance with CTCAE). MABs clearance based on results from 3 sputum specimens or one BAL. Tolerance will be defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 5.0). Only adverse events that are attributed as either possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug will be assessed in the determination of tolerance. "Good" tolerance defined as no adverse events occurring or only adverse events coded as CTCAE grades 1 and 2. "Poor" as any adverse events coded as CTCAE grades 3, 4, or 5.
Time Frame
Samples collected at 4 weeks and culture results determined at 6 weeks
Title
Nested study A1.1.1 Efficacy of inhaled Amikacin during intensive therapy in comparison to intravenous Amikacin in the treatment of MABS-PD
Description
The number of patients in each group with microbiological clearance of MABS with good tolerability at completion of short intensive therapy with the use of inhaled amikacin (Arm B) and with the use of IV amikacin (Arm A) given during intensive phase. Clearance will be based on results from 3 consecutive sputum or 1 BAL sample.Tolerance will be defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 5.0). Only adverse events that are attributed as either possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug will be assessed in the determination of tolerance. "Good" tolerance defined as no adverse events occurring or only adverse events coded as CTCAE grades 1 and 2. "Poor" as any adverse events coded as CTCAE grades 3, 4, or 5.
Time Frame
samples collected at 4 weeks and culture results determined at 6 weeks
Title
Nested Study A1.1.2 Efficacy of additional clofazimine during short intensive therapy in comparison to no additional clofazimine for treatment of MABS-PD
Description
The number of patients in each group with microbiological clearance of MABS with good tolerability at completion of short intensive therapy with the use of additional clofazimine (Arm A) and without the use of additional clofazimine (Arm C) given during intensive phase. Clearance will be based on results from 3 consecutive sputum or 1 BAL sample.Tolerance will be defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 5.0). Only adverse events that are attributed as either possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug will be assessed in the determination of tolerance. "Good" tolerance defined as no adverse events occurring or only adverse events coded as CTCAE grades 1 and 2. "Poor" as any adverse events coded as CTCAE grades 3, 4, or 5.
Time Frame
samples collected at 4 weeks and culture results determined at 6 weeks
Title
Nested Study A1.2 - Comparison of microbiological clearance of MABS with good tolerability at 12 weeks in patients with MABS positive cultures at 6 weeks and allocated to prolonged intensive therapy and those allocated to consolidation therapy.
Description
The number of patients in each group with clearance of MABS at 12 weeks with good tolerance. Clearance will be based on the results of 3 consecutive sputum samples or 1 BAL sample.Tolerance will be defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 5.0). Only adverse events that are attributed as either possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug will be assessed in the determination of tolerance. "Good" tolerance defined as no adverse events occurring or only adverse events coded as CTCAE grades 1 and 2. "Poor" as any adverse events coded as CTCAE grades 3, 4, or 5.
Time Frame
samples collected at 10 weeks and culture results determined at 12 weeks
Title
Nested Study 1.3 Consolidation Therapy - Comparison of MABS clearance between those allocated to consolidation therapy with oral treatment and those allocated to consolidation with oral therapy and additional inhaled amikacin
Description
The number of patients with microbiological clearance of MABS with good tolerability between those allocated to consolidation therapy with oral treatment and those allocated to consolidation therapy with oral therapy and additional inhaled amikacin. MABS clearance based on 3 consecutive sputum samples or 1 BAL sample.Tolerance will be defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 5.0). Only adverse events that are attributed as either possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug will be assessed in the determination of tolerance. "Good" tolerance defined as no adverse events occurring or only adverse events coded as CTCAE grades 1 and 2. "Poor" as any adverse events coded as CTCAE grades 3, 4, or 5.
Time Frame
52 weeks or 58 weeks depending on clearance of MABS at 4 weeks, with those allocated to short IT completing at 52 weeks and those allocated to prolonged IT completing at 58 weeks.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The probability of microbiological clearance of MABS at time point final, irrespective of toxicity for participants according to treatment path.
Description
Probability of microbiological clearance irrespective of adverse event reporting.
Time Frame
6 weeks, 12 weeks, at end of consolidation (52 and 58 weeks) and at final outcomes at 56 weeks and 62 weeks
Title
The safety of the treatment combinations in patients with MABS
Description
The number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE version 5 at completion of short IT, at completion of prolonged IT, at completion of CT and at final outcomes.
Time Frame
6 weeks and 12 weeks and at end of consolidation (52 and 58 weeks) and after trial has been completed
Title
The relative change in FEV1 z-score between treatment groups for time point final compared with time point start in patients who do and who do not clear MABS at time point final.
Description
Relative change in FEV1 z score compared between treatment groups
Time Frame
Day 0, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, at end of consolidation (52 and 58 weeks) and at final outcomes at 56 weeks and 62 weeks
Title
Change in % Bronchiectasis scored using PRAGMA in chest CTs between Day 0 (screening) and at 12 weeks and at final outcome and between those who clear and those who do not clear MABS
Description
Change in % Bronchiectasis using PRAGMA CT between screening Day 0 and at 12 weeks and at final outcome
Time Frame
Day 0 and 12 weeks and at final outcome at either 56 weeks or 62 weeks according to treatment path
Title
Change in % Air Trapping scored using PRAGMA in chest CTs between Day 0 (screening) and at 12 weeks and at final outcome and between those who clear and those who do not clear MABS
Description
Change in % Trapped Air using PRAGMA CT between screening Day 0 and at 12 weeks and at final outcome
Time Frame
Day 0 and 12 weeks and at final outcome at either 56 weeks or 62 weeks according to treatment path
Title
Change in % Disease scored using PRAGMA in chest CTs between Day 0 (screening) and at 12 weeks and at final outcome and between those who clear and those who do not clear MABS
Description
Change in % Disease using PRAGMA CT between screening Day 0 and at 12 weeks and at final outcome
Time Frame
Day 0 and 12 weeks and at final outcome at either 56 weeks or 62 weeks according to treatment path
Title
The predictive value of structural abnormalities at Day 0 (screening) CTs for sputum conversion and for progression of structural changes in relation to therapy.
Description
Association between structural abnormalities (%Bronchiectasis, %Air trapping and %Disease) at screening Day 0 and clearance of MABs at 12 weeks and at final outcome and with change in %Bronchiectasis, %Air trapping and %Disease between screening day 0 and at 12 weeks and at final outcome
Time Frame
Day 0 and 12 weeks and at final outcome at either 56 weeks or 62 weeks according to treatment path
Title
The change in CFQ-R respiratory domain for those with CF between treatment groups for short intensive, prolonged intensive and consolidation phases as well as between Day 0 and final outcome and between participants with and without MABS clearance.
Description
The change in CFQ-R respiratory domain for patients with CF between baseline and at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 56 weeks for those that had short intensive therapy and 62 weeks for those who received prolonged intensive therapy
Time Frame
Day 0 and 6 weeks and 12 weeks, and at completion consolidation (at 52 and 58 weeks for those who completed short or prolonged IT) and at final outcome (at 56 and 62 weeks for those who completed short or prolonged IT)
Title
The change in HRQOL in adults, between treatment groups for short intensive, prolonged intensive and consolidation phases as well as between Day 0 and final outcome and between participants with and without MABS clearance.
Description
Change in HRQOL measured using the SF36
Time Frame
Day 0 and 6 weeks and 12 weeks, and at completion consolidation (at 52 and 58 weeks for those who completed short or prolonged IT) and at final outcome (at 56 and 62 weeks for those who completed short or prolonged IT)
Title
The change in HRQoL in Children between treatment groups for short intensive, prolonged intensive and consolidation phases as well as between Day 0 and final outcome and between participants with and without MABS clearance.
Description
Change in HRQOL measured using the Peds-QL™
Time Frame
Day 0 and 6 weeks and 12 weeks, and at completion consolidation (at 52 and 58 weeks for those who completed short or prolonged IT) and at final outcome (at 56 and 62 weeks for those who completed short or prolonged IT)
Title
The cost effectiveness of the proposed treatment combinations across both intensive and consolidation phases of the trial.
Description
Total cost between treatments calculated as the sum product of health resource utilisation and resource unit price during treatment period.
Time Frame
from date of randomization for the duration of treatment up to 56 weeks for those allocated to short IT and up to 62 weeks for those allocated to prolonged IT
Title
The change in six minute walk distance for adult participants from the date of randomization to up to 62 weeks according to treatment path and in participants who do and do not clear MABS at time point final.
Description
Change in 6 minute walk distance using the six minute walk test in adult participants
Time Frame
from date of randomization for the duration of treatment up to 56 weeks for those allocated to short IT and up to 62 weeks for those allocated to prolonged IT
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Examine the MABS clearance status at twelve (12 months) after time point final
Description
To examine whether MABS has been cleared after 12 months completion of the trial using the 12 month follow up site Principal Investigator Questionnaire.
Time Frame
12 months post trial completion

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Intervention Cohort Inclusion Criteria: Subjects with respiratory cultures positive for M. abscessus (MABS) (sub species abscessus, sub species bolletii, or subspecies massiliense) are required to meet all 3 American Thoracic Society criteria (clinical, radiological and microbiological) for MABS pulmonary disease (PD). Subjects with mixed NTM infections (slow growers + MABS) (adding ethambutol will be permitted if required by the treating physician). Willingness and ability to comply with trial regimens and the study visit requirements. Intervention cohort Exclusion Criteria: Receiving active treatment for MABS within the previous 12 months, except azithromycin for participants with cystic fibrosis and bronchiectasis. Healthy volunteers may not participate. Pregnancy or planning to continue breastfeeding Known hypersensitivity to any of the therapies for which no alternate options(s) have been provided. Observation Cohort Inclusion Criteria: At least one positive respiratory MABS culture Willingness and ability to comply with the study visit requirements. Observation cohort Exclusion Criteria for: Receiving active treatment for MABS within the previous 12 months, except azithromycin for participants with cystic fibrosis and bronchiectasis. Healthy volunteers may not participate.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Claire Wainwright, MD
Phone
+61730697322
Email
claire.wainwright@health.qld.gov.au
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Kara Brady, MPharm
Phone
+61730697618
Email
FORMaTtrial@health.qld.gov.au
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Queensland Children's Hospital
City
South Brisbane
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4101
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tiffany Jong
Phone
+61730697620
Email
FORMaTtrial@health.qld.gov.au
Facility Name
Princess Alexandra Hospital
City
Woolloongabba
State/Province
Queensland
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Name
Royal Adelaide Hospital
City
Adelaide
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Name
Sunshine Coast University Hospital
City
Birtinya
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Name
Cairns Base Hospital
City
Cairns
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
City
Camperdown
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
The Prince Charles Hospital
City
Chermside
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Name
Monash Children's Hospital
City
Clayton
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
Monash Medical Centre
City
Clayton
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
Concord Repatriation Hospital
City
Concord
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
Gladstone Hospital
City
Gladstone
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
Gold Coast University Hospital
City
Gold Coast
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Name
Greenslopes Private Hospital,
City
Greenslopes
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Name
Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital
City
Herston
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
Royal Hobart Hospital
City
Hobart
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
Mackay base Hospital
City
Mackay
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
Sir Charles Gardiner Hospital
City
Nedlands
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
John Hunter Hospital
City
New Lambton
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
Perth Children's Hospital
City
Perth
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
The Alfred
City
Prahran
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
Sydney Children's Hospital
City
Randwick
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
Rockhampton Hospital
City
Rockhampton
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
Mater Adult Hospital
City
South Brisbane
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
Townsville Hospital
City
Townsville
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
The Children's Hospital at Westmead
City
Westmead
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
Westmead Hospital
City
Westmead
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
St Michaels Hospital
City
Toronto
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
The Hospital for Sick Kids
City
Toronto
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
Skejby University Hospital
City
Aarhus
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
Rigshospitalet
City
København
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Name
Hospital Cochin
City
Paris
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
St Vincent's University Hospital
City
Dublin
Country
Ireland
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital
City
Rotterdam
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
Starship Children's Hosptial
City
Auckland
Country
New Zealand
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
St George's Hospital
City
Christchurch
Country
New Zealand
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
Tan Tock Seng Hospital Pte Ltd
City
Singapore
ZIP/Postal Code
308433
Country
Singapore
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
Royal Brompton Hosptial
City
London
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Name
Nottingham Children's Hosptial
City
Nottingham
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
All de-identified raw data measured during the trial will be made available.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Immediately following publication with no end date.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Data will be made available to recognised academic institutes and clinical teams upon written request with a proposal for data usage to Chief Investigator, Professor Claire Wainwright

Learn more about this trial

Finding the Optimal Regimen for Mycobacterium Abscessus Treatment

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs