search
Back to results

Effects of Dry Needling When Applied to the Infraspinatus Muscle in People With Chronic Shoulder Pain

Primary Purpose

Trigger Point Pain, Myofascial, Chronic Shoulder Pain

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dry needling
Sham needling (SN)
Sponsored by
Université de Sherbrooke
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Trigger Point Pain, Myofascial focused on measuring Dry needling, Infraspinatus, Neurophysiological effects

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Unilateral, chronic non-traumatic shoulder pain (VAS ≥ 2/10; >3 months)
  2. Localized pain in the shoulder region or referred according to the territory of the infraspinatus (Travell and Simons, 1999)
  3. Presence of a palpable nodule inside a tight muscle band reproducing the patient's pain

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cancer or metastasis in organs or tissues above the pelvis (< 5 years)
  2. Shoulder capsulitis
  3. Shoulder, thorax or mastectomy surgeries
  4. Shoulder bone fracture (< 6 months)
  5. C4-C5 or C6 radiculopathy
  6. Osteoporosis or excessive atrophy of the infraspinous fossa (infraspinatus <10 mm)
  7. Body mass index (BMI) > 28

Exclusion (TMS security):

  1. Pregnant woman
  2. Neurological, psychiatric or epilepsy conditions
  3. Implants (e.g. Neurostimulator, pacemaker, cerebral aneurysm clip, screw or plate), metallic foreign body in the eye
  4. Head trauma with loss of consciousness

Sites / Locations

  • Centre de Recherche sur le Vieillissement

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

Dry needling (DN)

Sham needling (SN)

Arm Description

Intramuscular insertion

Intradermal insertion

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Recruitment rate
Average number of participants recruited per month
Exclusion rate
Number of participants excluded from the study due to eligibility criteria (e.g. too narrow, are they clear)
Refusal rate
Number of participants who refused to participate (e.g. fear of needle, fear of transcranial magnetic stimulation)
Retention rate
Number of loss at follow-up
Length of time of the procedure
Average time needed per participant (testing and intervention)
Safety of the procedure: adverse effects
Listing of any adverse effects

Secondary Outcome Measures

Corticospinal excitability of the infraspinatus
Tested with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) connected to a neuronavigation device, characterized by the active motor threshold and expressed in stimulator maximum power percentage
Glenohumeral arthrokinematics
Captured images are taken using ultrasound imaging (GE Logiq-e; linear array 5-12MHz) at 0° and 30° of external rotation. Measurements in cm included: 1) subacromial space (position of the humeral head relative to the acromion); 2) anteroposterior position of the humeral head relative to the glenoid.
Pressure pain perceived
Obtained using an algometer (directly applied on the TrP; average of three measurements taken at 30 sec. interval), characterized by the threshold of discomfort and expressed in kg.

Full Information

First Posted
March 11, 2020
Last Updated
March 18, 2020
Sponsor
Université de Sherbrooke
Collaborators
Ordre Professionnel de la Physiothérapie du Québec (OPPQ), Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04316793
Brief Title
Effects of Dry Needling When Applied to the Infraspinatus Muscle in People With Chronic Shoulder Pain
Official Title
Neurophysiological, Biomechanical and Clinical Effects of Dry Needling Versus Sham Needling When Applied to the Infraspinatus Muscle in People With Chronic Shoulder Pain: a Randomized Pilot Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 3, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 20, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 20, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Université de Sherbrooke
Collaborators
Ordre Professionnel de la Physiothérapie du Québec (OPPQ), Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Up to 77% of patients with chronic shoulder pain have a trigger point (TrP) in the infraspinatus muscle. These TrPs can lead to pain, limitation of activities and reduced quality of life. Dry needling (DN) is gaining popularity as a treatment for TrPs in physiotherapy. However, its clinical effects remain poorly understood mechanistically and its neurophysiological effects little studied. The primary objective of this study is to determine the feasibility of a larger scale study. The secondary objective of this study is to to explore the immediate neurophysiological, biomechanical and clinical effects of DN and sham needling when applied to TrP of the infraspinatus muscle in people with chronic non-traumatic shoulder pain.
Detailed Description
Methodology In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial, twenty adults with chronic non-traumatic shoulder pain and with a infraspinatus TrP will be recruited according to established criteria. Participants will be randomized into two groups: one group (n = 10) receiving a DN in the infraspinatus TrP and another group (n = 10) receiving a sham needling. Recruitment strategies Recruitment will be done through posters that will be posted on bulletin boards of the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences of the University of Sherbrooke and in physiotherapy clinics in the region. The persons interested will be invited to contact the research assistant in charge of the study to verify their eligibility to participate. Data collection procedure The experimental procedure will take place in a laboratory located at the Research Center on Aging in Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada. Upon arrival, individuals will be greeted by a research assistant. Verification of the presence of TrP in the infraspinatus to confirm eligibility to participate will be carried out by a physiotherapist with more than 20 years of experience in the identification of TrPs and with the application of DN, according to the following procedure: Participants will be asked to lie in a decubitus lateral position on a treatment table and on the asymptomatic side. The upper arm will be supported on a box placed in front of them, so that the muscles can be relaxed, but the arm will be positioned in a and have a slight horizontal adduction to slightly stretch the fibers of the infraspinatus muscle. Manual palpation with flat fingers and perpendicular to the fibers will be used to identify the tight muscle band. Once a tight muscle band has been identified, the physiotherapist will search within this band for a contraction node, namely the TrP. Once she had identified this TrP with a non-toxic black Sharpie pencil, she will validate with the patient that the compression of this TrP reproduces local or referred pain. This pain should correspond to the pain patterns known to the infraspinatus according to Simons and Travell, 1999 and reproduce the pain known by the patient. This pain should be at least a 1/10 intensity on the visual analog scale (VAS). Ineligible participants will receive advices from the physiotherapist as well as a prescription for exercises related to their condition and a list of physiotherapists they can consult. The research assistant will explain the nature of the project to the selected participants, he will make sure that the participants have no contraindications to receive DN and/or for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) examination, and he will obtain written informed consent. Participants will then complete a questionnaire used to collect baseline medical information. Intervention (DN and Sham) DN will be performed by a certified clinician, experienced with the technique. She will explain the purpose of the intervention and she will review the contraindications and precautions for DN to ensure that the procedure is safe. The technique used is recommended by l'Ordre professionnel de la physiothérapie du Québec (OPPQ). The clinician will insert a sterile disposable acupuncture needle, OPTIMED (non-silicone), 40 mm x 0.30 caliber. The direction of the needle will be slightly oblique, directly in the TrP and in the direction of the muscle fibers. The production of a twitch is expected, gliding and rotation of the needle may be performed to produce this effect, if necessary. The needle will be removed after the twitch. The same procedure will be used for the sham group, except that the needle will be inserted at the subcutaneous level, at the depth of the superficial adipous tissues

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Trigger Point Pain, Myofascial, Chronic Shoulder Pain
Keywords
Dry needling, Infraspinatus, Neurophysiological effects

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
21 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Dry needling (DN)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Intramuscular insertion
Arm Title
Sham needling (SN)
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Intradermal insertion
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Dry needling
Intervention Description
Intramuscular insertion of an OPTIMED 40mm x 0.3mm acupuncture needle in a trigger point of the infraspinatus muscle
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Sham needling (SN)
Intervention Description
Intradermal insertion of an OPTIMED 40mm x 0.3mm acupuncture needle over the infraspinatus region
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Recruitment rate
Description
Average number of participants recruited per month
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 10 months
Title
Exclusion rate
Description
Number of participants excluded from the study due to eligibility criteria (e.g. too narrow, are they clear)
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 10 months
Title
Refusal rate
Description
Number of participants who refused to participate (e.g. fear of needle, fear of transcranial magnetic stimulation)
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 10 months
Title
Retention rate
Description
Number of loss at follow-up
Time Frame
Baseline, immediately after and 24 hours post-treatment evaluation
Title
Length of time of the procedure
Description
Average time needed per participant (testing and intervention)
Time Frame
Baseline, immediately after and 24 hours post-treatment evaluation
Title
Safety of the procedure: adverse effects
Description
Listing of any adverse effects
Time Frame
Immediately after intervention to 24 hours post-treatment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Corticospinal excitability of the infraspinatus
Description
Tested with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) connected to a neuronavigation device, characterized by the active motor threshold and expressed in stimulator maximum power percentage
Time Frame
At baseline, immediately after intervention, 24 hours after the intervention
Title
Glenohumeral arthrokinematics
Description
Captured images are taken using ultrasound imaging (GE Logiq-e; linear array 5-12MHz) at 0° and 30° of external rotation. Measurements in cm included: 1) subacromial space (position of the humeral head relative to the acromion); 2) anteroposterior position of the humeral head relative to the glenoid.
Time Frame
At baseline, immediately after intervention, 24 hours after the intervention
Title
Pressure pain perceived
Description
Obtained using an algometer (directly applied on the TrP; average of three measurements taken at 30 sec. interval), characterized by the threshold of discomfort and expressed in kg.
Time Frame
At baseline, immediately after intervention, 24 hours after the intervention

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Unilateral, chronic non-traumatic shoulder pain (VAS ≥ 2/10; >3 months) Localized pain in the shoulder region or referred according to the territory of the infraspinatus (Travell and Simons, 1999) Presence of a palpable nodule inside a tight muscle band reproducing the patient's pain Exclusion Criteria: Cancer or metastasis in organs or tissues above the pelvis (< 5 years) Shoulder capsulitis Shoulder, thorax or mastectomy surgeries Shoulder bone fracture (< 6 months) C4-C5 or C6 radiculopathy Osteoporosis or excessive atrophy of the infraspinous fossa (infraspinatus <10 mm) Body mass index (BMI) > 28 Exclusion (TMS security): Pregnant woman Neurological, psychiatric or epilepsy conditions Implants (e.g. Neurostimulator, pacemaker, cerebral aneurysm clip, screw or plate), metallic foreign body in the eye Head trauma with loss of consciousness
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nathaly Gaudreault, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Université de Sherbrooke
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mélanie Morin, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Université de Sherbrooke
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Guillaume Léonard, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Université de Sherbrooke
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Centre de Recherche sur le Vieillissement
City
Sherbrooke
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
J1H 4C4
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
19066669
Citation
Bron C, Franssen J, Wensing M, Oostendorp RA. Interrater reliability of palpation of myofascial trigger points in three shoulder muscles. J Man Manip Ther. 2007;15(4):203-15. doi: 10.1179/106698107790819477.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17314589
Citation
Tough EA, White AR, Richards S, Campbell J. Variability of criteria used to diagnose myofascial trigger point pain syndrome--evidence from a review of the literature. Clin J Pain. 2007 Mar-Apr;23(3):278-86. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31802fda7c.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23206963
Citation
Cagnie B, Barbe T, De Ridder E, Van Oosterwijck J, Cools A, Danneels L. The influence of dry needling of the trapezius muscle on muscle blood flow and oxygenation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012 Nov-Dec;35(9):685-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.10.005.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25143704
Citation
Dunning J, Butts R, Mourad F, Young I, Flannagan S, Perreault T. Dry needling: a literature review with implications for clinical practice guidelines. Phys Ther Rev. 2014 Aug;19(4):252-265. doi: 10.1179/108331913X13844245102034.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20186400
Citation
Hidalgo-Lozano A, Fernandez-de-las-Penas C, Alonso-Blanco C, Ge HY, Arendt-Nielsen L, Arroyo-Morales M. Muscle trigger points and pressure pain hyperalgesia in the shoulder muscles in patients with unilateral shoulder impingement: a blinded, controlled study. Exp Brain Res. 2010 May;202(4):915-25. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2196-4. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28098584
Citation
Rathbone ATL, Grosman-Rimon L, Kumbhare DA. Interrater Agreement of Manual Palpation for Identification of Myofascial Trigger Points: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin J Pain. 2017 Aug;33(8):715-729. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000459.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23138883
Citation
Tekin L, Akarsu S, Durmus O, Cakar E, Dincer U, Kiralp MZ. The effect of dry needling in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome: a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Mar;32(3):309-15. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-2112-3. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27720812
Citation
Arias-Buria JL, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Palacios-Cena M, Koppenhaver SL, Salom-Moreno J. Exercises and Dry Needling for Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Parallel-Group Trial. J Pain. 2017 Jan;18(1):11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.08.013. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15844434
Citation
Baldry P. The integration of acupuncture within medicine in the UK--the British Medical Acupuncture Society's 25th anniversary. Acupunct Med. 2005 Mar;23(1):2-12. doi: 10.1136/aim.23.1.2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23993756
Citation
Cagnie B, Dewitte V, Coppieters I, Van Oosterwijck J, Cools A, Danneels L. Effect of ischemic compression on trigger points in the neck and shoulder muscles in office workers: a cohort study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013 Oct;36(8):482-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11562554
Citation
Chen JT, Chung KC, Hou CR, Kuan TS, Chen SM, Hong CZ. Inhibitory effect of dry needling on the spontaneous electrical activity recorded from myofascial trigger spots of rabbit skeletal muscle. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Oct;80(10):729-35. doi: 10.1097/00002060-200110000-00004.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18576919
Citation
Dorsher PT. Can classical acupuncture points and trigger points be compared in the treatment of pain disorders? Birch's analysis revisited. J Altern Complement Med. 2008 May;14(4):353-9. doi: 10.1089/acm.2007.0810.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3865133
Citation
Fricton JR, Kroening R, Haley D, Siegert R. Myofascial pain syndrome of the head and neck: a review of clinical characteristics of 164 patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985 Dec;60(6):615-23. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(85)90364-0.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8043247
Citation
Hong CZ. Lidocaine injection versus dry needling to myofascial trigger point. The importance of the local twitch response. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Jul-Aug;73(4):256-63. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199407000-00006.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11641255
Citation
Langevin HM, Churchill DL, Cipolla MJ. Mechanical signaling through connective tissue: a mechanism for the therapeutic effect of acupuncture. FASEB J. 2001 Oct;15(12):2275-82. doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0015hyp.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16511830
Citation
Langevin HM, Bouffard NA, Badger GJ, Churchill DL, Howe AK. Subcutaneous tissue fibroblast cytoskeletal remodeling induced by acupuncture: evidence for a mechanotransduction-based mechanism. J Cell Physiol. 2006 Jun;207(3):767-74. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20623.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20667633
Citation
Lucas KR, Rich PA, Polus BI. Muscle activation patterns in the scapular positioning muscles during loaded scapular plane elevation: the effects of Latent Myofascial Trigger Points. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2010 Oct;25(8):765-70. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.05.006. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16618044
Citation
Lund I, Lundeberg T. Are minimal, superficial or sham acupuncture procedures acceptable as inert placebo controls? Acupunct Med. 2006 Mar;24(1):13-5. doi: 10.1136/aim.24.1.13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19083696
Citation
Shah JP, Gilliams EA. Uncovering the biochemical milieu of myofascial trigger points using in vivo microdialysis: an application of muscle pain concepts to myofascial pain syndrome. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2008 Oct;12(4):371-384. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2008.06.006. Epub 2008 Aug 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16037403
Citation
Shah JP, Phillips TM, Danoff JV, Gerber LH. An in vivo microanalytical technique for measuring the local biochemical milieu of human skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005 Nov;99(5):1977-84. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00419.2005. Epub 2005 Jul 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25900020
Citation
Bradnam L, Shanahan EM, Hendy K, Reed A, Skipworth T, Visser A, Lennon S. Afferent inhibition and cortical silent periods in shoulder primary motor cortex and effect of a suprascapular nerve block in people experiencing chronic shoulder pain. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan;127(1):769-778. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.03.012. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20220073
Citation
Bradnam LV, Stinear CM, Lewis GN, Byblow WD. Task-dependent modulation of inputs to proximal upper limb following transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2010 May;103(5):2382-9. doi: 10.1152/jn.01046.2009. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23617624
Citation
Ngomo S, Mercier C, Roy JS. Cortical mapping of the infraspinatus muscle in healthy individuals. BMC Neurosci. 2013 Apr 24;14:52. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-14-52.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18715892
Citation
Roberts LV, Stinear CM, Lewis GN, Byblow WD. Task-dependent modulation of propriospinal inputs to human shoulder. J Neurophysiol. 2008 Oct;100(4):2109-14. doi: 10.1152/jn.90786.2008. Epub 2008 Aug 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16272828
Citation
Alisauskiene M, Truffert A, Vaiciene N, Magistris MR. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice. Medicina (Kaunas). 2005;41(10):813-24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2860322
Citation
Barker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet. 1985 May 11;1(8437):1106-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92413-4. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19690944
Citation
Berth A, Pap G, Neuman W, Awiszus F. Central neuromuscular dysfunction of the deltoid muscle in patients with chronic rotator cuff tears. J Orthop Traumatol. 2009 Sep;10(3):135-41. doi: 10.1007/s10195-009-0061-7. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19722252
Citation
Brown SH, Brookham RL, Dickerson CR. High-pass filtering surface EMG in an attempt to better represent the signals detected at the intramuscular level. Muscle Nerve. 2010 Feb;41(2):234-9. doi: 10.1002/mus.21470.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16147516
Citation
Cowey A. The Ferrier Lecture 2004 what can transcranial magnetic stimulation tell us about how the brain works? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Jun 29;360(1458):1185-205. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1658.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12849236
Citation
Kobayashi M, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology. Lancet Neurol. 2003 Mar;2(3):145-56. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(03)00321-1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22331213
Citation
Moseley GL, Flor H. Targeting cortical representations in the treatment of chronic pain: a review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Jul-Aug;26(6):646-52. doi: 10.1177/1545968311433209. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22227444
Citation
Ngomo S, Leonard G, Moffet H, Mercier C. Comparison of transcranial magnetic stimulation measures obtained at rest and under active conditions and their reliability. J Neurosci Methods. 2012 Mar 30;205(1):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.12.012. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25043198
Citation
Ngomo S, Mercier C, Bouyer LJ, Savoie A, Roy JS. Alterations in central motor representation increase over time in individuals with rotator cuff tendinopathy. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Feb;126(2):365-71. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.035. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21435567
Citation
Romero JR, Ramirez DM, Aglio LS, Gugino LD. Brain mapping using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2011 Apr;22(2):141-52, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2010.11.002.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17296913
Citation
Rossini PM, Rossi S. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: diagnostic, therapeutic, and research potential. Neurology. 2007 Feb 13;68(7):484-8. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000250268.13789.b2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34663474
Citation
Laramee A, Leonard G, Morin M, Roch M, Gaudreault N. Neurophysiological and psychophysical effects of dry versus sham needling of the infraspinatus muscle in patients with chronic shoulder pain: a randomized feasibility study. Arch Physiother. 2021 Oct 18;11(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40945-021-00118-x.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Effects of Dry Needling When Applied to the Infraspinatus Muscle in People With Chronic Shoulder Pain

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs