Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Parietal Endometriosis (PRFA) (PRFA)
Primary Purpose
Endometriosis
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of parietal endometriosis
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Endometriosis focused on measuring Parietal endometriosis, Abdominal Wall endometriosis, Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient over 25 years of age;
- Presenting between 1 and 3 lesions of parietal endometriosis, all accessible to radiofrequency treatment, with a major axis less than 10cm;
- Symptomatic (chronic and/or catamenial pain);
- Histological diagnosis of endometriosis;
- In failure of medical treatment;
- Nodule visible on ultrasound;
- Affiliated with or beneficiary of a social security or similar scheme.
- Having signed an informed consent for participation in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of a parietal endometriosis lesion with superficial skin involvement (dermis);
- Presence of other symptomatic extra-parietal endometriosis lesions for which surgical treatment is planned;
- Uncontrolled diabetes, i.e. HbA1c >7% despite well-treated and well-controlled treatment;
- Contraindication to the use of radiofrequency: implanted electronic device, such as a pacemaker or self-synchronizing defibrillator; weakened immune system; coagulation disorder;
- Contraindication to the use of Sonovue
- Contraindication to the use of gadolinium
- Severe renal failure (glomerular filtration rate less than 30 ml / min / 1.73m²)
- Pregnant patient or with a desire to become pregnant within 6 months after treatment;
- Patient who is not fluent in the English language;
- Patient over the age of majority protected by law, under curatorship or guardianship;
- Person deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, person subject to psychiatric care and people admitted to a health or social establishment for purposes other than that of research.
- Patient participating in other interventional research that may interfere with the present research (at the discretion of the investigator);
- Patient who has participated in other research that includes an ongoing opt out period.
Sites / Locations
- Hospices Civils de Lyon - Hôpital de la Croix Rousse
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
treated patient
Arm Description
Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of parietal endometriosis
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Feasibility of PRFA. Evaluation by composite criteria with the need to validate all the criteria for the procedure to be considered "feasible".
The treatment is considered "feasible" if it meets all of the following criteria:
Visualization of the lesion intraoperatively by percutaneous ultrasound (yes/no),
Visibility of the posterior aponeurosis/peritoneum interface behind the lesion (yes/no),
Placement of one or more radiofrequency (RF) needles within the target lesion (yes/no),
Procedure for firing without anomaly (yes/no) :
Performing one or more treatment zones until a drop in effective power is obtained, automatically interrupting needle activity and demonstrating the effectiveness of the treatment.
complete covering of the nodule by the CO bubbles released by the procedure.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Security and tolerance of PRFA
Number, type and severity of adverse events related to radiofrequency treatment. Pain during treatment.
radiological effectiveness measured by ultrasonography with Sonovue (composite criteria)
Diameters (largest, orthogonal to the largest diameter and anteroposterior diameter [in cm]) and volume (in cm3) of the lesions,
Echogenicity to muscle (hypo- / iso- / hyper-echoic)
Presence of a posterior shadow cone (yes/no)
Sonovue characteristics (no, moderate or frank enhancement)
US Doppler characteristics (no, slight or marked vascularization)
Characteristics in Shearwave elastography (in kPa)
Evaluation by the radiologist of the percentage of nodule volume presenting a change in appearance on ultrasound (0% / < 50% / > 50% / 100%)
radiological effectiveness measured by ultrasonography with Sonovue (composite criteria)
Diameters (largest, orthogonal to the largest diameter and anteroposterior diameter [in cm]) and volume (in cm3) of the lesions,
Echogenicity to muscle (hypo- / iso- / hyper-echoic)
Presence of a posterior shadow cone (yes/no)
Sonovue characteristics (no, moderate or frank enhancement)
US Doppler characteristics (no, slight or marked vascularization)
Characteristics in Shearwave elastography (in kPa)
Evaluation by the radiologist of the percentage of nodule volume presenting a change in appearance on ultrasound (0% / < 50% / > 50% / 100%)
radiological effectiveness measured by ultrasonography with Sonovue (composite criteria)
volume (in cm3) of the lesions,
Echogenicity to muscle (hypo- / iso- / hyper-echoic)
Presence of a posterior shadow cone (yes/no)
Sonovue characteristics (no, moderate or frank enhancement)
US Doppler characteristics (no, slight or marked vascularization)
Characteristics in Shearwave elastography (in kPa)
Evaluation by the radiologist of the percentage of nodule volume presenting a change in appearance on ultrasound (0% / < 50% / > 50% / 100%)
radiological effectiveness measured by MRI with Gadolinium (composite criteria)
Diameters (largest, orthogonal to the largest diameter and anteroposterior diameter [in cm]) and volume (in cm3) of the lesions
signal in T2 sequence with respect to the muscle (hypo- / iso- / hyper-signal) ;
presence of T1 hypersignal (yes/no);
minimum and maximum ADC (Apparent Diffusion Coefficent) value (in mm²/s);
lesional enhancement in the center (yes/no);
Peri-lesional enhancement (yes/no);
clinical efficiency (composite criteria)
Assessment of pain related to the lesion: maximum EVA during menstruation and maximum EVA outside of menstruation
clinical efficiency measured by SF36
Quality of life of patients measured by validated questionnaire in endometriosis: SF36 (Short Form (36) Health Survey)
clinical efficiency measured by EHP-5
Quality of life of patients measured by validated questionnaire in endometriosis: EHP-5 (Endometriosis Health Profile)
clinical efficiency (composite criteria)
Assessment of pain related to the lesion: maximum EVA during menstruation and maximum EVA (Echelle Visuelle Analogique) outside of menstruation
clinical efficiency measured by SF36
Quality of life of patients measured by validated questionnaire in endometriosis: SF36
clinical efficiency measured by EHP-5
Quality of life of patients measured by validated questionnaire in endometriosis: EHP-5
clinical efficiency (composite criteria)
Assessment of pain related to the lesion: maximum EVA during menstruation and maximum EVA outside of menstruation
clinical efficiency measured by SF36
Quality of life of patients measured by validated questionnaire in endometriosis: SF36
clinical efficiency measured by EHP-5
Quality of life of patients measured by validated questionnaire in endometriosis: EHP-5
population characteristics (composite criteria)
age, gestational age, parity, history of caesarean section, history of gynaecological surgery excluding endometriosis, history of endometriosis surgery, age of diagnosis of endometriosis, age of diagnosis of parietal endometriosis.
Feature of PRFA: power of the shot
Description of the procedure: power (Watt) of the shot
Feature of PRFA: duration of the shot
Description of the procedure: duration (min) of the shot.
Feature of PRFA: total duration (min) of the procedure
Description of the procedure: total duration (min) of the procedure.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04333017
First Posted
March 11, 2020
Last Updated
February 9, 2023
Sponsor
Hospices Civils de Lyon
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04333017
Brief Title
Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Parietal Endometriosis (PRFA)
Acronym
PRFA
Official Title
Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Parietal Endometriosis : a Pilot Study (PRFA)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 12, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 27, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 31, 2023 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hospices Civils de Lyon
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Parietal endometriosis is the implantation of endometrial tissue in abdominal structures more superficial than the peritoneum. It is a rare form of the disease (incidence estimated between 0.04 and 12% among women operated on for endometriosis depending on the series) but is classically resistant to medical treatment and can be disabling. Surgical resection is currently the reference treatment in the event of failure of hormonal treatment, despite the sometimes significant skin scars and the risk of parietal fragility that may require a cure of venting by parietal prosthesis. The recurrence rate after surgical resection is 4.3%. The use of radiofrequency for therapeutic purposes is nowadays described in multiple applications such as cardiac arrhythmia, neurological and spinal disorders, as well as for the treatment of liver, kidney, prostate, breast, lung or skin cancers. Its use has already been reported in the field of benign gynecology with, in particular, demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of uterine fibroids by laparoscopic, trans-vaginal or percutaneous means. There are also large published series on radiofrequency for the treatment of adenomyosis, by the transvaginal and laparoscopic route.
In the context of parietal endometriosis, this would be a minimally invasive, percutaneous treatment. Ultrasound guidance allowing good targeting of the lesions and the procedure would most often be carried out on an outpatient basis and under local anaesthesia. And in case of failure or partial effectiveness, the reference treatment would remain accessible for these patients.
There is only one published case of the use of radiofrequency in parietal endometriosis (case reports). Despite results that seem encouraging in terms of a rapid and prolonged therapeutic effect on symptoms, no further cases or series have been published since.
Our study aims to investigate the feasibility of percutaneous radiofrequency treatment for parietal endometriosis, with the secondary objective of evaluating the safety, efficacy and risk factors for failure of the technique.
10 patients will be treated. For follow-up all patients will have an ultrasound and MRI before treatment, then an ultrasound at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post-treatment and a second MRI at 6 months post-treatment. The investigators will also evaluate pain and quality of life with specific questionnaires at each visit.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Endometriosis
Keywords
Parietal endometriosis, Abdominal Wall endometriosis, Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
11 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
treated patient
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of parietal endometriosis
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of parietal endometriosis
Intervention Description
Treatment is carried out under local anaesthesia after surgical asepsis, in interventional radiology room. Radiofrequency needles are inserted percutaneously under ultrasound guidance. Number of needles depends on the size of lesion (1 or 2 or 3 needles). In case of proximity between lesion and peritoneum, artificial ascites can be performed. Treatment is carried out in accordance with device's instructions for use (thyroid nodules treatment algorithm), with a gradual increase in power every 5 minutes, without exceeding the maximum authorised power (depending on number and length of needles). State of coagulation is monitored under visual ultrasound control of ablation area (diffusion of Co bubbles), until a decrease in effective power is obtained. Several ablation zones are performed on the same nodule with overlapping of the different impacts. An ice pack is applied to the treated area. An analgesic PO treatment of step 1 and/or 2 is prescribed for 5 days.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Feasibility of PRFA. Evaluation by composite criteria with the need to validate all the criteria for the procedure to be considered "feasible".
Description
The treatment is considered "feasible" if it meets all of the following criteria:
Visualization of the lesion intraoperatively by percutaneous ultrasound (yes/no),
Visibility of the posterior aponeurosis/peritoneum interface behind the lesion (yes/no),
Placement of one or more radiofrequency (RF) needles within the target lesion (yes/no),
Procedure for firing without anomaly (yes/no) :
Performing one or more treatment zones until a drop in effective power is obtained, automatically interrupting needle activity and demonstrating the effectiveness of the treatment.
complete covering of the nodule by the CO bubbles released by the procedure.
Time Frame
The day of the treatment (Day 0) - no earlier than 7 days after the 1st visit
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Security and tolerance of PRFA
Description
Number, type and severity of adverse events related to radiofrequency treatment. Pain during treatment.
Time Frame
From the 1st visit (no later than 7 days before treatment (Day -7)) until the end of the study (Month 6)
Title
radiological effectiveness measured by ultrasonography with Sonovue (composite criteria)
Description
Diameters (largest, orthogonal to the largest diameter and anteroposterior diameter [in cm]) and volume (in cm3) of the lesions,
Echogenicity to muscle (hypo- / iso- / hyper-echoic)
Presence of a posterior shadow cone (yes/no)
Sonovue characteristics (no, moderate or frank enhancement)
US Doppler characteristics (no, slight or marked vascularization)
Characteristics in Shearwave elastography (in kPa)
Evaluation by the radiologist of the percentage of nodule volume presenting a change in appearance on ultrasound (0% / < 50% / > 50% / 100%)
Time Frame
1 month post therapeutic (Month 1)
Title
radiological effectiveness measured by ultrasonography with Sonovue (composite criteria)
Description
Diameters (largest, orthogonal to the largest diameter and anteroposterior diameter [in cm]) and volume (in cm3) of the lesions,
Echogenicity to muscle (hypo- / iso- / hyper-echoic)
Presence of a posterior shadow cone (yes/no)
Sonovue characteristics (no, moderate or frank enhancement)
US Doppler characteristics (no, slight or marked vascularization)
Characteristics in Shearwave elastography (in kPa)
Evaluation by the radiologist of the percentage of nodule volume presenting a change in appearance on ultrasound (0% / < 50% / > 50% / 100%)
Time Frame
3 month post therapeutic (Month 3)
Title
radiological effectiveness measured by ultrasonography with Sonovue (composite criteria)
Description
volume (in cm3) of the lesions,
Echogenicity to muscle (hypo- / iso- / hyper-echoic)
Presence of a posterior shadow cone (yes/no)
Sonovue characteristics (no, moderate or frank enhancement)
US Doppler characteristics (no, slight or marked vascularization)
Characteristics in Shearwave elastography (in kPa)
Evaluation by the radiologist of the percentage of nodule volume presenting a change in appearance on ultrasound (0% / < 50% / > 50% / 100%)
Time Frame
6 month post therapeutic (Month 6)
Title
radiological effectiveness measured by MRI with Gadolinium (composite criteria)
Description
Diameters (largest, orthogonal to the largest diameter and anteroposterior diameter [in cm]) and volume (in cm3) of the lesions
signal in T2 sequence with respect to the muscle (hypo- / iso- / hyper-signal) ;
presence of T1 hypersignal (yes/no);
minimum and maximum ADC (Apparent Diffusion Coefficent) value (in mm²/s);
lesional enhancement in the center (yes/no);
Peri-lesional enhancement (yes/no);
Time Frame
6 month post therapeutic (Month 6)
Title
clinical efficiency (composite criteria)
Description
Assessment of pain related to the lesion: maximum EVA during menstruation and maximum EVA outside of menstruation
Time Frame
1 month post therapeutic (Month 1)
Title
clinical efficiency measured by SF36
Description
Quality of life of patients measured by validated questionnaire in endometriosis: SF36 (Short Form (36) Health Survey)
Time Frame
1 month post therapeutic (Month 1)
Title
clinical efficiency measured by EHP-5
Description
Quality of life of patients measured by validated questionnaire in endometriosis: EHP-5 (Endometriosis Health Profile)
Time Frame
1 month post therapeutic (Month 1)
Title
clinical efficiency (composite criteria)
Description
Assessment of pain related to the lesion: maximum EVA during menstruation and maximum EVA (Echelle Visuelle Analogique) outside of menstruation
Time Frame
3 month post therapeutic (Month 3)
Title
clinical efficiency measured by SF36
Description
Quality of life of patients measured by validated questionnaire in endometriosis: SF36
Time Frame
3 month post therapeutic (Month 3)
Title
clinical efficiency measured by EHP-5
Description
Quality of life of patients measured by validated questionnaire in endometriosis: EHP-5
Time Frame
3 month post therapeutic (Month 3)
Title
clinical efficiency (composite criteria)
Description
Assessment of pain related to the lesion: maximum EVA during menstruation and maximum EVA outside of menstruation
Time Frame
6 month post therapeutic (Month 6)
Title
clinical efficiency measured by SF36
Description
Quality of life of patients measured by validated questionnaire in endometriosis: SF36
Time Frame
6 month post therapeutic (Month 6)
Title
clinical efficiency measured by EHP-5
Description
Quality of life of patients measured by validated questionnaire in endometriosis: EHP-5
Time Frame
6 month post therapeutic (Month 6)
Title
population characteristics (composite criteria)
Description
age, gestational age, parity, history of caesarean section, history of gynaecological surgery excluding endometriosis, history of endometriosis surgery, age of diagnosis of endometriosis, age of diagnosis of parietal endometriosis.
Time Frame
At the 1st visit: up to 7 days before treatment (Day -7)
Title
Feature of PRFA: power of the shot
Description
Description of the procedure: power (Watt) of the shot
Time Frame
The day of the treatment (Day 0) no earlier than 7 days after the 1st visit
Title
Feature of PRFA: duration of the shot
Description
Description of the procedure: duration (min) of the shot.
Time Frame
The day of the treatment (Day 0) no earlier than 7 days after the 1st visit
Title
Feature of PRFA: total duration (min) of the procedure
Description
Description of the procedure: total duration (min) of the procedure.
Time Frame
The day of the treatment (Day 0) - no earlier than 7 days after the 1st visit
10. Eligibility
Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
25 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient over 25 years of age;
Presenting between 1 and 3 lesions of parietal endometriosis, all accessible to radiofrequency treatment, with a major axis less than 10cm;
Symptomatic (chronic and/or catamenial pain);
Histological diagnosis of endometriosis;
In failure of medical treatment;
Nodule visible on ultrasound;
Affiliated with or beneficiary of a social security or similar scheme.
Having signed an informed consent for participation in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
Presence of a parietal endometriosis lesion with superficial skin involvement (dermis);
Presence of other symptomatic extra-parietal endometriosis lesions for which surgical treatment is planned;
Uncontrolled diabetes, i.e. HbA1c >7% despite well-treated and well-controlled treatment;
Contraindication to the use of radiofrequency: implanted electronic device, such as a pacemaker or self-synchronizing defibrillator; weakened immune system; coagulation disorder;
Contraindication to the use of Sonovue
Contraindication to the use of gadolinium
Severe renal failure (glomerular filtration rate less than 30 ml / min / 1.73m²)
Pregnant patient or with a desire to become pregnant within 6 months after treatment;
Patient who is not fluent in the English language;
Patient over the age of majority protected by law, under curatorship or guardianship;
Person deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, person subject to psychiatric care and people admitted to a health or social establishment for purposes other than that of research.
Patient participating in other interventional research that may interfere with the present research (at the discretion of the investigator);
Patient who has participated in other research that includes an ongoing opt out period.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospices Civils de Lyon - Hôpital de la Croix Rousse
City
Lyon
ZIP/Postal Code
69002
Country
France
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Parietal Endometriosis (PRFA)
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs