search
Back to results

Amplify Gait to Improve Locomotor Engagement in Spinal Cord Injury (AGILE SCI)

Primary Purpose

Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Gait training performed on a treadmill
Gait training performed in a Movement Amplification Environment
Sponsored by
VA Office of Research and Development
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury focused on measuring gait, locomotion, walking, balance, spinal cord injury, rehabilitation robotics

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Medically stable with medical clearance from a physician to participate
  • Neurologic level of the SCI between C1-T10 with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) C or D
  • > 6 months since initial injury
  • Passive range of motion of the legs within functional limits and not restricting the ability to engage in locomotor training
  • Able to ambulatory 10m with no physical assistance, use of unilateral assistive devices (e.g. single cane), and/or braces that do not cross the knee joint (e.g. anklefoot orthosis) are permitted
  • Able to provide transportation to and from the testing location.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Excessive spasticity in the lower limbs as measured by a score of > 3 on the Modified Ashworth Scale
  • Inability to tolerate 30 minutes of standing
  • Severe cardiovascular and pulmonary disease
  • History of recurrent fractures or known orthopedic problems in the lower extremities (i.e. heterotopic ossification)
  • Concomitant central or peripheral neurological injury (i.e. traumatic head injury or peripheral nerve damage in lower limbs)
  • Inability to provide informed consent due to cognitive impairments
  • Presence of unhealed decubiti or other skin compromise
  • Enrollment in concurrent physical therapy or research involving locomotor training
  • Use of braces/orthotics crossing the knee joint
  • Known pregnancy

Sites / Locations

  • Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, ILRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Treadmill group

Movement Amplification group

Arm Description

Participants randomized to the Treadmill group will complete high intensity gait training on a treadmill.

The locomotor training protocol described for the Treadmill group will be used for the Movement Amplification group with one exception. The Movement Amplification group will perform all gait training within the movement amplification environment.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Daily Stepping
The investigators will assess the amount of daily stepping in the home and community during three 1-week periods. Daily stepping will be measured and recorded using an activity monitor.
Lane Width Optimization Test
The Lane width Optimization test will be used to quantify the capacity of individuals to control their lateral center of mass motion during treadmill walking. Participants will walk on the treadmill for 2 minutes. During the test a narrow lane will be projected on the treadmill belt surface. Individuals will be asked to maintain their body position within the lane during walking. If successful the lane will become progressively more narrow. If unsuccessful, the lane will become progressively wider. The width of the lane at the completion of the test will provide a quantitative measure of the individual's ability to control the center of mass motion during walking.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Lower Extremity Motor Score
The lower extremity motor score assess strength of five muscle groups representing neurological levels L2 to S1. Muscle function is grade on a range from 0 (total paralysis) to 5 (active movement, full ROM against gravity and sufficient resistance to be considered normal.
Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI II)
The WISCI II evaluates the amount of physical assistance needed for gait after spinal cord injury. The index ranges from 0 (client is unable to stand and/or participate in assisted walking) to 20 (ambulates with no devices, no braces and no physical assistance, 10 meters).
Functional Gait Assessment (FGA)
The FGA is a ten-item test that evaluates dynamic balance and postural stability during gait. Each item on the test is scored from 0 (severe impairment) to 3 (normal ambulation).
10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
The 10MWT is a simple measurement of an individuals average walking speed.
Activities Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale
The ABC scale is a 16-item self-report measurement of an individual's confidence while performing numerous postural and ambulatory activities. Each item is rated on a scale of 0 (no confidence) to 100 (complete confidence). Overall score is calculated by adding item scores and then dividing by the total number of items.
Balance Evaluations Systems Test (BESTest)
The BESTest is used to assess balance impairments across six different domains of postural control. We will use only the reactive balance item from the BESTest to assess changes in the capacity to react to fore-aft, and lateral perturbations. Each item will be scored on a range from 0 (severe impairment) to 3 (no impairment).
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
The BBS is a 14-item measure that assesses static balance. Each item is scored on a range of 0 to 4. A total score is determined by summing scores on the all the individual items. A higher score indicates better balance.
The World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF)
The WHOQOL-BREF is a 26 item self-report quality of life assessment focusing on areas such as physical, psychological, social and environmental health. Scores range from 0-100 with 100 indicating higher quality of life.
International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF)
The ICIQ-UI SF is a 4-item self-report of urinary incontinence to document changes in bladder function. Scores range from 0-21, with greater values indicating increased severity.
Biomechanical Assessment - Step Width
The investigators will perform biomechanical laboratory assessments to make quantitative measures of changes in dynamic balance during walking. The investigators will record 3D coordinates of reflective markers placed on anatomical landmarks. These markers will be used to quantify changes in an individual's preferred step width (lateral distance between calcaneal markers) during treadmill walking.
Biomechanical Assessment - Step Length
The investigators will perform biomechanical laboratory assessments to make quantitative measures of changes in dynamic balance during walking. The investigators will record 3D coordinates of reflective markers placed on anatomical landmarks. These markers will be used to quantify changes in an individual's preferred step length (anterior - posterior distance between calcaneal markers) during treadmill walking.
Biomechanical Assessment - Minimum lateral margin of stability
The investigators will perform biomechanical laboratory assessments to make quantitative measures of changes in dynamic balance during walking. The investigators will record 3D coordinates of reflective markers placed on anatomical landmarks. These markers will be used to quantify changes in an individual's average minimum lateral margin of stability (distance between a velocity weighted whole body center of mass position and the edge of the base of support) occurring each step during treadmill walking.
Biomechanical Assessment - peak lateral center of mass speed
The investigators will perform biomechanical laboratory assessments to make quantitative measures of changes in dynamic balance during walking. The investigators will record 3D coordinates of reflective markers placed on anatomical landmarks. These markers will be used to quantify changes in an individual's average peak lateral center of mass speed occurring each step during treadmill walking.
Biomechanical Assessment - lateral center of mass excursion
The investigators will perform biomechanical laboratory assessments to make quantitative measures of changes in dynamic balance during walking. The investigators will record 3D coordinates of reflective markers placed on anatomical landmarks. These markers will be used to quantify changes in an individual's average lateral center of mass excursion occurring each step during treadmill walking.

Full Information

First Posted
April 6, 2020
Last Updated
January 20, 2023
Sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Collaborators
Northwestern University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04340063
Brief Title
Amplify Gait to Improve Locomotor Engagement in Spinal Cord Injury
Acronym
AGILE SCI
Official Title
Amplify Gait to Improve Locomotor Engagement in Spinal Cord Injury (AGILE SCI Trial)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
October 15, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 30, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 30, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Collaborators
Northwestern University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Spinal cord injury (SCI) affects ~42,000 Veterans. The VA provides the single largest network of SCI care in the nation. The lifetime financial burden of SCI can exceed $3 million. A major cost of SCI is impaired mobility. Limited mobility contributes to decreased ability to work, increased care requirements, secondary injury, depression, bone mineral density loss, diabetes, and decreased cardiovascular health. Among ambulatory individuals with iSCI, residual balance deficits are common and are strongly correlated with both functional walking ability and participation in walking activities. The development of effective rehabilitation tools to improve dynamic balance would substantially improve quality of life for Veterans living with iSCI. Improving mobility through interventions that enhance dynamic balance would positively impact health, independence, and the ability to integrate into social, intellectual, and occupational environments.
Detailed Description
Background: Among ambulatory individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI), residual balance deficits are common and are a primary factor limiting participation in walking activities. There is broad recognition that effective evidence-based interventions are needed to enhance dynamic balance following iSCI. However, improving dynamic balance after iSCI has proven to be very challenging. Experimental interventions that amplify self-generated movements (e.g. error augmentation) may accelerate motor learning by intensifying sensory motor feedback and facilitating exploration of alternative motor control strategies. These features may be beneficial for retraining dynamic balance after iSCI. The investigators have developed a cable-driven robot to create a movement amplification environment during treadmill walking by applying a continuous viscous force field to the pelvis that is proportional in magnitude to a participant's real-time range of motion (ROM) velocity. The purpose is to investigate if locomotor training performed in a movement amplification environment can effectively improve dynamic balance and increase participation in walking activities of individuals with iSCI. Specific Aims: Aim 1: To evaluate if locomotor training performed in a movement amplification environment is effective for improving dynamic balance of individuals with iSCI. The investigators' pilot data found that following locomotor training performed in a movement amplification environment three individuals with iSCI each improved dynamic balance by more than 30%. These improvements were accompanied by faster over ground walking speeds and improved reactive balance. Thus, the investigators hypothesize that improvements in dynamic balance during walking will be greater when locomotor training is performed in a movement amplification environment when compared to locomotor training performed in a traditional treadmill environment. Aim 2: To evaluate the impact of locomotor training performed in either a movement amplification environment or in a traditional treadmill environment on participation in walking activities. Based on evidence identifying a strong relationship between balance and steps per day in ambulatory individuals with iSCI, the investigators hypothesize that training in the movement amplification environment will positively impact dynamic balance, and in turn increase participating in walking activities. Approach: The investigators will conduct a two-arm parallel-assignment intervention and will enroll 36 ambulatory participants with chronic motor incomplete spinal cord injury. Participants will be randomized into either a Control group receiving locomotor training or an Experimental group receiving locomotor training performed in a movement amplification environment. All participants will receive 20 training sessions. The investigators will assess changes in dynamic balance using measures that span the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework including; 1) clinical outcome measures of gait, balance, and quality of life, 2) biomechanical assessments of the capacity to control COM motion during walking, and 3) data collected from activity monitors to quantify changes in participation in walking activities as evaluated by number of steps taken per day. Impact: Training dynamic balance of individuals with iSCI by amplifying their own self-generated center of mass motion during walking is a radical departure from current practice and may create effective new clinical strategies for addressing balance impairments of individuals with iSCI. Successful outcomes from the proposed trial would motivate development of clinically-feasible tools to first replicate and then to evaluate the movement amplification environment within the VA's clinical care settings. Knowledge gained from this study will expand the understanding of how individuals with iSCI learn dynamic balance and how targeted dynamic balance training impacts participation in walking activities.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
Keywords
gait, locomotion, walking, balance, spinal cord injury, rehabilitation robotics

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
The investigators will conduct a two-arm parallel assignment intervention. Participants will be randomized into a high intensity locomotor training intervention that will be conducted in either a normal treadmill environment or in a movement amplification environment.
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Study personnel performing the clinical assessments will be blinded to the intervention.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
36 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Treadmill group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants randomized to the Treadmill group will complete high intensity gait training on a treadmill.
Arm Title
Movement Amplification group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The locomotor training protocol described for the Treadmill group will be used for the Movement Amplification group with one exception. The Movement Amplification group will perform all gait training within the movement amplification environment.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Gait training performed on a treadmill
Other Intervention Name(s)
Treadmill Group
Intervention Description
Participants randomized to the Control group will complete high intensity gait training on a treadmill.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Gait training performed in a Movement Amplification Environment
Other Intervention Name(s)
Movement Amplification Group
Intervention Description
The Experimental group will perform all gait training within the movement amplification environment. To create the movement amplification environment, the investigators have constructed a cable-driven robot, the Agility Trainer. The Agility Trainer applies small forces to the pelvis that increase the difficulty to maintain forward walking
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Daily Stepping
Description
The investigators will assess the amount of daily stepping in the home and community during three 1-week periods. Daily stepping will be measured and recorded using an activity monitor.
Time Frame
10 Week Change from Baseline, 3 Month Change from Baseline
Title
Lane Width Optimization Test
Description
The Lane width Optimization test will be used to quantify the capacity of individuals to control their lateral center of mass motion during treadmill walking. Participants will walk on the treadmill for 2 minutes. During the test a narrow lane will be projected on the treadmill belt surface. Individuals will be asked to maintain their body position within the lane during walking. If successful the lane will become progressively more narrow. If unsuccessful, the lane will become progressively wider. The width of the lane at the completion of the test will provide a quantitative measure of the individual's ability to control the center of mass motion during walking.
Time Frame
5 Week Change from Baseline, 10 Week Change from Baseline, 3 Month Change from Baseline
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Lower Extremity Motor Score
Description
The lower extremity motor score assess strength of five muscle groups representing neurological levels L2 to S1. Muscle function is grade on a range from 0 (total paralysis) to 5 (active movement, full ROM against gravity and sufficient resistance to be considered normal.
Time Frame
5 Week Change from Baseline, 10 Week Change from Baseline, 3 Month Change from Baseline
Title
Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI II)
Description
The WISCI II evaluates the amount of physical assistance needed for gait after spinal cord injury. The index ranges from 0 (client is unable to stand and/or participate in assisted walking) to 20 (ambulates with no devices, no braces and no physical assistance, 10 meters).
Time Frame
5 Week Change from Baseline, 10 Week Change from Baseline, 3 Month Change from Baseline
Title
Functional Gait Assessment (FGA)
Description
The FGA is a ten-item test that evaluates dynamic balance and postural stability during gait. Each item on the test is scored from 0 (severe impairment) to 3 (normal ambulation).
Time Frame
5 Week Change from Baseline, 10 Week Change from Baseline, 3 Month Change from Baseline
Title
10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
Description
The 10MWT is a simple measurement of an individuals average walking speed.
Time Frame
5 Week Change from Baseline, 10 Week Change from Baseline, 3 Month Change from Baseline
Title
Activities Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale
Description
The ABC scale is a 16-item self-report measurement of an individual's confidence while performing numerous postural and ambulatory activities. Each item is rated on a scale of 0 (no confidence) to 100 (complete confidence). Overall score is calculated by adding item scores and then dividing by the total number of items.
Time Frame
5 Week Change from Baseline, 10 Week Change from Baseline, 3 Month Change from Baseline
Title
Balance Evaluations Systems Test (BESTest)
Description
The BESTest is used to assess balance impairments across six different domains of postural control. We will use only the reactive balance item from the BESTest to assess changes in the capacity to react to fore-aft, and lateral perturbations. Each item will be scored on a range from 0 (severe impairment) to 3 (no impairment).
Time Frame
5 Week Change from Baseline, 10 Week Change from Baseline, 3 Month Change from Baseline
Title
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Description
The BBS is a 14-item measure that assesses static balance. Each item is scored on a range of 0 to 4. A total score is determined by summing scores on the all the individual items. A higher score indicates better balance.
Time Frame
5 Week Change from Baseline, 10 Week Change from Baseline, 3 Month Change from Baseline
Title
The World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF)
Description
The WHOQOL-BREF is a 26 item self-report quality of life assessment focusing on areas such as physical, psychological, social and environmental health. Scores range from 0-100 with 100 indicating higher quality of life.
Time Frame
5 Week Change from Baseline, 10 Week Change from Baseline, 3 Month Change from Baseline
Title
International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF)
Description
The ICIQ-UI SF is a 4-item self-report of urinary incontinence to document changes in bladder function. Scores range from 0-21, with greater values indicating increased severity.
Time Frame
5 Week Change from Baseline, 10 Week Change from Baseline, 3 Month Change from Baseline
Title
Biomechanical Assessment - Step Width
Description
The investigators will perform biomechanical laboratory assessments to make quantitative measures of changes in dynamic balance during walking. The investigators will record 3D coordinates of reflective markers placed on anatomical landmarks. These markers will be used to quantify changes in an individual's preferred step width (lateral distance between calcaneal markers) during treadmill walking.
Time Frame
5 Week Change from Baseline, 10 Week Change from Baseline, 3 Month Change from Baseline
Title
Biomechanical Assessment - Step Length
Description
The investigators will perform biomechanical laboratory assessments to make quantitative measures of changes in dynamic balance during walking. The investigators will record 3D coordinates of reflective markers placed on anatomical landmarks. These markers will be used to quantify changes in an individual's preferred step length (anterior - posterior distance between calcaneal markers) during treadmill walking.
Time Frame
5 Week Change from Baseline, 10 Week Change from Baseline, 3 Month Change from Baseline
Title
Biomechanical Assessment - Minimum lateral margin of stability
Description
The investigators will perform biomechanical laboratory assessments to make quantitative measures of changes in dynamic balance during walking. The investigators will record 3D coordinates of reflective markers placed on anatomical landmarks. These markers will be used to quantify changes in an individual's average minimum lateral margin of stability (distance between a velocity weighted whole body center of mass position and the edge of the base of support) occurring each step during treadmill walking.
Time Frame
5 Week Change from Baseline, 10 Week Change from Baseline, 3 Month Change from Baseline
Title
Biomechanical Assessment - peak lateral center of mass speed
Description
The investigators will perform biomechanical laboratory assessments to make quantitative measures of changes in dynamic balance during walking. The investigators will record 3D coordinates of reflective markers placed on anatomical landmarks. These markers will be used to quantify changes in an individual's average peak lateral center of mass speed occurring each step during treadmill walking.
Time Frame
5 Week Change from Baseline, 10 Week Change from Baseline, 3 Month Change from Baseline
Title
Biomechanical Assessment - lateral center of mass excursion
Description
The investigators will perform biomechanical laboratory assessments to make quantitative measures of changes in dynamic balance during walking. The investigators will record 3D coordinates of reflective markers placed on anatomical landmarks. These markers will be used to quantify changes in an individual's average lateral center of mass excursion occurring each step during treadmill walking.
Time Frame
5 Week Change from Baseline, 10 Week Change from Baseline, 3 Month Change from Baseline

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Medically stable with medical clearance from a physician to participate Neurologic level of the SCI between C1-T10 with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) C or D > 6 months since initial injury Passive range of motion of the legs within functional limits and not restricting the ability to engage in locomotor training Able to ambulatory 10m with no physical assistance, use of assistive devices (e.g. single cane, rolling walker), and/or braces that do not cross the knee joint (e.g. anklefoot orthosis) are permitted Able to provide transportation to and from the testing location. Exclusion Criteria: Excessive spasticity in the lower limbs as measured by a score of > 3 on the Modified Ashworth Scale Inability to tolerate 30 minutes of standing Severe cardiovascular and pulmonary disease History of recurrent fractures or known orthopedic problems in the lower extremities (i.e. heterotopic ossification) Concomitant central or peripheral neurological injury (i.e. traumatic head injury or peripheral nerve damage in lower limbs) Inability to provide informed consent due to cognitive impairments Presence of unhealed decubiti or other skin compromise Enrollment in concurrent physical therapy or research involving locomotor training Use of braces/orthotics crossing the knee joint Known pregnancy
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Keith E Gordon, PhD
Phone
(708) 202-8387
Ext
28387
Email
Keith.Gordon2@va.gov
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Christine S Jelinek
Phone
(708) 202-8387
Ext
24429
Email
Christine.Jelinek@va.gov
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Keith Edward Gordon, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL
City
Hines
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60141-3030
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Keith E Gordon, PhD
Phone
(708) 202-8387
Ext
28387
Email
Keith.Gordon2@va.gov
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Keith Edward Gordon, PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
The investigators will create and share de-identified, anonymized data sets. Data sets will be open file formats that include documentation of the material. The investigators will link data sets to associated study publications. Final data sets will be made available as per Hines VA Hospital local policy for long term storage and access until enterprise-level resources become available. These data will be available upon request by researchers and scientists in accordance with federal guidelines and Hines local policy. The final data sets will be sufficient for anyone to perform analogous or supplemental analyses that would permit validation of the analysis and results. The sharing of data will enable others to evaluate the data and to validate and interpret the data independently.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data will be available following the completion and publication of study results.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Data will be publicly available.

Learn more about this trial

Amplify Gait to Improve Locomotor Engagement in Spinal Cord Injury

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs